Will a casino lose popularity if it stops its signature campaign?

[Japinat]

Just an observation, but I’ve noticed that many casinos with signature campaigns eventually stop, and the community seems to forget about them. Meanwhile, the casinos with long-term campaigns are still popular today. Of course, we can’t deny the popularity of these casinos...Stake, Sportsbet, Rollbit, Duelbits, and Betcoin.ag. Maybe it’s because they run their campaigns long-term, so their presence is seen daily on the forum. So, do you think casinos get significant benefits from having a signature campaign, especially when it’s long-term?

[Adbitco]

Just an observation, but I’ve noticed that many casinos with signature campaigns eventually stop, and the community seems to forget about them. Meanwhile, the casinos with long-term campaigns are still popular today. Of course, we can’t deny the popularity of these casinos...Stake, Sportsbet, Rollbit, Duelbits, and Betcoin.ag. Maybe it’s because they run their campaigns long-term, so their presence is seen daily on the forum. So, do you think casinos get significant benefits from having a signature campaign, especially when it’s long-term?

To me what I sense is that when they are active here it makes it that easy for people especially gambler to use them, and can easily sort out issue when there is any need for it. Though there presence really matter because you can trust them immediately they shut their campaign, in fact it's like an open way to attract more gamblers.

[Tungbulu]

Just an observation, but I’ve noticed that many casinos with signature campaigns eventually stop, and the community seems to forget about them. Meanwhile, the casinos with long-term campaigns are still popular today. Of course, we can’t deny the popularity of these casinos...Stake, Sportsbet, Rollbit, Duelbits, and Betcoin.ag. Maybe it’s because they run their campaigns long-term, so their presence is seen daily on the forum. So, do you think casinos get significant benefits from having a signature campaign, especially when it’s long-term?

First of all you need to realize that the online world is a pretty big place and BTT is just one community or should I say the strongest and largest crypto community ( I wouldn’t be wrong if I said that) in that world. There are also lots of other communities too where these crypto casinos also advertise their casinos and services too (I believe), so some of those casinos that stopped their signature campaigns can only become less famous as you said it only on this community, and maybe a lot more famous amongst the crypto users in that other crypt community where they also run their ads.

It’s just about marketing strategy, those casinos still running ads here are comfortable with the results they get from running ads here, the results can’t always be the same for all casinos who come to the community, so those that are not satisfied with the results they get from running ads here, they leave to somewhere else they may feel is more profitable for them. I don’t know if I expressed my thoughts perfectly or if I missed something though.

[_act_]

Of course, we can’t deny the popularity of these casinos...Stake, Sportsbet, Rollbit, Duelbits, and Betcoin.ag.

Sportbets still have campaign on this forum? I did not notice that. Only what I thought before is their promotion offers like the competitions they offer on games and rounds board. Are you sure they still have signature campaign on this forum?

People easily see the campaigns if they continue to be active and that is what people that do visit this forum will use. If it is about this forum, the casino may lose popularity if they stop signature campaign. There are many gambling sites campaigns that were existing before I joined this forum but which I do not know. That is how it is to many people. People use what they see.

[coin-investor]

Just an observation, but I’ve noticed that many casinos with signature campaigns eventually stop, and the community seems to forget about them. Meanwhile, the casinos with long-term campaigns are still popular today. Of course, we can’t deny the popularity of these casinos...Stake, Sportsbet, Rollbit, Duelbits, and Betcoin.ag. Maybe it’s because they run their campaigns long-term, so their presence is seen daily on the forum. So, do you think casinos get significant benefits from having a signature campaign, especially when it’s long-term?

It has something to do with branding and the casinos that continue to advertise know the importance of branding, Take the case of Coke. Everyone knows about Coke and they have millions of drinkers but they keep on advertising and sponsoring because they want to associate the word "softdrink" with Coke and they can do that through continuous marketing.
This applies to casinos People will have a recall when the word online casino is mentioned, This is the reason why Stake is on top of the industry; they continue to brand themselves as the online casino to go.

