Donald Trump sings executive order ending women to owns 50% of husbands wealth

[philipma1957]

In a swift of executive order that trump has quickly signed and taking effects immediately is the law that allows women in the United States to collect 50% of what ever that a man has infact for many years women in the U.S as digging gold because women has perfected the art of getting married to rich men and after some years divorce their husband just to take his hand earn money

Just last week pep quadorla  Manchester City manager fell to this law and lost half of his properties including his biggest mansion in the UK simply because that he is too focused on his work and so the UK court awarded the wife half of pep hard work for years though that is in the UK

According to trump henceforth in the United States of America women getting married to a rich man will not be entitled to his wealth and hard labor over the years but instead if a woman is leaving her marriage the husband can only borrow his wife one million dollars if the husband is rich since that money is not a big deal for the wealthy and this can only happen in the grounds that the woman should present a collateral so in case the woman doesn't pay the money back the collateral is there for the husband

This is a welcome development for men in the United States of America I just pray that other countries too can borrow a leave from trump and implement this law in their countries

What is your opinion concerning this new law

https://businesshilights.com.ng/2025/01/22/how-trump-dumped-divorce-law-tormenting-men-us-for-centuries-in-one-day/

My guess is this is not true at all. my next guess is if he did do this it would be frozen by the courts.

So I call bullshit on this for now.

[uneng]

My guess is this is not true at all. my next guess is if he did do this it would be frozen by the courts.

So I call bullshit on this for now.

I also suspect it's a fake news. It looks too much to be true. Moreover, I didn't see any establishment's news portals complaining about this measure, so it's definitely not true.

The world would be falling over Trump's head if he did a movement like that.

At same time, fake news of this kind are useful for Trump, as he gains more popularity and support from naive and ignorant people who believe he is the savior they were waiting for, or a super hero who dares acting as the average citizen would like him to act against the system.

Here in my country that was how it worked as well with president Bolsonaro. In the end, he was just a coward and weak politician on the hands of the local judiciary system, doing anything and everything to save himself and his shady son from jail.

Meanwhile, his followers kept sharing fake news to display him as a hero and patriot.

[mirakal]

In fact I believe such type of laws should be implemented in all first world countries.

Yeah, like in the USA, where there are so many wealthy people. And with a president like Trump, who’s very vocal and can directly push laws he thinks are right, you can expect a lot of changes during his time in office. Just recently, he even said there are only two genders in the US, man and woman. With those words, I’d assume he’s not in favor of same-sex marriage, which is already legal in USA.

Trump could turn into a game-changer but no doubt, a lot of ambitious women would be hating him. However, if this will bring welfare for majority of American men, then it's a positive change then.

Now with regards having only two genders in a society, I don't think this will easily work for the people around, most especially that these third gender individuals have found freedom already to expose their real gender identity, and Trump could only serve a threat for their inner happiness.

[philipma1957]

In fact I believe such type of laws should be implemented in all first world countries.

Yeah, like in the USA, where there are so many wealthy people. And with a president like Trump, who’s very vocal and can directly push laws he thinks are right, you can expect a lot of changes during his time in office. Just recently, he even said there are only two genders in the US, man and woman. With those words, I’d assume he’s not in favor of same-sex marriage, which is already legal in USA.

Trump could turn into a game-changer but no doubt, a lot of ambitious women would be hating him. However, if this will bring welfare for majority of American men, then it's a positive change then.

Now with regards having only two genders in a society, I don't think this will easily work for the people around, most especially that these third gender individuals have found freedom already to expose their real gender identity, and Trump could only serve a threat for their inner happiness.

I grew up in the USA. 50 states everyone has a different set of state laws and trump has federal decrees he can make but not so much state laws.

Also in the USA a lot of women make really good money.

A top woman account will earn 300,000 to 500,000 USD a year if she owns the practice.
top women doctors earn over 1,000,000

So the law would need to be the richer spouse not always the guy in maybe 10% of marriages the women makes more.

Still any rich person would love a law that favors him or her in a divorce.

