Cryptix Your Digital Currency for the Future Launch Now !!!

[red12345678]

Cryptix messenger incoming 

https://cryptix-network.org/cryptix-messenger

Here is the extended information about the upcoming messenger.

Our lead developer is incredibly hardworking and seems to be working day and night.

Just look at the website. You rarely find such a comprehensive and detailed crypto platform with so many subpages.

[HoosatNetwork]

Cryptix messenger incoming  

https://cryptix-network.org/cryptix-messenger

Here is the extended information about the upcoming messenger.

Our lead developer is incredibly hardworking and seems to be working day and night.

Just look at the website. You rarely find such a comprehensive and detailed crypto platform with so many subpages.

Creating subpages?? What are you comparing? It's rather easy to create HTML subpages with text. AI can do them all day long. 🤔 Why it has taken a year for his CryptixPay gateway to push even a single integration? I integrated Hoosat Payment Gateway yesterday to WooCommerce succesfully. So there's the level of developers you're comparing.


Cryptocurrency Payment Gateways?

This medium article explains what kind of a failure or false marketing CryptixPay is, when really creating self-runnable Hoosat Network (HTN) Payment Gateway integration to WooCommerce took only 2 days.

https://medium.com/@toni.lukkaroinen/cryptocurrency-payment-gateways-e9fca8d2f585

Have fun. Lets see how fast Cryptis forks it, as he seems to be incapable of developing source code. Otherwise he would not have been nagging about the Marketplace. Even the fans of Cryptis seem to agree that there's nothing else than subpages that he does.

[ptaank]

New update

The Cryptix Messenger will use end-to-end encryption; here is the exact information on how it works:

https://cryptix-network.org/messenger-encryption

[HoosatNetwork]

New update

The Cryptix Messenger will use end-to-end encryption; here is the exact information on how it works:

https://cryptix-network.org/messenger-encryption

Nothing new in deriving messenger key from the mnemonic and private key (tried this originally in HTN Web Wallet over about 2 years ago), but that "sub-page" fails to explain what algorithm is used for the derivation, so that the private keys are not leaked from the messenger keys.

[FreshEgg95]

Take care.

[Cryptix-Network]

Oh really? Even though you didn't have any payloads, you already had a messenger? Really? Where's the code? So we can see that you had it two years ago?

Why didn't you include it in the release then? Was it too difficult for you? Grok couldn't do the work for you back then, could he?

By the way, we heard that you were on the moon three years before the US, is that true?

But:
The messenger keys are deterministically derived from the wallet recovery phrase (mnemonic), but in a separate derivation domain so they remain isolated from normal wallet spending keys.

Technically the process works as follows:

Seed source
The wallet mnemonic is used as the root seed material.
Messenger E2E key generation
A deterministic 32-byte secret is derived from the seed using a HKDF-SHA256 based derivation step.
This value is then used as the private key for the messenger encryption keypair (CryptoBox), from which the messenger public key is generated.
Handshake signing key
A separate signing key is derived from the mnemonic via the standard BIP39 → seed → HD key derivation path.
This key is only used for handshake authentication.
There is also a separate handshake signing key via Mnemonic->Seed->XPrv.
And there is an additional signature verification, even though it is signed via transactions.

Because these keys are generated in separate derivation branches, messenger keys are never reused as wallet spending keys.
Messenger public keys therefore cannot be used to derive wallet private keys.

You apparently didn't think that far ahead, since you haven't understood anything again, not even the basics of how encryption works. Therefore, no, you've NEVER had anything like this before.
But please show me the GitHub code with the correct date. I could also claim that I programmed Bitcoin before Satoshi and make other such absurd statements. Show code, don't make claims.

New update

The Cryptix Messenger will use end-to-end encryption; here is the exact information on how it works:

https://cryptix-network.org/messenger-encryption

Nothing new in deriving messenger key from the mnemonic and private key (tried this originally in HTN Web Wallet over about 2 years ago), but that "sub-page" fails to explain what algorithm is used for the derivation, so that the private keys are not leaked from the messenger keys.

