Beware of DuckDice.io – My Disappointing Experience and Fairness Issues🚨

[Horsbyname]

spam

I'm copy pasting my previous comment to OPs new post as its the only way to address him:

Not tagging anything specific in this as at this point you ignore facts 100%, you throw in lies between the lines to make your smoke show more believable etc.

Like I've already stated long ago, I was able to dig out your betting information, even though I can't link them to your username, I can see the bets placed on that server seed/client seed, so you've actually helped us with this matter when you confirmed that you gambled on that server/client seed, thanks OP.  Managing to do that has confirmed that you have infact lied, you have not placed any 15.5% bets, you have not encountered any "huge loss streak" you simply lied from your 1st post, made fake accusations just so that you can strong arm DD into paying you anything.

Now, please stop with this nonsense and running in circles, the other fake threads that you have created and will probably create, and submit already your fake complaint to AG so I can provide them inside company data that shows you are nothing but a blackmailer and a scammer.

Thanks,


Kirito89

Duckdice Support.

So you have accused me of blackmailer and I proved it already that I am not the blackmailer. Instead of providing evidences of your accusation you chose to hide behind holydarkness. Kirito89 is actually "Horse Bouy" you are trying escape with this pattern as you are doing for years now.

You made so many accusations in this forum.

Its not baseless and you know that aswell .


Here's a tip for you OP, next time when you use different emails to send blackmail requests ( I assume you thought you'd use a different email to keep your "image" clean so you can go on this bitcointalk tirade), make sure you create a completely different email.   Cause if the blackmailer was a completely different, I'm pretty sure he would have no way of knowing your email address.

To give context to bitcointalk, the moment OP started this bitcointalk thread,  we've been getting bombarded on Trustpilot with fake reviews, and blackmail demands,  in context,  OPs email lets say is something like johndoe@gmail.com,  blackmailler's email address is johndoee@gmail.com, while OP initially stated its just a coincidence, its really one hell of a coincidence for the blackmailer to also know OPs email address . 

Like I've said OP, regardless of anything, you will not be getting a single $.   Your provably fairness accusation has been disproved, regardless of how much you spam to cover the thread up.


Kirito89,
Duckdice Support.

As I've provided the proof of everything you asked for.Please provide evidence of your statement. You have already tarnished my reputation in this forum by calling me blackmailer and scammer without proving it.


Nutildah why did you ignore this? I used AI ofc, and alot others are using.Our taxes are going to be invested in AI.

Kirito89 accused me that I am blackmailing them,but instead, they should be the one providing proof or evidence.Holydarkness asked me to provide proof, and I did. When I provided the proof, they dropped their accusations and shifted to another one.

But I’m wondering, what kind of proof are you asking for when you say "unfounded proofs"?

Anyway I was the one asking him not to derail the topic by baseles accusations. Why dont you ask him to prove his accusations.

Over the last few months I've noticed a spate of AI-generated complaints against casinos. When the problems these accounts have are explained to them by a forum member or casino representative, they either shift the nature of the complaint, add a bunch of unrelated information, or continue pounding on the same fallacy-laden argument (ala game-protect aka BlackyJacky). While of course some casino complaints are legitimate, I've found that 100% of the ones using AI are not. In short, a pattern seems to be emerging here (use AI to throw shit against the wall & see what sticks).

I want to assure you with all my soul that it was not me who shift the focus from the main issue, I never expected them to blackmail me .I would like to emphasize that throughout the entire time, I was the one asking him not to shift the focus away from the main issue. I repeatedly told him to stop making accusations and to concentrate on the issue I had raised. But he twisted it. Below are my responses, where I clearly told him and requested him not to divert attention from the main issue with those baseless allegations.


1.

my intention remains unchanged to share my personal experience and raise awareness about the issues i encountered with duckdice.io. i encourage you to focus on investigating my original concerns rather than conflating them with unrelated actions from other individuals.[/color]

2.

I hope we can now focus on the concerns i initially raised regarding the extraordinary losing streak and the fairness mechanisms in place.

Looking forward to your response.

3.

I want to emphasize that I have never contacted your team to demand money or bonuses, and I urge you to stop bringing up unrelated accusations to divert attention from this issue. While your provably fair system may work theoretcally, these inconsistencies and reports from other users suggest possible manipulation within your platform, and I stand by my concerns, seeking clarity on these issues.

4.