Some stats from ai:

423,000 women doctors  in general a women doctor earns 310,000 in the usa

500,000 women lawyers in general average salary is 118,000 a year

20% of usa airline pilots are women in average 142,000 to 239,000 salary


So a lot of the ones above are likely to earn more than their husbands.

one more ai number 1.5 million women in the USA are millionaires

[_Miracle]

i see alot of african social media gossip when i google search this... but no source of any real execution order (on the whitehouse website) actually existing of such topic

anyone dare show the execution order in regards to finance/asset allocation at divorce

For you franky1:

https://www.whitehouse.gov/

If you click on "executive actions" you will see all of the executive orders. This is and has been the legit White house site.
Yes it has been rebranded with Trumpiness.

[Synchronice]

What you earned before marriage is not subject to division during a divorce. What you earn after marriage is considered shared assets/marital properity. At least, that is the law in our country. I don't think it's different in the U.S. either.
In some places, feminism is promoted under the name of gender equality. However, we should generally talk about the equality of all people. No one should face discrimination because of their gender.

I think that such a life is a terrible life where you don't trust your spouse, it's a hell but at the same time I try to learn from mistakes of other people and don't become a victim. Today, when I see that probably 90% of girls have tens or hundreds of boyfriends, what they do behind the scenes once married, all of these really makes me think twice about what you should share with your spouse. I think it will be easier to share things once you and your spouse become 40 because this is the moment when both of them are mature.

What you earned before marriage is not subject to division during a divorce. What you earn after marriage is considered shared assets/marital properity. At least, that is the law in our country. I don't think it's different in the U.S. either.
In some places, feminism is promoted under the name of gender equality. However, we should generally talk about the equality of all people. No one should face discrimination because of their gender.

Usually people get married when they are starting life and I think it's still common in many families that men earn more than women and there are also some men that focus on job and their wives stay at home to take care of children. I'm sure that most of the time, men earn more than 50% of everything that's earned after marriage, so I think it's very unfair for men, especially for those who are millionaires.

[viljy]

Women need money anyway, and they'll get it. If a divorce does not produce wealth, then the wife can simply kill or somehow get rid of her husband and receive an inheritance. Those who rejoice in this stupid law here probably don't think about the fact that the vast majority of crimes remain unsolved, and they greatly underestimate the sophisticated female mind.
It turns out that now in any family, the husband will feel like a hunted animal, constantly waiting for a "stab in the back." Just for the fact that no woman likes to have no guarantees and live on "bird rights", and be sure that her husband will fully answer for this offense. Then it's better not to start a family at all. But the destruction of the institution of the family will sooner or later lead to the destruction of the state.

[Marvelockg]

one more ai number 1.5 million women in the USA are millionaires

but you know that it is rear to see a man that is too interested in his wife's wealth after they have separated? it is always the reverse where the wife always feels entitled to the husband's wealth and can even affect the divorce if she knows that by the process of the divorce that she has a high chance of getting her hands on the property of the husband. woman have benefitted a lot from any divorce and even in the typical African setting, any woman that makes it compulsory for the husband to go into a court marriage is looked in a suspicious manner because the majority of them only opt for court marriages when they have the plan of getting the wealth of the man along some point in the marriage.

this is a good law that will reduce the rate of gold diggers that are just looking for some innocent men to be preyed on. anyone that doesn't build wealth with a man should naturally have no right of sharing in it even at the point of divorce.

[Marykeller]

Inasmuch many of us would like this executive order to be true, it is not yet pass as order by Donald Trump. Which can be described as false information because Trump haven't implemented or thought about this, as one of the executive orders he administrator should put into law.

You can find about the list of executive orders of Donald Trump here

[SamReomo]

Trump could turn into a game-changer but no doubt, a lot of ambitious women would be hating him. However, if this will bring welfare for majority of American men, then it's a positive change then.

Yes, most women who thought about availing the money because of that law will hate Donald Trump but it's actually going to be helpful for them as well. Many men don't marry because they think if they somehow have to divorce their wives in future then they will have to give them 50% of their net worth. And, that's the main reason why most couples still live in open relationships, I guess Trump's still step could be helpful in some ways.

[Rabata]

What is your opinion concerning this new law

https://businesshilights.com.ng/2025/01/22/how-trump-dumped-divorce-law-tormenting-men-us-for-centuries-in-one-day/

In a family, both husband and wife have contributions. That is why both of them can be considered as the owners of all the assets of their family. However, in an event like divorce, if women are given half of their earned assets by men, there will be some adverse reaction on their part. I think that divorce should never be encouraged in the society, as this will not bring any fulfillment in social life. There will be no peace and order in the society. That is why no such policy should be implemented where divorce is encouraged.