[HoosatNetwork]

Oh really? Even though you didn't have any payloads, you already had a messenger? Really? Where's the code? So we can see that you had it two years ago?

Why didn't you include it in the release then? Was it too difficult for you? Grok couldn't do the work for you back then, could he?

By the way, we heard that you were on the moon three years before the US, is that true?

But:
The messenger keys are deterministically derived from the wallet recovery phrase (mnemonic), but in a separate derivation domain so they remain isolated from normal wallet spending keys.

Technically the process works as follows:

Seed source
The wallet mnemonic is used as the root seed material.
Messenger E2E key generation
A deterministic 32-byte secret is derived from the seed using a HKDF-SHA256 based derivation step.
This value is then used as the private key for the messenger encryption keypair (CryptoBox), from which the messenger public key is generated.
Handshake signing key
A separate signing key is derived from the mnemonic via the standard BIP39 → seed → HD key derivation path.
This key is only used for handshake authentication.
There is also a separate handshake signing key via Mnemonic->Seed->XPrv.
And there is an additional signature verification, even though it is signed via transactions.

Because these keys are generated in separate derivation branches, messenger keys are never reused as wallet spending keys.
Messenger public keys therefore cannot be used to derive wallet private keys.

You apparently didn't think that far ahead, since you haven't understood anything again, not even the basics of how encryption works. Therefore, no, you've NEVER had anything like this before.
But please show me the GitHub code with the correct date. I could also claim that I programmed Bitcoin before Satoshi and make other such absurd statements. Show code, don't make claims.

New update

The Cryptix Messenger will use end-to-end encryption; here is the exact information on how it works:

https://cryptix-network.org/messenger-encryption

Nothing new in deriving messenger key from the mnemonic and private key (tried this originally in HTN Web Wallet over about 2 years ago), but that "sub-page" fails to explain what algorithm is used for the derivation, so that the private keys are not leaked from the messenger keys.

Thanks for adding the information to the website.. I just refreshed it and read, had to make this sure if you are just using HMAC for generation of the private key, but HKDF-SHA256 does not leak the mnemonic input like HMAC could. But as you are again spreading FUD about using Grok, that deserves next medium post.

Laughing my ass off with your first question. If you're talking about https://hoochat-iu7.caffeine.xyz? Why you want code? It's not my project. It's off-chain chat with a HTN wallet, where users are identified through a wallet. Anyway HTN has 0x03 subnetwork open for payload use with restricted JSON data. Which is used by the voting platform.

If you are talking about the web wallet mnemonic key generation I did two years ago. It was work in progress for the HTN username to wallet user translation, which I have not had time to implement on the wallets. As in use mnemonic to generate new and deterministic way to identify wallet which would not be deposit address. That could be used as security secret identifier for submitting new deposit addresses for username in to the htn-translation-layer.

I won't show you any code, it's open source in Github, but you can write your own code.


Cryptix Fusion copying Qubic

What do you think of cryptocurrency developer who stole XMRig to create Cryptix Fusion to copy Qubic? Do you find this kind of projects acceptable when Cryptocurrency developer wants their miners to mine another cryptocurrency and sell it to buy their own cryptocurrency and increase their own cryptocurrency price through such actions? I call that a form of market manipulation.  

https://medium.com/@toni.lukkaroinen/cryptix-fusion-copying-qubic-d4da66a48c42


By the way.. It looks like I'm going to leave you Cryptis alone with your project if we're looking at the poll I created.
https://vote.hoosat.net/polls/9d802cd03a1677a7f6878b93a26584248731d58e4fb73f0fee35b91e6fac3037

[red12345678]

By the way.. It looks like I'm going to leave you Cryptis alone with your project if we're looking at the poll I created.
https://vote.hoosat.net/polls/9d802cd03a1677a7f6878b93a26584248731d58e4fb73f0fee35b91e6fac3037

A wise decision by the Hoosat community. I agree.
We should stop attacking each other and agree to a "truce" immediately.