[Agbamoni]

Just an observation, but I’ve noticed that many casinos with signature campaigns eventually stop, and the community seems to forget about them. Meanwhile, the casinos with long-term campaigns are still popular today. Of course, we can’t deny the popularity of these casinos...Stake, Sportsbet, Rollbit, Duelbits, and Betcoin.ag. Maybe it’s because they run their campaigns long-term, so their presence is seen daily on the forum. So, do you think casinos get significant benefits from having a signature campaign, especially when it’s long-term?

The Bitcointalk community is not the only place where these casinos advertise themselves. If you notice, most of the cryptocurrency casino have a front of shirt sponsorship deal with most of the football clubs. For example, Southampton has Rollbit on their shirt, Eyimba and Everton has Stake on their shirt and Lecester City has BC Game on their shirt. I know only on the few I mentioned.

The end of advertising in the forum is not the end of the casino. Many casinos that are not advertising in the forum are still doing well today while they might have plans to do more marketing in the forum. I know about Trustdice, they are very active and functioning, I am still making use of the casino.

[Eternad]

Just an observation, but I’ve noticed that many casinos with signature campaigns eventually stop, and the community seems to forget about them. Meanwhile, the casinos with long-term campaigns are still popular today. Of course, we can’t deny the popularity of these casinos...Stake, Sportsbet, Rollbit, Duelbits, and Betcoin.ag. Maybe it’s because they run their campaigns long-term, so their presence is seen daily on the forum. So, do you think casinos get significant benefits from having a signature campaign, especially when it’s long-term?

Popularity here probably yes but there’s some other place which they can advertise like social medial. Although some casino still popular even without active signature campaign here due to their reputation but their ANN thread is not that lively compared to users discussing on the ANN thread.

I’m not sure if this topic really fits here because I’m thinking this is more appropriate to discuss on service discussion board.

Anyway, campaign helps a lot to boost exposure here in the forum.

[Jawhead999]

Most of them lose it's popularity, but some of them not especially the old one like Bitsler and Primedice.

The most important thing when you run a business is having loyal customers, they will stay with you regardless you not have active campaign, not popular anymore etc, but it's hard to make people to be loyal because they will choose the best from the best.

Of course the casinos will get significant effect from long term campaign, it will attract people and might able to get few loyal gamblers.

[Aanuoluwatofunmi]

do you think casinos get significant benefits from having a signature campaign, especially when it’s long-term?

Of course there is this long term benefit a gambling platform enjoys when it is still enrolling on a signature campaign, however, when it pauses the same campaign promotion does not mean it will not make it to getting new players, but the target might have reduced base on the rate of getting more exposure is not there as before, this is all about promotion, some might have gotten more exposure through the signature campaign and retain their gamblers while some may need to continue the promotions in other to maintaining having more new users or traffic to the platform.

[Z_MBFM]

Just an observation, but I’ve noticed that many casinos with signature campaigns eventually stop, and the community seems to forget about them. Meanwhile, the casinos with long-term campaigns are still popular today. Of course, we can’t deny the popularity of these casinos...Stake, Sportsbet, Rollbit, Duelbits, and Betcoin.ag. Maybe it’s because they run their campaigns long-term, so their presence is seen daily on the forum. So, do you think casinos get significant benefits from having a signature campaign, especially when it’s long-term?

By running a signature campaign a casino site is marketing within this forum they probably get a lot of gamblers but by running the campaign for a long time they are able to drive the forum's active gamblers to their site. And then changing their campaign active on this forum is most effective to improve their service and offer attractive offers and some companies run out of budget for marketing on this forum due to which they close them down. And different companies may have different reasons for stopping a campaign

[alani123]

If a casino stops a signature campaign it loses big part of the trust it is building with the core crypto community and the most senior members. So really it's not a wise move. Casinos tend to make a lot of money once they get big, giving something back only makes sense when they want to keep their reputation.