Stop making baseless accusations. I have already made it clear that I do not want you to pay anyone a single penny, and I stand by that.
This kind of response only further damages Duckdice's reputation, as it shows the unprofessionalism of its representatives. To clear everything up, I will share the email conversation between your team and me, so everyone can see the truth for themselves.Here's the link:  https://imgur.com/a/ZbWExwU

5.

It’s clear you’re grasping at straws. Only a mindless scammer would create an email with the same name as mine to get something from you.
 I’ve already stated very clearly before: I never demanded money. What I have always asked for is fairness—something you’ve repeatedly avoided while coming back here with irrelevant claims that make no sense.

Even a kid could understand that using the same username for two accounts would never work in anyone’s favor at the same time. Your accusations are baseless and a poor attempt to shift attention away from the actual issues. Focus on addressing the real problems instead of spinning these pointless stories.

6.

Deflecting from the Core Issue:
It’s evident that you’re using this fabricated blackmail narrative to divert attention from the real issue—my concerns about unfair betting outcomes and your refusal to provide transparent data. This is a blatant attempt to tarnish my credibility and distract readers from DuckDice.io’s questionable practices.

7.

Regarding your claims about the so-called “blackmailer” emails, let me clarify something you keep twisting: I never stated it was a coincidence that you received emails from scammers with an email address similar to mine. What I said was that the scammer used my username, as clearly shown in the screenshot of the email you posted earlier. It’s you who keeps changing the narrative to suit your claims. You seem to conveniently ignore this distinction to push your baseless accusations against me.

8.

Additionally, I want the Bitcointalk community to witness what Duckdice representatives are doing in public forums—constantly shifting narratives, twisting facts, and making baseless accusations. If this is how they handle public discussions, it makes me wonder: what are they doing in private messages with users? How far does this behavior go when there’s no public scrutiny?

9.

Since I have already shared the relevant information publicly, it’s no longer an issue if Kirito89 decides to DM that information to you or anyone else. Transparency is my priority in this matter, and I hope this clears up any ambiguity.

Was it me who shifted the narrative? No. I begged him not to do this. I even asked Kirito89, "Is it a coincidence that whenever someone raises an issue against you in public forums, you start receiving those so called "blackmail emails"? Or is it just a way to weaken the claims of the person speaking out?" Yet, he didn’t respond to that.


[moderator's note: consecutive posts merged]

[Kirito89]

more spam

You are in fact a scammer and a blackmailler, and like I've stated already 3 times, submit your AG complaint so I can provide the evidence that you lied and went the scam/blackmail way from your 1st post.


Glad this account of yours finally got negative tagged.

Was it me who shifted the narrative? No. I begged him not to do this. I even asked Kirito89, "Is it a coincidence that whenever someone raises an issue against you in public forums, you start receiving those so called "blackmail emails"? Or is it just a way to weaken the claims of the person speaking out?" Yet, he didn’t respond to that.

It's not a coincidence, it only happens with the fake accusations you do here, and the multiple other fake threads you create.  All genuine complaints have been dealt with publicly here, where no blackmail-ing attempts have been made, the only ones when blackmail is involved, are the ones like this one you made, where you lied about a "losing streak" which we have evidence never happened, or the other thread with the GDPR nonsense you've created, where we have the email from OP (also you) asking for money,  regardless of the tactic you're trying to pull there.

So, my final comment on this thread, cause at this point I've spent way too much energy on this case, will re-iterate:

1.  All these fake accusations you make on bitcointalk, or the future ones you will create, they are all re-directed to me, so please believe me when I say that there is no possible scenario where these blackmail attempts will be succesful for you, and you're simply wasting your time, my time, and the bitcointalk users who've actually invested their time analyzing all this nonsense.

2. Submit that AG complain already, so I can provide internal data to them and prove there, and here aswell, that you're simply a scammer and blackmailer.

3. Stop using all the color palletes and text size available as it simply makes your walls of text more unreadable.

4. This is my last reply on this thread, holydarkness if you're still following this can you please dm me if there is anything actually relevant that OP states.

[nutildah]

Nutildah why did you ignore this? I used AI ofc, and alot others are using.Our taxes are going to be invested in AI.

It comes off as insincere. Its like you presented ChatGPT with your side of the story and then asked it to generate a list of things you could complain about. I think what tipped me toward leaving you the negative tag is your failure to address Kirito89's request to submit your complaint to AskGamblers. Is there any valid reason for not doing this? They are proper, well-respected mediators after all, and we are not. If the final outcome of your complaint to AG is favorable to you, or even undecided, I will remove the tag on your account. Right now it just seems like you're one of several blackmailers currently plaguing the forum.

