Crypto casino that doesn't ask for KYC (documents) at withdrawal

[Fivestar4everMVP]

A casino may not ask you for kyc while you deposit and gamble, but take note that they can always ask you for kyc anytime, some casinos are even notorious for asking for kyc when a user wins a huge amount of money and sometimes i suspect that some of them do it in order not to pay out the gambler, i find that to be very unfair. So in summary, always be ready to submit kyc in any casino, because it could be triggered anytime.

That is it and is always like that, I also advised most of my friends to pass kyc already before making deposit to start using the site. Many people are victims of these casinos and they are usually trapped when they make huge winning in the casino and of course casinos mostly carry out that operation if they are not ready to pay huge amount to the users and if they are not able to provide such kyc they would seize such amount from them.

You both are correct and I completely agree, this is something I believe we have discussed several times in the gambling discussion board.
We have to know that some casinos are very trickish and will do any thing to make sure they do not pay their player who wins a good amount of money. And one of the means they rely on is through kyc, and this is usually when they ask for documents that they know that the player won't find easy providing..

The best way to avoid such as the above from happening is always to first pass the kyc verification before making any form of deposit to the casino, and if the casino does not allow kyc before deposit, then the management of that casino must be up to something and such casino should be avoided.

[danadc]

For a casino not to request KYC information is almost impossible, only decentralized casinos, all casinos require KYC and that was something that was implemented in a mandatory way to ensure all privacy and with multiple excuses, such as security, so that they don't hack you, blah blah and blah, we all know that a casino can be hacked and they can steal, there is nothing safe there, if you look for a centralized casino without that requirement I would tell you that it is impossible at this point.

[Bushdark]

For a casino not to request KYC information is almost impossible, only decentralized casinos, all casinos require KYC and that was something that was implemented in a mandatory way to ensure all privacy and with multiple excuses, such as security, so that they don't hack you, blah blah and blah, we all know that a casino can be hacked and they can steal, there is nothing safe there, if you look for a centralized casino without that requirement I would tell you that it is impossible at this point.

There are so many casinos that will not ask for KYC but at the long run, they will always ask for KYC even though it's a simple one that will will require you to submit your identity only without going as far as asking for proofs of location r nationality. Privacy is what we should ensure we stick to because it's not every casinos that we have to do KYC since their are many that will always sell our information to the  public and can be used against us in the future. Maybe the government may make this process more difficult for us in the future by the time they start fighting against decentralized casinos.

[TribalBob]

For a casino not to request KYC information is almost impossible, only decentralized casinos, all casinos require KYC and that was something that was implemented in a mandatory way to ensure all privacy and with multiple excuses, such as security, so that they don't hack you, blah blah and blah, we all know that a casino can be hacked and they can steal, there is nothing safe there, if you look for a centralized casino without that requirement I would tell you that it is impossible at this point.

There are so many casinos that will not ask for KYC but at the long run, they will always ask for KYC even though it's a simple one that will will require you to submit your identity only without going as far as asking for proofs of location r nationality. Privacy is what we should ensure we stick to because it's not every casinos that we have to do KYC since their are many that will always sell our information to the  public and can be used against us in the future. Maybe the government may make this process more difficult for us in the future by the time they start fighting against decentralized casinos.

in the end they ask for KYC 
even though it is basic KYC I think we also have to be careful in this matter, so it is better to play on one site or a few sites that do KYC not on all gambling sites
because KYC is currently very vulnerable to fraud and data sales for bad things and even harm the data owner

[EarnOnVictor]

A casino may not ask you for kyc while you deposit and gamble, but take note that they can always ask you for kyc anytime, some casinos are even notorious for asking for kyc when a user wins a huge amount of money and sometimes i suspect that some of them do it in order not to pay out the gambler, i find that to be very unfair. So in summary, always be ready to submit kyc in any casino, because it could be triggered anytime.

