🔴🔴DONALD TRUMP has been shot🔴🔴

[Churchillvv]

Biden needs to hire a better shot.   He is immune from prosecution if he is saving the country.  

I was up all night reviewing the videos and I suspected something behind trump before the shots. The shooter couldn't get a better angle on him because he wanted to avoid shooting his agent who was behind trump.

If you watch the video over and over you might understand what I'm saying. there was a woman on white clothing with a write up Joe Biden. You're Fired. that is similar with others which got me convinced that it's a professional attack that was practiced severally before the hit. This lady waved her paper before the shot was released. she's definitely an agent behind the attack.

I'm not a religionists but I'm certain that God is helping him out if not, it would have been a successful assassination.

[o48o]

A clear fail of the Secret Service, like mammoth size fail to leave access to a building 150 meters or less from the speaker. Only because the shooter was not much of a sniper the original target is just now missing a bit of an ear (other people there were less lucky unfortunately).

I am looking forward to know more about the guy, 20 apparently, that decided that trying to shoot a candidate is actually a good idea - I mean, what are the chances of you getting out alive??

This looks suspicious, but I am guessing that security has been careless not only in this case, but probably more often. I mean, this guy did not seem to have much trouble finding the hole.

Looks like shooter was spotted minutes ago crawling in the roof into the position.



(click the image for the link to the reddit post)

I am guessing that when someone is are a convicted felon with a multiple rape and child molesting accusations, and keeps using rhetorics like he does. it gets harder to get a motivated security team who cares if you live or die. I am also quite stumped about the fact, that he didn't go and pay his respects the Corey Comperatore's family after the shooting. You know, Corey, who dove on his family to protect them and actually got shot.

I guess good guys with guns were supposed to prevent these things, so why wasn't everyone there carrying? I mean everyone on the gathering are pro open carry, just like the shooter was.

[suchmoon]

Why are we all suddenly so sure that the responsible AR-15 owner wasn't just casually hunting or whatever it is that responsible AR-15 owners do with their responsibly owned AR-15s. Why do we have to assume the worst.

I guess good guys with guns were supposed to prevent these things, so why wasn't everyone there carrying? I mean everyone on the gathering are pro open carry, just like the shooter was.

You'll be shocked when you find out that people had to pass through metal detectors and were not allowed to carry guns inside the event. It's almost as if the constitution doesn't apply to Trump or something.

[NotFuzzyWarm]

You'll be shocked when you find out that people had to pass through metal detectors and were not allowed to carry guns inside the event.

Nope. Open carry does NOT mean everywhere. It means you can be armed as long as folks in charge of the location do not restrict it eg schools, sports events, rallies, airports, etc.

[suchmoon]

You'll be shocked when you find out that people had to pass through metal detectors and were not allowed to carry guns inside the event.

Nope. Open carry does NOT mean everywhere. It means you can be armed as long as folks in charge of the location do not restrict it eg schools, sports events, rallies, airports, etc.

We need the Supreme Court to fix this ASAP. It's obvious that if the attendees had at least two AR-15s each then this event would have been 100% safe.

[BADecker]

You'll be shocked when you find out that people had to pass through metal detectors and were not allowed to carry guns inside the event.

Nope. Open carry does NOT mean everywhere. It means you can be armed as long as folks in charge of the location do not restrict it eg schools, sports events, rallies, airports, etc.

We need the Supreme Court to fix this ASAP. It's obvious that if the attendees had at least two AR-15s each then this event would have been 100% safe.

Nope. We need candidates who speak at rallies to stand behind protective barriers. Cops wear bullet resistant vests. Why? Because they are prone to getting into unsafe positions in their job. Presidential candidates the same... as we see with the Trump assassination attempt.

Just think of how the world would be different if JFK had protection in his motorcade.

Take a chance with your life and you just might lose it.

SCOTUS adjudications don't change anything for the bad guy. Rather, they give false security to those who rely on them.

[Gyfts]

I guess good guys with guns were supposed to prevent these things, so why wasn't everyone there carrying? I mean everyone on the gathering are pro open carry, just like the shooter was.

