Cancer

[BADecker]

Cancer is parasites.


What If Cancer is Really a Parasite Infection? - Dr Lee Merritt

[takewhatyouneed]

It's a terrible disease. I hope they find a cure.

[BADecker]

It's a terrible disease. I hope they find a cure.

Anti-parasite medicine seems to be working... at least in loads of cases.

[franky1]

badecker yet again advertises for big pharma by trying to help them increase their anti-parasite sales, for a non-parasite medical issue
badecker thinks he is against big pharma, but doesnt realise he is a promoter of their products

when will badecker learn to try to learn some biology.. instead of the PR pamphlets given by veterinary medical sales reps
every big pharma product badecker advertises is a big pharma product designed for animals. so its obvious he is talking to a veterinary sales rep or occasionally his gay male full body masseuse whom cosplays as a doctor for kinks

[BADecker]

badecker yet again advertises for big pharma by trying to help them increase their anti-parasite sales, for a non-parasite medical issue
badecker thinks he is against big pharma, but doesnt realise he is a promoter of their products

when will badecker learn to try to learn some biology.. instead of the PR pamphlets given by veterinary medical sales reps
every big pharma product badecker advertises is a big pharma product designed for animals. so its obvious he is talking to a veterinary sales rep or occasionally his gay male full body masseuse whom cosplays as a doctor for kinks

Did you really forget to look at my signature part of all my posts... at the bottom? Dr. Ardis is not at all Big Pharma. But the point is, do what works. If it includes pharmaceuticals, do what works.

Animals, esp. mice, are very similar to humans in their makeup. That's why they use them for experimentation. What works on animals, works on people.

Besides, many people in the forum won't be interested in being healed if it doesn't include pharmaceuticals. Let's do what works, and then, over time, clean up the whole body with proper nutrition.

[franky1]

cancer is not a parasite.. you have no clue.. you just read none-sense blogs trying to sell pharmaceuticals

a parasite is a foreign invader that feeds off the host body but does it in a way to maximise its life by doing minimum destruction to its host
cancer is a mutation OF the body that does maximum destruction as it grows and mutates more from the bodies own cells

as for Dr ardis.. he is a glorified masseuse not someone that specialises in cancers or even parasites, all of the products he promotes ar things he can buy wholesale without needing a doctors licence.. but then pretends they are doctor prescribed when he sells them

he is a un-glorified pharma rep, buying produce from the same suppliers as big pharma, but just without the licence requirement because he is reselling animal pharma products as human pharma products... for mega profit

[Hispo]

So if cancer is caused by parasites or the tumors themselves are made of parasites, why would people take the hassle to go as far as using radioactive isotopes and surgery for one to fight cancer effectively anyways? To me it does not make sense.
Also, Perhaps there are some chances anti-parasite medicines could help to counter cancer but that does not mean cancer are microscopic bugs, it only would mean there is some undiscovered chemical mechanism which weakens the cancer and does not do the same to healthy normal cells within the body.
It could be similar to how antidepressants got discovered, people were seeking for medicines to treat neumonia, and one of the side effects was the improvement of the mood of the patients who were part of the scientific trial.

Anyways, all this feels like an excuse and conspiracy theory set up by cuacks to sell overpriced ivermectin to people who are desperate enough to fall for their scam, it is very sad and disgusting at the same time.

[BADecker]

Since Dr. Andrew Kaufman and associates and colleagues (and many others over the years) - https:/www.andrewkaufmanmd.com/ - have proven that if there are any such things as viruses, nobody has isolated one (except by accident, maybe), what else is there? Bacteria, parasites, and poisons/toxins.

No such thing as cancer in the way that the standard description explains.

[JeromeTash]

Parasites? Like worms?  

Come on @BADecker you are better than this.

A cancer is an abnormal tissue growth. The cells are usually the same as that of the body part that is affected. Chemotherapy is dangerous because it's sometimes hard to target it toward only cancer cells, as it also kills normal body cells. It can't distinguish them because the cells are the same.

Not everything on the internet has to religiously believed!

[BADecker]

Parasites? Like worms?  

Come on @BADecker you are better than this.

A cancer is an abnormal tissue growth. The cells are usually the same as that of the body part that is affected. Chemotherapy is dangerous because it's sometimes hard to target it toward only cancer cells, as it also kills normal body cells. It can't distinguish them because the cells are the same.

Not everything on the internet has to religiously believed!

My disclaimer is that I am not the researcher.