That's it, it's just unfair but people now see it as normal these days, you know when the insane things are common in an environment, people now see it as normal even if it is an abomination elsewhere. I've always said that collecting people's money without KYC but trying to pay them only with KYC is not so cool, but I don't mind since there is a solution. The solution is that you should complete your KYC as soon as you register with the casino before depositing your money. That is good only for the KYC casinos, but it got worse when the casino preached no-KYC when you opened the account but suddenly asked you for it. We've seen a lot of cases like that and it puts people in unfortunate situations if they already have their money hooked there.

Maybe not unfair especially if they know that the casino they are playing is KYC compliant. For sure they already know that's part of regulation and common things happening in a legitimate casino now. It will only goes unfair if the casino claims to be a KYC free but suddenly end up asking that saying for verification purposes.

Although I was so minor about that, but since you brought it out I think it's good to "iron it out." The truth is that the world of payment has never been fair to the customers (not casino alone), it's all about the company, and the regulators even gave them a high degree of freedom and flexibility. This can only explain why you would be able to deposit $100,000 without any KYC but won't be able to withdraw $1 without KYC. Is that fair? No, because "what is good for the goose is good for the gander." That adage is fairness. Fine, they are regulated and must obey the regulation, I wonder why the law did not state it emphatically that no company must receive a dime from any client/customer without a KYC as well. It is then we can talk about fairness.

[Lanatsa]

A casino may not ask you for kyc while you deposit and gamble, but take note that they can always ask you for kyc anytime, some casinos are even notorious for asking for kyc when a user wins a huge amount of money and sometimes i suspect that some of them do it in order not to pay out the gambler, i find that to be very unfair. So in summary, always be ready to submit kyc in any casino, because it could be triggered anytime.

That's it, it's just unfair but people now see it as normal these days, you know when the insane things are common in an environment, people now see it as normal even if it is an abomination elsewhere. I've always said that collecting people's money without KYC but trying to pay them only with KYC is not so cool, but I don't mind since there is a solution. The solution is that you should complete your KYC as soon as you register with the casino before depositing your money. That is good only for the KYC casinos, but it got worse when the casino preached no-KYC when you opened the account but suddenly asked you for it. We've seen a lot of cases like that and it puts people in unfortunate situations if they already have their money hooked there.

Maybe not unfair especially if they know that the casino they are playing is KYC compliant. For sure they already know that's part of regulation and common things happening in a legitimate casino now. It will only goes unfair if the casino claims to be a KYC free but suddenly end up asking that saying for verification purposes.

Although I was so minor about that, but since you brought it out I think it's good to "iron it out." The truth is that the world of payment has never been fair to the customers (not casino alone), it's all about the company, and the regulators even gave them a high degree of freedom and flexibility. This can only explain why you would be able to deposit $100,000 without any KYC but won't be able to withdraw $1 without KYC. Is that fair? No, because "what is good for the goose is good for the gander." That adage is fairness. Fine, they are regulated and must obey the regulation, I wonder why the law did not state it emphatically that no company must receive a dime from any client/customer without a KYC as well. It is then we can talk about fairness.

But we arent seeing these stuffs right? but rather they wouldnt really be mindful or having those strict imposing of rules about before making some big deposits then they should have made or comply the KYC first
on which we know that this mostly will really be done on the moment that you do make out some withdrawal. Sounds new? No it isnt. We've been through with those horrendous and nightmare kind of scenarios on which platforms really do allow on making that huge deposits and asking nothing but on the moment that tries out to withdraw then this is where shit things starts to happen. On the moment or time that you have sin something significant then you wont really be bothered about complying with those requirements on which as long you do able to get your winnings then this would really be your outmost priority. It do really just sucks that if they were really that asking verification in the first place then they should be asking it out since from the start so that there would really be that smooth transaction with those future transactions or request that be done by a certain user. Actually there would be no problems as long you do deal up with a known and reputable site but if we do speak about into those new ones or havent established out their company or
site yet in terms of reputation and popularity then there would really be those probabilities that you wont be able to get your winnings due to that issue.

