[edited out]
I am not sure that I understand your distinction @Sticky Bomb. What are you arguing exactly?
In simpler terms what I'm arguing is that the main focus of a serious investor should not be on
how much he's accumulated just like suhadi88 proclaimed in my bolded text, but on
The quantity he's set out to accumulate and keep on adding to his portfolio until he arrives at it.
That seems like a distinction without a difference, and even potentially distracting from what the goals of anyone might be.
It seems kind of fantastical to imagine some quantity of bitcoin in the abstract as being relevant, since the target would be ongoingly moving both in terms of valuations and in terms of how much bitcoin any of us might have had been able to accumulate, whether we are taking measurements at 4 years, 10 years, 15 years or some other increments along the way in our bitcoin accumulation journey.
I believe where we place our focus matters, because focusing so much on our current success more than the actual target ahead may induce an unnecessary sense of satisfaction which may lead to lack of focus and action, especially if you've stacked up for a while but yet to reach your accumulation target,
You seem to be referring to a skepticism about abilities to focus and discipline rather than an attempt to strive for meaningful assessments, and yeah for sure, any of us might get distracted by the riches and the big tittie bitches along the way... but I doubt that we should be presuming that guys don't have abilities to stay focused and to assess and reassess and to account for both the various facts but also the potential (and likely) changes in their measuring tools along the way.
It makes little sense to stay blindly locked in on some goal(s) and/or targets that might have had been first formulated 4 years, 10 years, 15 years or some other earlier timeline without ongoingly measuring..and maybe even making alterations in the ways of attacking the bitcoin accumulation matter.
For example, if a guy has an income of $30k per year and he is ongoingly investing $100 per week, then such bitcoin investor should be able to take snapshots along the way in terms of how much income his accumulated bitcoin stash would be able to generate based on his ongoing accumulation and valuation of his stash.
I will agree with you that guys will get distracted into valuing their bitcoin stash at bitcoin spot prices rather than making sure to valuate their bitcoin with more durable and substantial ways, such as using the 200-WMA, yet I still doubt that there is much value to proclaim that they need to stick with their original ways of assessing their bitcoin investment - and in that regard, it is likely that after 4 years, 10 years, 15 years or some other amount of passage of time investing in bitcoin, the bitcoin investor is going to become more sophisticated in his ways of valuating his bitcoin stash.
For sure, there are so many examples of guys who sold way too many bitcoin too soon, and yeah, guys are going to have to suffer the consequences of their dumbness when they end up going down the road of selling too many bitcoin too soon, yet I still doubt that the fact that there are a lot of historical errors should be guidelines for guys to figure out and come to the correct conclusions about how to go through the various phases of their bitcoin accumulation journey, and then perhaps their bitcoin maintenance time frame prior to their starting to employ sustainable withdrawal theories or whatever might be their ways of liquidating their bitcoin whether they decide to so it in sustainable ways or if they end up cashing out their principle and expediting their ways of cashing out their coins.
so my argument is that it is better to focus on your accumulation target and strive to achieve it within your holding period, rather than focusing so much on your already accumulated stash and as a result loose sight of your initial target.
I will agree that there are a certainly large number of guys who will get distracted by bitcoin price, and they may well slow down stacking bitcoin too soon and/or they will start to sell bitcoin too soon, yet I doubt that practices to blind oneself to their ongoing progress and monitoring of their progress is going to be the solution to such faltering attention, and surely there are likely ways that guys have to spend their 4, 10, 15 or other amount of years in ways that get them to learn how to reasonably valuate ongoing progress, whether they are measuring quantity of bitcoin, amount invested into the bitcoin, value of the bitcoin in dollars (spot price and/or 200-WMA), the spending power of the bitcoin stash and/or possible sustainable withdrawal practices (price-based and/or time based). It seems that guys likely have to figure out ways to play around with their various ways of assessing and perhaps even ongoingly be assessing their current status along with if they have reached or are getting close to reaching their goals and perhaps considering if there might be any changes that they might want (or need) to make to their bitcoin accumulation and/or maintenance practices when they are on their way to reaching a sufficient quantity of bitcoin or more than a sufficient amount of bitcoin.
[edited out]
Well, I don't see any much difference about focusing on your target instead of the accumulated bitcoin because at the end, the distance between your current portfolio and your accumulation target will involve subtracting your accumulated bitcoin from your accumulation target. It is better to even focus on your accumulation process (DCA), instead of focusing either on your accumulated bitcoin or your accumulation target to be able to avoid getting pressured. If you focus on your accumulation process instead of accumulation target, you may wake up one day to
realise that you have even exceeded your accumulation target without putting yourself under pressure that comes with knowing that you still have a long way to go.