Abnormal tissue growth has a reason. Some of the researchers have found that cancer is parasite caused. This has been known around the world for a long time. It's only in the developed countries - the so-called free world - where it has been hidden.

As you say, not every thing on the Internet has to be believed, nor can it. You can't easily believe contradictory things. So, don't look for the Internet stuff. Look for the truth.

[franky1]

parasites dont alter dna. they just eat tissue and nutrients
..
whats next, swallowing/inhaling flies and spiders while you sleep is the cause of all illness and death
..
as for your endless stupidity about pretending no one has ever found a virus.. you really need to take the silly links off your browsers bookmark list and instead take atleast 30 minutes out of your wasted 3 years of posting your BS and maybe try to do some actual research for once

you can learn alot more facts in 30 minutes than you spent in the last 3 years blindly following cultish narratives and avoiding research
even andrew kaufman is not a virologist he was a psychiatrist

your posts no matter the topic sound like an indoctrinated cult follower. you cant even be bothered to look deeper into the failures of understanding related to the freeman/sovereignty cult crap, let alone your failures of medical/biological understanding


may i ask one serious question..
why do you always follow and fall into these cult traps of stupid nonsense stuff.. are you lonely and just looking to be part of some community that differs from whats deemed normal. or are you just so easily lead that you will follow any stupidity into stupid town

[BADecker]

As I have said, I am not the researcher, however...

parasites dont alter dna. they just eat tissue and nutrients - Parasites small enough to exist inside the cell can do damage there, just like you said, eating nutrients... cell parts.
..
whats next, swallowing/inhaling flies and spiders while you sleep is the cause of all illness and death - If the research shows it, what do you have against the idea?
..
as for your endless stupidity about pretending no one has ever found a virus.. you really need to take the silly links off your browsers bookmark list and instead take atleast 30 minutes out of your wasted 3 years of posting your BS and maybe try to do some actual research for once - Perhaps it's is time for you to use some of that logical thinking to question why there isn't much more data coming from the Microsphere Nanoscope. Could it be because it would prove that viruses don't exist? There are different kinds of research, but nobody seems to have used the Rivers Postulates to find a single virus. At least not that they can verify. All of the findings are based on the potential of there being viruses, rather than on the actual viruses.

you can learn alot more facts in 30 minutes than you spent in the last 3 years blindly following cultish narratives and avoiding research
even andrew kaufman is not a virologist he was a psychiatrist - Note that nobody has done anything other than talk around Dr. Kaufman's points. It's not that viruses don't exist. It's that there hasn't been any virus found, that all such findings are based on hypothetical ideas that there are viruses. Dr. Kaufman shows that the findings of researchers don't prove virus one way or another, to exist or not exist. It's the methods behind the so-called proofs that are faulty.

your posts no matter the topic sound like an indoctrinated cult follower. you cant even be bothered to look deeper into the failures of understanding related to the freeman/sovereignty cult crap, let alone your failures of medical/biological understanding - And the cult has taken over modern medicine. One of the ways is by their so-called proving of the existence of viruses, which seems to be a lie. And you fell for it. Or are you one of the happy ones because you are sucking a bunch of money off the cancer-sick people?


may i ask one serious question..
why do you always follow and fall into these cult traps of stupid nonsense stuff.. are you lonely and just looking to be part of some community that differs from whats deemed normal. or are you just so easily lead that you will follow any stupidity into stupid town

When you look at the research that has been done on the human body - the complexity - there is no reason for death or even old age. When are you going to step out of your stupidity and see that there is more to it that we haven't been told and aren't being told. Stay stupid if you like. That doesn't mean the rest of us have to.





EDIT: Here's less than two minutes by Dr. Lee Merritt. Listen for the Dr. Ardis part - https://www.bitchute.com/video/7EYangQj4Ytb.

[franky1]

you already got debunked about your silly scripts years ago. you went silent with your tail between your legs.. kaufman already got proven to be a liar and you got told he was.. thats why you dropped that garbage subject for a while.. seems you forgot to leave your scripts in the trash

the rivers and bell postulates have already been articulated to you on this forum.. go search the post history and remember it this time

as for the other doctor you now mention
you must have back/spine injuries as you keep taking advice from people that specialise in (merrit)orthopaedic, (ardis)chiropractic or (kaufman)psychiatrists.. the 3 elements someone in back pain would consult(psychiatric is if they think your pain is a mental fantasy rather than a physical injury)

have you ever actually tried to look into studies made by actual microbiologists, virologists and immunologist