[Cryptix-Network]

My code has been online since yesterday. GitHub already has the new Rust code. The web wallet also has the new features on the mainnet. It's not all final yet, as there are still changes coming, but it's 98% complete. I don't need your "pseudo" code, what not exits.

And it doesn't have to be anything "new." But feel free to show me an L1 messenger with full E2E encryption, like the one we implemented. There are only a few, and even those are mostly not fully L1.

But even if something like that already exists, it doesn't matter. Everyone should support free and uncensored communication because it's a human right that is being suppressed more and more. So it doesn't matter if it's new. It only matters that it exists.

And you can write 10,000 more blog posts, I don't care. Be glad I'm not writing blog posts about the 350 million coins you've frozen on the blockchain, forever stealing them from users. And other things about you. You're just jealous because you can't accomplish anything. And you're ruining your project with your crazy behavior—and you don't even realize it during your psychotic episodes.

While you're writing blog posts, I'm writing about tools, encryption, web wallets, and similar things. Let's see how successful you are in the long run with a blockchain project, based on blog posts.

But you can't understand it. Because of your mental problem.

And Qubic is different from Fusion because Fusion is actually designed for different jobs in the future. It's also not on-chain, but off-chain. That's a completely different system. And yes, XMRIG was used for a quick start, but it will soon be replaced with our own Cryptis miner. This was never a secret, though, because we even linked the XMRIG developers and their wallets in the README. How open-source software can be "stolen" is beyond me. Perhaps you should familiarize yourself with licenses and what they mean.

Next, I looked at the sourcecode of the Website you showed me, and what can I say? There's nothing there. There's no WASM, no cryptographic encryption, and no decentralized L1 messenger. Could it be that this is just a regular server-based messenger and something completely different? Don't you understand the difference? Now you'll have to ask your AI what the difference is. I'm not going to explain that to you.

And now, let's leave it at that. You do your thing and we'll do ours. This "war," as you call it, is all in your head. Remember when I virtually shook your hand a long time ago and said, "Hey, let's work on hashes together." Your arrogant reply was, "You need my help." And I said no. Instead of fighting with any other cryptocurrency, you could have collaborated. That would have gotten you further than what you're doing now.

This whole drama stems from your need for attention and your attempt to visualize superiority—which you've never actually possessed. And it triggers you immensely when someone doesn't care what you do or say.

And we don't have to be friends, work on your project, focus on that. Not on other people's projects. Then you'll have healthy competition, and progress will bring success. Not the level you're currently displaying.

Good luck, Bye

Oh really? Even though you didn't have any payloads, you already had a messenger? Really? Where's the code? So we can see that you had it two years ago?

Why didn't you include it in the release then? Was it too difficult for you? Grok couldn't do the work for you back then, could he?

By the way, we heard that you were on the moon three years before the US, is that true?

But:
The messenger keys are deterministically derived from the wallet recovery phrase (mnemonic), but in a separate derivation domain so they remain isolated from normal wallet spending keys.

Technically the process works as follows:

Seed source
The wallet mnemonic is used as the root seed material.
Messenger E2E key generation
A deterministic 32-byte secret is derived from the seed using a HKDF-SHA256 based derivation step.
This value is then used as the private key for the messenger encryption keypair (CryptoBox), from which the messenger public key is generated.
Handshake signing key
A separate signing key is derived from the mnemonic via the standard BIP39 → seed → HD key derivation path.
This key is only used for handshake authentication.
There is also a separate handshake signing key via Mnemonic->Seed->XPrv.
And there is an additional signature verification, even though it is signed via transactions.

Because these keys are generated in separate derivation branches, messenger keys are never reused as wallet spending keys.
Messenger public keys therefore cannot be used to derive wallet private keys.

You apparently didn't think that far ahead, since you haven't understood anything again, not even the basics of how encryption works. Therefore, no, you've NEVER had anything like this before.
But please show me the GitHub code with the correct date. I could also claim that I programmed Bitcoin before Satoshi and make other such absurd statements. Show code, don't make claims.

