If Donald J. Trump wins, Bitcoin will be better than fine.

[Marvell1]

...

...

I also wish what you said was true, do you have any proof that Harris said she supports crypto? As far as I know, not long ago, some members of the Democratic Party took the initiative to form a group called Crypto4Harris with the aim of attracting cryptocurrency users to support her. But did you know that she refused to join that campaign and has so far ignored the group's efforts to help her connect with the crypto community? It seems that not only does she not care about cryptocurrencies, but she also has some disdain and contempt for crypto investors and the crypto industry. As for Gary, everyone has seen what he has done with crypto and I think you don't need to say anything more about him and don't need to prove anything more.

Yes, bitcoin is fine under Biden and is fine even if Harris wins but it would be better if Trump wins. Between fine and better, I wouldn't choose fine like you.

[LDL]

Bitcoin has become a national issue in the US presidential election, with Donald Trump and Kamala Harris currently focusing heavily on Bitcoin. One of the main reasons why presidential candidates are focusing on Bitcoin is that the United States is the leading Bitcoin holder country. Bitcoin holders have influence in the election, which is why the two candidates are putting so much emphasis on Bitcoin ahead of the election. But whichever candidate wins the election will certainly focus on Bitcoin, and both candidates will focus on Bitcoin's universal acceptance as a secure currency in the future.

[Luzin]

~snip~. But whichever candidate wins the election will certainly focus on Bitcoin, and both candidates will focus on Bitcoin's universal acceptance as a secure currency in the future.

So far both have been very open to Bitcoin, even Kemala who initially disagreed began to change. Don't you see these results? If we respond to this, so far we are happy that the future leaders are supporting Bitcoin. But I also have to be vigilant, because I am also afraid that they will immediately change their minds when they have received support votes. I'm worried that they are creating a program that supports crypto specifically and not in general. Hopefully it's just my bad thoughts and it won't happen.

[goldkingcoiner]

The fact you people keep trusting in the promises of politicians, year after year, is really funny to me. 

This time will be different^TM

[bitterguy28]

trump for president  

Standard Chartered exec predicts Bitcoin will reach $200K regardless of US election outcome.” News link.
image source

actually this was predicted by others to happen next year at least , even without this US election .

[Nothingtodo]

Donald Trump's pre-election promises about Bitcoin make it look like Bitcoin will jump over $100k if Donald Trump wins the election. Many election candidates make such promises before the election but after winning the election they do not pay any attention to those promises. Yes, if Donald Trump wins the election, we will definitely consider it as an advance opportunity for Bitcoin.

[Hispo]

I agree Bitcoin will survive and continue to thrive as a Blockchain regardless who ends up winning the presidency of the United States this year. Though, (and this may be a completely personal thing) but under the rule of Kamala Harris it is more likely Bitcoin farms will try to find more reliable and economically good method to transition their farming facilities from gas and oil to go fully on solar and wing energy.
Actually, if I recall correctly, in the state of New York it is illegal to mine cryptocurrency unless it is being done using renewable energies. That is the future I would like to see for Bitcoin in the United States and in other countries around the planet, Bitcoin running off the gas and petroleum grid.
In the case Trump wins, that process of transition will get delayed at least four years more.

In terms of adoption and price, I must concede and say Trump is more friendly towards the adoption to Bitcoin (at least within traditional markets offering products which have something to do with Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies), I am still on the boat which claims Trump is only appealing to the Bitcoin community because he desperately needs votes, not because he believes on the principles and ideas which made Bitcoin possible im the first place. 

[YUriy1991]

Donald Trump's pre-election promises about Bitcoin make it look like Bitcoin will jump over $100k if Donald Trump wins the election. Many election candidates make such promises before the election but after winning the election they do not pay any attention to those promises. Yes, if Donald Trump wins the election, we will definitely consider it as an advance opportunity for Bitcoin.

During the campaign, all candidates have different visions and missions whether they are elected or not, but if one of them wins who is pro to the Crypto market, more or less must also realize it, but, my focus is not there, but whoever wins later, the process will remain the same where there will always be FOMC Meetings throughout the year regarding the development of Economic Projections and policies in the future and the public is also waiting for every release.

[Cryptmuster]

Bitcoin has become a national issue in the US presidential election, with Donald Trump and Kamala Harris currently focusing heavily on Bitcoin. One of the main reasons why presidential candidates are focusing on Bitcoin is that the United States is the leading Bitcoin holder country. Bitcoin holders have influence in the election, which is why the two candidates are putting so much emphasis on Bitcoin ahead of the election. But whichever candidate wins the election will certainly focus on Bitcoin, and both candidates will focus on Bitcoin's universal acceptance as a secure currency in the future.