[paxmao]

badecker yet again advertises for big pharma by trying to help them increase their anti-parasite sales, for a non-parasite medical issue
badecker thinks he is against big pharma, but doesnt realise he is a promoter of their products

when will badecker learn to try to learn some biology.. instead of the PR pamphlets given by veterinary medical sales reps
every big pharma product badecker advertises is a big pharma product designed for animals. so its obvious he is talking to a veterinary sales rep or occasionally his gay male full body masseuse whom cosplays as a doctor for kinks

Did you really forget to look at my signature part of all my posts... at the bottom? Dr. Ardis is not at all Big Pharma. But the point is, do what works. If it includes pharmaceuticals, do what works.

Animals, esp. mice, are very similar to humans in their makeup. That's why they use them for experimentation. What works on animals, works on people.

Besides, many people in the forum won't be interested in being healed if it doesn't include pharmaceuticals. Let's do what works, and then, over time, clean up the whole body with proper nutrition.

BA, dumBAss snake oil seller, you are going to get people killed with your stupidity. Stop promoting false science and anything that pays you a few SAT for spreading dis-information.  Cancer is what it is, there is plenty of rearch on all types of cancer and there is no doubt that is NOT a parasitic infection but related to genetic mutations.

Of course this is not big pharma, it stupid little snake oil sellers living of the desperation of people who are about to die and would try anything.

BTW it is starting to get obvious that you are using multiple newby accounts to bump threads.

Parasites? Like worms?  

Come on @BADecker you are better than this.
[...]

Parasites like BA. He is not better than this - look in his posting history.

[BADecker]

you already got debunked about your silly scripts years ago. you went silent with your tail between your legs.. kaufman already got proven to be a liar and you got told he was.. thats why you dropped that garbage subject for a while.. seems you forgot to leave your scripts in the trash

the rivers and bell postulates have already been articulated to you on this forum.. go search the post history and remember it this time

as for the other doctor you now mention
you must have back/spine injuries as you keep taking advice from people that specialise in (merrit)orthopaedic, (ardis)chiropractic or (kaufman)psychiatrists.. the 3 elements someone in back pain would consult(psychiatric is if they think your pain is a mental fantasy rather than a physical injury)

have you ever actually tried to look into studies made by actual microbiologists, virologists and immunologist

There was no debunking as you describe. Kaufman didn't get proven wrong; he got silenced by people talking around what he said rather than answering his points. It's the same today. They can't answer his points, so they just talk around him and make it sound like they said something.

The Rivers Postulates are weak in two little areas where they can produce uncertain results. But they are the simple best and strongest that we have. There is nothing to remember about them in former posts except that they were never proven to have been used by anybody to find even one virus. All past talk about Rivers was talk around the idea of using the Rivers ideas to prove a virus.

The fact that a person, doctor or otherwise, has knowledge other than a particular certification, and the fact that you keep picking on the certification part, shows that you are not interested in the topic, but are interested in the people. Sure, people are 'fun'. But the point is totally bypassed when you do that.

Nobody has to look into the studies of microbiologists and others. Why not? Because the stuff they show doesn't prove anything. It only supposes and suggests stuff. They even say this in their conclusions, right in the studies. This supports the fact that viruses were never PROVEN to exist, but only guessed about.

Give us a Rivers or Bell study that actually, literally, sucked some virus matter out of some lung goo, and then proved that there was viral matter in it somehow, and then that it made somebody else sick... by proof of having done the actual doing of the study. You can't. There aren't any. It's all basically proven nonsense.

One of the things that is left to study is parasites, and that is what is being done now that there is so much interest in things like Fenbendazole having worked on cancer.

[BADecker]

badecker yet again advertises for big pharma by trying to help them increase their anti-parasite sales, for a non-parasite medical issue
badecker thinks he is against big pharma, but doesnt realise he is a promoter of their products

when will badecker learn to try to learn some biology.. instead of the PR pamphlets given by veterinary medical sales reps
every big pharma product badecker advertises is a big pharma product designed for animals. so its obvious he is talking to a veterinary sales rep or occasionally his gay male full body masseuse whom cosplays as a doctor for kinks

Did you really forget to look at my signature part of all my posts... at the bottom? Dr. Ardis is not at all Big Pharma. But the point is, do what works. If it includes pharmaceuticals, do what works.

Animals, esp. mice, are very similar to humans in their makeup. That's why they use them for experimentation. What works on animals, works on people.

