God bless stake.com and eddie and take care

[BlackyJacky]

What does 99,5% RTP mean?

RTP = Return To Player

That means for every bet you make you statistically will get 99,5% back (returned) and lose 0,5%.

As the casino doesn't reduce 0,5% from evey bet or 0,5% from the total amount wagered, that means you will lose 0,5% of all bets placed.

The number of bets you will lose more than you will win is what goes to the casino = house edge.

If you made 100 bets and won 50 and lost 50, nothing went to the casino and your experienced house or player edge is zero and RTP is 100%.

[BlackyJacky]

How does the casino collect the house edge?

A) Casino reduces the house edge from every bet placed

B) Via the bets a player loses more than it wins

(Example: 100 bets placed, 49 bets won and 51 lost = 2 bets went to the casino)

[BlackyJacky]

IMO the calculation to get 3 x 4 of clubs in a series of five 4s should be:

(1/52) x (4/52) x (1/52) x (4/52) x (1/52) = 1 in 23.7 million

Stake has dealt hundreds of millions of hands and this sequence should happen multiple times.

A rare probability of a certain event isn't proof that the system is rigged!

When the probability of a certain event is 1 in 23.7 million, it already can happen after 100 hands.

🔴 This Isn’t Random – This is Scripted Play

• Infinite deck doesn’t justify impossible patterns—each draw should be fair.
• The occurrence of three identical suits in a sequence of the same rank is effectively impossible in an unbiased RNG.

1 in 23.7 million hands isn't impossible.

[BlackyJacky]

A key question is why does Stake "shuffle" after every hand?

This way they know exactly which cards the player and the dealer gets and can shuffle for Stake convenient cards.

Whereas if Stake shuffles 1,000 cards upfront, they only know in the first hand which cards the player and the dealer will get.

So why don't they make it fair and shuffle 1,000 cards upfront?

[BlackyJacky]

Strange how the attacker and nonsense hallucinator group has left all at once! 

[BlackyJacky]

Stake is still running a provably rigged in-house Black Jack!

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2178857.msg65228332#msg65228332

[noviesol]

Strange how the attacker and nonsense hallucinator group has left all at once! 

Exactly. It’s almost like they were on a shift schedule. 😆

Let’s not pretend this is coincidence — users like Captain Clown Edge, HolyDarkness, Nuteldah and the rest of that gang operate like a syndicate. They come in waves, using fancy language and fake “analysis” to defend the casinos and mock anyone who exposes the rigging.

They’re not here to debate — they’re here to disrupt.

They’ll gaslight, cherry-pick hands, and post walls of fluff trying to make the victims look dumb. But anyone who has played long enough knows exactly how these original blackjack games work — they work against you.

I think none of them has time or feel like reacting on this topic. Because this topic is just spam.

[BlackyJacky]

Strange how the attacker and nonsense hallucinator group has left all at once!  

Exactly. It’s almost like they were on a shift schedule. 😆

Let’s not pretend this is coincidence — users like Captain Clown Edge, HolyDarkness, Nuteldah and the rest of that gang operate like a syndicate. They come in waves, using fancy language and fake “analysis” to defend the casinos and mock anyone who exposes the rigging.

They’re not here to debate — they’re here to disrupt.

They’ll gaslight, cherry-pick hands, and post walls of fluff trying to make the victims look dumb. But anyone who has played long enough knows exactly how these original blackjack games work — they work against you.

I think none of them has time or feel like reacting on this topic.

They had a lot of time to place their hallucinated nonsense in this thread and suddenly they don't have it anymore all at once?  

Rather looks like their client withdrew the order!

Despite of this, criminal and stupid little sickheads don't act based on their feelings, they act based on money!

Also, a person with feelings and ethics would shout out loud about Stake's provably rigged in-house Black Jack!

Yet, none of the nonsense hallucinators did!


What do you think about Stake's provably rigged in-house Black Jack?

[BlackyJacky]

How does the casino collect the house edge?

A) Reduces the house edge from every bet amount

B) Via the number of bets a player loses more than it wins

[BlackyJacky]

🚨 Stake.com Silencing Users After Imposing 15% Withdrawal Tax in India — Legal Compliance or Strategic Deflection?

Stake says the payment provider takes the fee, so it is not a tax payment to the Government in India.

[BlackyJacky]

🚨 Stake.com Silencing Users After Imposing 15% Withdrawal Tax in India — Legal Compliance or Strategic Deflection?

Stake says the payment provider takes the fee, so it is not a tax payment to the Government in India.