[holydarkness]

[...]
4. This is my last reply on this thread, holydarkness if you're still following this can you please dm me if there is anything actually relevant that OP states.

OP's thread actually has become a tangled mess of repetitive old statements and quotes and demand for explanation that's already given to him several times, that not only it's hard to navigate without a headache [those font color and all clearly has lost its function], I find myself tired of keep on trying to explain things to him as it'll be re-asked as a "breakthrough" and "revealing" matter on the three or four post ahead, that I can only conclude the best approach is to let OP rant whatever he want and I'll just take spectator seat until he escalate to AG.

But sure, you can leave this, I'll keep my eyes on this thread as a spectator and will nudge you if something new and worth addressing [or if OP finally decide to own his word and go to AG] come up. Otherwise, if OP keep on his track of repeating things that's made abundantly clear, like the last dozen of his post, I'll just read and won't notify you as it doesn't worth to be [re]addressed [again].

[Horsbyname]

Nutildah why did you ignore this? I used AI ofc, and alot others are using.Our taxes are going to be invested in AI.

It comes off as insincere. Its like you presented ChatGPT with your side of the story and then asked it to generate a list of things you could complain about. I think what tipped me toward leaving you the negative tag is your failure to address Kirito89's request to submit your complaint to AskGamblers. Is there any valid reason for not doing this? They are proper, well-respected mediators after all, and we are not. If the final outcome of your complaint to AG is favorable to you, or even undecided, I will remove the tag on your account. Right now it just seems like you're one of several blackmailers currently plaguing the forum.

This is what I was waiting for, because I have provided every single piece of evidence Holydarknes asked for, and later he will ignore it and move to other things. I have filed a complaint and will update you once I get any. I hope you will not jump into other things like Holydarknees & Kirito89

[shasan]

This is what I was waiting for, because I have provided every single piece of evidence Holydarknes asked for, and later he will ignore it and move to other things. I have filed a complaint and will update you once I get any. I hope you will not jump into other things like Holydarknees & Kirito89

I have several posts on this topic and came to know you have written the story with the help of ChatGPT which has been accused by the great forum member nutildah. If nutildah is wrong then please provide enough proof supporting your words otherwise it will be proved that you have posted a fake scam accusation. If so please lock this thread to avoid misguide.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               

[holydarkness]

Nutildah why did you ignore this? I used AI ofc, and alot others are using.Our taxes are going to be invested in AI.

It comes off as insincere. Its like you presented ChatGPT with your side of the story and then asked it to generate a list of things you could complain about. I think what tipped me toward leaving you the negative tag is your failure to address Kirito89's request to submit your complaint to AskGamblers. Is there any valid reason for not doing this? They are proper, well-respected mediators after all, and we are not. If the final outcome of your complaint to AG is favorable to you, or even undecided, I will remove the tag on your account. Right now it just seems like you're one of several blackmailers currently plaguing the forum.

This is what I was waiting for, because I have provided every single piece of evidence Holydarknes asked for, and later he will ignore it and move to other things. I have filed a complaint and will update you once I get any. I hope you will not jump into other things like Holydarknees & Kirito89

The necessity to straighten the narrative need to be done to minimize the spread area and severity of the smoke screen. Your evidences were not ignored, redirected to AG. It's been the mutual understanding since you propose it and the second party [DuckDice via Kirito89] agreed.

So far, the other topic that become the entree of this topic has been repetitively explained to you and it was proven that your skull seemingly made of diamond, hard and refracting light shone upon it into many facets. The tangle of previous matters of fairness seems to become irrelevant here and has to be tabled as you insist on playing on one specific angle, the one you think you've got your smoking gun, that Kirito89 did not provide proof here even after you gave your permission.

The reason for this has been explained several posts above, I am sure, I'm just too lazy to dig as I know it won't matter to you. Even with your permission, DuckDice corporation itself, with their customer privacy agreement and other things, would prevent Kirito89 from publishing here. No, I am not ignoring your proof and/or not asking Kirito for his proof.