Besides, many people in the forum won't be interested in being healed if it doesn't include pharmaceuticals. Let's do what works, and then, over time, clean up the whole body with proper nutrition.

BA, dumBAss snake oil seller, you are going to get people killed with your stupidity. Stop promoting false science and anything that pays you a few SAT for spreading dis-information.  Cancer is what it is, there is plenty of rearch on all types of cancer and there is no doubt that is NOT a parasitic infection but related to genetic mutations.

Of course this is not big pharma, it stupid little snake oil sellers living of the desperation of people who are about to die and would try anything.

BTW it is starting to get obvious that you are using multiple newby accounts to bump threads.

Parasites? Like worms?  

Come on @BADecker you are better than this.
[...]

Parasites like BA. He is not better than this - look in his posting history.

It seems that paxmao, like franky1, has been tricked into believing Big Pharma. The difference is that the only thing that paxmao has left is to pick on other people rather than show anything substantial. This makes us believe that paxmao is invested in Big Pharma, and doesn't really care one way or the other, otherwise. franky1 at least seems to believe the BF nonsense.

People are flocking to Dr. Ardis. People don't do that except when they see stuff that really works. Look Dr. Ardis up at the links below, and find out what is really going on.

[JeromeTash]

My disclaimer is that I am not the researcher.

Abnormal tissue growth has a reason. Some of the researchers have found that cancer is parasite caused. This has been known around the world for a long time. It's only in the developed countries - the so-called free world - where it has been hidden.

As you say, not every thing on the Internet has to be believed, nor can it. You can't easily believe contradictory things. So, don't look for the Internet stuff. Look for the truth.

Unlike you who just quotes from articles, videos, and random online research docs. I actually do have some medical knowledge. From Microbiology as a broad course to parasitology.

From the basics

If I have an abnormal growth on one of my toes. Does it qualify as a parasite?

[BADecker]

My disclaimer is that I am not the researcher.

Abnormal tissue growth has a reason. Some of the researchers have found that cancer is parasite caused. This has been known around the world for a long time. It's only in the developed countries - the so-called free world - where it has been hidden.

As you say, not every thing on the Internet has to be believed, nor can it. You can't easily believe contradictory things. So, don't look for the Internet stuff. Look for the truth.

Unlike you who just quotes from articles, videos, and random online research docs. I actually do have some medical knowledge. From Microbiology as a broad course to parasitology.

From the basics

If I have an abnormal growth on one of my toes. Does it qualify as a parasite?

As stated, only if you are the parasite.     

[BADecker]

Fenbendazole and its two sister drugs are succeeding in conquering cancer, at about $11 a week. It won't come out in the medical journals in a practical way. And we all know why.


Cancer Remission Achieved with Low-Cost Drug | Media Blackout


https://vigilantfox.news/p/cancer-remission-achieved-with-low?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=975571&post_id=152352129&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=5gat1&triedRedirect=tr
3 patients experienced complete remission after regularly taking fenbendazole.

But the cancer industry seems to hate it because it only costs about $11 per week.

Fenbendazole (FBZ) is a medicine originally designed to treat worms and parasites in animals. Its sister drugs, Mebendazole and Albendazole, have had remarkable success treating similar ailments in humans with few side effects.

The case series highlights the remarkable stories of three cancer patients who achieved miraculous recoveries with fenbendazole after exhausting all conventional therapies.

After analyzing these cases, the abstract concluded, "FBZ appears to be a potentially safe and effective antineoplastic agent that can be repurposed for human use in treating genitourinary malignancies."

Adding to the growing evidence in support of fendendazole's use case against cancer, an Oklahoma man credited his miraculous cancer recovery to the pet med after overcoming terminal small cell lung cancer, defying a less than 1% survival rate and leaving doctors baffled.

This story is truly remarkable. Watch.
...

[franky1]

Fenbendazole

^^
promoting more pharma products while pretending to be anti-pharma

also badecker, who is not a researcher nor intelligent in any subject he talks about wants to tell people to swallow dog medication.. where its a known fact to cause liver damage in humans

seems he doesnt care about human health, and just wants to promote some masseuses recommendation he seen online.. even funnier is badecker is not even getting any commission for his promotions.. so many will ask why is badecker being such a absolute fool

de-wormer does not cure cancer. it only works to kill gastro-intestinal parasites/worms. its not even functional as a de-wormer within cells/bloodstream or other body parts of animals.. it just works in the gut.. however the chemicals of the drug have negative affect on humans