I hope goverments will give more money to people

[LDL]

It may be fine for America and UK but we live in a country in the world where the government is far from helping the people but the government is embezzling money from the people.
As a Bangladeshi, I can say that if all the countries of the world work for the people but only the government of my country who acted against the people of this country.
My country's government and government party bureaucrats have laundered billions of dollars from my country and smuggled them abroad due to which the people of my country are in per capita debt and no one can say when Bangladesh will be free from this disastrous situation.

[Iranus]

Printing money & providing stimulus is not helpful because it drives inflation out of control. Look what happened after COVID money printing, we all get lumped with the costs of everything sky rocketing. Money printing & stimulus is a terrible thing.

I once asked my father about money printing but he told me that will not help matters because it will make things worse which I asked further to know why, he then said when money is printed over it causes inflation which he gave me the example of Zimbabwe who had suffered it in the past to the extent of not making use of their currency again because it has lose value.

You can ask your dad, during the Covid pandemic, what would happen if the government did not print money and did not give money to us to consume while the entire economy was almost closed and everyone was unemployed?

I'm not saying printing too much money is good because what we are suffering is the consequence of printing money during the Covid pandemic. But if the government didn't print money, would we still be alive today?

Printing money is possible but there needs to be control and policies commensurate with the amount of money printed. The Zimbabwean government printed too much money but did not have the right strategy to circulate money in accordance with its economy, thereby causing the money to lose value and become trash.

[RockBell]

It may be fine for America and UK but we live in a country in the world where the government is far from helping the people but the government is embezzling money from the people.
As a Bangladeshi, I can say that if all the countries of the world work for the people but only the government of my country who acted against the people of this country.
My country's government and government party bureaucrats have laundered billions of dollars from my country and smuggled them abroad due to which the people of my country are in per capita debt and no one can say when Bangladesh will be free from this disastrous situation.

Even if all governments are not the same, I don't think it is advisable for the government to be sharing money instead, the government should come up with schemes to engage people and for them to earn money That will actually be better because how much do the governments want to give that would be enough to actually solve your problems? But when you earn money yourself, you will actually know how to manage it and what exactly you want to use the money for, but when the government keeps giving you money, you will end up doing relevant things and spending it lavishly, and instead of the government trying to get peoples attention by giving them money, why not create more farms, so have enough foot supply in circulation provide more transportation system. These are little little things that can make life easy for everyone instead of looking for ways to spend money I don't care whatever government it may be, but the government should always do the right thing it is not Asif. They don't know what to do, but they don't just care because they are not ready to do the writing thing the moment they decide to do the right things will actually get better.

[Mr.sprin]

Even if all governments are not the same, I don't think it is advisable for the government to be sharing money instead, the government should come up with schemes to engage people and for them to earn money That will actually be better because how much do the governments want to give that would be enough to actually solve your problems? But when you earn money yourself, you will actually know how to manage it and what exactly you want to use the money for, but when the government keeps giving you money, you will end up doing relevant things and spending it lavishly, and instead of the government trying to get peoples attention by giving them money, why not create more farms, so have enough foot supply in circulation provide more transportation system. These are little little things that can make life easy for everyone instead of looking for ways to spend money I don't care whatever government it may be, but the government should always do the right thing it is not Asif. They don't know what to do, but they don't just care because they are not ready to do the writing thing the moment they decide to do the right things will actually get better.

That's right bro, I agree with you, the government is not there to distribute money to its people, but they open up opportunities for people to be able to make money from their hard work so that people are generally independent and can solve their problems by themselves without depending on other people or the government, if the government distributes money to its people so that they are not poor, this indirectly makes people lazy to think and try to find solutions to their own problems, with the government distributing money to the community, all people will continue to depend on the government, when the government does not can no longer distribute money, so the people also cannot find a solution to their respective problems because they are dependent on the government because the government distributes money for nothing, they as the government prepare the facilities and infrastructure so that we can try to make money ourselves.

