Few observations about luck-based games in comparison to skill-based games (2).

[Casdinyard]

There is a chance that the nature of the game has something to do with the gender that plays in that game most. There is no official study for this yet, but I am thinking that we will find more females playing and drawn to luck-based games than skill-based games because of how difficult the process of learning skill-based games may be.

Another observation about luck-based games that a new gambler with an interest in them has to know is that they have the potential to make you, as a gambler, spend more money gambling than skill-based games.

What do you think?

You're trying to strike gold inside a septic tank.

Luck's not gender-based, nor is there a gender propensity for game types. There's no such thing as a certain gender having more luck than the other or ladies being more drawn towards luck-based games than skill-based games, and if that's how you think shit works within and outside the gambling world then you might want to start touching grass and reading the bible every now and then cause that's some clear-cut sign that you need God in your life. But I digress.

How do you even come up with shit like this in the first place lol. Where did you draw this conclusion from? You made the missus place bets for you and instead of her losing she won more? Or you made someone, a newcomer in the gambling industry, gamble inside a casino? Cause if those were the case the answer is literally slapping you in the face already my g.

That's skewed and stupid. Statistics do not lie and I say you try looking that up instead of trying to be so profound that you're already sounding like a 4channer.

[Rruchi man]

You're trying to strike gold inside a septic tank.

Luck's not gender-based, nor is there a gender propensity for game types. There's no such thing as a certain gender having more luck than the other or ladies being more drawn towards luck-based games than skill-based games, and if that's how you think shit works within and outside the gambling world then you might want to start touching grass and reading the bible every now and then cause that's some clear-cut sign that you need God in your life. But I digress.

How do you even come up with shit like this in the first place lol. Where did you draw this conclusion from? You made the missus place bets for you and instead of her losing she won more? Or you made someone, a newcomer in the gambling industry, gamble inside a casino? Cause if those were the case the answer is literally slapping you in the face already my g.

That's skewed and stupid. Statistics do not lie and I say you try looking that up instead of trying to be so profound that you're already sounding like a 4channer.

You don't have to sound so rude.

You can disagree with my observations and present your arguments without trying to sound all-knowing and insulting using words like "stupid," because using such words to describe my observations means that all those that agree with my observation have stupidity in them too.

[bering]

There is a chance that the nature of the game has something to do with the gender that plays in that game most. There is no official study for this yet, but I am thinking that we will find more females playing and drawn to luck-based games than skill-based games because of how difficult the process of learning skill-based games may be.

Another observation about luck-based games that a new gambler with an interest in them has to know is that they have the potential to make you, as a gambler, spend more money gambling than skill-based games.

What do you think?

I have try to observe and i know this is not general and probably this statement can be debatable but according to the psychology research which i have read the main reason why women want to gambling is because they want to escape from the stress so they want to makes gambling as the thing that can make them forget about the problems they have and mostly when starting to gamble women is very likes to play the game luck based this because the women likes to playing simple games which not required the skill

And according to the research too slots is one of the popular game which women is very often to play this because to playing this game it's not required special skill because slots is very simple to learned and this game also can be considered as luck based game and i think from this research we can see it that to gamble women is more likely to interested to playing luck based games rather than skill based games

[Zigabel]

There is a chance that the nature of the game has something to do with the gender that plays in that game most. There is no official study for this yet, but I am thinking that we will find more females playing and drawn to luck-based games than skill-based games because of how difficult the process of learning skill-based games may be.

Another observation about luck-based games that a new gambler with an interest in them has to know is that they have the potential to make you, as a gambler, spend more money gambling than skill-based games.

What do you think?

This is just a share of your taughts and as it's got no statistical backing that will get us understanding and confirming how true it is, then I personally cannot completely buy into this idea even if it's proven with many valid points probably to show validity, both genders are usually involved in luck based game and skill based game but for the reason of the disparity, it does feels like the "easy" one is that which catches the interest of the female gender the most and the males would want to be logical.