I chase this path to validate the issue [the one that should be minor but turn to be major] so we can go back to the fairness question soonest possible, but later you choose a more viable way to get it validated, through ADR, where DuckDice will minimize the possible violation in any of GDPR article and the validator couldn't be more neutral and well-equipped in verifying things, in case someone will later accuse the mediator sided with casino [suppose the validation made here in the forum, by us]. So, AG is the perfect path, that you suggested yourself, which DuckDice agreed.

To summarize, all these past two or three weeks, it's about waiting for you to escalate to AG as you wished yourself, then we can get things back in motion.

And rest assuread, in many cases, we respected the ADR's verdict, so no one would jump into their own conclusion, but rather compliant to what the arbitrator dictate. Could you, though?

[Horsbyname]

Holydarkness stop playing around and stop defending Duckdice.io you are over acting now.

Wasn't it you who asked me where Duckdice.io representative asked for my permission to publish the data? you didn't even read that how you can call your self the mediator?

Umm... actually, I can't find the other instances where he asked permission to publish the data, other than on #94. Unless I am wrong? Do you mind to point us out to the other --at least-- three other instances?

Here I proved that to you, But instead asking Duckdice.io representative to post the evidences now, you skip it.

When Kirito89 was asking me repeatedly to give him permission to post those emails and conversations publicly, why didn’t anyone stop him or point out that such information shouldn’t be requested publicly? Why didn’t anyone remind him that this kind of data shouldn’t be shared so casually? I’m sure you’ve read this part as well, and I’d like to hear your thoughts on it.

Was Kirito89 not that professional, or was he unaware of his site’s terms, What should we call this? Was he trying to silence me? oR was he attempting to publicly label me a scammer by asking me to give him permission so that he could post the emails he claimed to have received from a blackmailer? I don't believe they actually received any emails from scammers; it could be them creating this drama to discredit my thread against them.

You mentioned that you couldn't find instances where Kirito89 asked for permission to publish the data aside from one. Here are the screenshots again for your reference: https://imgur.com/a/6yTLgbm https://imgur.com/a/17vZu5H  https://imgur.com/a/SZHEeZK  

If you take the time to read through his responses thoroughly, you’ll notice how many times he has changed his narrative throughout this issue. But honestly, I don’t expect you to point out any of his inconsistencies or mistakes.

Meanwhile, you’ve never asked Duckdice.io representatve  to prove their accusations or claims against me. Why is that? Like this one:

https://imgur.com/a/pCGawpm

Have you ever asked Kirito89 to prove his claim that I said it’s a coincidence that the blackmailer’s email and mine are similar but different by one letter?

[/quote]

How you don’t "dig through posts" when it comes to Duckdice.io side, but you have all the time in the world to nitpick mine.

They are proper, well-respected mediators after all, and we are not. If the final outcome of your complaint to AG is favorable to you, or even undecided, I will remove the tag on your account. Right now it just seems like you're one of several blackmailers currently plaguing the forum.

My complaint on AG is rejected and the reason :Your complaint has been rejected due to following reason:

Unfortunately, GDPR related matters cannot be subject to AGCCS. Please keep in mind that considering the nature of your dispute AskGamblers Complaints Team is strongly encouraging you to forward your complaint to the relevant competent authorities dealing and handling GDPR related issues in your country of reside­nce.

Screenshot: https://imgur.com/a/5tu4uMG

Now please consider removing the tag as per your statement, Kindly consider going through the thread before you take such decisions.

[moderator's note: consecutive posts merged]

[Kirito89]

My complaint on AG is rejected and the reason :Your complaint has been rejected due to following reason:

Unfortunately, GDPR related matters cannot be subject to AGCCS. Please keep in mind that considering the nature of your dispute AskGamblers Complaints Team is strongly encouraging you to forward your complaint to the relevant competent authorities dealing and handling GDPR related issues in your country of reside­nce.

Screenshot: https://imgur.com/a/5tu4uMG

................... OP I think you accidentally mistook this thread with your other one: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5529127.msg65060819#msg65060819    Why was the concern you raised with AG about GDPR related matters?  I thought your accusation was about an "unrealistic losing streak"  you keep twisting and turning events trying to throw mud in every direction hoping it sticks,  why have you not gone to AG with the provably fair matter, with the things you've complained here about, so that we could provide to them the evidence which shows you've lied from your 1st statement....