The payment provider will pay the tax, making it as 28% if they want to get their hands clean.

The payment provider takes 10% and will not pay a 15% tax to the Government in India and lose 5% from its pocket.

Stake will also not pay a 15% tax and lose 25% from all deposits.

The payment provider is a secret agent working for the undercover online casino operation Stake!

Stake support doesn't have the identities of the secret agents working for Stake, only Bijan and Edward have it.

But you can take a look at your bank transaction history to see to who your UPI deposit went.

[foxymethoxy]

@foxymethoxy

I have to admit you are a funny clown, but facts say more than thousand hallucinations!  

Why not speak about facts instead of hallucinated Stake's in-house Black Jack simulations?

You can of course simulate how Black Jack should be, but what has this to do with Stake's in-house Black Jack?

Only the scam artists Bijan and Edward know what code is running on their backend server!

The Curacao Gaming Control Board doesn't care that Stake's in-house Black Jack is provably rigged!

Hi,

I explained that yes, that is exactly Stake's implementation- it is 1:1.

If you use the same seed pair, and nonce, you will get the same result- you can double check that by checking on stake's site, or stakestats.

Therefore, my simulator is simulating what would be genuine, real games, if those seeds were used. You can try to diminish that by saying it's just a simulation, but that's exactly how the game is coded- the visuals and frontend are just there to animate the mechanics, which are core and are indeed open source and reproducible.

If my code can replicate the results of every hand you ever play, given the same inputs (hmac(secret=unhashedserverseed, message=clientseed:nonce:round)) independent of their site, then it is the same game.

Your analysis was flawed because you were miscounting natural blackjacks, improperly using doubles and splits, and this skews your RTP down.

Stake Stats uses similar code to reproduce your bets- they are not connected to the house, or anything like that. They have no idea whether you won or lost, and yet, they can still reproduce specific nonces. Have you ever considered why, or tried to do it yourself? I guess not.



To you guys complaining about your INR domestic provider scamming you: use crypto. You're on bitcointalk... use crypto.

[Saint-loup]

[...]
To you guys complaining about your INR domestic provider scamming you: use crypto. You're on bitcointalk... use crypto.

Your post is interesting, but I’m afraid I might misunderstand what you meant by that last sentence. The goal of this section is not to seek advice about what people should have done to avoid being scammed (which is usually the last step before blaming the victim) but to expose scams to the community in order to prevent others from getting scammed in turn and to prevent scammers from profiting from their crimes (on top of finding ways to recover their funds when it's possible of course). So the topic is maybe not the right one for that but their complaints are not irrelevant in this section, just to say. In addition there are far more crypto users scammed by casinos than fiat ones, proportionally.

[BlackyJacky]

@foxymethoxy

I have to admit you are a funny clown, but facts say more than thousand hallucinations!  

Why not speak about facts instead of hallucinated Stake's in-house Black Jack simulations?

You can of course simulate how Black Jack should be, but what has this to do with Stake's in-house Black Jack?

Only the scam artists Bijan and Edward know what code is running on their backend server!

The Curacao Gaming Control Board doesn't care that Stake's in-house Black Jack is provably rigged!

Hi,

I explained that yes, that is exactly Stake's implementation- it is 1:1.

Show proof that Stake uses your simulation software?

If you use the same seed pair, and nonce, you will get the same result- you can double check that by checking on stake's site, or stakestats.

If I use what same seed pair and nonce, I will get what same result?

Therefore, my simulator is simulating what would be genuine, real games, if those seeds were used. You can try to diminish that by saying it's just a simulation, but that's exactly how the game is coded- the visuals and frontend are just there to animate the mechanics, which are core and are indeed open source and reproducible.

Your simulator?

But there is a difference between your simulator and Stake's backend server software?

There is a difference between a simulator and reality.

Did your simulator came to a 4,6% experienced house edge after 180,900 bets?

If Stake uses your simulator, your simulator should lead to the same 4,6% experienced house edge, right?

If my code can replicate the results of every hand you ever play, given the same inputs (hmac(secret=unhashedserverseed, message=clientseed:nonce:round)) independent of their site, then it is the same game.

 

 

Your analysis was flawed because you were miscounting natural blackjacks, improperly using doubles and splits, and this skews your RTP down.

Here you show what a stupid little sickhead you are!

1) I didn't count my Stake bets statistics, Stake did!  

2) My analysis of the maximal possible deviation from the expected outcome is not flawed.

If you believe it is flawed, show where and why it is flawed?