In summary; Focusing on your accumulated bitcoin can cause laziness while focusing on your accumulation target can cause pressure (wanting to go overly aggressive) which may ruin your entire portfolio.
I think that any of us could come accross situations where we might end up reassessing our bitcoin accumulation status, and surely it is likely better to reassess and realize that we have more bitcoin than we need as compared with the opposite of not having as much bitcoin as we thought that we needed.
Many guys know that I have been in bitcoin for right around 12.5 years, yet even with some of my own assessments of how to manage my bitcoin stash and even how I should behave in accordance with my bitcoin stash, I have several times come up with new ways of valuating my bitcoin stash and tweaking aspects of my conduct based on my reassessments.
It also seems that actually having the bitcoin becomes much more important in any assessment based on having theories about how many bitcoin might be needed, so we can create ball park assessments in order to help us to make progress in the direction that we believe that we need to go, such as ongoingly accumulating bitcoin, and so many times if we make assessments to the valuation of our bitcoin stash, we want to be erroring on the side of having enough or more than enough, rather than erroring on the side of not having enough, which is also part of an assessment in which guys found out that they ended upselling too many bitcoin too soon because they wrongly valuated the quantity of the bitcoin that they had and how many they would be able to sell on a regular basis whether they were to follow some kind of a price-based withdrawal practice and/or a time-based withdrawal practice, and yeah, if they mis-measured how many bitcoin that they needed, then they would find themselves overly depleting their bitcoin and not able to continue to live off of their bitcoin and/or to supplement their income with their bitcoin.
Sometimes guys need to present information about quantity of bitcoin and income, even if they present fictional numbers in order to attempt to help out in the assessment of whether guys might be following sound practices in their assessment of their bitcoin stashes and whether they believe that they are going to be able to sustainably withdraw from their bitcoin stash or if they might merely be planning to cash out their bitcoin and become no coiners.
I am not sure that I understand your distinction @Sticky Bomb. What are you arguing exactly?
In simpler terms what I'm arguing is that the main focus of a serious investor should not be on
how much he's accumulated just like suhadi88 proclaimed in my bolded text, but on
The quantity he's set out to accumulate and keep on adding to his portfolio until he arrives at it. I believe where we place our focus matters, because focusing so much on our current success more than the actual target ahead may induce an unnecessary sense of satisfaction which may lead to lack of focus and action, especially if you've stacked up for a while but yet to reach your accumulation target, so my argument is that it is better to focus on your accumulation target and strive to achieve it within your holding period, rather than focusing so much on your already accumulated stash and as a result loose sight of your initial target.
People start investing and holding Bitcoin for different reasons and purposes. There are people who wants to stash at least 10 BTC before they retire from active service, this set of people set their target base on quantity of Bitcoin. There also people whose strategy is to invest at least 20% of their income into Bitcoin, this set of people do not care about the quantity of Bitcoin that will give them and as long as they continue to invest 20% of their income into Bitcoin, they are satisfied. I don't think there should be argument on what constitute a target, what we should be discussing is the process for which JJG have made a fantastic strategy which we can tailor to individual needs and do better with our Bitcoin accumulation.
One thing is targeting how to accumulate bitcoin, and another thing is assessing the extent that any guys might assess that they had reached their accumulation goal.
It seems to me that many times guys will have a more aggressive bitcoin accumulation phase, and then they may well slow down into a more moderate bitcoin accumulation phase, and then they may well start to ONLY buy bitcoin on dips, and then they may well stop accumulating except maybe in extreme dips and then maybe at some point they will get into a stage where they are starting to sustainably withdraw bitcoin in price-based and/or time-based ways.
Many times it is going to take 4-10 years or longer to go through these various stages unless guys might be to front load their bitcoin investment in various ways, including potentially guys who might be reallocating some value into bitcoin from other investments that they might have had prior to coming to bitcoin.
To try to be structural in hypotheticals, a guy who invest 5% of his income into bitcoin will take 20 years to invest 1 year's of income into bitcoin, while a guy who invests 10% will take 10 years, a guy who invests 25% will take 4 years, etc etc... So we can see that there can be value for guys to attempt to front load their bitcoin investment, even though we also know that there are a decently large number of guys who struggle to even be able to invest into bitcoin at a rate that is 1% of their income so they will not be able to accumulate as much bitcoin relative to their overall income level, so they might be accumulating bitcoin most, if not all, of their lives, and they still might have some timeline targets to start to cash out their bitcoin, even though they might never reach a point in being able to completely live off of their bitcoin or to supplement a large portion of their cost of living with their bitcoin.