I will recap, and hopefully others beside nutdilah flag this OP, he lied about an "red streak" that he supposedly encountered on our website,  we proved here publicly that on the seed he played, that streak didn't happen (it was verified by a 3d party bitcointalk member),  then OP changed his story that he "manually switched bets" so we couldn't actually tell anymore if the streak was relevant, BUT! thanks to OPs unintentional help, we were able to dig out from our archive the bets played on that server/client seed which OP confirmed it was his, and everything he claimed was a complete lie, OP didn't even play on the 15.5% chance he was claiming, thus asking him to go with this complaint to Askgamblers, so we can provide inside company data which proves this,  OP turns around and submits a complaint about GDPR matters? Funnily enough same subject, that was brought up from another OP recently here ( I'm 100% sure its the same person).






Kirito89,

Duckdice Support.

[nutildah]

Now please consider removing the tag as per your statement, Kindly consider going through the thread before you take such decisions.

This was my statement:

If the final outcome of your complaint to AG is favorable to you, or even undecided, I will remove the tag on your account. Right now it just seems like you're one of several blackmailers currently plaguing the forum.

Right now there's zero resolved or undecided (open) cases for DuckDice on AskGamblers. So I won't be removing your tag based on what you have presented.

Furthermore, I thought you would be submitting the complaint based on the issued outlined in your first post, where you claim to have lost 0.37 BTC on 158 losses in a row. Seems like that's what you should be doing if you want your money back.

[Horsbyname]

Now please consider removing the tag as per your statement, Kindly consider going through the thread before you take such decisions.

This was my statement:

If the final outcome of your complaint to AG is favorable to you, or even undecided, I will remove the tag on your account. Right now it just seems like you're one of several blackmailers currently plaguing the forum.

Right now there's zero resolved or undecided (open) cases for DuckDice on AskGamblers. So I won't be removing your tag based on what you have presented.

Furthermore, I thought you would be submitting the complaint based on the issued outlined in your first post, where you claim to have lost 0.37 BTC on 158 losses in a row. Seems like that's what you should be doing if you want your money back.

Allow me to send you a direct message where you can view what I have written in the complaint.

Also how about I get accused of things I never done? I brought a unfairness issue and he start baseless accusation which is never answered, If I ask about evidences from Duckdice.io representative holydarkness get sick and instead of him Holydarkness will reply to make things easy for kirito89. Is Duckdcie.io representative allowed to blackmail a person without any evidences? What is your POV? I am accused in this form right in-front of everyone's,  and you believed that without a single piece of evidence?  BTW why you believed him? because of holydarkness is already on his side? or you read some solid evidences?

My complaint on AG is rejected and the reason :Your complaint has been rejected due to following reason:

Unfortunately, GDPR related matters cannot be subject to AGCCS. Please keep in mind that considering the nature of your dispute AskGamblers Complaints Team is strongly encouraging you to forward your complaint to the relevant competent authorities dealing and handling GDPR related issues in your country of reside­nce.

Screenshot: https://imgur.com/a/5tu4uMG

................... OP I think you accidentally mistook this thread with your other one: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5529127.msg65060819#msg65060819    Why was the concern you raised with AG about GDPR related matters?  I thought your accusation was about an "unrealistic losing streak"  you keep twisting and turning events trying to throw mud in every direction hoping it sticks,  why have you not gone to AG with the provably fair matter, with the things you've complained here about, so that we could provide to them the evidence which shows you've lied from your 1st statement....

I will recap, and hopefully others beside nutdilah flag this OP, he lied about an "red streak" that he supposedly encountered on our website,  we proved here publicly that on the seed he played, that streak didn't happen (it was verified by a 3d party bitcointalk member),  then OP changed his story that he "manually switched bets" so we couldn't actually tell anymore if the streak was relevant, BUT! thanks to OPs unintentional help, we were able to dig out from our archive the bets played on that server/client seed which OP confirmed it was his, and everything he claimed was a complete lie, OP didn't even play on the 15.5% chance he was claiming, thus asking him to go with this complaint to Askgamblers, so we can provide inside company data which proves this,  OP turns around and submits a complaint about GDPR matters? Funnily enough same subject, that was brought up from another OP recently here ( I'm 100% sure its the same person).






Kirito89,

Duckdice Support.

There is no Mistake at all, you paid that user simply to delete all the evidences from a public form. That post is not mine- If that post was mine nothing was going to be deleted. that was so slid evidences of you and more colleague crying over the lies. I still have those evidences in this thread. Also you blackmailed him after paying,that he is asking for money through emails while he declined that.


