How Do You Compare Dogs To Hampster

[X-ray]

I have never and I will never waste my precious time and n working in any of this airdrops reason is that, I am too experienced to be waste time on something that I know won't result into anything positive or tangible, alot of people put too much hopes on all this Hamster of a thing, and most of them are disappointed with the present outcome of the deal.

Those developers are also looking for free money as airdrops hunters also are looking for money and in most cases, its clear that majority will only benefit the developers more than investors a d airdrops hunters.

It has always been on the benefit of the developer, otherwise they won't put that much effort into making the project in the first place.
same thing with those VC funded project, the dev want to elevate metrics by letting people interact with the project in exchange for reward but really at the end of the day the one who gets millions of dollars are the dev and the VC also getting some good ROI because they bought the allocation at really good deal.

the small fry like us? only get left over this is exactly why I just stick with investing in actually decentralized L1 coin.

[DubemIfedigbo001]

Hamster was very much a dust compared to Dogs, in dogs there was no mining, just tho invite friends and do normal tasks, so as soon as you're done with the tasks, you only have tho with in your referrals tho earn it big.

In hamster, you mine, upgrade cards, watch YouTube videos, do tasks, even download third party games to play and redeem keys, the hype around it was so massive that people were very expectant of it being more promising than NOTCOIN and Dogs, but players were disappointed starting from their disqualification of more than half of their players and giving their players few quantities of the coin for their stress.

Most people couldn't even get up to the amount they spent on data while mining. They're not in any way comparable with Dogs. In fact it's an insult to Dogs project to compare it with Hamster.

[fikrett]

Hamster was very much a dust compared to Dogs, in dogs there was no mining, just tho invite friends and do normal tasks, so as soon as you're done with the tasks, you only have tho with in your referrals tho earn it big.

In hamster, you mine, upgrade cards, watch YouTube videos, do tasks, even download third party games to play and redeem keys, the hype around it was so massive that people were very expectant of it being more promising than NOTCOIN and Dogs, but players were disappointed starting from their disqualification of more than half of their players and giving their players few quantities of the coin for their stress.

Most people couldn't even get up to the amount they spent on data while mining. They're not in any way comparable with Dogs. In fact it's an insult to Dogs project to compare it with Hamster.

They are in the same "mini-apps" niche, so to speak, so I wouldn't say it's an insult, rather, it should be done.
Because we have the good, the bad, and the ugly.
And, of course, the first type of project is scarce on the TON chain

[Taskford]

I have never and I will never waste my precious time and n working in any of this airdrops reason is that, I am too experienced to be waste time on something that I know won't result into anything positive or tangible, alot of people put too much hopes on all this Hamster of a thing, and most of them are disappointed with the present outcome of the deal.

Those developers are also looking for free money as airdrops hunters also are looking for money and in most cases, its clear that majority will only benefit the developers more than investors a d airdrops hunters.

It has always been on the benefit of the developer, otherwise they won't put that much effort into making the project in the first place.
same thing with those VC funded project, the dev want to elevate metrics by letting people interact with the project in exchange for reward but really at the end of the day the one who gets millions of dollars are the dev and the VC also getting some good ROI because they bought the allocation at really good deal.

the small fry like us? only get left over this is exactly why I just stick with investing in actually decentralized L1 coin.

They want people to expect some big from thing but current result with these telegram airdrops came out bad for those people spend a lot of effort on Hamster combat. Lucky I didn't spend much time and I decide not to continue when seeing there's a lot of people participating their task since it somehow expected there's nothing huge to get in their project.

But that's how things go with airdrop scene so for those disappointed people better luck next time. For sure there would be a lot more airdrops will came out which they could test out their luck again. But if they are done and want to try those better coins then I guess this is way more better since they provably could able to see more chance to earn with those potential tokens that they are going to buy.

[Yatsan]

I worked on Dogs for less than 2 months  and I made $70 and so are many of my friends and I worked on Hamster Kombat for more than two months and I got 350 and the pre market price based on what I saw on some article is $0.1 which will translate to $35.

Do you think its worth the effort? Anyway,  its free money I read that they deleted millions of participants from cheating which is why many are complaining.
This picture summarizes my comparison between Dogs and Hamster Kombat, How about you? How do you compare the two.


I got this picture from a post on social media from one disappointed participant.

Both seem to be in the work pipeline for a considerable amount of time. Some of the comparisons you make also open up interesting points regarding your effectiveness in the work. The two months of earning $70 through Dogs while $350 from Hamster Kombat marks a pretty marked difference in such rewards. But the most important thing is the content.

And what with reports of millions of people leaving the market due to fraud came out, especially once the price of Hamster Kombat had dropped and frustrations turned into a critical mass. How long will the project remain viable and fair? - - - even if free money is attractive. But the value of your effort should take the latter factors, such as the stability of the said platform, income that may occur in the future, and sustainability of these projects into consideration.