New update

The Cryptix Messenger will use end-to-end encryption; here is the exact information on how it works:

https://cryptix-network.org/messenger-encryption

Nothing new in deriving messenger key from the mnemonic and private key (tried this originally in HTN Web Wallet over about 2 years ago), but that "sub-page" fails to explain what algorithm is used for the derivation, so that the private keys are not leaked from the messenger keys.

Thanks for adding the information to the website.. I just refreshed it and read, had to make this sure if you are just using HMAC for generation of the private key, but HKDF-SHA256 does not leak the mnemonic input like HMAC could. But as you are again spreading FUD about using Grok, that deserves next medium post.

Laughing my ass off with your first question. If you're talking about https://hoochat-iu7.caffeine.xyz? Why you want code? It's not my project. It's off-chain chat with a HTN wallet, where users are identified through a wallet. Anyway HTN has 0x03 subnetwork open for payload use with restricted JSON data. Which is used by the voting platform.

If you are talking about the web wallet mnemonic key generation I did two years ago. It was work in progress for the HTN username to wallet user translation, which I have not had time to implement on the wallets. As in use mnemonic to generate new and deterministic way to identify wallet which would not be deposit address. That could be used as security secret identifier for submitting new deposit addresses for username in to the htn-translation-layer.

I won't show you any code, it's open source in Github, but you can write your own code.


Cryptix Fusion copying Qubic

What do you think of cryptocurrency developer who stole XMRig to create Cryptix Fusion to copy Qubic? Do you find this kind of projects acceptable when Cryptocurrency developer wants their miners to mine another cryptocurrency and sell it to buy their own cryptocurrency and increase their own cryptocurrency price through such actions? I call that a form of market manipulation.  

https://medium.com/@toni.lukkaroinen/cryptix-fusion-copying-qubic-d4da66a48c42


By the way.. It looks like I'm going to leave you Cryptis alone with your project if we're looking at the poll I created.
https://vote.hoosat.net/polls/9d802cd03a1677a7f6878b93a26584248731d58e4fb73f0fee35b91e6fac3037

[HoosatNetwork]

By the way.. It looks like I'm going to leave you Cryptis alone with your project if we're looking at the poll I created.
https://vote.hoosat.net/polls/9d802cd03a1677a7f6878b93a26584248731d58e4fb73f0fee35b91e6fac3037

A wise decision by the Hoosat community. I agree.
We should stop attacking each other and agree to a "truce" immediately.

Good. Stop spreading false statements.

[HoosatNetwork]

My code has been online since yesterday. GitHub already has the new Rust code. The web wallet also has the new features on the mainnet. It's not all final yet, as there are still changes coming, but it's 98% complete. I don't need your "pseudo" code, what not exits.

And it doesn't have to be anything "new." But feel free to show me an L1 messenger with full E2E encryption, like the one we implemented. There are only a few, and even those are mostly not fully L1.

But even if something like that already exists, it doesn't matter. Everyone should support free and uncensored communication because it's a human right that is being suppressed more and more. So it doesn't matter if it's new. It only matters that it exists.

And you can write 10,000 more blog posts, I don't care. Be glad I'm not writing blog posts about the 350 million coins you've frozen on the blockchain, forever stealing them from users. And other things about you. You're just jealous because you can't accomplish anything. And you're ruining your project with your crazy behavior—and you don't even realize it during your psychotic episodes.

While you're writing blog posts, I'm writing about tools, encryption, web wallets, and similar things. Let's see how successful you are in the long run with a blockchain project, based on blog posts.

But you can't understand it. Because of your mental problem.

And Qubic is different from Fusion because Fusion is actually designed for different jobs in the future. It's also not on-chain, but off-chain. That's a completely different system. And yes, XMRIG was used for a quick start, but it will soon be replaced with our own Cryptis miner. This was never a secret, though, because we even linked the XMRIG developers and their wallets in the README. How open-source software can be "stolen" is beyond me. Perhaps you should familiarize yourself with licenses and what they mean.

