holydarkness
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 2940
Merit: 1769
Yes, I'm an asshole
|
 |
January 30, 2025, 07:29:06 PM |
|
Hello, pardon the wall of text ahead as it is quite necessary to make things clear.
To the overseers, a context to give you all a comprehensive understanding. I might be limited to give an even clearer detail and precise wordings as the communication happens through PM [and DM, for the convo with BC]. Nonetheless, please read as it'll give you a better understanding of the situation.
Following my last post here on this thread on 27th January, I then sent the OP a PM containing a voucher that was entrusted to me by BC team, which they generated by 27th January, approx. 13:30 to "refund" his SC that got stuck, and I relayed to the OP later on 28th January, 08:30, that he redeemed [if I may judge from his reply to me] on 28th January, 13:23.
Given my footing at how SC works was not as steady as it is now as per I write this post, as well as [which actually the main reason of why I took the path] I feel some degree of responsibility to OP, especially following his post on #21, about how the price fluctuated, given I actually had the solution in my hand couple of hours earlier, which means that whole fluctuation was not necessarily need to be experienced by OP, I took OP's words at face value, that the voucher is only worth USD 1,317, and that he suffered USD 183 difference. Again, this is me still with unsteady footing about how SC works, and I assume the rate of SC fluctuated, which contribute to that 183 difference.
I consider this as my fault as I was hinted by my contact that they've generate SC in the exact amount as OP's LTC, and they [rightfully] can't take responsibility for price fluctuation as they've generated voucher in the exact amount of what they owed the player.
In my head, the price difference won't happen if I gave the voucher right away, as BC provided SC voucher in the exact value of OP's balance. With that in mind, and that I certainly can't ask BC to take responsibility for the fluctuation happened because I gave the voucher too late, I offered OP to take step further to assume the responsibility and pay the difference from my own wallet, that I intended to transfer to OP's TRC USDT, valued USD 183.
Little did the OP know, simultaneously while I asked for his address, I also tried to make things right and go into a complete resolution according to procedure by reaching my contacts and ask them both [separately] a favor, whether I can get them to generate a voucher worth USD 183 to OP, of which I'll later send them the fund for that amount.
This is when my main contact rushed to chat me and told me to stop, that it is a step too far [for me to pay from my wallet just because I feel the need to take responsibility of the price difference], to not send OP anything as they will generate voucher to compensate that difference.
He'll need OP's UID for that, of which I provided.
So, I told OP that the fund will not get transferred through USDT from me, and instead will be given in form of another voucher, and I asked him to kindly wait [PM sent 28th January, 22:23], and I woke up to several PMs from OP telling me that he already closed his account, whether my contact can make that voucher redeemable generally instead of UID specific, that he might will create an account just to redeem and then close the account right away [let it be on the record that I warned about multi-acc] or that to send it to his brother's account.
Bottomline, the UID now [as per 29th January, 16:44] and where to generate the voucher become rather unclear. Naturally, BC reserve the full right to generate voucher only to the UID 65593920 [it's in the opening post, I didn't breach any of OP's personal data], but as I wanted to be sure everything sorted out clearly and for the best of every side, I told my contact of the situation and that perhaps it's best to wait to generate the voucher until I can get the proper UID from OP.
The chat was left unread as my contact were most likely busy with things. Whatever that was that took them away from me, is irrelevant.
What important is, in between getting my contact's response [received 30th January, 08:38] and my last PM to OP [29th January, 16:44], I got another PM [received 29th January, 23:00], informing me that his account is already gone, that he deleted it the second I told him I'll send the difference through my own wallet, through USDT, so it's safe to assume it happened on 28th January.
Funny thing is, when I heard from my contact about my inquiry of the possibility to change UID as OP's account already closed, they frowned upon it and told me that they can see everything's fine from their side. In fact, they can see a round was play about 8 hours ago.
Of course, this brought us to a complete state of confusion, that I'll give OP chance to publicly clarify.
So, OP, which one is it? You closed your account right away after I told you that I'll compensate from my own wallet, that BC quite likely no longer can nor under obligation to refund in form of voucher, as the UID no longer available to redeem the fund, or was it still active like what my contact can see from their side, so they're good to proceed with generating the voucher?
I am expecting a full explanation regarding the situation with your account, in relation to the colorful words you sent me through your multiple PM, before I can ask my contact to put things back in motion.
And in case you wondered, the answer is quite likely to be a, "Yes, this is you seeing other side of me that I extremely rarely show to public. I am nice and I try to help people as best as I can, but that doesn't translate as me being an angel, nor I ever claimed that I am. Thus, my username."
And why do I give you privilege to get acquainted with Dark? Obvious to you at this point or not, I'll spell it out: I spent my time these past couple of week tackling cases against BC, literally on daily basis I nudged my contacts [sans the weekend] and have discussion with them to get things cleared. When we get to the near-bottom of your case and we stumbled upon a trouble, I don't even think twice to go to a length to make you whole, honest to all holy and dark being that I didn't even hesitate, I was about to assume responsibility for the difference of fund you experienced, before I got stopped by BC staffs.
Your reaction? I'll ask your permission to publish here all of your PM sent to me from the past few days so others can decide themselves if I am overreacting, losing the thickness of my face, the blindness of my eyes, and the deafness of my ears, or someone just need a wake up call, hard, that the world did not revolve around them, and that in some place on this planet we call Earth, is summer or dry season, where snowflake does not exist.
So OP, the ball is in your court.
Shall I ask BC to put things back in motion and issue the voucher as the UID is still good, then we can close this case, or shall we close it right here and now because the UID no longer available to redeem vouchers, thus we can only consider BC had given all they can to make the player whole, they tried, but with the UID no longer available, the case ended there.
Pass the ball.
|