[D ltr]

But we arent seeing these stuffs right? but rather they wouldnt really be mindful or having those strict imposing of rules about before making some big deposits then they should have made or comply the KYC first
on which we know that this mostly will really be done on the moment that you do make out some withdrawal. Sounds new? No it isnt. We've been through with those horrendous and nightmare kind of scenarios on which platforms really do allow on making that huge deposits and asking nothing but on the moment that tries out to withdraw then this is where shit things starts to happen. On the moment or time that you have sin something significant then you wont really be bothered about complying with those requirements on which as long you do able to get your winnings then this would really be your outmost priority. It do really just sucks that if they were really that asking verification in the first place then they should be asking it out since from the start so that there would really be that smooth transaction with those future transactions or request that be done by a certain user. Actually there would be no problems as long you do deal up with a known and reputable site but if we do speak about into those new ones or havent established out their company or
site yet in terms of reputation and popularity then there would really be those probabilities that you wont be able to get your winnings due to that issue.

Actually there is a reason why they implement KYC where there will be a connection with money laundering or other bad things, as we see now, the Tampa KYC word promotion is the main key to new casinos, after we play and make a withdrawal, there will be a KYC requirement for withdrawals so not 100% of casinos do not do KYC

[Odusko]

For a casino not to request KYC information is almost impossible, only decentralized casinos, all casinos require KYC and that was something that was implemented in a mandatory way to ensure all privacy and with multiple excuses, such as security, so that they don't hack you, blah blah and blah, we all know that a casino can be hacked and they can steal, there is nothing safe there, if you look for a centralized casino without that requirement I would tell you that it is impossible at this point.

Maybe what the ops is looking for is a decentralized casino that have no requirements for KYC verification, if not as long as the gambling sites is a centralized casino, you have to respect that their license demands them to always know their customers and if they don't abide by such a policy to ask for verification from player's at some point, their license could be revoked, and their be forced out of the market, that is why, any cryptocurrency casino that is decentralised always have that tendency to ask for KYC to fulfil their Anti money laundering regulations.

Unless if a casino want to become a trap for the player that is when and where their may say, they don't require KYC to play on them, but on the long run, the gambler will eventually be asked to verify their accounts one way or the other.

So anything that make you to create an accoyon centralised casinos, just be ready to hand out you documents for verification any point you are asked for, this is the only way to keep your account active on such a site.

[3kpk3]

That adage is fairness. Fine, they are regulated and must obey the regulation, I wonder why the law did not state it emphatically that no company must receive a dime from any client/customer without a KYC as well. It is then we can talk about fairness.

Brilliant take. Casinos are just businesses that are trying to survive in this saturated landscape which is why it makes sense as to why they request KYC only during withdrawals and not during deposits even though it seems unethical.

I'm fine with providing simple KYC stuff like ID proof, address proof etc, but advanced KYC like source of funds, video KYC etc for simple reasons is nonsensical.

[Sanitough]

I'm fine with providing simple KYC stuff like ID proof, address proof etc, but advanced KYC like source of funds, video KYC etc for simple reasons is nonsensical.

Honestly, I hate it when a casino asks for my source of funds. It feels like giving away a secret. In that case, maybe we could just lie a bit? Like, say it’s from remittances or allowance from parents or relatives who support us? Because if we actually have a business and they ask for permits, licenses, and bank accounts, that’s like setting ourselves up for trouble, if you ask me.

[panjul07]

I'm fine with providing simple KYC stuff like ID proof, address proof etc, but advanced KYC like source of funds, video KYC etc for simple reasons is nonsensical.

Honestly, I hate it when a casino asks for my source of funds. It feels like giving away a secret. In that case, maybe we could just lie a bit? Like, say it’s from remittances or allowance from parents or relatives who support us? Because if we actually have a business and they ask for permits, licenses, and bank accounts, that’s like setting ourselves up for trouble, if you ask me.

I'm with you at this stage, I also will never do the next level of KYC where I have to provide source of funds.
I'd prefer to lose my gambling account although it is on my favorite casino if they ask me to provide it.
KYC level 2 or where it is just about providing personal document such as ID Card or Passport is still fine for me.