[Cryptmuster]

I hope biden and trump both will do that.
Not only in USA but UK europe need to do same thing.
And If people stay more home and invest money in crypto.
I know it's not well and sustained economic way but i don't care becouse world is all ready messed up too late to fix anything.
Those who working and got jobs let them just keep up everything so we have food necessary services so most people we can just focus on staying home and trading crypto and invest in crypto.
Also If less people working then less traffic and it save envoirement and nature also.
let's just earn with crypto more people come into crypto space more money coming in but stimulus money need to be somehow.
And If it's problem for USA to print money then they can find few big countries wich large enough to take all the usa inflation burden of money printing ...or let the usa make bundle of the countries who will take usa inflation.
Nothing else matters the system is done all ready and messed up now lets focus on just earning with cryptocurrency but for that people need easy money hardly people invest their hard earned money so goverments need to find the ways to keep people in homes and they trading cryptocurrency.
Then we the Western countries together will choose few other countries in where we will send our dollar inflation so we can print money and do the stimulus.

I don't see anything reasonable in this step, in order to hand out money to everyone again, we will have to print even more of it, and this will mean giving a new impetus to the growth of inflation. There is no need to hope that other countries are able to take on this inflation, firstly, there is nothing good in this, secondly, last time this did not happen and the USA faced the growth of inflation, which entailed many difficulties for the population and the economy as a whole. So the proposal to continue handing out money is very short-sighted, and is calculated for some short-term results, but in the long term it will bring even more problems and growth of inflation.

[CryptopreneurBrainboss]

I hope biden and trump both will do that.
Not only in USA but UK europe need to do same thing.
And If people stay more home and invest money in crypto.
I know it's not well and sustained economic way but i don't care becouse world is all ready messed up too late to fix anything.

Giving everybody comfort creates a weak society, the government giving us money won't solve any problem but it will only increase the problems for the world. If everybody is in crypto do you think the market will be profitable again, what makes the market profitable are the new money/people coming into the market to buy the dips as they also want to be beneficiary of the market. The society will just be a mess if everybody is receiving money without any work being done. Government shouldn't give out handout but they can make hustling more profitable that people will know that if they hustle they can live a comfortable life and not like now that everything is becoming more expensive yet we aren't being paid more.

Then we the Western countries together will choose few other countries in where we will send our dollar inflation so we can print money and do the stimulus.

There are people in other parts of the world and the world doesn't revolve around only people on the western world. I think your government have done enough too because if not for you guys. Some African and third world countries would been living better than their current standards. Printing more more doesn't solved the problem in anyway but it causes more inflation. Zimbabwe, Venezuela can testify to this.

[mirakal]

Honestly, we don't need the government to give us money, but we do need earning opportunities. The population is growing fast, but job opportunities are very limited, which makes more and more people jobless. That is why I don't beg for money or ask them to give it to me, instead, I hope that they will open opportunities that help poor people survive, not just rich people. 

Not just in the US and Europe but in all countries facing such a situation. If they are very concerned about the welfare of all their people, leaders should look deeper and determine the needs of the poor. They can certainly work hard if there is a chance, but the government gives nothing aside from sweet promises. 

[Taskford]

Honestly, we don't need the government to give us money, but we do need earning opportunities. The population is growing fast, but job opportunities are very limited, which makes more and more people jobless. That is why I don't beg for money or ask them to give it to me, instead, I hope that they will open opportunities that help poor people survive, not just rich people. 

Not just in the US and Europe but in all countries facing such a situation. If they are very concerned about the welfare of all their people, leaders should look deeper and determine the needs of the poor. They can certainly work hard if there is a chance, but the government gives nothing aside from sweet promises. 

If people will always rely on government aid then for sure everyone will suffer since it will just promote laziness and that cannot produce product like food we eat and other things we need to live.

So its more better if the government will give work opportunities to a lot of people since with this we provably could have good economy and people could sustain their daily needs. That's why people should think about asking money since it will just create some huge trouble to them and they will be eaten by inflation and again they are the one will suffer. People and government need to cooperate together so that they can smoothly run their machineries and create more better future to their countrymen.

[Marvell1]

Honestly, we don't need the government to give us money, but we do need earning opportunities. The population is growing fast, but job opportunities are very limited, which makes more and more people jobless. That is why I don't beg for money or ask them to give it to me, instead, I hope that they will open opportunities that help poor people survive, not just rich people.