Just in-case you forget this question

[b]Is it truly a coincidence that these emails always seem to appear conveniently after someone publicly calls you out? This raises serious questions about your narrative and whether these “blackmail attempts” are being fabricated or manipulated as a tactic to discredit anyone who challenges your platform.[/b]

If I may - When exactly did you last pay a blackmailer, and what was the specific issue they were using to blackmail you? What made you so afraid that you decided to pay them despite claiming their accusations were baseless?

I’ve repeatedly asked you to provide proof that I sent those blackmail emails, but you’ve failed to provide any evidence whatsoever. Instead, you come up with a different story every time, completely ignoring my questions related to the case.[/b]

[moderator's note: consecutive posts merged]

[nutildah]

If you allow Newbie to send you Direct Message, I will share my complaint with you.

That's not necessary, I don't need to see anything other than what is posted in the DuckDice entry on AskGamblers. You've shifted your complaint to something GDPR related... It doesn't really matter what your complaint says if it doesn't relate to your first post in this thread. I realize there's 3 sides to every story, but you've been using ChatGPT from the getgo, and in other areas of the forum. Your account won't have much value going forward but if you're genuinely interested in participating in the forum, my trust rating won't stop you.

BTW why you believed him? because of holydarkness is already on his side?

Yeah, that's a pretty good reason IMO.

[Horsbyname]

If you allow Newbie to send you Direct Message, I will share my complaint with you.

That's not necessary, I don't need to see anything other than what is posted in the DuckDice entry on AskGamblers. You've shifted your complaint to something GDPR related... It doesn't really matter what your complaint says if it doesn't relate to your first post in this thread. I realize there's 3 sides to every story, but you've been using ChatGPT from the getgo, and in other areas of the forum. Your account won't have much value going forward but if you're genuinely interested in participating in the forum, my trust rating won't stop you.

BTW why you believed him? because of holydarkness is already on his side?

Yeah, that's a pretty good reason IMO.

You are wrong, It was not me who shifted things to GDPR, It was Duckdice.io represitative who Stated this:

Sorry for the long delay on a response, I've received confirmation that unfortunately you have self-deleted the account, basically revoked the customer agreement according to GDPR, so all data about your account has been deleted,

That's why I asked everyone's to read the thread before you post.

[nutildah]

You are wrong, It was not me who shifted things to GDPR, It was Duckdice.io represitative who Stated this:

Sorry for the long delay on a response, I've received confirmation that unfortunately you have self-deleted the account, basically revoked the customer agreement according to GDPR, so all data about your account has been deleted,

That's why I asked everyone's to read the thread before you post.

The thread has more than 150 posts, I'm not reading all of them. I'm just addressing your initial complaint, which on its face sounds completely fabricated. And since your account was deleted, its impossible to verify your claims.

Here's what it comes down to:

Will check aswell for under 8449 (15.5% chance on the other side) but I'm guessing it will be something similar, which is not even close to the 158 losing streak he claims.

I just checked it too and can confirm the numbers you gave are correct.
- For bets with 15.5% win chance on under 1550, the longest losing streak is 41, from roll number 12 to roll number 51.
- For bets with 15.5% win chance on over 8449, the longest losing streak is 57, from roll number 5074 to roll number 5130.

So you're claiming that for whatever reason the outcome of the bets you made wasn't calculated according to DuckDice's system of provably fair. Unfortunately, there's no way to verify that claim if we don't know what the bets are.

I will remove your negative trust but have opposed your flag as its not based on anything tangible.

Edit: please don't think this means I will consider supporting your argument; as a matter of fact, this is my last post in this thread.

[Horsbyname]

You are wrong, It was not me who shifted things to GDPR, It was Duckdice.io represitative who Stated this:

Sorry for the long delay on a response, I've received confirmation that unfortunately you have self-deleted the account, basically revoked the customer agreement according to GDPR, so all data about your account has been deleted,

That's why I asked everyone's to read the thread before you post.

The thread has more than 150 posts, I'm not reading all of them. I'm just addressing your initial complaint, which on its face sounds completely fabricated. And since your account was deleted, its impossible to verify your claims.

Here's what it comes down to:

Will check aswell for under 8449 (15.5% chance on the other side) but I'm guessing it will be something similar, which is not even close to the 158 losing streak he claims.