Next, I looked at the sourcecode of the Website you showed me, and what can I say? There's nothing there. There's no WASM, no cryptographic encryption, and no decentralized L1 messenger. Could it be that this is just a regular server-based messenger and something completely different? Don't you understand the difference? Now you'll have to ask your AI what the difference is. I'm not going to explain that to you.

And now, let's leave it at that. You do your thing and we'll do ours. This "war," as you call it, is all in your head. Remember when I virtually shook your hand a long time ago and said, "Hey, let's work on hashes together." Your arrogant reply was, "You need my help." And I said no. Instead of fighting with any other cryptocurrency, you could have collaborated. That would have gotten you further than what you're doing now.

This whole drama stems from your need for attention and your attempt to visualize superiority—which you've never actually possessed. And it triggers you immensely when someone doesn't care what you do or say.

And we don't have to be friends, work on your project, focus on that. Not on other people's projects. Then you'll have healthy competition, and progress will bring success. Not the level you're currently displaying.

Good luck, Bye

I have several times already said the Xeggex Karl scammed the +359,022,330.4287768 HTN and it's SOFT freezed by community vote. Those soft frozen coins also include some of my coins and as I lost KAS, USDT and BTC even before they finalized their exit scam as they were converted to promissary tokens which finally were just removed when the exit scam happened like everything else dissapiered. Anyway it's soft freezed, as in Xeggex is able to move the coins if they remove the freeze from their node and mine the block that adds the transaction. I have said this already several times, as in I have not stolen them, I don't have private keys for the Xeggex wallet. So you are still spreading false statements, even if your follower just before you kind of agreed to truce between our projects.

You have modified the XMRig source code according to the Cryptix Fusion terminal data and you have not published your modifications as such you are even currently breaking GPLv2, even if you published the XMRig original code.

Looked source code of which Website? Can't answer your questions before I know which website. 🤔 If you are talking about the off-chain chat, that is not done by me and it's created with caffeinate.xyz and as such runs of ICP. So no wonder you can't read the client side code.

Do you accept that I will publish the private threatening messages you have sent to me before you even started CYTX and other private stuff? You are the one who started this flame war and I made poll if I should stop this, because you have not stopped spreading false-statements. in your Discord. You are even announcing your software release with "Blogger will be scared.", which makes me laugh out a lot. You have been just jealous, because I really have patent application filed in EU, US, Taiwan and China. All of them come public on their own time.

I don't care about your projects, other than that you have several false claims on your research and you are spreading false statements constantly in your Discord after I blocked you in private messages.

There's 4 days in the poll and I will respect the poll results, but until then I will write about your research every time you spread false statements like now. So wait for the next medium post as soon as I find something new to write about as too lazy to rant about same stuff, but If you want I can write one tomorrow about the origins of our arguments if you agree that I can publish some private messages?

Yet Karl is back at it again and you're defending the fact that HTN community decided to try and freeze the stolen HTN coins. When you yourself were interested of finding him, even though your coin was not listed in Xeggex.


So simple question. Please answer this. Cryptis can I post some of our private messages in medium article? It would be final article on the matter and then we both can stop and call truce for the rest of the life of our projects.


Algorithm Update to Nullify Mining rewards?

CYTX -> CPay genesis restart was intentionally meant to nullify mining rewards of FPGA users and you know who, Bawls. Because he was implementing CryptixHash bitstream to ColEngine. Yet Cryptis and his followers dare to spread false statements of Hoosat Network, about freezing of exit scam coins, and price of Hoosat Network coins. It's rather annoying that anonymous wannabes are twisting the truth to false statements, when they can not function inside the truth of the matters.

https://medium.com/@toni.lukkaroinen/algorithm-update-to-nullify-mining-rewards-8d90f7b64dd0

Oh by the way remember Cryptis that I told you. I'll wait a year and I'll check where you are with Cryptix Network. I've done that and it seems very shady, anonymous developer nullifying intentionally miners coin rewards through genesis restart and freezing on exchange, breaking GPLv2 license agreements, doing fallacious research full of false claims, what else? The list probably keeps growing in the future.