Nowadays, the rate of divorce has become much higher than before. If the assets of the husband and wife in a family are equal, then it is logical for her to get 50 percent, but if there is no asset for the women, then I do not think that distributing 50 percent is very logical. In many cases, it is seen that women are greedy and they are encouraged to get divorced due to some trivial incident. So, to those who are leading the law, I would like to say that a law should be made where the person who wants a divorce will be the one responsible. The money should be shared, which would definitely create the possibility of a huge reduction in incidents like divorce. If the law is not rational, then it will certainly be difficult to implement it.

[fuguebtc]

Inasmuch many of us would like this executive order to be true, it is not yet pass as order by Donald Trump. Which can be described as false information because Trump haven't implemented or thought about this, as one of the executive orders he administrator should put into law.

You can find about the list of executive orders of Donald Trump here

On the contrary , I do not want this decree to be passed and become a reality even though I am the main economic pillar of my family .  I think women have sacrificed their youth for us, they give birth and take care of children , they give up everything to become a housewives and do all the housework so we can go out and earn money . So I think women need to be respected and given more than that instead of thinking that they are asking for too much or getting more benefits than us .

Not to mention, most mothers are often responsible for taking care of their children after divorce and childcare is a barrier that prevents them from finding a job with a stable income . That is why most laws in every country require that assets be divided equally upon divorce .

[AmaGold70]

In a swift of executive order that trump has quickly signed and taking effects immediately is the law that allows women in the United States to collect 50% of what ever that a man has infact for many years women in the U.S as digging gold because women has perfected the art of getting married to rich men and after some years divorce their husband just to take his hand earn money

Just last week pep quadorla  Manchester City manager fell to this law and lost half of his properties including his biggest mansion in the UK simply because that he is too focused on his work and so the UK court awarded the wife half of pep hard work for years though that is in the UK

According to trump henceforth in the United States of America women getting married to a rich man will not be entitled to his wealth and hard labor over the years but instead if a woman is leaving her marriage the husband can only borrow his wife one million dollars if the husband is rich since that money is not a big deal for the wealthy and this can only happen in the grounds that the woman should present a collateral so in case the woman doesn't pay the money back the collateral is there for the husband

This is a welcome development for men in the United States of America I just pray that other countries too can borrow a leave from trump and implement this law in their countries

What is your opinion concerning this new law

https://businesshilights.com.ng/2025/01/22/how-trump-dumped-divorce-law-tormenting-men-us-for-centuries-in-one-day/

Most women has turned marriage and divorce to business for wealth, and such marriages doesn't last for more than 5yrs. The American law concerning divorce has made most women rich over night, if this new law is True then I must applaud Mr Trump. Though there are still some women that has dedicated their lives and sacrificed a lot for their families and they should be appreciated for there commitment to family, we should be able to know the difference between gold diggers and loyalty.

[franky1]

i see alot of african social media gossip when i google search this... but no source of any real execution order (on the whitehouse website) actually existing of such topic

anyone dare show the execution order in regards to finance/asset allocation at divorce

For you franky1:

https://www.whitehouse.gov/

If you click on "executive actions" you will see all of the executive orders. This is and has been the legit White house site.
Yes it has been rebranded with Trumpiness.

read what i said. i was telling you lot about the white house website. i dont need to be given the link
what i said was the EO in question of this topic specifically about divorce law DOES NOT EXIST
i dared people to find the specific EO.. (yes i already searched it and read every EO to know i doesnt exist)

but it is funny how you just think you are being smart by linking the link i was ALREADY talking about, but you could not even find the EO in question which this topic talks about..
so again

"but no source of any real execution order (on the whitehouse website) actually existing of such topic"
no EO exists about changing divorce law.. end of story., the africans social media gossip is a lie.. end of

have a nice day

[Reatim]

At same time, fake news of this kind are useful for Trump, as he gains more popularity and support from naive and ignorant people who believe he is the savior they were waiting for, or a super hero who dares acting as the average citizen would like him to act against the system.

he is already popular no need to spread stuff like this especially if it is not gonna be true anyway

but rumors like this will always exist and it will always be linked to the president but as long as it doesn't happen then there is no reason for anyone to get too excited or get too disappointed