I just checked it too and can confirm the numbers you gave are correct.
- For bets with 15.5% win chance on under 1550, the longest losing streak is 41, from roll number 12 to roll number 51.
- For bets with 15.5% win chance on over 8449, the longest losing streak is 57, from roll number 5074 to roll number 5130.

So you're claiming that for whatever reason the outcome of the bets you made wasn't calculated according to DuckDice's system of provably fair. Unfortunately, there's no way to verify that claim if we don't know what the bets are.

I will remove your negative trust but have opposed your flag as its not based on anything tangible.

Edit: please don't think this means I will consider supporting your argument; as a matter of fact, this is my last post in this thread.

Please consider reading this, as this is from the same user.

Those numbers do not mean anything anymore since OP said he kept switching between under and over and we don’t know when he did that exactly.

The result is not shoing   if the bet is a win or a lose, not showing if the bet is on high or low side, not showing how much is the bet amount. Base on that you opposed my flag, While the user who posted the result clearly stated that those numbers mean nothing since I changed sides.

[Kirito89]

The thread has more than 150 posts, I'm not reading all of them. I'm just addressing your initial complaint, which on its face sounds completely fabricated. And since your account was deleted, its impossible to verify your claims.

Here's what it comes down to:

Will check aswell for under 8449 (15.5% chance on the other side) but I'm guessing it will be something similar, which is not even close to the 158 losing streak he claims.

I just checked it too and can confirm the numbers you gave are correct.
- For bets with 15.5% win chance on under 1550, the longest losing streak is 41, from roll number 12 to roll number 51.
- For bets with 15.5% win chance on over 8449, the longest losing streak is 57, from roll number 5074 to roll number 5130.

So you're claiming that for whatever reason the outcome of the bets you made wasn't calculated according to DuckDice's system of provably fair. Unfortunately, there's no way to verify that claim if we don't know what the bets are.

I will remove your negative trust but have opposed your flag as its not based on anything tangible.

Edit: please don't think this means I will consider supporting your argument; as a matter of fact, this is my last post in this thread.

I will break the 150 posts down into a single relevant one,  while we couldn't find in our database anymore user OP's bets,  OP at some point posted a screenshot here, from which we identified the server seed/client seed, in our database, while those bets couldn't be linked to an account ( OPs account) we could see what % they were played on, bet amounts, results if they were won or lost.  Basically a server/client seed combination is unique to each player,  and while OP was the one who provided the screenshot of the bet, it was also confirmation that indeed they were his bets.  OP has not played on the 15.5% chance,  ( he played 33% chance) OP has not encountered a 158 losing streak, and we have proof of this, thus the request for him to submit his complain to AG so we can provide it.    OP has been beating around the bush (he perfectly knows this, thus why he for the past 3 weeks is completely ignoring this aspect, and submitted an what I assume GDPR related, probably fake, AG complaint).

So what I'm trying to portray is that, we have solid evidence that will disprove everything OP has stated on this thread, we just needed it to be handled by a verified mediator (aka AskGamblers).

And yes, OP is the blackmailer, judging also from the fact that he started this off with completely fabricated facts, us receiving blackmail emails, its pretty clear what he was going after.






Kirito89,

Duckdice Support.

[Horsbyname]

I will break the 150 posts down into a single relevant one,

Calm down.... Calm... You are not at that level yet to summarize 150 posts to a single reply. A person who cant stand by his statement is summarizing 150 posts to a single reply, you’re just dodging everything. You keep changing your story.

Wasn’t it you who said this before?

And 2.  Do I have permission to publicly show the email address you've been in contact with us? that way I can show the blackmailer's email address, and let bitcointalk give their oppinion on it .

Kirito89,

Duckdice Support.

4. OP didn't take into account, that the blackmailer's email, and his email are unique, only separated by 1 letter, so if someone was trying to take advantage of his bitcointalk thread, there would be no way of guessing his unique email, I've actually asked him in the other thread if he gives me permission (due to GDPR constraints) to disclose his email, which he conviniently ignored, so regardless of any reason provided by you, or me, or anyone else for that matter, he will simply ignore it and spam the thread so he can push his narrative.


Kirito89,

Duckdice Support.

Since Nutildah have not read 150 posts of the thread but decided to oppose the flag, I hope he will see it more clear now.



I believe there is no single evidence of what you accused me of, or any so-called blackmail emails. If you had proof, you would’ve posted it 50 times by now given the way you throw around accusations.