If you are talking about the time devoted to Bitcoin in their election campaigns, Trump devotes more time, but it is not that much and he does it only occasionally so as not to lose the favor of voters. I am almost sure that after the election they will have many other things to worry about besides Bitcoin, and they will not influence it in any way or worry about its adoption. All you need to know about politicians is that they will always care about achieving their goals by any means necessary. And as for Bitcoin, I think that no matter who wins the election, we will still see a bullrun, the most important thing is that none of the candidates want to ban the use of Bitcoin.

[Minor Miner]

Bitcoin has become a national issue in the US presidential election, with Donald Trump and Kamala Harris currently focusing heavily on Bitcoin. One of the main reasons why presidential candidates are focusing on Bitcoin is that the United States is the leading Bitcoin holder country. Bitcoin holders have influence in the election, which is why the two candidates are putting so much emphasis on Bitcoin ahead of the election. But whichever candidate wins the election will certainly focus on Bitcoin, and both candidates will focus on Bitcoin's universal acceptance as a secure currency in the future.

If you are talking about the time devoted to Bitcoin in their election campaigns, Trump devotes more time, but it is not that much and he does it only occasionally so as not to lose the favor of voters. I am almost sure that after the election they will have many other things to worry about besides Bitcoin, and they will not influence it in any way or worry about its adoption. All you need to know about politicians is that they will always care about achieving their goals by any means necessary. And as for Bitcoin, I think that no matter who wins the election, we will still see a bullrun, the most important thing is that none of the candidates want to ban the use of Bitcoin.

We have made great strides as bitcoin has become one of the topics in this year's election but it is not the main factor that decides this election. We are not there yet, there are still more important issues that need to take priority than bitcoin and cryptocurrencies.

Yes, no matter who becomes president, Bitcoin will continue to grow. This has been proven in the past, bitcoin grew under Obama and then Trump, and most recently, it also grew under Biden despite their unfriendly policies. We can be sure that banning bitcoin is impossible these days but having a pro-bitcoin president is still much better than an unfriendly one.

Trump would be the first US president to publicly support cryptocurrencies if he is elected and that could be seen as the strongest catalyst for this year’s bull run. As a bitcoin investor, why would we turn down the chance to witness the biggest bull run when it is the dream of all of us? Only by voting for him can we see that and vice versa.


source: x

[armanda90]

If you are talking about the time devoted to Bitcoin in their election campaigns, Trump devotes more time, but it is not that much and he does it only occasionally so as not to lose the favor of voters. I am almost sure that after the election they will have many other things to worry about besides Bitcoin, and they will not influence it in any way or worry about its adoption. All you need to know about politicians is that they will always care about achieving their goals by any means necessary. And as for Bitcoin, I think that no matter who wins the election, we will still see a bullrun, the most important thing is that none of the candidates want to ban the use of Bitcoin.

Become the politician habit not really care about what they are promising exactly for Donald Trump since first time show him as US president candidate make huge promising about legalizing bitcoin as payment transaction on United State.
One month left before election campaign but still not bring significant positive impact for bitcoin keep growing up although many people expected with Trump promising and possibility become United State president will bitcoin have huge impact?

Considering some media reported, the other president candidate Kamala Harris have announced support with bitcoin, its only his trick get many vote from US citizen or he really adopt bitcoin later when becoming president. I don't know what the opinion about US Citizen from their president candidate about bitcoin which one have positive impact later when becoming president between Donald Trump and Kamala Harris.

[Argoo]

...

...

I also wish what you said was true, do you have any proof that Harris said she supports crypto? As far as I know, not long ago, some members of the Democratic Party took the initiative to form a group called Crypto4Harris with the aim of attracting cryptocurrency users to support her. But did you know that she refused to join that campaign and has so far ignored the group's efforts to help her connect with the crypto community? It seems that not only does she not care about cryptocurrencies, but she also has some disdain and contempt for crypto investors and the crypto industry. As for Gary, everyone has seen what he has done with crypto and I think you don't need to say anything more about him and don't need to prove anything more.

Yes, bitcoin is fine under Biden and is fine even if Harris wins but it would be better if Trump wins. Between fine and better, I wouldn't choose fine like you.

