Kamala Harris is Considering Anti-Crypto Senator As Running Mate

[ranochigo]

Do the Americans really think of crypto as such a big issue? The way I see it, the vocal few are on the internet and the majority are people who don't know or don't care enough about Bitcoin. It would be obvious why when you see the composition of the political donations.

With his statements about wanting Bitcoins to be entirely mined in the US, I can't see how it would be beneficial for the Bitcoiners who have always sought to separate the politics from it.

[pooya87]

As I've said many times, the "crypto" community is too small for them to care about and make decisions based on what people in this community think.

In this case the only reason why she picked this dude as her VP (or as the rumors say) is to increase her chances at getting the votes from the key state, Michigan. She has already been losing a lot of votes for supporting the genocide in Gaza so she is getting desperate. Remember that Michigan has a large Muslim population.

[mindrust]

You are both underestimating the crypto crowd.

Believe in our power, together we can make a change.

Let’s change it in November, end the establishment,

Vote TRUMP

[fuguebtc]

You are both underestimating the crypto crowd.

Believe in our power, together we can make a change.

Let’s change it in November, end the establishment,

Vote TRUMP

It cannot be denied that cryptocurrency is not a big factor, a key factor in this election. We have bigger issues that deserve more attention like climate change, world peace, immigration, taxes...But there is no denying the role and influence of cryptocurrency, if it really had no impact, I don't think Trump's campaign team would spend much time on it and attracting voters from crypto.

We should not underestimate ourselves too much, even though our contribution is very small, at least we are contributing to bringing victory to one of them. So let's vote for someone who will create and give us opportunities to develop more instead of the current government that is oppressing us.

[ranochigo]

It cannot be denied that cryptocurrency is not a big factor, a key factor in this election. We have bigger issues that deserve more attention like climate change, world peace, immigration, taxes...But there is no denying the role and influence of cryptocurrency, if it really had no impact, I don't think Trump's campaign team would spend much time on it and attracting voters from crypto.

Do you know how much fundings are from Crypto-related figures or from the channel? It's a low hanging fruit to say the least.

We should not underestimate ourselves too much, even though our contribution is very small, at least we are contributing to bringing victory to one of them. So let's vote for someone who will create and give us opportunities to develop more instead of the current government that is oppressing us.

At the risk of becoming too political in a Bitcoin discussion, I'd like to point out the definition of oppression. If you think US is being oppressed, then you've got to go out and read up on what's happening around the world.

When DJT aims to have Bitcoin mined solely in the US and the introduction of more stringent regulations, do you really think it is good for Bitcoin?

[tread93]

You are both underestimating the crypto crowd.

Believe in our power, together we can make a change.

Let’s change it in November, end the establishment,

Vote TRUMP

TRUMP is paving the way for longevity with not only Bitcoin but the USA baby! As an American and a Bitcoiner I am so glad to see Trump embracing it and of course its helping him too. The crypto donations he is receiving will help further fund his campaign and spread the news. So many people are against Trump for such stupid things just because they don't like him but he is effective as a President! I absolutely love his stance on crypto in this political landscape because it is a very pressing issue for the US to either fight it or embrace it and currently Trump is embracing it while Biden and Harris only put up roadblocks. 

[Webetcoins]

And Trump's really knows when to enter and uses Bitcoin as one of highlights of their political platform. So with that, we all know how big Bitcoin or crypto is in the USA and so maybe there will be voters who might sway and go and vote on Trump on the strength of his support to crypto.

Against Harris and there were reports that she will be getting a VP as ant-crypto. So it that happens and if they win, it might be that bad for us to see the sitting President and his VP against crypto and who knows what they are going to do for miners in the USA or anything related to crypto in general.

Enter where? On politics? Or in Bitcoin? But if on politics, I think there are no times that Trump did not participate on it. That shows his enthusiasm on it but who wouldn't be when I heard that there is a good amount of money waiting for them there. I think the task given to them isn't also that hard and they can still make it easy if they really wanted to. If in terms of Bitcoin, well Bitcoin is not a secret anymore so it's only normal for an individual to get involved with it.

The US is a huge country but I think BTC and crypto have been restricted on them before. This can make them have a reason to vote Trump or the other candidates who are a pro-crypto now because they think crypto will then be fully legal once they win. I see that Harris as VP is anti to it. This is contradicting but the president still has more power, so she might not do much but obey the orders given to him and to others.

[Rruchi man]

~

Even if Kamala's running mate is anti crypto, if this candidate support the other policies that Trump is against, and people who have cryptocurrency really in support of these other policies seeing them as really important and their love for these policies more than their love for cryptocurrency, they will support Kamala even though she may be anti-crypto.