This whole blackmail email drama is just a strategy Duckdice.io uses to silence people who speak against them in public, just like you recently did to another person and in the past to every single person who posted against you here.

By the way, this "Horse Buoy" is actually Kirito89.

https://imgur.com/a/OKAlIXC  https://imgur.com/a/lgtNUTD  https://imgur.com/a/Xhl5Gw0

[nutildah]

For the very last time:

I believe there is no single evidence of what you accused me of, or any so-called blackmail emails. If you had proof, you would’ve posted it 50 times by now given the way you throw around accusations.

That's not what this thread is about, and its not what your flag is about. This thread is about your scam accusation, which is unfounded and unprovable. You have no evidence; therefore I have opposed the flag. Please don't "whatabout" me with this or that, as I won't be responding.

[Kirito89]

This whole blackmail email drama is just a strategy Duckdice.io uses to silence people who speak against them in public, just like you recently did to another person and in the past to every single person who posted against you here.

By the way, this "Horse Buoy" is actually Kirito89.

https://imgur.com/a/OKAlIXC  https://imgur.com/a/lgtNUTD  https://imgur.com/a/Xhl5Gw0

Interesting how you completely ignored once again the provably fair aspect of it, the literal point of your entire thread. But of course you would, since we have proof of you lying, and you made a phoney AG complaint that was dismissed.


" just like you recently did to another person and in the past to every single person who posted against you here." -  I strongly believe you're the one behind all the previous blackmail attempts aswell, as like you said its highly unlikely to receive blackmail attempts  from multiple people, so judging by these following aspects I strongly believe you are the blackmailer and simply a scammer:
-  you've lied about the streak, about the chance you've played on, about the losses you've encountered, and we have EVIDENCE of this!
-  Due to having definetive proof of these lies, combined with the blackmail emails we've received, makes me be 100% certain that you are infact the blackmailer, and as I doubt this is a common practice, and I highly doubt we as Duckdice would be targetted by multiple people with these tactics, I strongly believe you are behind most of the blackmail attempts made against us on this forum which follow the pattern : Fake accusations on bitcointalk, private emails asking for money to make the noise go away, fake trustpilot reviews.


Have a nice day!



Duckdice Support.

[Horsbyname]

Interesting how you completely ignored once again the provably fair aspect of it, the literal point of your entire thread. But of course you would, since we have proof of you lying, and you made a phoney AG complaint that was dismissed.

No. You are wrong, you ignored those posts as you ignored many questions, I have already answered those, but you don't want to read them. and if you read em you will not answer but dodge it with something like this

I highly doubt we as Duckdice would be targetted by multiple people with these tactics, I strongly believe you are behind most of the blackmail attempts made against us on this forum which follow the pattern : Fake accusations on bitcointalk, private emails asking for money to make the noise go away, fake trustpilot reviews.

BTW Where is the proof? You keep saying you have evidence, yet you never post it. First, you needed my permission to post the emails. Then, you needed my Trustpilot email that the review was not deleted by me but by truspilot. Then, you said you are waiting for trustpilot to send you the email.then, you needed AskGamblers to be mediators. Now, you’re just repeating baseless claims. If you actually had proof, you would’ve posted it already given the way you throw around accusations.

If I’m lying, why you are not proving it already? You claim to have evidence of my blackmailing emails, my trsutpilot review, my bets, my streak, my losses post it publicly, That’s what I want at all. It’s been 2 months since I am asking you to post it, and yet you ignoring.

@kirito89 @Duckdice.io representative answer this, Wasn’t it you who said this before? there wasn't nor there is any proof at all, You have not revived any email from blackmailer but you was trying to scare me and silence me, just like you did to others. You simply used these strategies to avoid accountability. But this time you cant- you cant get escape of your accusation and your proven/admitted unfairness.

And 2.  Do I have permission to publicly show the email address you've been in contact with us? that way I can show the blackmailer's email address, and let bitcointalk give their oppinion on it .

Kirito89,

Duckdice Support.

2.

4. OP didn't take into account, that the blackmailer's email, and his email are unique, only separated by 1 letter, so if someone was trying to take advantage of his bitcointalk thread, there would be no way of guessing his unique email, I've actually asked him in the other thread if he gives me permission (due to GDPR constraints) to disclose his email, which he conviniently ignored, so regardless of any reason provided by you, or me, or anyone else for that matter, he will simply ignore it and spam the thread so he can push his narrative.

Kirito89,