Will Kamala Harris be the first apolitical U.S. presidential candidate?

[alani123]

I don’t know how true it is that she is apolitical. She was literally rated the most liberal voting senator there is from an independent group. Democrats have a way of finding their most far left people they can find and then thrusting them into the Presidency to inflict maximum damage on the country and spite the right. Nothing new here.

Ok, so Kamala is liberal. But American Liberal isn't particularly left wing, let alone far left... By any impartial standard American liberals would be considered centrists or even center right. They enforce neoliberal economic policies and wage more wars than even the Bushes...

Academic Lara Bazelon wrote of Kamala Harris "In her career, Ms. Harris did not barter or trade to get the support of more conservative law-and-order types; she gave it all away"... This is why I call Kamala the first apolitical presidential candidate. She has no sense of direction in her politics. She's not truly left wing, she's not right wing and she's not a proper centrist either. She's just a sleazy politician handing favors left and right to advance her career. This is her track record.

[legiteum]

Academic Lara Bazelon wrote of Kamala Harris "In her career, Ms. Harris did not barter or trade to get the support of more conservative law-and-order types; she gave it all away"... This is why I call Kamala the first apolitical presidential candidate. She has no sense of direction in her politics. She's not truly left wing, she's not right wing and she's not a proper centrist either. She's just a sleazy politician handing favors left and right to advance her career. This is her track record.

You are basically describing any politician that gets elected in a functioning democracy.

If you want to be completely happy, I suspect the system you are looking for is called a "dictatorship". And with a dictator that aligns exactly with every one of your views. And one who doesn't change when they are given absolute power (here's the historical list of dictators who pulled this off: [] ).

If you don't want to take your chances with a dictator, then you are going to need to learn to... compromise with your fellow citizens....

[alani123]

Academic Lara Bazelon wrote of Kamala Harris "In her career, Ms. Harris did not barter or trade to get the support of more conservative law-and-order types; she gave it all away"... This is why I call Kamala the first apolitical presidential candidate. She has no sense of direction in her politics. She's not truly left wing, she's not right wing and she's not a proper centrist either. She's just a sleazy politician handing favors left and right to advance her career. This is her track record.

You are basically describing any politician that gets elected in a functioning democracy.

If you want to be completely happy, I suspect the system you are looking for is called a "dictatorship". And with a dictator that aligns exactly with every one of your views. And one who doesn't change when they are given absolute power (here's the historical list of dictators who pulled this off: [] ).

If you don't want to take your chances with a dictator, then you are going to need to learn to... compromise with your fellow citizens....

Dude you went from defending Kamala to defending the integrity of the US political system? Grow up. It's a very flawed system even in terms of "functioning democracy" standards. When Hillary won the majority vote but lost because of the electoral college your peers in the "Democratic" party were all of a sudden in favor of radical changes in your "democracy".

Will you now go on about how money ruling politics is also something normal or do you at least have a tiny shred of moral decency to denounce lobbying?

[Vod]

The world does not want to see a superpower dictator.   If by some chance he cheats and doesn't get caught this time, he will be assasinated quickly, and the world will be happy.

[legiteum]

Dude you went from defending Kamala to defending the integrity of the US political system? Grow up. It's a very flawed system even in terms of "functioning democracy" standards. When Hillary won the majority vote but lost because of the electoral college your peers in the "Democratic" party were all of a sudden in favor of radical changes in your "democracy".

Will you now go on about how money ruling politics is also something normal or do you at least have a tiny shred of moral decency to denounce lobbying?

So maybe you can tell us about the better way of controlling a government, since you are against the democratic way. Any ideas?

[BADecker]

The world does not want to see a superpower dictator.   If by some chance he cheats and doesn't get caught this time, he will be assasinated quickly, and the world will be happy.

The superpower dictator type guy dropped out of the race. The world wants to see the things the winner of the race will bring in... freedom. He might not be able to change the world for freedom in 4 years, but he will start the change in a lot of good ways.

Btw, freedom means freedom for people to support themselves, not to live on Welfare, or off the rape of other people.


WAYNE ROOT: The Biggest Gaslighting Scam Yet: Kamala Isn’t Winning. She’s Doing Worse Than Biden. Trump is Winning a Landslide. Here is the Proof.


https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/07/wayne-root-biggest-gaslighting-scam-yet-kamala-isnt/
We have been gaslighted so badly, so many times in past few years, it's almost impossible to believe. But none has been as absurd as what's happening right now with the fake news stories and fake polls about Kamala Harris.

Only a couple weeks ago, Democrat leaders were discussing how to dump Kamala from the ticket.

She was that big of an albatross. The most unpopular, unlikeable Vice President in modern history was an anchor on the Democrat Party and yes, even "the Biden brand."

Only a couple of weeks ago, a crowd of Democrat consultants and donors was debating who the candidate should be. A top Democrat fundraiser actually said to the crowd, Kamala as the presidential candidate would be "more threatening" to swing voters than a dead or comatose Joe Biden. See:

Only a week ago, the New York Times looked at the pros and cons of every possible Biden replacement and called Kamala Harris "the most unelectable" of any possible Democrat candidate.

And a quick reminder- for the past four years, virtually every poll showed Kamala was the only politician on earth more unpopular than her boss, Joe Biden (the lowest rated president in a century).

Everyone at the top levels of Washington DC agreed Kamala was thoroughly unlikeable, completely incompetent, and dim-witted. That's a very bad combination.
...

