Tim Pool Sues Kamala Harris Over Alleged Plan to Execute Trump Opponents

[caroasi]

The Kamala Harris campaign is said to have falsely claimed "Mr Pool is promoting a 'plan to give Trump total, unchecked legal power so they can jail and execute those who don't support Trump if he wins".

https://www.newsweek.com/tim-pool-kamala-harris-defamation-lawsuit-west-virginia-project-2025-1955775

That said, is seems Tim Pool actually isn't much of a Trump supporter to begin with despite having arguably moved from the political center to the center-right over support for free speech and gun rights. Rather, he has been critical of both Trump and Harris. Under a dramatically improved definition of center as "Left-wing is for social freedoms but also for economic restraints, while right-wing is for economic freedoms but for social restraints", Tim Pool is most certainly a centrist as being for both social and economic freedoms, with a preference for only small amounts of social and economic restraint of various kinds.

Tim Pool is seeking damages for higher security measures needed to fight off the people who often put death threats against him as a result of comments like those by the Harris campaign. Despite being mostly a centrist, the death threats are by almost entirely leftist individuals.

[eristica.com]

What I like about democracy is that you can demand millions of dollars for anything that could offend you or damage your reputation.

It's funny that Tip will get this money. It's also funny that because of this very democracy I had to emigrate from Russia to Georgia.

[TwitchySeal]

The Kamala Harris campaign is said to have falsely claimed "Mr Pool is promoting a 'plan to give Trump total, unchecked legal power so they can jail and execute those who don't support Trump if he wins".

https://www.newsweek.com/tim-pool-kamala-harris-defamation-lawsuit-west-virginia-project-2025-1955775

That said, is seems Tim Pool actually isn't much of a Trump supporter to begin with despite having arguably moved from the political center to the center-right over support for free speech and gun rights. Rather, he has been critical of both Trump and Harris. Under a dramatically improved definition of center as "Left-wing is for social freedoms but also for economic restraints, while right-wing is for economic freedoms but for social restraints", Tim Pool is most certainly a centrist as being for both social and economic freedoms, with a preference for only small amounts of social and economic restraint of various kinds.

Tim Pool is seeking damages for higher security measures needed to fight off the people who often put death threats against him as a result of comments like those by the Harris campaign. Despite being mostly a centrist, the death threats are by almost entirely leftist individuals.

He may have have been centrist years ago when he was working for Vice, but he's about as right wing as it gets these days.  Anti-trans, anti-immigration, pushes the right wing victim complex, he was one of the top 20 spreaders of baseless conspiracy theories on the 2020 election on social media, oh and he was literally being paid $100k per episode by Russia to help Trump get elected up until like 2 weeks ago.  

That's not "arguably center-right", that's right-wing MAGAtard.  

[suchmoon]

That said, is seems Tim Pool actually isn't much of a Trump supporter to begin with despite having arguably moved from the political center to the center-right over support for free speech and gun rights. Rather, he has been critical of both Trump and Harris. Under a dramatically improved definition of center as "Left-wing is for social freedoms but also for economic restraints, while right-wing is for economic freedoms but for social restraints", Tim Pool is most certainly a centrist as being for both social and economic freedoms, with a preference for only small amounts of social and economic restraint of various kinds.

Tim "screaming Putinist" Pool is not a centrist. Also right-wing politics in the US against quite a few "economic freedoms", from labor unions to free trade. It's more about economic nationalism than freedom.

So nice try to redefine the political spectrum to fit one Russian plant but you may want to revise your approach.

But if he wants to waste his rubles on a frivolous lawsuit - that's his constitutional right.

[caroasi]

That said, is seems Tim Pool actually isn't much of a Trump supporter to begin with despite having arguably moved from the political center to the center-right over support for free speech and gun rights. Rather, he has been critical of both Trump and Harris. Under a dramatically improved definition of center as "Left-wing is for social freedoms but also for economic restraints, while right-wing is for economic freedoms but for social restraints", Tim Pool is most certainly a centrist as being for both social and economic freedoms, with a preference for only small amounts of social and economic restraint of various kinds.

