BC Game account locked.

[xLays]

[I think it hold more waters if a legendary account make an accusation thread, compared to a newbie, sometimes if a legendary member makes as accusations even without sufficient evidence, it will still be looked into closely by other members compared to when such accusations are coming from a newbie which is always discarded if without evidence, although the most vital ingredients of any accusations here on bitcointalk is evidence regardless of the member rank.
Between I do t see the reason why I should create a new account just to hide my identity when I am creating a legitimate zscam thread, I don't see anything to hide for the public, although the point Kingsden raised hold some value as for hiding not to be exposed as being active heavy gambler, but me personally I don't see anything wrong in that aso long that you gamble responsibly.

There are many possibilities why newbie account would file scam accusations or have issues with a gambling site and create thread here on bitcointalk. One reason you mentioned is right. Most often, newbies create threads like this because sometimes the platform made the right decision, and the thread creator just doesn't want their main or actual account to be known. It could also be that the concern or issue is legitimate and someone recommended bitcointalk to speed up the resolution of their problem, or at least to warn the community to lay low on this platform (bc.game) for now.

[KingsDen]

IMO making an accusation with your main account holds a little more credibility with the accusation. Of course, it's definitely still going to depend on the evidence presented, but if the evidence is solid and the person making the complaint is a reputable member, I would give the accusation more credit.

As coolcoinz said, new account is not equal to false accusation. We should rather look at the evidences provided if any, rather than the age of an account. I have also known a situation where complete newbies locate this forum through search engines when they run into troubles with casino.

I don't think it's necessary to base it on the account status here. Newbie or hero, they're the same, and when someone makes an accusation, we don't evaluate it based on the reputation of the accuser but on the evidence presented. If it appears in our minds that when someone with a higher rank and good reputation in the forum makes an accusation against a certain casino, even without enough evidence, we would already side with them, then that is not fair and not how the forum works.

We are almost saying the same thing from different points of view. It will be beneficial if we also understand the angle Yahoo is coming from. In as much as all accusations depend on the evidences provided, we should also not forget that in the ambient of the forum, reputation and trust is important. Not necessarily about the age of the accusing account here, but the reputation of the account.

I can stumble on some random accusations by newbies against BC.games, skip and move on. But if such an accusation is made by yahoo62278, I'll likely not skip. I have to read the accusation and it will take the project owners not more than 24hrs to clear their name. That's the angle yahoo is coming from.

[Wind_FURY]

Another BC.Game accusation with proper proof in recent times. This is one heck of a weird ass site. They used to be great and then sank into the gutter, but picked themselves back up and are sinking into the gutter yet again.

If they seriously mess up this time, I don't really see how they can pick themselves back up again since a good portion of this forum will probably boycott them.

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

They're in the gutter again for getting a scam accusation from a brand new account? Plus have you considered that there was a valid reason to lock OP's account?

Plus be careful of making posts like that, ser. In general, whether it's deliberate or not deliberate, posts like that could manipulate the readers into believing that OP is actually being scammed by BC.Game.

[Russlenat]

As coolcoinz said, new account is not equal to false accusation. We should rather look at the evidences provided if any, rather than the age of an account. I have also known a situation where complete newbies locate this forum through search engines when they run into troubles with casino.

I don't think it's necessary to base it on the account status here. Newbie or hero, they're the same, and when someone makes an accusation, we don't evaluate it based on the reputation of the accuser but on the evidence presented. If it appears in our minds that when someone with a higher rank and good reputation in the forum makes an accusation against a certain casino, even without enough evidence, we would already side with them, then that is not fair and not how the forum works.

We are almost saying the same thing from different points of view. It will be beneficial if we also understand the angle Yahoo is coming from. In as much as all accusations depend on the evidences provided, we should also not forget that in the ambient of the forum, reputation and trust is important. Not necessarily about the age of the accusing account here, but the reputation of the account.

I can stumble on some random accusations by newbies against BC.games, skip and move on. But if such an accusation is made by yahoo62278, I'll likely not skip. I have to read the accusation and it will take the project owners not more than 24hrs to clear their name. That's the angle yahoo is coming from.

I understand we might have different perspectives, but as forum members who deeply care for the community, we want to maintain a clean environment where fairness is promoted. I can't blame you for looking at the reputation, as there are plenty of newbies here who make accusations against certain casinos without providing evidence, more like a job to destroy the casino's reputation. In relation to the BC.game case, not every newbie who posts a scam accusation against the casino should be taken seriously, especially if they lack proof. However, at the end of the day, we should still examine the evidence and its reliability.

We, the long-standing members who have been here for years, are just a few of the gamblers who patronize casinos here. The majority are newbies who search for casinos to try. What I'm saying is, we have to give importance to any topic that needs to be discussed, as long as all the necessary information and evidence are presented, and not just dismiss it as spam or a demolition job on the reputation of a casino.