Vice President and Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris may not have a very positive attitude towards Bitcoin. According to Bitcoin Magazine CEO David Bailey, Harris has privately called Bitcoin “money for criminals.” However, Harris has not made any notable public statements about cryptocurrency or Bitcoin during her political career. The lack of comments makes it difficult to determine her exact views on the matter. However, many emphasize her openness to new technologies and hope for cooperation with the sector. According to experts, a change in the Democratic candidate could give the party a chance to establish a dialogue with crypto enthusiasts.

 Meanwhile, Trump is actively engaging with the crypto community and positioning himself as a crypto candidate. He will attend the Bitcoin Conference in Nashville along with other famous personalities such as Cathie Wood, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., and Michael Saylor. However, I am not sure that Trump will fulfill his campaign promises once he becomes US President.

[Abiky]

Vice President and Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris may not have a very positive attitude towards Bitcoin. According to Bitcoin Magazine CEO David Bailey, Harris has privately called Bitcoin “money for criminals.” However, Harris has not made any notable public statements about cryptocurrency or Bitcoin during her political career. The lack of comments makes it difficult to determine her exact views on the matter. However, many emphasize her openness to new technologies and hope for cooperation with the sector. According to experts, a change in the Democratic candidate could give the party a chance to establish a dialogue with crypto enthusiasts.

 Meanwhile, Trump is actively engaging with the crypto community and positioning himself as a crypto candidate. He will attend the Bitcoin Conference in Nashville along with other famous personalities such as Cathie Wood, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., and Michael Saylor. However, I am not sure that Trump will fulfill his campaign promises once he becomes US President.

This was expected. Especially when Kamala is part of the current "anti-crypto" administration. She, alongside Elizabeth Warren and a few other Democrats are against Bitcoin and all things crypto. To start accepting crypto donations indirectly, is a "last minute" move to try to attract crypto voters. But I'd say crypto supporters are NOT stupid. They will vote for the presidential candidate who's been showing the most support towards the industry. We all know who that person is. Trump even went as far as using BTC to pay for burgers at a NYC bar (look it up online). Not to mention the NFT collections he sold out so far, and the physical Bitcoin-themed sneakers.

If Trump wins, I'm certain Bitcoin will skyrocket like never before. A Kamala win will just slow things down. BTC will eventually go up in price as history has shown us. But a pro-crypto president will surely speed things up. That's what every Bitcoiner wants, right?

[mindrust]

Vice President and Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris may not have a very positive attitude towards Bitcoin. According to Bitcoin Magazine CEO David Bailey, Harris has privately called Bitcoin “money for criminals.” However, Harris has not made any notable public statements about cryptocurrency or Bitcoin during her political career. The lack of comments makes it difficult to determine her exact views on the matter. However, many emphasize her openness to new technologies and hope for cooperation with the sector. According to experts, a change in the Democratic candidate could give the party a chance to establish a dialogue with crypto enthusiasts.

 Meanwhile, Trump is actively engaging with the crypto community and positioning himself as a crypto candidate. He will attend the Bitcoin Conference in Nashville along with other famous personalities such as Cathie Wood, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., and Michael Saylor. However, I am not sure that Trump will fulfill his campaign promises once he becomes US President.

This was expected. Especially when Kamala is part of the current "anti-crypto" administration. She, alongside Elizabeth Warren and a few other Democrats are against Bitcoin and all things crypto. To start accepting crypto donations indirectly, is a "last minute" move to try to attract crypto voters. But I'd say crypto supporters are NOT stupid. They will vote for the presidential candidate who's been showing the most support towards the industry. We all know who that person is. Trump even went as far as using BTC to pay for burgers at a NYC bar (look it up online). Not to mention the NFT collections he sold out so far, and the physical Bitcoin-themed sneakers.

If Trump wins, I'm certain Bitcoin will skyrocket like never before. A Kamala win will just slow things down. BTC will eventually go up in price as history has shown us. But a pro-crypto president will surely speed things up. That's what every Bitcoiner wants, right?

I agree in general but some crypto people are not really as smart as you think. Or maybe they are not really crypto supporters at all because I can't find any other explanation that makes sense. One should be incredible stupid to support Camala when her alternative is Donald, a huge crypto supporter. Elon, Vance, Trump, Gemini brothers... This is the dream team of crypto. Why would anyone even support Cabala in this picture?

Or maybe mainstream media brainwashed these people successfully so they can't think properly anymore.