It's part of the bare minimum of keeping some community interaction and signature camsoigns are one of the best promotions in distributing funds to potential users fairly instead of just a large corporation like google or any advertising company. Also it spreads this message of high trustworthiness to some of the most dedicated members of the community so it's a win win.

[Davidvictorson]

Just an observation, but I’ve noticed that many casinos with signature campaigns eventually stop, and the community seems to forget about them. Meanwhile, the casinos with long-term campaigns are still popular today. Of course, we can’t deny the popularity of these casinos...Stake, Sportsbet, Rollbit, Duelbits, and Betcoin.ag. Maybe it’s because they run their campaigns long-term, so their presence is seen daily on the forum. So, do you think casinos get significant benefits from having a signature campaign, especially when it’s long-term?

Lol. The gambling board in the Bitcointalk community is not the only gambling board on the internet. There are a thousand and one of them. Aside the internet some of these casinos sponsor big football clubs in the big leagues. They may even have more reach compared to their reach in online internet forums adverts. Their significance isn't tied to signature campaigns. Those that run it long-term have a bigger budget than those who run it short term. Above all I think that significance comes with a good reputation.

[DubemIfedigbo001]

Just an observation, but I’ve noticed that many casinos with signature campaigns eventually stop, and the community seems to forget about them. Meanwhile, the casinos with long-term campaigns are still popular today. Of course, we can’t deny the popularity of these casinos...Stake, Sportsbet, Rollbit, Duelbits, and Betcoin.ag. Maybe it’s because they run their campaigns long-term, so their presence is seen daily on the forum. So, do you think casinos get significant benefits from having a signature campaign, especially when it’s long-term?

What they do is marketing and marketing is very important to stay competitive in the industry, BTT is a huge platform and has very huge traffic and it is very important to the success of their business. BTT is not the only place these companies run their marketing ads, like rollbit company that is sponsoring two English teams and have their company name printed boldly on their shirts, that is another marketing adventure while they maintain their sig. campaign here in the forum, they employ many patterns of marketing on different platforms and it is surely converting for them. I'm sure they know the importance of each marketing environment, hence their having a long-term campaign activity here in the forum.

Stopping campaign here on the forum would not necessarily mean the end of a casino, but it might have a good negative impact on their patronage and might be a drawback on their marketting strategies. Every good and serious company takes marketting very seriously and I give Rollbit and other long-term running sig. campaigns credit for that.

[Solosanz]

If a casino stops a signature campaign it loses big part of the trust it is building with the core crypto community and the most senior members.

Signature campaign and casino's reputation are two different thing, as long as the casino never scam, they don't need to run signature campaign at all to be trusted. We can know how trusted they're by looking the way they handle complain and accusation against them.

Sportbets still have campaign on this forum? I did not notice that. Only what I thought before is their promotion offers like the competitions they offer on games and rounds board. Are you sure they still have signature campaign on this forum?

I don't believe if you not know that, some of them wear signature + avatar, some of them only wear the avatar. The difference with other campaign is they're kinda private, the participants were invited.

[cabron]

I think so, too. People have short-term memories, and if they never see something that will remind them of the company or the casino, they will also forget their accounts. Remember, casinos are created now and then, and if a businessman receives an epiphany allowing him to launch a casino with a marketing plan up to 10 years in the future, the old ones are going to be forgotten.

I don't even see Primedice anymore, but this one was very popular back then. However, there are more of them that stopped marketing and were then overtaken by the newer ones.

[peter0425]

Just an observation, but I’ve noticed that many casinos with signature campaigns eventually stop, and the community seems to forget about them.

This community only. If a casino is already well established and has a dedicated and loyal customers already, I don’t think they will suffer too much from not having an active signature campaign. Obviously, it will be best if they did as it will only make their casino grow bigger and reach to more audiences. But like I said, if they were already operating even before all the new casino ones these days in signature campaigns They will be fine.

Maybe it’s because they run their campaigns long-term, so their presence is seen daily on the forum. So, do you think casinos get significant benefits from having a signature campaign, especially when it’s long-term?