Stake Stats uses similar code to reproduce your bets- they are not connected to the house, or anything like that.

The bets I made on stake.com are not connected to the house?

So Stake outsourced my bets to who?

They have no idea whether you won or lost, and yet, they can still reproduce specific nonces.

Stake isn't aware about its bets statistics?

Stake isn't aware about the crypto currencies they took from me?

I have read a lot of hallucinations here on Bitcointalk, but you are doubtless one of the top hallucinators here!  

Have you ever considered why, or tried to do it yourself? I guess not.

I am not able to understand what you suggest to try?

But my Stake bets statistics (confirmed by Stake) is 100% proof that their in-house Black Jack is rigged and there is no need to try something else.

[BlackyJacky]

I couldn't care less, I created this account to deal with 1 issue and 1 issue only and while I'm usually an advocate of freedom of speech, this is just a spammer and clear extortionist. Are there no admins in this forum? Why is this permissible?

Is hallucinated nonsense free speech or free sickness?

You should be happy that moderators allow you to place your hallucinated nonsense!

In case your stupid little sickhead missed it, informing about Stake's provably rigged in-house Black Jack and demand compensation isn't extortion!  

[nutildah]

Take a good look at his trust rating, then take a good look at mine.
Engaging with this user can be detrimental to your profiles health.

Their feedback doesn't show up as Default Trust so I wouldn't worry about it. I have a billion negative trust feedbacks and none of them mean anything, because anyone can leave a feedback for anything. Whether or not it affects your profile depends on if the person leaving the rating is part of Default Trust or not. These two users will never be on DT.

I couldn't care less, I created this account to deal with 1 issue and 1 issue only and while I'm usually an advocate of freedom of speech, this is just a spammer and clear extortionist. Are there no admins in this forum? Why is this permissible?

The forum is pretty lax when it comes to moderation standards. This is why its a good idea to point out stupidity and lies when it happens. Oftentimes AI posts will be deleted as spam if they are not conveying anything of substance.

[nutildah]

Although there's a difference between lax and negligible.
It's clear cut what needs to happen here.

When accounts spam too often in too many places, they are sometimes banned. BlackyJacky was already banned under his former name, game-protect, who was a relentless spammer / extortionist / all-around scumbag. There is some magical line that can only be crossed when the mods say so.

Also funny to see Mr AI, King of BJs using his alt saying he isn't a bot, you may as well be, you're just copying and pasting to and fro an LLM after all.

He is basically doing the bidding of the LLMs and not the other way around. There is currently no objective difference between this user and a bot. Some people believe using AI to think on their behalf is cool, but really all this AI text is just making the internet a more soulless place than it already was.

[nutildah]

Are you both talking to yourselves? It's clear that neither of you has disproven any of my claims.

Your claims were thoroughly disproven on Page 1 of this thread. You tried to claim that house edge was calculated using wins and losses, and then several different people kept trying to explain to you what house edge actually was for the next 14 pages. All you did in response was use Grok to insult the people who were proving you wrong.

Just keep protecting this mafia for peanuts, peasants. You're both merit farming and defending scam casinos, and it's obvious to anyone paying attention.

For the 10th time, I don't even like Stake. I've never played there, I've never recommended it to anybody, and I would never play there.

[noviesol]

Is there a way we can put an end to this?

It feels like an endless back-and-forth of yes and no? OP has shown no interest in the explanations of others and is only insulting and accusing everyone being a Stake ''employee''

[BlackyJacky]

Are you both talking to yourselves? It's clear that neither of you has disproven any of my claims.

Your claims were thoroughly disproven on Page 1 of this thread. You tried to claim that house edge was calculated using wins and losses, and then several different people kept trying to explain to you what house edge actually was for the next 14 pages. All you did in response was use Grok to insult the people who were proving you wrong.

None of the attackers were able to explain anything!

None of the attackers were able to answer this simple question:

How does the casino collect the house edge?

A) Reduces the house edge from every bet amount

B) Via the number of bets a player loses more than it wins

If someone does not know how the casino collects the house edge, it logically isn't qualified to contribute in this thread!

Let alone explain something.

If someone is not qualified to post in this thread, it does nothing but spamming here!


Let us not forget your nonsense answer:

Please answer the following question:

How does the casino collect the house edge?

A) Reduce or substract 0,5% from every bet

B) Reduce or substract 0,5% from the total amount wagered

C) Via the number of bets a player loses

The correct answer is D) None of the above.

That clearly confirms that you are not qualified to post in this thread.