Meanwhile, his followers kept sharing fake news to display him as a hero and patriot.

this happens often in my country too but the thing is they do not think they are spreading fake news they genuinely think that whatever they are sharing is true and so it is really harmful because they do not know how to distinguish real to fake news

[o48o]

-cut-
Some stats from ai:

423,000 women doctors  in general a women doctor earns 310,000 in the usa

500,000 women lawyers in general average salary is 118,000 a year

20% of usa airline pilots are women in average 142,000 to 239,000 salary


So a lot of the ones above are likely to earn more than their husbands.

one more ai number 1.5 million women in the USA are millionaires

So what you are saying is that husbands can't get their wives 50% either?

What i find kind of ironic is that Elmo was "concerned" with the birth rates not being high enough, and this executive order probably pushes women rather to have career over raising kids, in a same way men have done for ages now. This removes huge safety net for the people who stay at the home raising the kids, so they need to create their own one before even considering kids.

As if it's not blatantly obvious, they need that safety net in case their spouse turns into, or turns up to be a violent abuser, since there's no way out anymore, and no one wants to be dependable of their spouses anyway. So good luck usa, you are going to need it.

[BALIK]

Most women has turned marriage and divorce to business for wealth, and such marriages doesn't last for more than 5yrs. The American law concerning divorce has made most women rich over night, if this new law is True then I must applaud Mr Trump. Though there are still some women that has dedicated their lives and sacrificed a lot for their families and they should be appreciated for there commitment to family, we should be able to know the difference between gold diggers and loyalty.

I don't know if there are any differences between countries but based on what's going on in my country, I don't think most women see marriage as a business for wealth. Only a few women think that way, the majority of the rest want to have a happy marriage with a husband and children for life.

Furthermore, marriage is a decision and consent from both people, not a compulsion. So I don't understand why men marry women just for money and start complaining about dividing assets after divorce when they could have prevented the marriage from happening. Like you: if you knew your future wife agreed to marry you just for your money and she would take your assets if you two divorced, would you still want to marry her?

[milewilda]

Most women has turned marriage and divorce to business for wealth, and such marriages doesn't last for more than 5yrs. The American law concerning divorce has made most women rich over night, if this new law is True then I must applaud Mr Trump. Though there are still some women that has dedicated their lives and sacrificed a lot for their families and they should be appreciated for there commitment to family, we should be able to know the difference between gold diggers and loyalty.

I don't know if there are any differences between countries but based on what's going on in my country, I don't think most women see marriage as a business for wealth. Only a few women think that way, the majority of the rest want to have a happy marriage with a husband and children for life.

Furthermore, marriage is a decision and consent from both people, not a compulsion. So I don't understand why men marry women just for money and start complaining about dividing assets after divorce when they could have prevented the marriage from happening. Like you: if you knew your future wife agreed to marry you just for your money and she would take your assets if you two divorced, would you still want to marry her?

Different countries does have that different culture on which these are thing usually be founded or common on western countries on which there's really a serious issue about in wealth allocation in between husband and wife. This doesnt really sound that good that this is becoming like a business on which women are founded to be wise on how to act as long they could be able to take up some wealth. This is why divorce rate in other countries are higher in compared into those countries on which do sees out marriage as a sacred thing. Well, there's nothing we can do if they would be having that kind of approach on which even myself wont really be marrying a woman if you do obviously sees her that she's really that just marrying you just because of your possessions. This isnt called love but rather this is really basically making up some business and keeps on repeating on the same acts until the would be able to get on what they do want. We cant be able to put up some blame into men because we are the ones who do raises up the family on which means that the wealth that will be created will be most likely because of the husband. So this issue will be that usually be in connection into those women who are really that being wise on trying to get wealth as much as they could.

[dezoel]

There is a difference between "money made before marriage" vs "money made during marriage". The situation is all about money before the marriage I believe, we still have to see how that will go and we shouldn't be really accepting that as normal neither, we need to consider that good. Sure if a man and woman married, and have equal normal life, but then man gets rich, that woman is entitled to half.

Because they were together when he got rich, you can't say she had NOTHING to do with it, I would say she deserves it, or we could just move to monthly payments in most cases, instead of a big pay check. However, if a guy is already rich, and then gets married, and a week later divorces, then there is absolutely nothing she is owed.