Casino that pro VPN

[Vaculin]

I’m wondering why some casino discouraged the full use of VPN while others fully support the use of it.

even if a casino claims to be VPN friendly, i wouldn't play there if my country is blocked. they can change their policy at any time, and you would end up fucked.

And there is the catch. They are supposed to promote the VPN but in reality, they are setting a net (of protection or trap, take your pick) from which you cannot escape and you will always depend on their judgment and appetite. They profit from the advertising and the hype that is caused, they force you to go through the KYK for withdrawal (at some point they all do it) and if they consider you shady, they simply change the ToS. It's better not to use a VPN, you get into trouble from the start.

Yes, you’re right, it’s better to avoid using VPN from the start rather than seeing your account getting compromised. After all, anonymity is not an issue anymore. KYC verification is the current trend, whether you like it or not, gamblers should comply with it so they can play on a reputable casino.

However, other casinos might probably promote using VPN, but later on when problems arise, that’s when they have all the right to change and update their ToS.

[SmartGold01]

Perhaps you'll never face any issues, provided that you're not abusing the system in any way or using a free public VPN that may have been used by other users as well.

From my understanding and some post I have came across so far, if a gambling site doesn't specify in their TOS about restrictions/prohibition of vpn then there is nothing wrong with using it, but if they specify and still permit then it could be that your country of access is listed on the site and your location should fit or suits with the country of accessing from. With this there will be no issues and the casino wouldn't hold any issues against you neither would they restricts you from having access to your funds, though for me to avoid drama it's actually good to avoid it entirely.

[Sandra_hakeem]

I’m wondering why some casino discouraged the full use of VPN while others fully support the use of it.

Regulations.
What's allowed in Florida may possibly be a big offense in Massachusetts, but all in the same county. You don't expect the rules given out by different regulatory bodies to be exactly the same thing, otherwise, there's certain no point of breaking the monopoly -- one body can pass their laws onto every single casino and that's fine.

Again, the said casino isn't really popular -- atleast to me (or maybe I'm a little bit too old to know about them) but they haven't been in system for as long as 10 years.  Rule of the game is, the more you GROW, the more you FLOW with the system. I'm not gonna sit there and watch several people struggle to wager on my site but can't, meanwhile, every single bet counts towards the net profits that I make daily, bi-weekly or annually...
So many casinos(without any legal restrictions) are folding up due to the surge in expenses over the net profits, talk more of bringing in the same restrictions when you're not widely known.

[Ultegra134]

From my understanding and some post I have came across so far, if a gambling site doesn't specify in their TOS about restrictions/prohibition of vpn then there is nothing wrong with using it, but if they specify and still permit then it could be that your country of access is listed on the site and your location should fit or suits with the country of accessing from. With this there will be no issues and the casino wouldn't hold any issues against you neither would they restricts you from having access to your funds, though for me to avoid drama it's actually good to avoid it entirely.

I haven't noticed; to be honest, I don't pay much attention to the TOS. I'm not sure if Cloudflare is classified as a VPN, as it masks your IP; perhaps it's not considered a VPN, and that's perhaps the reason why I haven't faced issues so far. Who knows? It's perfectly reasonable that something that isn't mentioned in the TOS can't be used against you, even if your country of residence has blocked access to the said casino.

In any case, I'd never use a free VPN that everyone could use, as the same IP could be used by numerous users in the same casino, marking you for suspicious activity.

[sunsilk]

Yes, you’re right, it’s better to avoid using VPN from the start rather than seeing your account getting compromised. After all, anonymity is not an issue anymore. KYC verification is the current trend, whether you like it or not, gamblers should comply with it so they can play on a reputable casino.

However, other casinos might probably promote using VPN, but later on when problems arise, that’s when they have all the right to change and update their ToS.

If there is no clear violation with the TOS about usage of VPN, I still advise gamblers to ask the support of the casino that they're playing to verify if it's allowed or not.

Whether we like it or not, there are gamblers that have been used to the usage of VPN because they've paid premium for it and they want to put it into use such as when they gamble.

There's nothing wrong with that but it's a fact that when they are KYCed, they cannot still deny if they are from the countries that the casino blocked its users.