  

[Cryptix-Network]

The same thing happened to us with MeccaCex, and we weathered the storm, watching as MeccaCex coins were dumped daily. Do you think we couldn't have implemented a wallet freeze function? But that's out of the question due to decentralization and the lack of custody. I strongly recommend finding another solution. Place deep buy orders; these coins will then be dumped once, and they can be bought cheaply, thus resolving the issue decentrally. That's how we did it. I mentioned it the last time we were in private contact, when we were both working on the new hashes. I said, "Let's cooperate," and I was even on your Discord back then. Remember, or check your messages. I offered you my hand. You didn't want it and instead caused trouble. Remember. But it doesn't matter, this information was meant for you, not for the public. Private communication is private communication. And as a user in your community already suggested, apologize for your attacks. Delete all your lying blog posts. Then this issue and this dispute will be over, and perhaps one day normal communication and cooperation will be possible once time has passed. I'm mature enough to offer this to you.
If you recently sent a webpage from caffeinate.xyz, then I probably meant caffeinate.xyz with the website's source code, what else?

And be careful with Xeggex, these aren't the real Xeggex people. Something's not right here. It seems like they just bought the domain and the code. That's why these people have the accounts. I don't know for sure, but the way they're writing now doesn't fit with the old Xeggex people. These are different people. Keep your distance, something's not right.

My code has been online since yesterday. GitHub already has the new Rust code. The web wallet also has the new features on the mainnet. It's not all final yet, as there are still changes coming, but it's 98% complete. I don't need your "pseudo" code, what not exits.

And it doesn't have to be anything "new." But feel free to show me an L1 messenger with full E2E encryption, like the one we implemented. There are only a few, and even those are mostly not fully L1.

But even if something like that already exists, it doesn't matter. Everyone should support free and uncensored communication because it's a human right that is being suppressed more and more. So it doesn't matter if it's new. It only matters that it exists.

And you can write 10,000 more blog posts, I don't care. Be glad I'm not writing blog posts about the 350 million coins you've frozen on the blockchain, forever stealing them from users. And other things about you. You're just jealous because you can't accomplish anything. And you're ruining your project with your crazy behavior—and you don't even realize it during your psychotic episodes.

While you're writing blog posts, I'm writing about tools, encryption, web wallets, and similar things. Let's see how successful you are in the long run with a blockchain project, based on blog posts.

But you can't understand it. Because of your mental problem.

And Qubic is different from Fusion because Fusion is actually designed for different jobs in the future. It's also not on-chain, but off-chain. That's a completely different system. And yes, XMRIG was used for a quick start, but it will soon be replaced with our own Cryptis miner. This was never a secret, though, because we even linked the XMRIG developers and their wallets in the README. How open-source software can be "stolen" is beyond me. Perhaps you should familiarize yourself with licenses and what they mean.

Next, I looked at the sourcecode of the Website you showed me, and what can I say? There's nothing there. There's no WASM, no cryptographic encryption, and no decentralized L1 messenger. Could it be that this is just a regular server-based messenger and something completely different? Don't you understand the difference? Now you'll have to ask your AI what the difference is. I'm not going to explain that to you.

And now, let's leave it at that. You do your thing and we'll do ours. This "war," as you call it, is all in your head. Remember when I virtually shook your hand a long time ago and said, "Hey, let's work on hashes together." Your arrogant reply was, "You need my help." And I said no. Instead of fighting with any other cryptocurrency, you could have collaborated. That would have gotten you further than what you're doing now.

This whole drama stems from your need for attention and your attempt to visualize superiority—which you've never actually possessed. And it triggers you immensely when someone doesn't care what you do or say.

And we don't have to be friends, work on your project, focus on that. Not on other people's projects. Then you'll have healthy competition, and progress will bring success. Not the level you're currently displaying.