Furthermore, weigh up effort against performance. Think about how much time you are prepared to devote to one of these projects. Especially so, if there is a question of the number and the loyalty of participants. Your comparison throws into relief the kind of careful attention such activities demand.

[Slow death]

Do you think its worth the effort? Anyway,  its free money

Why do you believe it's a free money? Didn't you perform any task to be given the coins? You definitely did pay;
If not through your data;
You paid through your time;
Or as the task completed;
How about referrals?
There's actually no free money on the air.

Unfortunately, many people on the internet do not understand what free money means. They think that when they participate in an airdrop in which they need to complete tasks in order to get paid, then this is free money. But these people do not think about the following: if they do not complete the tasks, will they be paid? They definitely will not be paid. So how would this be free money? Obviously it is not free money. They are being paid for the work they did.


In my opinion, if a person participates in an Airdrop and then that person gets paid, then that person needs to sit down and do calculations of the time it took to perform the task and the value of the money he received and then he can decide if it was worth it or not. In my case, given the risks of not getting paid or not knowing what the price of the token will be, I prefer not to participate in this.

[Dr.Bitcoin_Strange]

Indeed, they have placed a lot of hope in this airdrop, but the results obtained are not very satisfactory, and seeing the airdrops that continue to appear, I think there is always a chance, but they see the results of the existing airdrop, do they still like other airdrops, we will see the developments for the future.

After the unfair pattern of reward distribution by Catizen airdrop, I made a comment regarding why participants don't have to express joy yet until they see that the token have been listed with a good value, but someone opposed the comment, and when cati listed, it didn't get to the expectations of some people and that's exactly what happened in the hamster airdrop too. It disappointed so many people.

[Odusko]

I don't know how to classify this or is it a case of addictions, because with the rate at which people most especially newbies flood the cryptocurrency airdrop space in recent time is alarming and to point out the obvious, many of them never take the time to build a fundamental foundation about this projects before investing their money and time in them.

I hard that some of this tap to earn games on telegram even requires participants to pay some fees to get more advantage over others and that is obviously very scary because when the whole thing will come out, they find out that they have wasted time and money in promoting nonsense and total time wasting events.

So the can't compare dog coin Airdrop and Hamster airdrop because both are the same and similar in their team operations and management, because bounty is bounty and nothing can change that fact.

[Lida93]

.
This picture summarizes my comparison between Dogs and Hamster Kombat, How about you? How do you compare the two.

Hamster is no where near Dogs in terms of the listing price, there were no series of tasks to perform every now and then in dogs like hamster was, it was just mainly predicated on how old your telegram account is. They made sure everything was done and concluded within the shortest time without much hypes and everyone of  their participants received a decent airdrop amount.

Not sure we had all these complaints about Dogs as we're getting about hamster Kombat after all the tasks games and YouTube videos they had to condition people to engage with as to be eligible but at the end a lot of dust were airdropped.

[uchegod-21]

In my case, given the risks of not getting paid or not knowing what the price of the token will be, I prefer not to participate in this.

We are in the same space mate. If there's actually a promised and must fulfilled listing price for these projects and specific tasks with their rewards rightly stated, I will gladly participate because while expending my time, I'll know what I'm anticipating to get. There's actually alot of things to do with time and not to invest it in things that are not actually sure. That's the rule that Warran Buffet gave.

[khiholangkang]

.
This picture summarizes my comparison between Dogs and Hamster Kombat, How about you? How do you compare the two.

Hamster is no where near Dogs in terms of the listing price, there were no series of tasks to perform every now and then in dogs like hamster was, it was just mainly predicated on how old your telegram account is. They made sure everything was done and concluded within the shortest time without much hypes and everyone of  their participants received a decent airdrop amount.

Not sure we had all these complaints about Dogs as we're getting about hamster Kombat after all the tasks games and YouTube videos they had to condition people to engage with as to be eligible but at the end a lot of dust were airdropped.

The fact is that it is not comparable if you look at the payments given by these two projects to their participants, I am quite diligent in working on this Hamster but only get a small allocation of tokens, and what is much more profitable here is the owners of many referrals.
Meanwhile I work on dogs lazily but get a decent payment and even 10 times what I get from Hamster, so obviously from here it is not balanced, but from the benefits of the project that is the best is Hamster, they have a good social account with many users following them.

[Mate2237]

My comparation is simple. Dogs listed it token with 0.001 and the distribution was fear to all the players of the airdrop while hamster listed it token as the of 0.01 but the distribution process was nonsense so no player could get a reasonable amount from the airdrop. If dogs was listed with 0.01 then players would have making good amount of money.

Though as was said in another thread, we should not put our hopes on airdrop and one thing that is making people to join airdrop is because of the hardship in the countries and people are struggling to survive daily so as they see this airdrop which is paying small amount, people became interested to play along and Cash out to survive.

[fortunecrypto]

I don't know why people really grinded Hamster Kombat when they are basically being fooled and milked for ads.