Tim "screaming Putinist" Pool is not a centrist. Also right-wing politics in the US against quite a few "economic freedoms", from labor unions to free trade. It's more about economic nationalism than freedom.

So nice try to redefine the political spectrum to fit one Russian plant but you may want to revise your approach.

But if he wants to waste his rubles on a frivolous lawsuit - that's his constitutional right.

Is being anti-war the same thing as being Putinist? Please name all Tim Pool's specific policies that make him pro-Putin? And yes, the right-left wing spectrum is a hot mess that needs refinement, with completely contradictory positions on both sides. For example, the current "left wing" is pro-censorship. Sorry no, that is wrong. And I do expect you to acknowledge that for consistency and meaningfulness as usefulness of words.

ALL left wingers ALL agree in heavy economic restraint, so that makes sense.

ALL right wingers ALL agree in some cultural restraints whether it be religious, traditionalist, or law-and-order type restraints.

I'd think when there is an improved definition you'd embrace it instead of attacking it... its like you want to attack everything I say even when it is good.

[caroasi]

The Kamala Harris campaign is said to have falsely claimed "Mr Pool is promoting a 'plan to give Trump total, unchecked legal power so they can jail and execute those who don't support Trump if he wins".

https://www.newsweek.com/tim-pool-kamala-harris-defamation-lawsuit-west-virginia-project-2025-1955775

That said, is seems Tim Pool actually isn't much of a Trump supporter to begin with despite having arguably moved from the political center to the center-right over support for free speech and gun rights. Rather, he has been critical of both Trump and Harris. Under a dramatically improved definition of center as "Left-wing is for social freedoms but also for economic restraints, while right-wing is for economic freedoms but for social restraints", Tim Pool is most certainly a centrist as being for both social and economic freedoms, with a preference for only small amounts of social and economic restraint of various kinds.

Tim Pool is seeking damages for higher security measures needed to fight off the people who often put death threats against him as a result of comments like those by the Harris campaign. Despite being mostly a centrist, the death threats are by almost entirely leftist individuals.

He may have have been centrist years ago when he was working for Vice, but he's about as right wing as it gets these days.  Anti-trans, anti-immigration, pushes the right wing victim complex, he was one of the top 20 spreaders of baseless conspiracy theories on the 2020 election on social media, oh and he was literally being paid $100k per episode by Russia to help Trump get elected up until like 2 weeks ago.  

That's not "arguably center-right", that's right-wing MAGAtard.  

Like the neighboring comment you're left-right compass seems a bit skewed. Why is being neutral on someone being trans "anti-trans"? Tim Pool invites trans people as guests on his show, so I disagree that would be considered anti-trans. As for being anti-immigration, that would be a new position for him to have for sure, what quote is that based on?

Trump himself unlike Obama has always been in favor of gay marriage, therefore is stronger on gay rights than Obama. Secondly, Trump signed gun control legislation as president, so he accepts gun control. Thirdly, Trump apparently hosted a gay wedding at one of his premises, which only a centrist or left-leaning person would do. Fourthly, Trump is a centrist on the freedom of expression, having substantial support in some cases but not in others. One thing both Trump and Tim Pool have in common is they both support abortion at the state level... a moderate position. It seems both Tim Pool and Trump are mostly moderate centrists in many ways.

I don't think a gay-marriage supporting trans-wedding attending gun-law supporting non-free-speech absolutist moderate could ever be considered right wing. So, that would generally cover both Tim Pool and Trump. Perhaps you want to think of them as right-wing because you psychologically have a need to comply with the mainstream news requirement for Trump and Tim Pool to be bad guys in your life to be your mortal enemies? Are Kamala voters KamalaTARDS or does this only apply to your arch enemy? Or perhaps the definition of right-wing now includes people who find most free speech concepts acceptable, gay marriage acceptable, gun control just fine, and trans people acceptable, and abortion also acceptable?