[Lanatsa]

But we arent seeing these stuffs right? but rather they wouldnt really be mindful or having those strict imposing of rules about before making some big deposits then they should have made or comply the KYC first
on which we know that this mostly will really be done on the moment that you do make out some withdrawal. Sounds new? No it isnt. We've been through with those horrendous and nightmare kind of scenarios on which platforms really do allow on making that huge deposits and asking nothing but on the moment that tries out to withdraw then this is where shit things starts to happen. On the moment or time that you have sin something significant then you wont really be bothered about complying with those requirements on which as long you do able to get your winnings then this would really be your outmost priority. It do really just sucks that if they were really that asking verification in the first place then they should be asking it out since from the start so that there would really be that smooth transaction with those future transactions or request that be done by a certain user. Actually there would be no problems as long you do deal up with a known and reputable site but if we do speak about into those new ones or havent established out their company or
site yet in terms of reputation and popularity then there would really be those probabilities that you wont be able to get your winnings due to that issue.

Actually there is a reason why they implement KYC where there will be a connection with money laundering or other bad things, as we see now, the Tampa KYC word promotion is the main key to new casinos, after we play and make a withdrawal, there will be a KYC requirement for withdrawals so not 100% of casinos do not do KYC

Totally understandable about money laundering matters and since these businesses are really that regulated or licensed then they are really that complying governments rules on which it is really that a standard thing. When it comes to verification levels on which it does really give out that kind of question on why they do really comes into a point on asking out source of income? Aren't giving your personal details isn't enough?  Just like on what mentioned above by other poster that I would rather lose up gambling account or some funds if they would really be asking out this kind of verification on which this is really something which is too much.

As for worrying about withdrawals on which there are still some sites or platforms that doesn't ask out some verification and that is something that we do want. You won't really be that having those worries because you are confident that you could take out your winnings without any issues, because you've been dealing up with a legit platform. Never ever tend to deposit carelessly into the sites or platforms that doesn't have some known reputation.

[Taskford]

I'm fine with providing simple KYC stuff like ID proof, address proof etc, but advanced KYC like source of funds, video KYC etc for simple reasons is nonsensical.

Honestly, I hate it when a casino asks for my source of funds. It feels like giving away a secret. In that case, maybe we could just lie a bit? Like, say it’s from remittances or allowance from parents or relatives who support us? Because if we actually have a business and they ask for permits, licenses, and bank accounts, that’s like setting ourselves up for trouble, if you ask me.

I'm with you at this stage, I also will never do the next level of KYC where I have to provide source of funds.
I'd prefer to lose my gambling account although it is on my favorite casino if they ask me to provide it.
KYC level 2 or where it is just about providing personal document such as ID Card or Passport is still fine for me.

If situation came that they ask proof of funds or any more deeper information about ourselves then provably I will not cooperate with them and seek for another casino that only ask basic information when they asked KYC. Since for me its to much for asking that information while we want only to gamble in their casino.

There's lots of reputable choices here and will not settle for casino who implement more stricter KYC rules to their costumers.

For sure the casino ask that will lose a lot of costumer since to many gamblers don't really like KYC at first place but they just accept that it needed to submit an ID due to regulation, but if proof of income has been asked I guess this is main reason for them not to gamble anymore since security is more important than playing a risky game.

[Fivestar4everMVP]

I'm fine with providing simple KYC stuff like ID proof, address proof etc, but advanced KYC like source of funds, video KYC etc for simple reasons is nonsensical.

Honestly, I hate it when a casino asks for my source of funds. It feels like giving away a secret. In that case, maybe we could just lie a bit? Like, say it’s from remittances or allowance from parents or relatives who support us? Because if we actually have a business and they ask for permits, licenses, and bank accounts, that’s like setting ourselves up for trouble, if you ask me.

I'm with you at this stage, I also will never do the next level of KYC where I have to provide source of funds.
I'd prefer to lose my gambling account although it is on my favorite casino if they ask me to provide it.
KYC level 2 or where it is just about providing personal document such as ID Card or Passport is still fine for me.