[Charles-Tim]

Gambling skill based games are few. So you should name the ones you are referring to precisely, but yes I think there are women gambling on slots and bingo, raffles or loteries, than Blackjack, Baccarat, roulette, poker or craps.

Almost the ones that you mentioned are not skilled based so far you are gambling against the casino. Some may be skilled based if you do not gamble with the casino but competing with another person in a way that house edge is not involved. Example of skilled based is poker that gambling sites let people to compete between themselves. Not even all pokers are skilled based.

[Dr.Bitcoin_Strange]

I still remember the last bet I took was around 1.25 odds and on football live game, and when I staked 0.0001 bitcoin I was high hoped to win based on my team's analysis, but since the luck was not on my side, I still ended up losing that bet and then I realised that luck is a vital factors in Gambling and we shouldn't expect so much based on skills.

Yea, that was exactly what I was saying. Someone can have very high hope in a particular prediction, and the high hope could be as a result of their skill in making successful predictions or because of the high hope they have in the team they are betting on. This can make some gamblers stake a big amount in just one small odd, but it will be surprising how the game is going to go against the person's prediction. These examples you gave have happened to me regularly.

[uneng]

Luck is still the determining factor in every gambling games, being them sports betting or traditional casino games. You can be skilled in soccer, know all players, teams, strategies, statistics, but things can still go completely on the opposite you predicted, resulting in losses. The only game I would consider to be based on skills in gambling would be in case the gambler was the player himself, but hardly ever you will find this possibility. For an example, to bet on a chess match, where you are the bettor and also the player at same time.

From my understanding, the split between luck-based and skill-based games was a smart marketing strategy from casinos to boost their businesses and launch a new hype which is efficient gathering new customers in every layers of society. After all, most gamblers still lose on long run, doesn't matter how "skilled" they are. That is what should be taken into consideration and never neglected.

[redsun114]

I actually think that there are more number of females who are playing skill-based games because females are known to be more intelligent than the males. It is because of their soft nature and they mostly stay indoors, so they will just use their time studying instead.

As for the males, they are known for their masculine nature, so they can only risk more money in the game and this game is usually a luck-based game like slots for example. Sots are a famous gambling game, I think it is due to its exciting gameplay. I know others are exciting too but they don't have a unique animation and sound just like the Slots game has. Slots game do also has a bonus round which other games don't have and this makes the experience more entertaining and profitable if in case our luck strikes with us.

Skill-based games might be hard to learn but they are still very rewarding once one do so and is successful with his attempts. When I say the word rewarding, I don't only mean that they are more winnable and profitable but also the feeling of accomplishment is still there.

Lastly, in terms of spending money in each type of games, I think it was in skill-based games are the ones where we can spend more money because their odds are only low, however the gamblers can still spend more money in luck-based games because wins here are much harder to hit due to their randomness and the potential of earning a massive amount of profits.

[rachael9385]

I still remember the last bet I took was around 1.25 odds and on football live game, and when I staked 0.0001 bitcoin I was high hoped to win based on my team's analysis, but since the luck was not on my side, I still ended up losing that bet and then I realised that luck is a vital factors in Gambling and we shouldn't expect so much based on skills.

Yea, that was exactly what I was saying. Someone can have very high hope in a particular prediction, and the high hope could be as a result of their skill in making successful predictions or because of the high hope they have in the team they are betting on. This can make some gamblers stake a big amount in just one small odd, but it will be surprising how the game is going to go against the person's prediction. These examples you gave have happened to me regularly.

The reason for gambler to have too much of hope on their games is probably because of their previous results, if he has been winning all the time (maybe 80%) his hope on the bet will be too much, mostly if he staked with too much money. But the interesting thing is that no matter how high the gamblers hope is, he still needs luck for him to win if not his hopes will be lost when he lost the bet.

[Juse14]

There is a chance that the nature of the game has something to do with the gender that plays in that game most. There is no official study for this yet, but I am thinking that we will find more females playing and drawn to luck-based games than skill-based games because of how difficult the process of learning skill-based games may be.