Not just in the US and Europe but in all countries facing such a situation. If they are very concerned about the welfare of all their people, leaders should look deeper and determine the needs of the poor. They can certainly work hard if there is a chance, but the government gives nothing aside from sweet promises.

The government should give more money to people by creating more jobs instead of giving it away for free. Printing money and giving it away for free means the government is only creating demand while supply will inevitably be in short supply because no one will want to work. This only makes the our economy collapse faster.

Our world is becoming more and more difficult as the population increases because that means the needs also increase. But meanwhile, the government is stuck creating more supply and making the situation worse. The only solution for us is for the government to balance supply and demand, if they can't do this then there is no way to save us all.

[Juse14]

Honestly, we don't need the government to give us money, but we do need earning opportunities. The population is growing fast, but job opportunities are very limited, which makes more and more people jobless. That is why I don't beg for money or ask them to give it to me, instead, I hope that they will open opportunities that help poor people survive, not just rich people. 

Not just in the US and Europe but in all countries facing such a situation. If they are very concerned about the welfare of all their people, leaders should look deeper and determine the needs of the poor. They can certainly work hard if there is a chance, but the government gives nothing aside from sweet promises. 

Naturally, by creating more job opportunities, the government can create enhanced economic stability which will lead to a decrease in the number of people who depend on social assistance and a diminution of poverty-related problems. People through employment are empowered than just providing cash assistance — this is what we call a sustainable solution.

The government needs to hear its people, particularly those in hard times, and try and come up with programs that will make them thrive. It is not just about making one's life easy but also about the empowerment which allows every individual to be successful on their efforts.

This will make people more self-sufficient, more sure of themselves, and will have a good impact on the economy as a whole. A government that works to provide real opportunities for work and creation is what really deserves respect and is considered truly caring for the welfare of its people.

[Antotena]

I hope biden and trump both will do that.
Not only in USA but UK europe need to do same thing.
And If people stay more home and invest money in crypto.
I know it's not well and sustained economic way but i don't care becouse world is all ready messed up too late to fix anything.
Those who working and got jobs let them just keep up everything so we have food necessary services so most people we can just focus on staying home and trading crypto and invest in crypto.
Also If less people working then less traffic and it save envoirement and nature also.
let's just earn with crypto more people come into crypto space more money coming in but stimulus money need to be somehow.

You think the world only revive around crypto? Back in 2009 before crypto was born, many people were earning millions of dollars until crypto investment made everything looks easy but that doesn't change the outside world of crypto, other things are working and people are still making there money regardless. You just have to give it a try if you have the resources and not necessary everything crypto but if you think you need only crypto, stay like that don't make the world fall because you want crypto.

If inflation catches up, how are you going to cope with your crypto? How do you think even crypto will react if the purchasing power of currency are dying, you really think crypto that are you are capitalizing on will go up forever? All you have said is just speculation, try and error solution that will only cause more damage to what we have seen already.

[dezoel]

I don't see anything reasonable in this step, in order to hand out money to everyone again, we will have to print even more of it, and this will mean giving a new impetus to the growth of inflation. There is no need to hope that other countries are able to take on this inflation, firstly, there is nothing good in this, secondly, last time this did not happen and the USA faced the growth of inflation, which entailed many difficulties for the population and the economy as a whole. So the proposal to continue handing out money is very short-sighted, and is calculated for some short-term results, but in the long term it will bring even more problems and growth of inflation.

Here it's really important point about this with peoples not expect money from the governments because this is not going to solve their problems even it's going to create more problems for them with peoples needs more jobs opportunities and other things related to them because with these lives are going to have improvement.

We will be able to have development which is basic right of every human in developed world things are going good with governments understand how to fix their problems but in developing countries things are not going as they needed because mostly corrupt peoples are using this for their own sack which is surely never been ideal for them.

Every time when we talk about this we have to understand main problems as peoples never been live happy with government money because this is never been going to give them better chance of grow and development they need better things from the governments which are the best thing because if they will care about them peoples will be happy and try to built better things for the future with they will be positive and having good mindset for the build of good future but in many regions we are having no mindset like this so for decades peoples are having troubling life, and they are also having no incentives which are their right.

[darkangel11]

You are basically asking for stimulus checks all over again.