I can’t think of a single con of having a signature campaign so they should all definitely do that especially if money is not exactly an issue to their business anyway.

[nimogsm]

Just an observation, but I’ve noticed that many casinos with signature campaigns eventually stop, and the community seems to forget about them. Meanwhile, the casinos with long-term campaigns are still popular today. Of course, we can’t deny the popularity of these casinos...Stake, Sportsbet, Rollbit, Duelbits, and Betcoin.ag. Maybe it’s because they run their campaigns long-term, so their presence is seen daily on the forum. So, do you think casinos get significant benefits from having a signature campaign, especially when it’s long-term?

this is part of the marketing campaign for the product. Sometimes companies need to advertise to increase the recognition of the brand itself. When it is often in front of your eyes, it gives confidence to the future and potential player that this project is reliable, since it has been advertised for a long time, which means you can trust it or you can start playing there. And as for leaving after there is no more advertising, I don’t think it has a big impact, since during the advertising period new players come and stay in some proportion.

[Yatsan]

I doubt, especially with known platforms already. Reality is that only a small number of bettors are in this forum to start with. Signature campaigns are meant to build up the platform's popularity and engagement to its target communities. So once things are already up, it won't be that much of a downside since everything's established. Another proof is gambling platforms that has no signature and weekly campaign, but still operates and being more known by players inside and outside this industry.

Just an observation, but I’ve noticed that many casinos with signature campaigns eventually stop, and the community seems to forget about them. Meanwhile, the casinos with long-term campaigns are still popular today. Of course, we can’t deny the popularity of these casinos...Stake, Sportsbet, Rollbit, Duelbits, and Betcoin.ag. Maybe it’s because they run their campaigns long-term, so their presence is seen daily on the forum. So, do you think casinos get significant benefits from having a signature campaign, especially when it’s long-term?

To me what I sense is that when they are active here it makes it that easy for people especially gambler to use them, and can easily sort out issue when there is any need for it. Though there presence really matter because you can trust them immediately they shut their campaign, in fact it's like an open way to attract more gamblers.

At least in this forum however, not all people in this platform are gamblers as I said above. There's a bigger percentage of a platform's players from outside this industry. Some gambling sites are now even using mainstream advertisements such as being involved with leagues for example is boxing matches. But I agree that the presence of these campaigns matter especially if the project has the capacity to extend its longevity and to not shut it just because they have already achieved popularity.

[Onyeeze]

Just an observation, but I’ve noticed that many casinos with signature campaigns eventually stop, and the community seems to forget about them. Meanwhile, the casinos with long-term campaigns are still popular today. Of course, we can’t deny the popularity of these casinos...Stake, Sportsbet, Rollbit, Duelbits, and Betcoin.ag. Maybe it’s because they run their campaigns long-term, so their presence is seen daily on the forum. So, do you think casinos get significant benefits from having a signature campaign, especially when it’s long-term?

some casinos we today we know them through signature campaigns in the forum, but the thing is that, casino that has stand and people have known the casino very well, you will see that if casino stop campaigns many people will not visit their site, that's the thing you to understand very well about, casino games  is the kind of something you will see the adverts manually, its only online the adverts of casinos come up, so signature campaign is one of the things that makes casino to be well to known, so if signature is no more it will affect future casino to be easily known.

[Nrcewker]

According to me, a casino does signature campaigns when it is in the initial stage. At that time they have amazing products to offer, but no gamblers are present to try those. In such a scenario, they launch promotional campaigns, or specifically signature campaigns, in order to promote their product and attract the users to try it. After getting a good amount of users, they stop the promotion, as running marketing promotions is very expensive. Now regarding the popularity, it all depends on the casino and the user experience they provide. There are also some casinos present that do huge-scale marketing and promotions (like 1x Franchise), but are still not able to retain any loyal gamblers. So a casino won’t lose its popularity if it stops its signature campaigns.