DOGS didn't do any scumbag move to milk their community, if it wasn't for DOGS, Hamster Kombat and other projects before it wouldn't be pressured to release their Airdrops they would've milked their community until they wouldn't launched.

I just hope this would reduce this type of airdrop in the future.

I think Hampster is not going to be the last since other developers have seen how participants are willing to pay ay whatever amount just to get their allocation Many developers will still surprise their participants with late announcement of paying before they release their allocations.
If this is going to be the trend, many will just stop, or this will become a cash cow for many developers, good concept for developers; its easy money for them.

[lepbagong]

I think hamsters have too many participants and a lot of rules to make, but the results are not comparable to all that is seen from a lot of participants, compared inversely to dogs, doing a job that is not too difficult and not too many rules to be done. So a lot of participants just benefit the developer to make a lot of rules and receive rewards from what is specified and not returned to the participants.
If you compare, in my opinion, as a participant too,, you can be sure dogs are still much better than hamsters.

[Sovannar Sangha]

I think hamsters have too many participants and a lot of rules to make, but the results are not comparable to all that is seen from a lot of participants, compared inversely to dogs, doing a job that is not too difficult and not too many rules to be done. So a lot of participants just benefit the developer to make a lot of rules and receive rewards from what is specified and not returned to the participants.
If you compare, in my opinion, as a participant too,, you can be sure dogs are still much better than hamsters.

For the level of satisfaction and work results dogs are above hamsters and that's real. But what makes many people disappointed is that their work is paid in stages, not all at once. If it were all at once, I think users would be more or less satisfied with the results of their efforts to help increase the popularity of the coin and become contributors to other income from several task options that must be completed by participants.

[Coin_trader]

DOGS has ho hardcore task. It just need to follow some social media task and refer that’s it while hamster requires user to do a lot of playing time just to earn a mere penny. I knew it before that this project is already a flop because they are delaying the release of the token to the public while there’s already a lot of player spending time on the game which means the tokens circulation is already saturated.

Hamster now almost worthless for those who play hard while Dogs airdrop participants gain a lot with just minimal effort.

Dogs>Hamster periodt.

[Tipstar]

The problem with Hamster Kombat is that they were so popular and so many people who have never experienced an airdrop or transacted crypto joined the game and had unrealistic expectations. Content creators too have a part in the play where they promised cars and home to crypto illiterate population in South Asia and Africa.
In airdrop, larger the number of participants, lesser would be the reward. The Dogs and Hamster Kombat comparison is between a less popular airdrop with fewer participants and literally the most popular airdrop with millions of people.

[Z_MBFM]

I do think that it just depends on the project itself and the founders - the hype around the Hamster was for so long it became too bloated with people and farms of accounts, to the point of changing the eligibility criteria and other stuff.
DOGS, on the other hand, just delivered, in the community sense. Everybody was happy even though the money wasn't that big. Some got great boons from following the project for a long and shilling it to friends.
I can't say what's the turning factor of why DOGS delivered while HK - didn't, however, expectations on both of them shouldn't be too high, because they are driven by the hype around them and the chain they are on. They are the giants of the mini-apps era.

Hamster and Doge are both different type of strong because NOT and TON highly support dogs. and i also notice that any user can send his/her dogs from Tonkeeper by paying dogs fees. every holder will get two options sending dogs with dogs fees and sending dogs with TON fees. so even Dogs is meme coin but enough strong. HAMSTER is totally bad coin and it has no chance to do better then dogs. only tiktokers and some Crazy Youtubers create hype for Hamster and Dreamed of receiving a huge payment from a hamster. i mean they haven’t any deep knowledge abound crypto market and memecoins

[sotelorene]

To me I think Dogs was/is far better than hamster Kombat even though the listing price was almost same but at least I used just a day to get like 8 usdt unlike hamster where I used a month plus just to see that my token was giving me 3 usdt. I wasn't actually surprise because I wasn't doing it before not because I was sure it won't do well but I have the feeling and  secondly the participants was mad I mean very plenty and when I started seeing criteria and some funny funny talks then I was fully convinced that this project won't do well, I wish I spent the time I used in hamster in Dogs I believe I would've hit jackpot.

[OrangeII]

The problem with Hamster Kombat is that they were so popular and so many people who have never experienced an airdrop or transacted crypto joined the game and had unrealistic expectations. Content creators too have a part in the play where they promised cars and home to crypto illiterate population in South Asia and Africa.
In airdrop, larger the number of participants, lesser would be the reward. The Dogs and Hamster Kombat comparison is between a less popular airdrop with fewer participants and literally the most popular airdrop with millions of people.

Well, to be honest, because hamster kombat is too popular, I didn't even focus on working on DOGS. I really thought that Hamster Kombat would be one of the biggest airdrops that would be successful. However, the fact is, DOGS pays really well to its participants, while many people think that Hamster doesn't pay so well, especially for those who have focused for months on the tasks given. However, I think in pursuing airdrops, this kind of thing is probably a common thing.