That's not going to help anything, people will just spend them on consumer items, whereas employers will suffer because nobody will work a job anymore when they can just get money for free. Which means less of the product is created and in turn that means higher prices for the consumer, causing inflation. And of course the money printing involved in all these leads to even more inflation.

Exactly.
The deal is not to give people handouts but stop stealing from them. You probably are aware that in many countries government handouts are also taxed. This means that when you earn very little, the government taxes you, then gives you some welfare and taxes you again because welfare is seen as income. It's a vicious circle.
All governments know the way to make people rich is not to give them money, but completely stop taxing the poor, yet look at how hard it is for them to raise the tax bracket. Usually even if you don't even make minimum wage you're required to pay taxes.

[indah rezqi]

I don't see anything reasonable in this step, in order to hand out money to everyone again, we will have to print even more of it, and this will mean giving a new impetus to the growth of inflation. There is no need to hope that other countries are able to take on this inflation, firstly, there is nothing good in this, secondly, last time this did not happen and the USA faced the growth of inflation, which entailed many difficulties for the population and the economy as a whole. So the proposal to continue handing out money is very short-sighted, and is calculated for some short-term results, but in the long term it will bring even more problems and growth of inflation.

Here it's really important point about this with peoples not expect money from the governments because this is not going to solve their problems even it's going to create more problems for them with peoples needs more jobs opportunities and other things related to them because with these lives are going to have improvement.

We will be able to have development which is basic right of every human in developed world things are going good with governments understand how to fix their problems but in developing countries things are not going as they needed because mostly corrupt peoples are using this for their own sack which is surely never been ideal for them.

Every time when we talk about this we have to understand main problems as peoples never been live happy with government money because this is never been going to give them better chance of grow and development they need better things from the governments which are the best thing because if they will care about them peoples will be happy and try to built better things for the future with they will be positive and having good mindset for the build of good future but in many regions we are having no mindset like this so for decades peoples are having troubling life, and they are also having no incentives which are their right.

I also believe that a government has taken the wrong policy when they decide to provide cash assistance to the community, it is only a temporary solution and has a bad impact in the long term. Everyone can certainly easily guess the direction and other purposes of providing the money, the government wants to encourage purchasing power for goods and services, but if the assistance is not distributed properly, it will automatically trigger an increase in inflation. I am also very sure that the money given by the government can make people dependent.

The government should change its policies to be wiser, such as creating more jobs for every level of society, so that they are not dependent on the government. The budget for the cash assistance can be diverted to building a better education system, building the tourism sector, and so on. Although this does not have an instant impact, it is quite good as a long-term solution. Overall, currently there are fewer and fewer governments in a country that are fair to the people, in the end we only see a few countries whose people live happily.

[passwordnow]

The government giving money means another printing scenario that will happen. Do you think that the government takes all the money in the banks and just give it to the people? No. Money in the banks and the money of the government are two different places where they are getting the fund is through out of thin air if this is what you wish to happen. And you know what happens next when another series of brrrrrrrrr happens?

Inflation.

Yes, that's what will happen again as there will be a lot of supply of money in the circulation again. While inflation is there already whether there's printing or not, I am talking about a bigger impact of inflation so if we're getting around 3% of inflation then expect it to double or higher than that. Cash for works are okay and the government shouldn't just give fish to the people but equipment in fishing and teach them how to.

Instead of making the economy better by giving everyone an opportunity and career, they're just investing on the wrong thing by giving money stamps or direct cash to people. We're no longer in the covid era and that's why there is no need for this. A country that provides almost everything is good and even money but there's always the equal impact for it.

[Yatsan]

I hope biden and trump both will do that.
Not only in USA but UK europe need to do same thing.
And If people stay more home and invest money in crypto.
I know it's not well and sustained economic way but i don't care becouse world is all ready messed up too late to fix anything.
Those who working and got jobs let them just keep up everything so we have food necessary services so most people we can just focus on staying home and trading crypto and invest in crypto.
Also If less people working then less traffic and it save envoirement and nature also.
let's just earn with crypto more people come into crypto space more money coming in but stimulus money need to be somehow.
And If it's problem for USA to print money then they can find few big countries wich large enough to take all the usa inflation burden of money printing ...or let the usa make bundle of the countries who will take usa inflation.
Nothing else matters the system is done all ready and messed up now lets focus on just earning with cryptocurrency but for that people need easy money hardly people invest their hard earned money so goverments need to find the ways to keep people in homes and they trading cryptocurrency.
Then we the Western countries together will choose few other countries in where we will send our dollar inflation so we can print money and do the stimulus.