Another observation about luck-based games that a new gambler with an interest in them has to know is that they have the potential to make you, as a gambler, spend more money gambling than skill-based games.

What do you think?

Maybe luck-based games draw more women because they are easier and do not require the same complex learning curve as skill-based games. While there has been no formal research on this, the observation is valid. However, it is also important to consider that luck-based games can make players spend more money since they are easy and luring, too so the new gambler has to mind his pocket.

And, of course, every player has their own preferences and playing style. What is most important is that one understands the risks and advantages of each type of game before deciding to get involved, and always plays with wisdom and responsibility, whichever game that may be. With a proper approach, gambling can be enjoyable while keeping it free from jeopardizing one's finances or personal well-being.

[tread93]

There is a chance that the nature of the game has something to do with the gender that plays in that game most. There is no official study for this yet, but I am thinking that we will find more females playing and drawn to luck-based games than skill-based games because of how difficult the process of learning skill-based games may be.

Another observation about luck-based games that a new gambler with an interest in them has to know is that they have the potential to make you, as a gambler, spend more money gambling than skill-based games.

What do you think?

Well, I think its more on an opinion or your own observation, because to me I think it depends on the person who eill play gambling, as for me those who plays luck based gambling games is those who wants to just play gambling without hassle or without thinking as you will just play and let your luck works, but those who want some thrill and excitement will most likely play gambling games that will consist of opponent and some challenge when they are playing, so in short it depends on the liking of the gambler.

Yeah it’s really just going to come down to gambling preference at that point. Some people don’t care to play poker because there are a lot of foundational rules and strategies that one must know where as the slot machine you crank back that know and let the numbers fly and hope you’re lucky! I would think that women in general don’t gamble as much as men do, that’s just my gut idk if that’s a real thing like the OP is saying either.

[stadus]

Another observation about luck-based games that a new gambler with an interest in them has to know is that they have the potential to make you, as a gambler, spend more money gambling than skill-based games.

I don't think there's a big difference in that factor. Luck-based or skill-based games probably just differ in chances, but if a gambler is really interested in gambling and feels challenged, they'll continue to gamble to try to find the secret to winning, hence addiction is likely possible. This doesn't focus on the kind of game but on how a gambler handles the game. If you can't control yourself, then you'll likely spend more money on gambling—simple as that.

[mirakal]

Skilled based games are still luck based games also. All matches are still luck based. But I understand your question.

It is true that casino games can be addictive than sport betting. But in sport there are still horse,  dog racing and some other short minute games. Also there are in-play which are all very addictive also. Also there are virtual matches that can take less than 30 seconds. Also are esports that can take less than 5 to 12 minutes. All these are in sport and they can be very addictive.

I do not have enough information about women likely to gamble on casino games than betting on sport matches. But generally people gamble on casinos than they bet on sport matches.

For me, all gambling games are actually luck-based games that’s why we often lose in gambling regardless of what type of game we are playing, but the fact that the house certainly has all the edge, then if we can’t be lucky, we will have no chances to win in gambling. Even with skill-based games, experience won’t actually guarantee that you’ll win later in your game, but with luck, it does guarantee that you will definitely make good profits in the end.

[Obim34]

Another observation about luck-based games that a new gambler with an interest in them has to know is that they have the potential to make you, as a gambler, spend more money gambling than skill-based games.

I don't think there's a big difference in that factor. Luck-based or skill-based games probably just differ in chances, but if a gambler is really interested in gambling and feels challenged, they'll continue to gamble to try to find the secret to winning, hence addiction is likely possible. This doesn't focus on the kind of game but on how a gambler handles the game. If you can't control yourself, then you'll likely spend more money on gambling—simple as that.