[Popkon6]

Just to clarify things, let’s not focus on the casino itself rather the feature of promoting the use of VPN

You heard it right. I’m recently become active on Casinopunkz due to its contest and to explore what I’m promoting on my signature space. Upon exploring, I notice that this casino is actually promoting the use of VPN for privacy purposes which is peculiar in a good way since most of the licensed casino discourage the use of VPN.
.
I’m wondering why some casino discouraged the full use of VPN while others fully support the use of it.

There are various reasons why casinos have banned VPNs, especially to eliminate fraud. Because using VPNs reveals locations in different countries at different times, it is basically not legal to play in a legitimate casino. Every time you connect and disconnect a VPN, your location will change, and casinos that have licenses do not tolerate these things.
And gamblers can focus more and do not need VPNs in countries where gambling is legal. Of course, in the future, the use of VPNs in casinos may be legal.

[Onyeeze]

Just to clarify things, let’s not focus on the casino itself rather the feature of promoting the use of VPN

You heard it right. I’m recently become active on Casinopunkz due to its contest and to explore what I’m promoting on my signature space. Upon exploring, I notice that this casino is actually promoting the use of VPN for privacy purposes which is peculiar in a good way since most of the licensed casino discourage the use of VPN.
.
I’m wondering why some casino discouraged the full use of VPN while others fully support the use of it.

I may say that the reason why some casinos, say something is because they don't want some country don't be involved in their casino playing so I think it's one of the kid in that met casino don't allow VPN w's to access their gambling website so casino that restrict some countries not to involve themselves with the nose the reason is not because they don't want someone to make use of to access it making use of a VPN to access a particular website showing that you don't want to show or you don't want to particular website to know the country that you are registering from and some platforms have a registration of countries they want or they don't want to be part or to involve in their website that is why then dislike VPN

[Botnake]

There are various reasons why casinos have banned VPNs, especially to eliminate fraud. Because using VPNs reveals locations in different countries at different times, it is basically not legal to play in a legitimate casino. Every time you connect and disconnect a VPN, your location will change, and casinos that have licenses do not tolerate these things.
And gamblers can focus more and do not need VPNs in countries where gambling is legal. Of course, in the future, the use of VPNs in casinos may be legal.

It’s safe to say that a VPN won’t reveal your real location or IP, but some VPNs can provide a static IP. This means it’s wrong to assume that your IP will always change every time you connect to a VPN.

Legally, casinos don’t explicitly say that using a VPN is illegal, but there’s definitely a risk involved. If we decide to use one, it’s a risk we choose to take. While some casinos may seem pro-VPN, at the end of the day, if they are truly regulated, they will still want to verify your real location and IP, which a VPN can hide from them.

[Hirose UK]

Perhaps you'll never face any issues, provided that you're not abusing the system in any way or using a free public VPN that may have been used by other users as well.

From my understanding and some post I have came across so far, if a gambling site doesn't specify in their TOS about restrictions/prohibition of vpn then there is nothing wrong with using it, but if they specify and still permit then it could be that your country of access is listed on the site and your location should fit or suits with the country of accessing from. With this there will be no issues and the casino wouldn't hold any issues against you neither would they restricts you from having access to your funds, though for me to avoid drama it's actually good to avoid it entirely.

I think casinos free up restrictions on countries that are indeed excluded by most gambling sites because they want to get more customers, they try to attract more people with various conveniences without any exceptions and this is kind of strategy to be able to gain more profits.
However, if at some point the gambler gets really big win and interestingly, no one knows whether the gambling site will still accept the withdrawal with full convenience or there will be series of complicated problems, basically as gambler, the majority still don't think about what will happen if there are certain conditions that might be problematic about KYC or the use of VPN if they withdraw large amounts of money.

[Mpamaegbu]

I’m wondering why some casino discouraged the full use of VPN while others fully support the use of it.

Many members have mentioned country/geographical location as a reason for restriction of VPN, I concur to that too. However, I also want us to see it from another point of view and that's in terms of criminal access and hack. Sometimes, users of sites do get notifications (that's if notification is enabled) if someone is trying to assess their accounts from an IP that's different from the one by which they've assessed such site(s) in the past. With VPN, that may not be possible to know that as random IPs are picked. I endorse a KYC free casino but certainly not a casino that allows the use of VPN.