[suchmoon]

Is being anti-war the same thing as being Putinist?

Is asking loaded questions the only fallacy y'all kremlinbots have?

Tim Pool is not "anti-war", he's very much pro-Putin's-war-in-Ukraine, and being paid by Kremlin to do so.

I'd think when there is an improved definition you'd embrace it instead of attacking it... its like you want to attack everything I say even when it is good.

You can't really expect to come here shilling one of the dumbest extremist youtubers and get "embraced" by everyone. Not how it works. Get yourself out of the conspiratardery cesspool if you're interested in some sort of discussion on substance but that's not really your goal, is it.

[BADecker]

Whatever anybody has to say against Tim Pool, he is constantly bringing new info and ideas into the open. If he is doing it for profit from somewhere... why not? We all are working for profit. Tim Pool makes a lot of sense... like Alex Jones and Tucker Carlson and a whole lot of others who are conservative.

[TwitchySeal]

The Kamala Harris campaign is said to have falsely claimed "Mr Pool is promoting a 'plan to give Trump total, unchecked legal power so they can jail and execute those who don't support Trump if he wins".

https://www.newsweek.com/tim-pool-kamala-harris-defamation-lawsuit-west-virginia-project-2025-1955775

That said, is seems Tim Pool actually isn't much of a Trump supporter to begin with despite having arguably moved from the political center to the center-right over support for free speech and gun rights. Rather, he has been critical of both Trump and Harris. Under a dramatically improved definition of center as "Left-wing is for social freedoms but also for economic restraints, while right-wing is for economic freedoms but for social restraints", Tim Pool is most certainly a centrist as being for both social and economic freedoms, with a preference for only small amounts of social and economic restraint of various kinds.

Tim Pool is seeking damages for higher security measures needed to fight off the people who often put death threats against him as a result of comments like those by the Harris campaign. Despite being mostly a centrist, the death threats are by almost entirely leftist individuals.

He may have have been centrist years ago when he was working for Vice, but he's about as right wing as it gets these days.  Anti-trans, anti-immigration, pushes the right wing victim complex, he was one of the top 20 spreaders of baseless conspiracy theories on the 2020 election on social media, oh and he was literally being paid $100k per episode by Russia to help Trump get elected up until like 2 weeks ago.  

That's not "arguably center-right", that's right-wing MAGAtard.  

Like the neighboring comment you're left-right compass seems a bit skewed. Why is being neutral on someone being trans "anti-trans"? Tim Pool invites trans people as guests on his show, so I disagree that would be considered anti-trans.

If a guy with a long history of calling calling people pedophiles and groomers because they are gay or trans or are against removing books from schools because of lgbtq content is "neutral" than my left-right compass is definitely skewed.  

I bet if I said Tim Pool wasn't against Nazi's, White Supremacy, or the conspiracy theories about school shootings being fake because he invites people like Alex Jones, Milo, and Nick Fuentes on his show you would have responded that just because he invited them on the show doesn't mean he supports their causes....he just likes free speech.

As for being anti-immigration, that would be a new position for him to have for sure, what quote is that based on?

How about the conspiracy theory that so many illegal immigrants are voting that it's swaying the outcome of elections despite after all the scrutiny of the 2020 elections turning up 30 cases of non citizens casting votes.  

Trump himself unlike Obama has always been in favor of gay marriage, therefore is stronger on gay rights than Obama. Secondly, Trump signed gun control legislation as president, so he accepts gun control. Thirdly, Trump apparently hosted a gay wedding at one of his premises, which only a centrist or left-leaning person would do. Fourthly, Trump is a centrist on the freedom of expression, having substantial support in some cases but not in others. One thing both Trump and Tim Pool have in common is they both support abortion at the state level... a moderate position. It seems both Tim Pool and Trump are mostly moderate centrists in many ways.