Good luck, Bye

I have several times already said the Xeggex Karl scammed the +359,022,330.4287768 HTN and it's SOFT freezed by community vote. Those soft frozen coins also include some of my coins and as I lost KAS, USDT and BTC even before they finalized their exit scam as they were converted to promissary tokens which finally were just removed when the exit scam happened like everything else dissapiered. Anyway it's soft freezed, as in Xeggex is able to move the coins if they remove the freeze from their node and mine the block that adds the transaction. I have said this already several times, as in I have not stolen them, I don't have private keys for the Xeggex wallet. So you are still spreading false statements, even if your follower just before you kind of agreed to truce between our projects.

You have modified the XMRig source code according to the Cryptix Fusion terminal data and you have not published your modifications as such you are even currently breaking GPLv2, even if you published the XMRig original code.

Looked source code of which Website? Can't answer your questions before I know which website. 🤔 If you are talking about the off-chain chat, that is not done by me and it's created with caffeinate.xyz and as such runs of ICP. So no wonder you can't read the client side code.

Do you accept that I will publish the private threatening messages you have sent to me before you even started CYTX and other private stuff? You are the one who started this flame war and I made poll if I should stop this, because you have not stopped spreading false-statements. in your Discord. You are even announcing your software release with "Blogger will be scared.", which makes me laugh out a lot. You have been just jealous, because I really have patent application filed in EU, US, Taiwan and China. All of them come public on their own time.

I don't care about your projects, other than that you have several false claims on your research and you are spreading false statements constantly in your Discord after I blocked you in private messages.

There's 4 days in the poll and I will respect the poll results, but until then I will write about your research every time you spread false statements like now. So wait for the next medium post as soon as I find something new to write about as too lazy to rant about same stuff, but If you want I can write one tomorrow about the origins of our arguments if you agree that I can publish some private messages?

Yet Karl is back at it again and you're defending the fact that HTN community decided to try and freeze the stolen HTN coins. When you yourself were interested of finding him, even though your coin was not listed in Xeggex.


So simple question. Please answer this. Cryptis can I post some of our private messages in medium article? It would be final article on the matter and then we both can stop and call truce for the rest of the life of our projects.


Algorithm Update to Nullify Mining rewards?

CYTX -> CPay genesis restart was intentionally meant to nullify mining rewards of FPGA users and you know who, Bawls. Because he was implementing CryptixHash bitstream to ColEngine. Yet Cryptis and his followers dare to spread false statements of Hoosat Network, about freezing of exit scam coins, and price of Hoosat Network coins. It's rather annoying that anonymous wannabes are twisting the truth to false statements, when they can not function inside the truth of the matters.

https://medium.com/@toni.lukkaroinen/algorithm-update-to-nullify-mining-rewards-8d90f7b64dd0

Oh by the way remember Cryptis that I told you. I'll wait a year and I'll check where you are with Cryptix Network. I've done that and it seems very shady, anonymous developer nullifying intentionally miners coin rewards through genesis restart and freezing on exchange, breaking GPLv2 license agreements, doing fallacious research full of false claims, what else? The list probably keeps growing in the future.


  

[HoosatNetwork]

The same thing happened to us with MeccaCex, and we weathered the storm, watching as MeccaCex coins were dumped daily. Do you think we couldn't have implemented a wallet freeze function? But that's out of the question due to decentralization and the lack of custody. I strongly recommend finding another solution. Place deep buy orders; these coins will then be dumped once, and they can be bought cheaply, thus resolving the issue decentrally. That's how we did it. I mentioned it the last time we were in private contact, when we were both working on the new hashes. I said, "Let's cooperate," and I was even on your Discord back then. Remember, or check your messages. I offered you my hand. You didn't want it and instead caused trouble. Remember. But it doesn't matter, this information was meant for you, not for the public. Private communication is private communication. And as a user in your community already suggested, apologize for your attacks. Delete all your lying blog posts. Then this issue and this dispute will be over, and perhaps one day normal communication and cooperation will be possible once time has passed. I'm mature enough to offer this to you.
If you recently sent a webpage from caffeinate.xyz, then I probably meant caffeinate.xyz with the website's source code, what else?