A good guy with a gun shot the assailant. Secret Service incompetence is what got Trump nearly killed.

[Vod]

A good guy with a gun shot the assailant. Secret Service incompetence is what got Trump nearly killed.

Let's be fair.  They could easily see a dark object moving slowly over a light roof, one of just a few they had to cover.

They chose Democracy over Fascism in their reactions. 

[IngerlamandetS]

They say that they fired from three types of weapons, in my opinion this is nonsense

[BADecker]

A good guy with a gun shot the assailant. Secret Service incompetence is what got Trump nearly killed.

Let's be fair.  They could easily see a dark object moving slowly over a light roof, one of just a few they had to cover.

They chose Democracy over Fascism in their reactions. 

Of course. Government in its operations IS Democracy. But we the people have a Constitutional Republic.

Democracy = group dictatorship.

Republic makes everybody the ruler of his own castle, so to speak.

Down with Democracy. Up with the Republic.

[paxmao]

Why are we all suddenly so sure that the responsible AR-15 owner wasn't just casually hunting or whatever it is that responsible AR-15 owners do with their responsibly owned AR-15s. Why do we have to assume the worst.

I guess good guys with guns were supposed to prevent these things, so why wasn't everyone there carrying? I mean everyone on the gathering are pro open carry, just like the shooter was.

You'll be shocked when you find out that people had to pass through metal detectors and were not allowed to carry guns inside the event. It's almost as if the constitution doesn't apply to Trump or something.

The guy with the big gun killed the guy with the gun -> freedom to carry weapons with no particular reason nor checks is good because you can kill people who are using their right to carry weapons (without any particular reason nor checks) when they do the type of thing that people who buy weapons (without "any particular reason" and that would not ever pass a check) do the type of stuff they do with weapons.

But that is fine, every twenty year old with likely cognitive disorders in the US gets a chance to kill candidates - what could go wrong?

A clear fail of the Secret Service, like mammoth size fail to leave access to a building 150 meters or less from the speaker. Only because the shooter was not much of a sniper the original target is just now missing a bit of an ear (other people there were less lucky unfortunately).

I am looking forward to know more about the guy, 20 apparently, that decided that trying to shoot a candidate is actually a good idea - I mean, what are the chances of you getting out alive??

This looks suspicious, but I am guessing that security has been careless not only in this case, but probably more often. I mean, this guy did not seem to have much trouble finding the hole.

Looks like shooter was spotted minutes ago crawling in the roof into the position.



[...]

Interesting, and looks legit. I would like to see some validation but this looks like people either did not call the security guys or the security guys ignored it or it took to long to reach the guy "with the big gun" or someone hesitated in shooting or...

[BADecker]

~

But that is fine, every twenty year old with likely cognitive disorders in the US gets a chance to kill candidates - what could go wrong?

~

What could go wrong is the kid was killed. Eternity in Hell.

What else could go wrong? Trump will make better sure of his own safety in the future.

What else could go wrong? More armament US-wide so that all bad shooters are taken out by good people... as is happening all over the US right now.

Did you notice Trump at the Milwaukee convention where he was named the Republican nominee? His demeanor was one of fight, but what for? He finally understands that there are a thousand things that can take hope away from himself and the people. This is probably the worst damage the Deep State could have done to him outside of successful assssination, but it is also the best enlightenment.

[paxmao]

~

But that is fine, every twenty year old with likely cognitive disorders in the US gets a chance to kill candidates - what could go wrong?

~

What could go wrong is the kid was killed. Eternity in Hell.

What else could go wrong? Trump will make better sure of his own safety in the future.

What else could go wrong? More armament US-wide so that all bad shooters are taken out by good people... as is happening all over the US right now.

Did you notice Trump at the Milwaukee convention where he was named the Republican nominee? His demeanor was one of fight, but what for? He finally understands that there are a thousand things that can take hope away from himself and the people. This is probably the worst damage the Deep State could have done to him outside of successful assssination, but it is also the best enlightenment.