What Trump and Pool have in common is their stance will reflect whatever they think will benefit them the most financially or politically.

Trump supports abortion when he's talking to swing voters one day, the next day he's bragging about abolishing roe to evangelicals, and then he will go on national TV and claim that democrats want to abort babies after they are born.

He will sign an executive order on bump stocks after a guy with a bump stock gets off 1000 rounds in 10 minutes, hitting 400 people and killing 60 (which was overturned thanks to the judges he nominated), and then a few years later he will tell the crowd at an NRA event “During my four years nothing happened. And there was great pressure on me having to do with guns. We did nothing. We didn’t yield”   "I am the best friend gun owners have ever had in the White House, your Second Amendment will always be safe with me as your president”

[BADecker]

~

What Trump and Pool have in common is their stance will reflect whatever they think will benefit them the most financially or politically.

Trump supports abortion when he's talking to swing voters one day, the next day he's bragging about abolishing roe to evangelicals, and then he will go on national TV and claim that democrats want to abort babies after they are born.

He will sign an executive order on bump stocks after a guy with a bump stock gets off 1000 rounds in 10 minutes, hitting 400 people and killing 60 (which was overturned thanks to the judges he nominated), and then a few years later he will tell the crowd at an NRA event “During my four years nothing happened. And there was great pressure on me having to do with guns. We did nothing. We didn’t yield”   "I am the best friend gun owners have ever had in the White House, your Second Amendment will always be safe with me as your president”

Trump is good to focus on the 2nd Amendment for owning guns. He is benefiting us all by doing so. After all, a gun and ammo are private property of the owner. It falls under the 4th Amendment. But if the Dems and other anti-gun people are tricked into focusing on the 2nd Amendment, they will never focus private property and the 4th Amendment.

Thank you President Trump.

Btw, you have not a clue what Trump will do once he is in office. Executive Orders aren't for average people. They are for government operations.

[caroasi]

The Kamala Harris campaign is said to have falsely claimed "Mr Pool is promoting a 'plan to give Trump total, unchecked legal power so they can jail and execute those who don't support Trump if he wins".

https://www.newsweek.com/tim-pool-kamala-harris-defamation-lawsuit-west-virginia-project-2025-1955775

That said, is seems Tim Pool actually isn't much of a Trump supporter to begin with despite having arguably moved from the political center to the center-right over support for free speech and gun rights. Rather, he has been critical of both Trump and Harris. Under a dramatically improved definition of center as "Left-wing is for social freedoms but also for economic restraints, while right-wing is for economic freedoms but for social restraints", Tim Pool is most certainly a centrist as being for both social and economic freedoms, with a preference for only small amounts of social and economic restraint of various kinds.

Tim Pool is seeking damages for higher security measures needed to fight off the people who often put death threats against him as a result of comments like those by the Harris campaign. Despite being mostly a centrist, the death threats are by almost entirely leftist individuals.

He may have have been centrist years ago when he was working for Vice, but he's about as right wing as it gets these days.  Anti-trans, anti-immigration, pushes the right wing victim complex, he was one of the top 20 spreaders of baseless conspiracy theories on the 2020 election on social media, oh and he was literally being paid $100k per episode by Russia to help Trump get elected up until like 2 weeks ago.  

That's not "arguably center-right", that's right-wing MAGAtard.  

Like the neighboring comment you're left-right compass seems a bit skewed. Why is being neutral on someone being trans "anti-trans"? Tim Pool invites trans people as guests on his show, so I disagree that would be considered anti-trans.

If a guy with a long history of calling calling people pedophiles and groomers because they are gay or trans or are against removing books from schools because of lgbtq content is "neutral" than my left-right compass is definitely skewed.  

I bet if I said Tim Pool wasn't against Nazi's, White Supremacy, or the conspiracy theories about school shootings being fake because he invites people like Alex Jones, Milo, and Nick Fuentes on his show you would have responded that just because he invited them on the show doesn't mean he supports their causes....he just likes free speech.

