Is my profile eligible for signature campaigns ?

[krishnaverma]

My trust shows
Trust:   +0 / =2 / -0

I am not very much sure how the trust is calculated. The reason is mentioned though on trust page. Am I eligible for signature campaigns now or I cannot participate ?

[Hazink]

The =2 you are seeing are for the 2 neutral tags you got.
 
Some campaign managers still accept members with neutral tags, but it depends on what the tags are for. If they are for spam, it's hard for you to get into a campaign unless there is some noticeable change, which managers will see and consider as a reason to hire you.

[Rikafip]

You are eligible (albeit one of those neutral tags sounds pretty negative) but you will have to seriously improve your posting quality if you want to get into one.

[yahoo62278]

I remember you applied to EVO campaign that I am managing and I passed on you for a couple reasons. You have made less than 20 posts in the last 2 months being 1 of the top reasons. Looking at your profile again, I see that you are also burstposting which IMO is a big no no unless the quality is exceptional.

Are you eligible? Yes, but likely need many improvements to be given a chance.

[Crypto Library]

My trust shows
Trust:   +0 / =2 / -0

I am not very much sure how the trust is calculated. The reason is mentioned though on trust page. Am I eligible for signature campaigns now or I cannot participate ?

If you don't have any banned on your signature then yes you are eligible for the signature campaign.
But here are some things and that is that many users apply for signature campaigns and here those whose activity and reputation are better than all, they got accepted by the managers.
And also each manager accepts users from different perspectives here to see what will be best for the project for which they are going to promoting.
And the tags you currently have are already reducing the possibility of your signature campaign being accepted. But if you can do good activities in the future and if you can convince them that you have improved yourself, they might reconsider your feedback.

[krishnaverma]

I remember you applied to EVO campaign that I am managing and I passed on you for a couple reasons. You have made less than 20 posts in the last 2 months being 1 of the top reasons. Looking at your profile again, I see that you are also burstposting which IMO is a big no no unless the quality is exceptional.

Are you eligible? Yes, but likely need many improvements to be given a chance.

I am happy that at least you remember me applying there. So my profile was rejected by you not for these trust ratings ? But because of inactivity and burp posting ?

I will try to improve as per your suggestions.

[Churchillvv]

With your forum rank? Yes you're eligible even people below your ranks can still participate but perhaps your eligible depends on the managers terms and conditions towards the campaign.

If you're found worthy of being accepted in any of the campaigns surely you will be accepted but if for some reason just as yahoo62278 mentioned above you're probably never or rarely going to be accepted.

[yahoo62278]

I remember you applied to EVO campaign that I am managing and I passed on you for a couple reasons. You have made less than 20 posts in the last 2 months being 1 of the top reasons. Looking at your profile again, I see that you are also burstposting which IMO is a big no no unless the quality is exceptional.

Are you eligible? Yes, but likely need many improvements to be given a chance.

I am happy that at least you remember me applying there. So my profile was rejected by you not for these trust ratings ? But because of inactivity and burp posting ?

I will try to improve as per your suggestions.

The feedback although neutral by Don I wouldn't pay attention to. Merit is able to be used pretty much in any way a user sees fit, minus selling it. The feedback by LoyceV you might be hindered by and are lucky it's not a red tag and you banned. I suppose you were just copying 1 of his terms for making a deal on your sig space, but you should probably come up wit your own terms or ask permission to use someone else's. I would have to look deeper into it if I ever did consider you for a campaign, but usually neutrals are not an issue.

[_act_]

My trust shows
Trust:   +0 / =2 / -0

I am not very much sure how the trust is calculated. The reason is mentioned though on trust page. Am I eligible for signature campaigns now or I cannot participate ?

You are eligible to get into a signature campaign but the chance is very low to the extent that you can not get into any. First is your merit in 120 days, at least 5 merits are requested by campaign managers while people that have 100 merits or more are taken. Although there are few exceptional cases but yours is not like it. Also try to begin to post good and convince LoyceV to remove that neutral tag. I am sure he will remove it if he see a very clear changes in you and notice that you are here to contribute and not to plagiarize.

The =2 you are seeing are for the 2 neutral tags you got.
 
Some campaign managers still accept members with neutral tags, but it depends on what the tags are for. If they are for spam, it's hard for you to get into a campaign unless there is some noticeable change, which managers will see and consider as a reason to hire you.

A neutral tag can be a negative tag. That tag that he got from LoyceV is like a negative tag although it is a neutral tag and not related to trading trust. A campaign manager will always dislike accounts that are plagiarizing.

[Botnake]

The rules for signature campaigns are pretty simple. Since you don't have a negative tag, you're eligible to apply. But just review the rules so you can figure out if you're eligible or not. However, being eligible doesn't mean you'll get hired. With only a few campaigns and a lot of users wanting to join, the manager will definitely look for the best posters who fit well with the project or company they're running in the signature campaign.

I'm not sure why you're asking this, but I'm guessing it's because you haven't been hired when you applied, maybe a few times now. Just a small tip: try to be more active first, be helpful in the community, and earn some merits, as that's also something managers look at when choosing participants. Also, I noticed you have a neutral feedback. That could be something they consider too, there are a lot of factors, but it really depends on the campaign managers.

[dzungmobile]

My trust shows
Trust:   +0 / =2 / -0

I am not very much sure how the trust is calculated. The reason is mentioned though on trust page. Am I eligible for signature campaigns now or I cannot participate ?