And be careful with Xeggex, these aren't the real Xeggex people. Something's not right here. It seems like they just bought the domain and the code. That's why these people have the accounts. I don't know for sure, but the way they're writing now doesn't fit with the old Xeggex people. These are different people. Keep your distance, something's not right.

I know that MecaCex scammed some of the Cryptix users. The Hoosat Network freeze is basically the way that you can decide which transactions can pass on your own node to the blocks you mine on your own node. Which is as far as we can do decentralized freezing, beyond that it's almost impossible to freeze coins from moving. So don't confuse decentralized soft freeze to freeze mechanism, which is impossible without master server systems.

I did not want to help you or cooperate, because you threatened me, because you did not understand that your first Cryptixhash was not FPGA/ASIC resistant which you learned when Bawls was adding it to ColEngine. There's no lies on the blogs and I can prove everything I've written. I've even requested everyone to point one thing that they could disprove as a false statement. So to answer your deletion request. I will unpublish the blogs about your research and history of Cryptix Network changes if you apologize to your community for spreading false statements about Hoosat Network. I have read all your FUD in your Discord.

I'm not the developer who created the chat with caffeinate.xyz, so don't know much about the code. Other than that caffeinate.xyz obscures frontend code.

Whole Hoosat Networks knows that Xeggex is scam.

Nice that you show that you are afraid of displaying the private messages like all the threats you've sent to me in private discussion. Anyway after the poll ends, I'm going to diss you for the rest of your life. So there's only 3 days to decide if I unpublish the blog posts. So the clock is ticking.


Do you accept that Cryptocurrency adds master ban list to the whole network? Which can actually be removed from a single node and then all the banned node blocks will flow to the network through unbanned modified node.

https://medium.com/@toni.lukkaroinen/cryptix-network-adds-master-ban-list-9028e18f876e

So the question is, does Cryptis try intentionally to centralize his network or does he not understand that his master banlist can be removed and all the banned node blocks can come through? What do you think?


Take note of this also, nothing in Cryptix Network Mining Terms of Use prohibit mining of the Chinese miner which has ~200 Gh/s on your network and yet you are implementing master ban list to try disable RPlant from allowing the miner from mining and already have requested Exbitron to freeze the wallet. This is not decentralization, this is off-chain centralization under your sole control as you are scared that the miner will dump your cryptocurrency price down. As you can't prove it is datacenter misuse or illegal botnet, as such there is no unfair advantage, but only your decision to work against the miner and as far as I've seen the miner or RPlant has not executed anything like 51% attacks which they could do at the moment. You yourself have stated in Discord that you do not know what kind of a miner there is mining, yet you say it's against your Terms of Use.

We also don’t know whether the miner is using a data center, whether the devices involved have been compromised, or if it’s a botnet. It could even be the data center operators themselves—we simply don’t know.
What we do know, however, is that this behavior violates our fair mining policy.

The terms of use.
https://cryptix-network.org/terms-of-use


Though Cryptis I kind of like your idea of 50% PoS / 50% PoW or hybrid mining between ASIC & GPU algorithms. But for real, why not do them both if the question is between those? Hybrid mining is simple to setup and if you want create your 50% PoS. Hoosat Network will stay CPU/GPU mineable with single algorithm and 100% PoW.
  


So Anyway Cryptis. If you want me to remove the medium articles, are you yourself ready to apologize to your community for starting this flame war in 17.1.2025 and apologize for your continued false statements about HTN and tarnishing my name. if you do that your #announcement channel and remove the FUD articles from your website and the single medium article, I can do the same.

I'll give you the time until the Hoosat poll (Time Remaining 2 days) If the poll passes like it is now, I will be dissing you for the of your life and I won't be listening to any deletion requests or write afterwards anymore about your project.

https://vote.hoosat.net/polls/9d802cd03a1677a7f6878b93a26584248731d58e4fb73f0fee35b91e6fac3037

So the decision is yours if you want a truce, before the poll ends and the medium articles removed or not. I'm following your discord channel and watching answers here until the poll ends. The time is running out.