As for being anti-immigration, that would be a new position for him to have for sure, what quote is that based on?

How about the conspiracy theory that so many illegal immigrants are voting that it's swaying the outcome of elections despite after all the scrutiny of the 2020 elections turning up 30 cases of non citizens casting votes.  

Trump himself unlike Obama has always been in favor of gay marriage, therefore is stronger on gay rights than Obama. Secondly, Trump signed gun control legislation as president, so he accepts gun control. Thirdly, Trump apparently hosted a gay wedding at one of his premises, which only a centrist or left-leaning person would do. Fourthly, Trump is a centrist on the freedom of expression, having substantial support in some cases but not in others. One thing both Trump and Tim Pool have in common is they both support abortion at the state level... a moderate position. It seems both Tim Pool and Trump are mostly moderate centrists in many ways.

What Trump and Pool have in common is their stance will reflect whatever they think will benefit them the most financially or politically.

Trump supports abortion when he's talking to swing voters one day, the next day he's bragging about abolishing roe to evangelicals, and then he will go on national TV and claim that democrats want to abort babies after they are born.

He will sign an executive order on bump stocks after a guy with a bump stock gets off 1000 rounds in 10 minutes, hitting 400 people and killing 60 (which was overturned thanks to the judges he nominated), and then a few years later he will tell the crowd at an NRA event “During my four years nothing happened. And there was great pressure on me having to do with guns. We did nothing. We didn’t yield”   "I am the best friend gun owners have ever had in the White House, your Second Amendment will always be safe with me as your president”

Support for abortion is consistent with ending Roe v. Wade. when one takes the position that all controversial moral issues should be resolved at the local level, which is a highly rational and reasonable position to have. As for banning guns, everything that the laws of physics allow us to make is a basic human right for us to create and own. If there is is any political science study that showing a benefit to banning physical items leading to a higher level of safety, I have not seen it, but would find that interesting. It seems that humans start with the position they don't have to have any evidence of a better position in order to take away other people's things without their permission.

[TwitchySeal]

Support for abortion is consistent with ending Roe v. Wade.

Oh, so someone that thinks a woman should have the right to choose whether or not she wants to grow another person inside of her also thinks the government should be able to make it illegal for her to choose not to.  Got it, thanks for explaining. Guess tim pool isn't right wing after all.

[caroasi]

Is being anti-war the same thing as being Putinist?

Is asking loaded questions the only fallacy y'all kremlinbots have?

Tim Pool is not "anti-war", he's very much pro-Putin's-war-in-Ukraine, and being paid by Kremlin to do so.

I'd think when there is an improved definition you'd embrace it instead of attacking it... its like you want to attack everything I say even when it is good.

You can't really expect to come here shilling one of the dumbest extremist youtubers and get "embraced" by everyone. Not how it works. Get yourself out of the conspiratardery cesspool if you're interested in some sort of discussion on substance but that's not really your goal, is it.

Your post is intellectually dishonest, and I strongly suggest you re-think your life in full on the concept of embracing truth. The worst part is clearly that you interpret a desire to have a civil dialog as "wanting to be embraced". You seem to specifically reject definitions that improve language because you want to disagree with everything I say while avoiding any points of agreement, and that is intellectually dishonest.

You seem to put anti-war commentators like Tim Pool who have strong leftist tendencies on a side of the political compass they don't exist on, authoritarianism, just because they are and always have been anti-war. Given Tim Pool has been against just about every single war, your comment he is for Putin invading Ukraine seems dishonest. Many people could be more akin to a pacifist than a dictator, who clearly don't support any war effort, and to you this makes them authoritarians, the exact extreme polar opposite of a dictator.  Do you also falsely categorize Jimmy Dore as an authoritarian dictator Putin puppet because he is an anti-war leftist, or is your categorization reserved for people who the mainstream news has targeted?