[ethereumhunter]

I think casinos free up restrictions on countries that are indeed excluded by most gambling sites because they want to get more customers, they try to attract more people with various conveniences without any exceptions and this is kind of strategy to be able to gain more profits.
However, if at some point the gambler gets really big win and interestingly, no one knows whether the gambling site will still accept the withdrawal with full convenience or there will be series of complicated problems, basically as gambler, the majority still don't think about what will happen if there are certain conditions that might be problematic about KYC or the use of VPN if they withdraw large amounts of money.

Yes, their reason is like that because with attracting many people from many countries can grow their business and they will have many loyal members who will playing gambling at their site. That means, they can make a lot of money from their business while they can promote it using other ways. They don't prohibit for those people who come from a country that prohibit gambling but those people must responsible to themselves if something bad happen to them. Casino only gives a place to playing gambling while people must realize about the risk of gambling.

But most casinos are not allow their members using VPN because casino want to know where they are come from. Maybe that will related to the KYC process but we are not sure about that.

[adzino]

Just to clarify things, let’s not focus on the casino itself rather the feature of promoting the use of VPN

You heard it right. I’m recently become active on Casinopunkz due to its contest and to explore what I’m promoting on my signature space. Upon exploring, I notice that this casino is actually promoting the use of VPN for privacy purposes which is peculiar in a good way since most of the licensed casino discourage the use of VPN.
.
I’m wondering why some casino discouraged the full use of VPN while others fully support the use of it.

If you use VPN, you will be circumventing their GEO restrictions. If you do so, you will be breaking their terms of service and you will be causing issues for them since according to their license they aren't allowed to serve people from the GEOs they are restricting due to local and international laws. Hence, they don't allow users to play with VPN to protect themselves and the players from unwanted situations. The casino you are promoting says NO KYC, so most likely they aren't a registered casino and has no license. So they are using the opportunity to promote using VPNs (just to make it sound like they care about privacy), but the risk of not being a licensed casino is not worth using the VPN.

[stadus]

The casino you are promoting says NO KYC, so most likely they aren't a registered casino and has no license.

They actually have a license, although it’s a bit odd considering there are plenty of casinos advertising themselves as "no KYC," yet they still hold licenses.
As for casinopunkz.io, according to this review site, this is the license detail.

https://cryptogambling.com/casinos/casinopunkz

Website   https://casinopunkz.io/
License   Anjouan Gaming

[Adbitco]

Correct though if they're not having that on their Tos there wouldn't had been a day they would restricts that person, but if they openly say they allows the use of vpn what more there is nothing to be afraid but I said in respect of those that state against the use of vpn on their gambling site.
We actually need to be very careful while involving with using of VPN as there could be a bad effect maybe if they decided to update their TOS against vpn.

People that complained of something related to this that their account were banned on the gambling site they use is actually because the gambling site states that the person is from a restricted country and not the use of VPN. I just want to be practical about this but I may not be totally right. I have mistakenly left VPN on while accessing some sites before but I do not know if they allow or not allow VPN but I got no problem till today. Although, when I know I on the VPN, I will disable it.

Yes are saying same thing as well.
For instance I could reference those days when the use of twitter twitter was restricted from our country, this isn't official rules from Twitter rather out country made it so to limit people from accessing twitter, which they were using vpn to access it and they were making use of it without any implications provided that twitter official do not bad our country then there would be no bad effects. Same is applicable to using gambling site with vpn.

[lizarder]

You heard it right. I’m recently become active on Casinopunkz due to its contest and to explore what I’m promoting on my signature space. Upon exploring, I notice that this casino is actually promoting the use of VPN for privacy purposes which is peculiar in a good way since most of the licensed casino discourage the use of VPN.

If I am not mistaken maybe they are not trying to restrict gamblers and they want to facilitate users who cannot use certain sites in their country due to restrictions. I see this as a positive because considering people do not have to worry about restrictions and anyone can access the site using a VPN without having to worry. I am also on this campaign and maybe they are trying to explore some of the feedback we often talk about in the discussion forums.

I also want to test this in the long term because even though there are no issues now then as the site grows there may be updates that they will make and I hope that the presence of this site will be a solution for those of us who live in countries that are subject to restrictions.