[alani123]

Welp, seems like my intuition was right...
Read: Democrats Have Finally Learned the Value of Shitposting

It's not just tiktok, youtube shorts etc. It's everywhere. The Kamala campaign is now using tactics that would normally be memes on the general population. Their super PACs are pushing "cringe" attack ads on TV, they're even pushing cringey clips of Kamala herself on purpose, not as an attack, but to make her more relatable.

We've reached the age where people are called to vote, not because of values, not because of ideas, but because a certain candidate looks and sounds better. It's now official. Kamala's campaign uses this tactic much more than speaking of any ideals whenever they have a chance to show something publicly.

[mindrust]

Kamala herself is a walking meme. A very bad and distasteful one.

Trump thee meme-god will smoke her in the upcoming memewars.

[alani123]

This is quite interesting. So now Kamala supporters are against open debates? Even though the democrat campaign completely lost it at the CNN debate in spite of the set up and the many attack questions directed towards Trump, now they're against holding a debate with a Channel that's not "theirs"?

Typical. Funny how Biden was like "I'll take any debate". Seems like it ain't so after he dropped out. Kamala is more of a coward even than him!

[legiteum]

This is quite interesting. So now Kamala supporters are against open debates? Even though the democrat campaign completely lost it at the CNN debate in spite of the set up and the many attack questions directed towards Trump, now they're against holding a debate with a Channel that's not "theirs"?

Typical. Funny how Biden was like "I'll take any debate". Seems like it ain't so after he dropped out. Kamala is more of a coward even than him!

So Trump backed out of the originally agreed-upon debate and switched it to a partisan news channel on his own terms, and yet you somehow conclude that Harris is the "coward".

You obviously support Trump, and that's fine, but don't pretend that is some kind of neutral analysis .

[alani123]

So what, isn't CNN also partisan by those same standards?

Democratic candidates should also face some attack questions and see how they manage to overcome it for once.
It's quite interesting however, that while Kamala has also been facing protests on her rallies, the medie talks bone of that.
I guess the country's rich don't want anyone to hear that their darling is knee deep in the sea of blood she has spilled in Palestine with Biden. Surely she'll work very closely with republicans to ban TikTok so they can enforce this, but only after they use it for their campaign.

[legiteum]

So what, isn't CNN also partisan by those same standards?

Not even close. Fox News was successfully sued for several billion dollars for knowingly lying for Donald Trump. No other major media outlet is remotely like them. Other news outlets might have a "liberal bias", but Fox News is a direct campaign arm of the Republican party.

Regardless, Trump and Harris agreed to a time and a venue, and then Trump bailed out, and then came back with ridiculous demands in hopes that he could get out debating somebody half his age who would absolutely mop the floor with him.

Anybody who is serious about the Palestinian cause will vote for Harris. Donald "Muslim Ban" Trump would would set the Palestinian cause back a decade.

(And I said serious: anybody who treats the Palestinian cause as a game to be played by college students will "both sides" Harris and Trump, saying "they are all the same", and not care if Trump is elected, who will prop up Bibi, who 70% of Israelis want to kick out of office).

[jvanname]

Let's see what Kamala stands for. On one hand, Kamala has smoked weed in the past. But Kamala has also prosecuted people for weed. This is called hypocrisy. And people f@#$ing hate me for bringing this up. Humans are horrible creatures.

Regards,

-Joseph Van Name Ph.D.

P.S. No. I am not a supporter of Trump. Trump is a bit overweight. This is why we never see him without a shirt on. And being 78 and overweight is not very healthy. That does not sound like a guy fit for office. You may be able to tolerate old age, and you may be able to tolerate a guy who is a bit chubby, but those two factors combined seem a bit sketchy. There. I gave both sides of the argument. Since I gave both sides, I am unbiased, and everyone will f@#$ing hate me for it.

[mpoletiek]

This is quite interesting. So now Kamala supporters are against open debates? Even though the democrat campaign completely lost it at the CNN debate in spite of the set up and the many attack questions directed towards Trump, now they're against holding a debate with a Channel that's not "theirs"?

Typical. Funny how Biden was like "I'll take any debate". Seems like it ain't so after he dropped out. Kamala is more of a coward even than him!

So Trump backed out of the originally agreed-upon debate and switched it to a partisan news channel on his own terms, and yet you somehow conclude that Harris is the "coward".

You obviously support Trump, and that's fine, but don't pretend that is some kind of neutral analysis .

I heard that in Kamala's speech, but then I heard that Trump wrote a letter that he'll commit once she's officially elected per her party.

Regardless of candidate, the original debate was unprecedented (pre party elections), and then one expected candidate dropped out. Feels like fair play to me.

[legiteum]

I heard that in Kamala's speech, but then I heard that Trump wrote a letter that he'll commit once she's officially elected per her party.

Regardless of candidate, the original debate was unprecedented (pre party elections), and then one expected candidate dropped out. Feels like fair play to me.

It's great to hear that Trump has backed down. Trump's excuse is pretty pathetic since he already debated Biden, who didn't have the official nomination at the time.

But now maybe there will be a debate on a neutral ground somewhere.

[kirgizskiyprezz]

Do you think she has any chances at all? She's not stupid.

[mpoletiek]

Do you think she has any chances at all? She's not stupid.

There's always a chance.

[Zanab247]

Do you think she has any chances at all? She's not stupid.

If she's not, why  can her face the citizens and make some promises that will make people to start following her than attacking her opponent who has made a good promise to voters in the country, which he will surely get all those votes when time come. Well, I don't have much to say concerning Kamala Harris attitude because election day will tell if she will going to be the first female candidate to assume the office which I know it will be difficult for people of U.S to allow her to break the record.

The more she attack Donald Trump, the more Donald Trump population increases because people love Donald Trump than any other candidate since Joe Biden stepped down for the race.