Your conversational focus is people and their motives, but on the internet there are just topics and their associated facts leading to or away from the truth.

[caroasi]

Support for abortion is consistent with ending Roe v. Wade.

Oh, so someone that thinks a woman should have the right to choose whether or not she wants to grow another person inside of her also thinks the government should be able to make it illegal for her to choose not to.  Got it, thanks for explaining. Guess tim pool isn't right wing after all.

If abortion and gay marriage were decided at the global level they would both be illegal. Is that your preference for legal systems? Are you cherry-picking nationalism on this issue?

[BADecker]

Support for abortion is consistent with ending Roe v. Wade.

Oh, so someone that thinks a woman should have the right to choose whether or not she wants to grow another person inside of her also thinks the government should be able to make it illegal for her to choose not to.  Got it, thanks for explaining. Guess tim pool isn't right wing after all.

If abortion and gay marriage were decided at the global level they would both be illegal. Is that your preference for legal systems? Are you cherry-picking nationalism on this issue?

TwitchySeal is simply a propagandist for the Deep State. He constantly agrees with this, even though he formally says otherwise. You can see it in the fact that he almost always presents half-truths that emphasize Deep State ideals, but ignores the reality of what is going on.

You can ignore anything he says, because like his name, his signature (seal) is almost always very 'twitchy'.

[TwitchySeal]

Support for abortion is consistent with ending Roe v. Wade.

Oh, so someone that thinks a woman should have the right to choose whether or not she wants to grow another person inside of her also thinks the government should be able to make it illegal for her to choose not to.  Got it, thanks for explaining. Guess tim pool isn't right wing after all.

If abortion and gay marriage were decided at the global level they would both be illegal. Is that your preference for legal systems? Are you cherry-picking nationalism on this issue?

So, done with Tim Pool then, huh?  Ok, I'll let you derail your own thread.

In my opinion, criticizing an opinion because it's not the most popular opinion is pretty dumb and not very relevant when it comes to determining whether it's a valid opinion or not.... but I'm curious what your source is for your claim about abortion and gay rights because after a few minutes of googling it appears you're wrong on both.  If you just pulled it out of your ass and admitting you were wrong is not something your comfortable with, feel free to tell me to rethink my life or tell me about how stupid polls are or something- but if not, and there's some reasonable data that backs up your claim, I'm genuinely curious if there's something I'm overlooking.  You probably would have been right about the gay marriage views 15 or 20 years ago, maybe the abortion also, but times change, peoples opinions change as humans learn more, science gradually answers more and more questions that people relied on religion for, and we all become less and less ignorant.  There's a reason they call progressives progressives, after all.

 

[BADecker]

^^^ jvanname has shown us in many of his posts, mostly in the 'Off Topic' section, that science nowadays is based on scientist and university consensus rather than science fact. But the FACT is that science fact backs up the Christian religion, and often the Islam and East Asian religions.

If people in general realized and understood that abortion was murder and trust contract breaking, the charts you show would be a whole lot different.

The gay/lesbian charts only show that people tend to allow freedom to other people. But if people understood how damaging the gay/lesbian lifestyle was to the doers of it, they wouldn't do it. And if other people understood how damaging it was to society, they wouldn't allow it.

[caroasi]

Support for abortion is consistent with ending Roe v. Wade.

Oh, so someone that thinks a woman should have the right to choose whether or not she wants to grow another person inside of her also thinks the government should be able to make it illegal for her to choose not to.  Got it, thanks for explaining. Guess tim pool isn't right wing after all.

If abortion and gay marriage were decided at the global level they would both be illegal. Is that your preference for legal systems? Are you cherry-picking nationalism on this issue?

So, done with Tim Pool then, huh?  Ok, I'll let you derail your own thread.