Luck based games can be most addictive because it generates more profits than skilled based games in my own opinion, if only the gambler already understands the techniques involved, this takes quite some time to do and extend how much time spent on playing. Even in the lucked based games there is some series of skills to apply during the process to enable a high chances of winning, it still shows some level of skills to be implied and both are just based on luck as well.

[Dr.Bitcoin_Strange]

The reason for gambler to have too much of hope on their games is probably because of their previous results, if he has been winning all the time (maybe 80%) his hope on the bet will be too much, mostly if he staked with too much money. But the interesting thing is that no matter how high the gamblers hope is, he still needs luck for him to win if not his hopes will be lost when he lost the bet.

You are right, mate. What gives some gamblers overconfidence in their bets is the level of success they have archived from their previous bets. Secondly, if a gambler trusts a team or a particular player so much that they believe that the team usually performs 90% well in all their matches, the gambler will be so confident in his bet because he feels that the team will not disappoint him, or the gambler believes that anytime a particular player is featured in a match, the team usually wins the game, which can also make a gambler so overconfident. 

[Solosanz]

Yeah women aren't that care and don't give so much effort on something that they don't really interested. I think there are many women into gambling because their partner are gamblers.

Luck based games can be most addictive because it generates more profits than skilled based games in my own opinion, if only the gambler already understands the techniques involved, this takes quite some time to do and extend how much time spent on playing. Even in the lucked based games there is some series of skills to apply during the process to enable a high chances of winning, it still shows some level of skills to be implied and both are just based on luck as well.

Nah, luck based games are more easier, faster and have a chance to surprise you in terms of the return, unlike skill based games where you already know how big the money you could win. This is why luck based games are more popular, many people are unskilled and they want faster results.

[Viscore]

You are right, mate. What gives some gamblers overconfidence in their bets is the level of success they have archived from their previous bets. Secondly, if a gambler trusts a team or a particular player so much that they believe that the team usually performs 90% well in all their matches, the gambler will be so confident in his bet because he feels that the team will not disappoint him, or the gambler believes that anytime a particular player is featured in a match, the team usually wins the game, which can also make a gambler so overconfident. 

It's easy to trust a team to win and feel confident in them, but the real challenge is whether they can cover the spread. The majority of bettors don't bet on the moneyline odds; they choose the point spread because it offers better odds for either team. You can bet on the underdog or the favorites to cover the spread, so even if you bet on a team that loses, as long as they cover the spread, your bet will win. This is the reality now because if you're a bettor looking to increase your chances of winning, you won't consistently bet on odds like 1.30 or below.

[Wexnident]

~

I'd say yes, but only in terms of quantity. In the level of skill itself? It might just be males dominating right now due to the sheer number of males that we have in the first place but who knows, there might be some females out there who could dominate males, just that they don't really play as much as males. But anyway, I don't really think there's any purpose for such comparisons in the first place, just let people play their games.

As for the second question, 100% people spend more on luck-based ones. It's no surprise why lotteries have sky-high prizes. People often don't have the time to try to win something after all, only those passionate about the game themselves would actually try to do so.

[retreat]

There is a chance that the nature of the game has something to do with the gender that plays in that game most. There is no official study for this yet, but I am thinking that we will find more females playing and drawn to luck-based games than skill-based games because of how difficult the process of learning skill-based games may be.

-snip-

I see it more that there will be more women involved in gambling based on luck because most women are too bored at home and they want to find an activity that can occupy their free time and at the same time have the opportunity to earn money - which they think can help increase their family income. The convenience provided by the game based on luck is also an important factor, because they don't need to bother learning the rules since they only need to tap their cellphone screen.

[Poker Player]

What do you think?

That you could have provided data instead of just stating that because you think so and that's it. As far as I can see, in one source they say that the percentage of male female gamblers is 64% to 36%, but in e-sports betting the difference would only be 3% which is not consistent with what you think.

Although in another source we see that the estimated percentage of women poker players is 15-20%, which would be in line with what you think.

And they still seem to me to be weak sources based on poor statistics, but they have more substance than what you simply think, and paint a more complex picture.