It's neutral trust feedback so it is less harmful for your account than negative trust feedback (Red one).

You got some helpful replies above including ones from a campaign manager, yahoo62278. I'd like to share one thread for you, that can help you too.
Signature Campaign Guidelines (read this before starting or joining a campaign).

Neutral trust feedbacks won't harm your account too much, so if you can improve your post quality, you will be in campaigns soon.

[krishnaverma]

A neutral tag can be a negative tag. That tag that he got from LoyceV is like a negative tag although it is a neutral tag and not related to trading trust. A campaign manager will always dislike accounts that are plagiarizing.

I was not plagiarizing the content for likes or merits. I was making a thread of "Renting my signature" and I was using his thread as a reference. My mistake was that I liked one line there and posted it as it is or with some modification. I do not remember exactly but this might be the reason why he gave neutral tag. I have thousands of posts here till now and I have not copied post from other user or from anywhere else on internet.

I am not saying I am perfect or I did not commit any mistake. Also, if I am not accepted in any campaign, that also does not mean the end of the world. I was just clarifying if I am still eligible based on my trust .

[LoyceV]

Also try to begin to post good

OP has been here for 7 years. If he wanted to improve his posts, he would have done it by now.

and convince LoyceV to remove that neutral tag.

Why? It's factually correct. Plagiarizing while applying to be hired tells me everything I need to know about OP.

I am sure he will remove it if he see a very clear changes in you and notice that you are here to contribute and not to plagiarize.

OP is on my ignore list for good reasons

A neutral tag can be a negative tag. That tag that he got from LoyceV is like a negative tag although it is a neutral tag and not related to trading trust.

The only reason it's neutral is because negative would be trust abuse.

I was not plagiarizing the content for likes or merits.

You were plagiarizing for money.

I was making a thread of "Renting my signature" and I was using his thread as a reference.

Proper referencing would mean including quote tags.

I do not remember exactly but this might be the reason why he gave neutral tag.

No need to speculate, there's a Reference link with the neutral tag.

I have thousands of posts here till now

Your Merit count doesn't speak in your favor.

I have not copied post from other user or from anywhere else on internet.

Most people who say that are quickly proven wrong here.

I am not saying I am perfect or I did not commit any mistake.

Maybe I'm too negative when it comes to plagiarism, but in my experience change is rare. Signature campaign managers can hire anyone they want. Just know you won't rank high against the competition.

[krishnaverma]

OP has been here for 7 years. If he wanted to improve his posts, he would have done it by now.

Your post imply I was doing mistake all over these 7 years. Reality is that I was hired in multiple campaigns during this period. I was also approached privately by advertiser and paid for renting my signature.

You were plagiarizing for money.

Yes, You are right. One line taken from your thread with modification is what every campaign manager looks for before finalizing any candidate.


I can go on with other comments you made in last post  but I do not care much especially seeing the tone of your last post.

[Stablexcoin]

My trust shows
Trust:   +0 / =2 / -0

I am not very much sure how the trust is calculated. The reason is mentioned though on trust page. Am I eligible for signature campaigns now or I cannot participate ?

You are eligible to apply for a signature campaign since you don't have a negative feedback. Although that not a criteria that you will get selected in any of the campaign because what would make you outstanding is your quality of post and merits earned. I have noticed that having a negative neutral tag reveiw will reduce your chances since campaign managers sees it as a red flag.

[krishnaverma]

I have noticed that having a negative neutral tag reveiw will reduce your chances since campaign managers sees it as a red flag.

Can you tell me about negative neutral tag ? How can I know if the neutral tag is negative or positive ?

[Stablexcoin]

I have noticed that having a negative neutral tag reveiw will reduce your chances since campaign managers sees it as a red flag.

Can you tell me about negative neutral tag ? How can I know if the neutral tag is negative or positive ?

What i mean by negative neutral tag is that, the comments left on your neutral speak negative of you. It could be that you are spammer, ai poster, or have an alternative accounts, some of them are people who take loans. All am saying is that any feedback left on your reference that does not speak good of you is negative feedback but was tagged neutral which means you are on watch list. Jsyk, neutral tag can have either negative or positive feedback.

[pakhitheboss]

My trust shows
Trust:   +0 / =2 / -0

I am not very much sure how the trust is calculated. The reason is mentioned though on trust page. Am I eligible for signature campaigns now or I cannot participate ?

If you are so smart then why are you getting confused? You have created a self moderated or shall I say an announcement thread to get sponsorship  from a client: Krishnaverma's Signature, Avatar and Personal Text for rent

I personally don't think you are from the Indian subcontinent as you  are trying to make a joke about yourself. If you were from the Indian subcontinent then you would have been active on multiple board related to the subcontinent.

Edit: why I am certain this guy is trying to act like a clown as he is using a username which is known in the Indian subcontinent.

[criptoevangelista]

The question you should ask yourself is: if you were a campaign manager, would you hire yourself to participate? Do you think your posts are of sufficient quality to carry a company brand and get paid for it? I think that gives you an idea of ​​whether or not you deserve to be in a campaign.

[NotATether]

Some campaign managers still accept members with neutral tags, but it depends on what the tags are for. If they are for spam, it's hard for you to get into a campaign unless there is some noticeable change, which managers will see and consider as a reason to hire you.

Neutral tags do not matter for campaigns.