I see these as a useless question.
Hahahahahaha. Aww man. The public is so brutal. Althought I'm laughing on the outside. I'm crying on the inside.
Pardon. The original concept was a USA-native coin, That way, wherever it goes, it can be traced back to America with an American paper trail- better protecting owners from scams and theft and legitimizing any wallet and any currency it comes into contact with, providing extra security to banks and financial systems- sure it can be converted to Ethereum in Tornado Cash and used for bad things-
It sounds similar with how bank works.
but anyone whose wallet doesn't contain a bit of USA-native coin might be a terrorist or criminal hiding from law enforcement. It's everybody's duty to themselves to legitimize their wallet with some USA-native coin.
It sounds like "Guilty until proven innocent", which trying force everyone to use such coin.
I thought it was a good idea... no?
Personally i don't see it as good idea.
What do you mean by reissuing bitcoin through hard fork with merge mining?
I guess there's no such thing as reissuing Bitcoin?
It's theoretically possible if you perform hard-fork which change how Bitcoin is issued or reissued. But unless majority of Bitcoin community agree with the change, you only create altcoin.