In my opinion, criticizing an opinion because it's not the most popular opinion is pretty dumb and not very relevant when it comes to determining whether it's a valid opinion or not.... but I'm curious what your source is for your claim about abortion and gay rights because after a few minutes of googling it appears you're wrong on both.  If you just pulled it out of your ass and admitting you were wrong is not something your comfortable with, feel free to tell me to rethink my life or tell me about how stupid polls are or something- but if not, and there's some reasonable data that backs up your claim, I'm genuinely curious if there's something I'm overlooking.  You probably would have been right about the gay marriage views 15 or 20 years ago, maybe the abortion also, but times change, peoples opinions change as humans learn more, science gradually answers more and more questions that people relied on religion for, and we all become less and less ignorant.  There's a reason they call progressives progressives, after all.

Your chart shows the iimportance of localism in public policy. Some entire countries are about 90% in favor of making abortion illegal, and somehow you feel justified in going in and forcing your reviled ways against their moral values on them at gun point?

[o48o]

^^^ jvanname has shown us in many of his posts, mostly in the 'Off Topic' section, that science nowadays is based on scientist and university consensus rather than science fact. But the FACT is that science fact backs up the Christian religion, and often the Islam and East Asian religions.
-cut-

Since you are so much to interpreting scripture, i have wondered why you seem to have missed this quote from it:

One of its heads seemed to have a mortal wound, but its mortal wound was healed, and the whole earth marveled as they followed the beast.

Maybe we shouldn't try to combine scientific method with ambiguous texts. And saying scientific facts back up something doesn't even mean anything, without actually showing how.

But if you are showing how, please don't just link to your own site for clicks.

I can give you probably 20 scientific facts backing up the opposite claim just from the top of my head, and hundred more by googling it. So 2 vague videos doesn't cut it.

And what comes to Tim Pool, he will be financially ruined by this. I really hope that this gets lots of media following, so that we get more media focus about Tim Pool being a Russian asset (and just to see him in the court without his hat).

[BADecker]

^^^ jvanname has shown us in many of his posts, mostly in the 'Off Topic' section, that science nowadays is based on scientist and university consensus rather than science fact. But the FACT is that science fact backs up the Christian religion, and often the Islam and East Asian religions.
-cut-

Since you are so much to interpreting scripture, i have wondered why you seem to have missed this quote from it:

One of its heads seemed to have a mortal wound, but its mortal wound was healed, and the whole earth marveled as they followed the beast.

Maybe we shouldn't try to combine scientific method with ambiguous texts. And saying scientific facts back up something doesn't even mean anything, without actually showing how.

But if you are showing how, please don't just link to your own site for clicks.

I can give you probably 20 scientific facts backing up the opposite claim just from the top of my head, and hundred more by googling it. So 2 vague videos doesn't cut it.

And what comes to Tim Pool, he will be financially ruined by this. I really hope that this gets lots of media following, so that we get more media focus about Tim Pool being a Russian asset (and just to see him in the court without his hat).

The death of the beast happened when Hitler essentially killed the Jewish banking system. But, as we all can see if we look, the banking system is back in strength. It is the major thing that is causing wars around the world, just for its own profit.

Scientific consensus will always back up some scientific fact. Most of the scientific fact that scientific consensus backs up is scientific fact that is reasonably obvious to the lay person. Other of it is scientific fact (or scientific consensus) that has been around for a long time and fills the textbooks, like, Newton or Einstein... to say nothing about facts and consensuses from many ages ago.

But we can see that scientific consensus is not always fact in the simple fact that Covid is snake venom poisoning rather than a viral infection of sorts. And a much broader way to show that scientific consensus is not fact is to look at the many scientific theories that were once held as facts by scientists, until they were debunked by other scientific theory consensus. Yet at the time they were held as fact by scientific consensus, they were published and advertised as fact.

If you really want proof that scientific consensus is not based in fact, make a study of the many scientific papers that contradict each other, especially in the medical field. The CDC is gradually removing these papers from public view, and is placing them where people have to buy them to get copies. Of course, when the CDC does this, they eliminate the papers that don't fit the world view they are trying to popularize among the public.