Which for a nuthead means nothing. That is why they are nutheads. You are missing the point. As said, I am sure that everytime Trump speaks about the right to wear arms and how good is that for society he will be thinking about this.

The deep state has not sent a 20 year old, know for being a poor shooter, to crawl his way in a roof and make a quick surgery of Trump earlobe.

[Hispo]

You'll be shocked when you find out that people had to pass through metal detectors and were not allowed to carry guns inside the event.

Nope. Open carry does NOT mean everywhere. It means you can be armed as long as folks in charge of the location do not restrict it eg schools, sports events, rallies, airports, etc.

We need the Supreme Court to fix this ASAP. It's obvious that if the attendees had at least two AR-15s each then this event would have been 100% safe.

Ironically, there will be people from certain political side who will believe the solution to avoid what happened in that rally was to have more people with guns who could have stopped the shooter from firing so many rounds in the direction of the crowd and Trump.
Perhaps it is a weird thing of mine, but I believe in a shooter situation, in which people do not know where the bullets are coming from, anyone holding a gun would be instantly in danger of friendly fire from police officers and other good guys with guns who could not correctly identify who the threat is.

Still, this happening looks like very amateur fail by Secret service, in my opinion.

[suchmoon]

You'll be shocked when you find out that people had to pass through metal detectors and were not allowed to carry guns inside the event.

Nope. Open carry does NOT mean everywhere. It means you can be armed as long as folks in charge of the location do not restrict it eg schools, sports events, rallies, airports, etc.

We need the Supreme Court to fix this ASAP. It's obvious that if the attendees had at least two AR-15s each then this event would have been 100% safe.

Nope. We need candidates who speak at rallies to stand behind protective barriers. Cops wear bullet resistant vests. Why? Because they are prone to getting into unsafe positions in their job. Presidential candidates the same... as we see with the Trump assassination attempt.

That's very unamerican of you, borderline communist. Trump should have guns to defend himself instead of relying on the government agencies like police or secret service.

[o48o]

Nope. We need candidates who speak at rallies to stand behind protective barriers. Cops wear bullet resistant vests. Why? Because they are prone to getting into unsafe positions in their job. Presidential candidates the same... as we see with the Trump assassination attempt.

I am all for protective barriers, but wouldn't those make just people buy bigger guns and drones, as it's their freedom to do that. And those barriers won't move with him, so maybe he needs to turn his gold cart to pope mobile tank. And vest won't protect anyone from headshots so maybe he should wear a golden helmet as well.

I feel like i might need to explain that was sarcasm.

Looks like shooter was spotted minutes ago crawling in the roof into the position.



[...]

Interesting, and looks legit. I would like to see some validation but this looks like people either did not call the security guys or the security guys ignored it or it took to long to reach the guy "with the big gun" or someone hesitated in shooting or...

Yeah, it would have better to wait for validation before posting, as there are groups that would benefit from a conspiracy theories around the secret service, and this a fuel for that, but no one has even tried to debunk this video as fake.

[IceLincoln]

please quote this as I cannot load images thanks

A bump for trump

Trump is really riling the opposition to get to this, I thought this only happens in Africa but maybe it just some dude with some personal vendetta on Trump, who knows (though someone said the shooter was bullied so much while in school).
It’s looking like Trump might win the next election tho.

[coolcoinz]

Still, this happening looks like very amateur fail by Secret service, in my opinion.

What did you expect from an agency run by a woman because of gender parity?
Why was a tall man covered by women much smaller than him? How are they supposed to take a bullet for him when their shoulders are much lower than his?
On videos you can see one of those female officers struggle to holster a gun and another one was hiding behind Trump... This is the naked truth the SS was not trained well enough.

Why weren't there any drones watching from above, no helicopters, no nothing? I've read that for active presidents the SS would sweep the place where he was supposed to talk days before and they'd spend the last night on site making sure the place is secure. I guess former presidents and candidates don't get that privilege.

There's an article by the NY Times that the Iranians were trying to kill Trump...

Do you know who's going to be the next president? The one that survives