So in my personal view, your suggestion that the US, and Europe as a whole, should move to encourage investment in their homes as a key monetary policy is interesting but difficult. If im correct that increased investment in cryptocurrency enhances market performance but poses more risk due to volatility and speculation o it can cause financial volatility. More money toward economic growth can foster inflation, shifting this to other countries can lead to global economic imbalances and additionally fuel geopolitical crises. It would turn out to help the environment if there were fewer people traveling around from home, but some other vital jobs and services need to keep running. Such complex measures, across so many countries, will require very strong international cooperation to manage their economic impacts and not lead to unintended consequences. If technology is to better serve individuals and the broader economy, then it needs to be aligned with best practice.

[Hanadawa]

Even if all governments are not the same, I don't think it is advisable for the government to be sharing money instead, the government should come up with schemes to engage people and for them to earn money.

If the government continues to share money with the public, I think it is very inefficient and will make the public mentality lazy to work. Honestly, I do not agree with the program of sharing money with the public. Most people do not really use the money they have earned for their primary needs or use the money to run the economy in a region. The money will be spent on unimportant and useless needs. I agree more if the government stimulates the entrepreneurial sector such as making it easier to borrow money from banks for small or medium entrepreneurs. Or provide subsidies for vital sectors such as logistics and education. These programs will have a significant impact in the long term, but unfortunately some people only want to receive money from the government even though it only has an impact in the short term.

[Oluwa-btc]

And If people stay more home and invest money in crypto.
I know it's not well and sustained economic way but i don't care becouse world is all ready messed up too late to fix anything.
Those who working and got jobs let them just keep up everything so we have food necessary services so most people we can just focus on staying home and trading crypto and invest in crypto.
Also If less people working then less traffic and it save envoirement and nature also.
let's just earn with crypto more people come into crypto space more money coming in but stimulus money need to be somehow.
And If it's problem for USA to print money then they can find few big countries wich large enough to take all the usa inflation burden of money printing ...or let the usa make bundle of the countries who will take usa inflation.
Nothing else matters the system is done all ready and messed up now lets focus on just earning with cryptocurrency but for that people need easy money hardly people invest their hard earned money so goverments need to find the ways to keep people in homes and they trading cryptocurrency.
Then we the Western countries together will choose few other countries in where we will send our dollar inflation so we can print money and do the stimulus.

Ons thing you should know is that it's not all countries that supports the use of cryptocurrency,cause the see it as it being competitive with their markets currency,so if you're saying one should stay home and let the government give them money to invest in crypto it's rather a funny comedy to me.

And even if the government want to give out such money to people they don't do it to the lazy ones,provided you have a good skills that they can support you with that will generate more money, that's where they'll want to invest their money on and yes giving out money to people in the other hand will help to minimize the rate of poverty in the society cause the are leasing helping hands to those that can't afford it.

[KeenanEl19]

the government will not give money to the people for free, sometimes they help in social assistance schemes, but there are other intentions behind it. I don't know if this only happens in my country or the same as other countries, in my country sometimes the government makes sweet promises at the beginning but when it is at the top it becomes selfish by only thinking about itself, and during my life I have never seen any news about the government giving money like that, but all the assistance given by the government was revealed with other intentions behind everything it did, so I myself do not believe that the government in my country will give money to the people without any other intentions.
I just hope the government can carry out its duties properly and honestly by providing job opportunities that can reduce the number of unemployed people.

I apologize, my quote is like democracy 

[kryptqnick]

Is the idea to get relief payments from the government and invest those payments in Bitcoin? Some Americans did that with Covid stimulus checks. It's not unheard of, but I wouldn't say it replaces a job with regular income.
Op mentioned fewer people working resulting in less traffic, but people can work remotely more, resulting in less traffic but also in earning money.
The state should support people in particularly vulnerable positions, in my opinion. But even that support should be designed to help a person get out of their situation rather than become fully reliant on social benefits.