[EarnOnVictor]

You heard it right. I’m recently become active on Casinopunkz due to its contest and to explore what I’m promoting on my signature space. Upon exploring, I notice that this casino is actually promoting the use of VPN for privacy purposes which is peculiar in a good way since most of the licensed casino discourage the use of VPN.

If this is true, then it is a good development and it will even help the casino in the competitive race. But I hope they are true to their words because it is not always like that sometimes despite claiming such to deceive people into believing so.

I’m wondering why some casino discouraged the full use of VPN while others fully support the use of it.

They have some reasons, of which some are genuine and the rest are flimsy. And the reasons are not limited to cheating with bonuses, casino systems and identity theft.

[AbuBhakar]

The casino you are promoting says NO KYC, so most likely they aren't a registered casino and has no license.

They actually have a license, although it’s a bit odd considering there are plenty of casinos advertising themselves as "no KYC," yet they still hold licenses.
As for casinopunkz.io, according to this review site, this is the license detail.

https://cryptogambling.com/casinos/casinopunkz

Website   https://casinopunkz.io/
License   Anjouan Gaming

You’re right, this is same license with some new casino like Metawin which is the most noteworthy casino that use this license. I bet the regulations of this license provider is less strict than Curacao that’s why new casino choose this and at the same time can offer a less restrictive terms such as mandatory KYC which now the new norm for Curacao license casino.

I think this new license provider is a nice alternative in case Curacao license becomes strict which is currently happening on popular casino nowadays.

[Maslate]

They actually have a license, although it’s a bit odd considering there are plenty of casinos advertising themselves as "no KYC," yet they still hold licenses.
As for casinopunkz.io, according to this review site, this is the license detail.

https://cryptogambling.com/casinos/casinopunkz

Website   https://casinopunkz.io/
License   Anjouan Gaming

That’s the point, they have a license, yet they encourage gamblers to use a VPN and even advertise as a no-KYC casino. It could just be their strategy to attract gamblers since the competition in the market is very strong. Hopefully, though, it won’t lead to misleading people.

It’s a bit tricky, but I think they’re still safe because all the terms are laid out before anyone decides to gamble with them. And they can always use that against us in the future, so we should be wary with this.

[Findingnemo]

Just to clarify things, let’s not focus on the casino itself rather the feature of promoting the use of VPN

You heard it right. I’m recently become active on Casinopunkz due to its contest and to explore what I’m promoting on my signature space. Upon exploring, I notice that this casino is actually promoting the use of VPN for privacy purposes which is peculiar in a good way since most of the licensed casino discourage the use of VPN.
.
I’m wondering why some casino discouraged the full use of VPN while others fully support the use of it.

AFAIK, casinos doesn't discourage the use of VPN but only when the people use it to bypass the restrictions from restricted countries and that leads to lot of complications that adds extra pressure for the support team. Using VPN is good as long as it's for privacy reasons and not to violate the terms. Another problem with VPN is not everyone is gonna get dedicated IPs, they simply uses free VPNs that might be used by million others and if two or more people used the same proxy that will overlap with user's profile and trigger a warning of multi account.

[Ever-young]

.
I’m wondering why some casino discouraged the full use of VPN while others fully support the use of it.

Does privacy really matters mostly in a gambling site? It’s strange actually they have their reasons and if anything might happen they know how to fix the issue I’m sure. The use of vpn while registering an account can be considered as cheating probably the location is restricted either they prioritize privacy while the casino wants transparency. Not just cheating though, what if something happens in the future should such person blame the casino after violating the rules ? No, Respectfully the use of vpn must be instructed first by the casino although there’s always a reason.

Privacy really matters in some casinos, especially for those that don't ask for KYC and make it clear that they won't. Some of them will allow you to use a VPN freely, but I doubt it; such casinos are still available. 
 
If the casino doesn't allow the use of VPN, then it will be breaking the rules for anyone to use it even when they are not restricted from using the casino, but if they are being advised by the casino representative for whatever reason to use VPN even when it's clearly stated in their rules that its use is not allowed, then it's now left between the player and the casino to decide which is what and who is at fault if anything leads to judging such action.