You are very correct and I completely agree wit you, I usually don't have issues with KYC when it just involves submitting my personal government issued ID card and taking pictures or a short video, or maybe a video chat or something, but when it gets to this level of providing my source of fund to casino or may an exchange, it's a real trouble for me..
And I am actually very glad that ever since I started doing things online and passing kyc verification, I've never gotten to that stage of having to provide my source of income, on Stake, I am currently on level 2 verification and have no plan of going beyond that level.

But then on the other hand, sometimes, the casinos forces a gambler to do this level of kyc or else, loose not just the account, but also a large sum of money that the gambler have won and he or she is trying to withdraw, at such a circumstance, what will you do? Imagine winning over a $100,000 and trying to withdraw the money, and the casino asked for a proof of fund verification, would you forfeit this money back to the casino and as well loose the account?

[Wiwo]

Can you recommend some?

With BNB, LTC, USDT (BEP20) payment options?

The stake is one casino that before now didn't ask for KYC from their customers, I don't know how the KYC policy at stake is at the moment, but rest assured that we have a few casinos that don't require kyc from customers unless there is a need for that, so for sure we have to come to alignment with the acceptance of the fact that we may be asked for KYC verification at some point if need be.

If you don't want to go through KYC at all, you have the option to choose a decentralized casino that doesn't require kyc at all but also know that it also has its limitations.

[LUCKMCFLY]

If you don't want to go through KYC at all, you have the option to choose a decentralized casino that doesn't require kyc at all but also know that it also has its limitations.

According to the experience of some of the players I know who have entered decentralized casinos, it seems to them that they offer their privacy and anonymity, that there are no KYC requirements and that all the withdrawals are fast and the whole process is good, but the bad thing about this is that every movement of the casino will be charged, every single thing you do is charged, so what is good on the one hand, they charge you on the other and it is with money, that is, it hurts more, it is not known at this stage which is better then.

[dimonstration]

If you don't want to go through KYC at all, you have the option to choose a decentralized casino that doesn't require kyc at all but also know that it also has its limitations.

According to the experience of some of the players I know who have entered decentralized casinos, it seems to them that they offer their privacy and anonymity, that there are no KYC requirements and that all the withdrawals are fast and the whole process is good, but the bad thing about this is that every movement of the casino will be charged, every single thing you do is charged, so what is good on the one hand, they charge you on the other and it is with money, that is, it hurts more, it is not known at this stage which is better then.

Real decentralized casino offers only limited games solely house games/original games only since 3rd party game providers such as Pragmatic, Evolution and many more usually require license to operate and can be only play via centralized casino.

Decentralized casino is really the best answer to this thread assuming the OP is not looking for 3rd party games that involves license.

Some CEX offer no KYC however, they have the right to ask KYC in case your account show some potential violation on ToS.

[Dunamisx]

Honestly, I hate it when a casino asks for my source of funds. It feels like giving away a secret.

Same here, am not always against the request on KYC for any reason while in the use of a casino, but the kind of request they ask such as providing with source of earnings could be annoying, why do they have to know my source of income when they are not the ones responsible for the income that goes in, this is not safe in our own part being a gambler, means of identity is not bad or we give our email, but taking selfie and the likes could also looks absurd on request.

[khaled0111]

but the kind of request they ask such as providing with source of earnings could be annoying, why do they have to know my source of income when they are not the ones responsible for the income that goes in, this is not safe in our own part being a gambler, means of identity is not bad or we give our email, but taking selfie and the likes could also looks absurd on request.

I agree that this can be very annoying for most users, but to combat money laundering, they need to verify the source of the funds they receive. Of course, they shouldn’t do this for all their customers, but only when they detect suspicious activities.

They also request selfies to confirm that the customer is indeed who they claim to be, as some users try to verify their identity using fake or stolen documents.

If you don’t want to go through this hussle, make sure to use a real no-KYC casino.

[NotATether]

Definitely can recommend: https://playnokyc.com/no-kyc-crypto-casinos. At least they specialize in no-KYC casinos. As far as I know, they should add some more anonymous casinos. My co-worker was on the development team.

I'm sure they exist but they are 1) too niche and not known outside of a particular country or region, or 2) trying to keep a low profile.

I wonder if there exist casinos on the darknet, bow that I have mentioned that.