Asap264 (OP)
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 33
Merit: 2
|
 |
February 04, 2025, 09:26:34 PM |
|
Relax, I'm not gonna condemn doing so. But it depends on how you use it. And, as I always say, as long as you're getting the results you want, nothing else matters.
But here are some tasks you shouldn't let AI do on your blog. Let real experts handle them.
1. Keyword Research
We’ve all heard that SEO is dead. So, is this even worth talking about? Yes, it is. There are still more than 1 billion daily searches that are purely informational. (Informational queries are those that people search for to learn about something.)
Getting off track... 😅
In general, topic selection is the most important step in any type of content creation. In our case, keyword research is the most important part of writing content. Get it wrong, and you might end up wasting your time on a piece of content no one wants to read.
2. Using AI to Write All Types of Content
No matter how good you think AI is at creating content, I believe it can't write all types of content the way humans do.
There are types of content where the reader is interested in knowing the actual experience a person had. And AI can't write content that demonstrates experience. Well, it has two choices:
a. Fake experience and come up with things that might be wrong or completely illogical.
b. Copy what some posts on that topic have in them and use it as its experience.
Another type of content where you shouldn't use AI is when expertise is required. Someone said, "No, AI can write EEAT content; you just have to learn how to prompt it." But if that were the case, there wouldn't be a single content writer with a job now. AI just obeys what you tell it or uses general knowledge to do what you ask it to do. In summary, don't let AI do keyword research for you—find human keyword research experts and let them handle it. If a piece of content requires experience and expertise, let a human content writer write it.
|
|
|
|
|
BADecker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4480
Merit: 1418
|
 |
February 04, 2025, 11:43:15 PM |
|
I know I am using AI. But I don't know how or where. 
|
|
|
|
Mariannalik
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 76
Merit: 0
|
 |
February 12, 2025, 09:46:36 AM |
|
AI is generally a cool tool, it helps me every day.
|
|
|
|
|
MysteryMiner
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1068
Death to enemies!
|
 |
February 21, 2025, 10:11:23 AM |
|
Devil should vacate Hell of thiefs and robbers to make additional space for degenerative AI users like You!
|
bc1q59y5jp2rrwgxuekc8kjk6s8k2es73uawprre4j
|
|
|
Reynaldo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1347
Merit: 1009
|
 |
February 22, 2025, 04:49:26 AM |
|
I used AI to check this post for grammar. No, I didn't let it write my opinions for me. That's the sweet spot.
|
|
|
|
|
jeanone
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 1
Merit: 0
|
 |
February 25, 2025, 07:10:03 PM |
|
I agree with the author - AI is a great tool, but it can't fully replace human expertise, especially in keyword research or content that relies on real experience. While it can help speed things up, some parts of content creation still need a human touch. If you want your content to stand out and actually provide value, it makes sense to work with professionals. I've found that content marketing seo services like those offered by seologist https://www.seologist.com/products/content-marketing.html can be really useful for optimizing content in a way that benefits both readers and search engines.
|
|
|
|
|
Rhow
Member

Offline
Activity: 131
Merit: 76
|
 |
February 26, 2025, 05:04:57 AM |
|
I use AI every day. It organizes and presents any information in front of us very easily. But I have been struggling for the past few days to understand which AI tool will be more helpful for us. chatgpt or deepseek.
|
|
|
|
|
damnrancho
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 53
Merit: 0
|
 |
February 26, 2025, 07:28:58 AM |
|
AI will not convey the thought that I can convey, what's the point for me to use AI then? I think not.
|
|
|
|
|
BitSean
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 45
Merit: 2
|
 |
February 26, 2025, 08:02:47 AM |
|
AI has been a game changer for me, especially when it comes to writing blogs. I use it to refine my writing, correct grammar, and make my content more professional. It's efficient and a huge time saver. But unfortunately, not everyone on Bitcointalk sees it the same way. Many believe that relying on AI means you're not thinking for yourself even if you only want to make your words look more nice. Well, maybe they are too smart to ask AI to correct their grammar, but I hope they consider those who are not PROFICIENT in English.
|
|
|
|
|
DediRock
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 176
Merit: 0
|
 |
February 26, 2025, 03:32:18 PM |
|
Indeed! AI can be useful, but it has limits. Keyword research and content requiring real expertise or personal experience are better handled by humans. AI is a tool, not a replacement.
|
|
|
|
|
UNTO Chain
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
|
 |
February 26, 2025, 04:53:44 PM |
|
I agree with you that AI should not be used for all types of content. It's true that AI can't write certain kinds of content like personal experiences or expert advice because it doesn't have the same level of understanding and empathy as a human writer would. However, I also believe that AI has its place in content creation and can help writers produce high-quality work faster and more efficiently. For example, while an experienced copywriter may need several hours to create a compelling piece of persuasive writing, an AI tool could generate multiple drafts within minutes based on specific prompts provided by the user. Additionally, many tools allow users to customize their output according to different styles such as formal vs informal language usage which helps ensure consistency throughout large pieces of text without requiring manual editing from start-to-finish every time new material needs adding into existing documents etc.. Ultimately though - whether we choose traditional methods over automation will depend largely upon individual preferences but ultimately both approaches offer unique benefits depending on project requirements at hand!
|
|
|
|
|
Reynaldo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1347
Merit: 1009
|
 |
March 27, 2025, 02:30:08 PM |
|
I do use AI, but mainly as a research assistant and learning tool. It helps me understand complex topics faster and gives me a foundation to build my own thoughts on.
|
|
|
|
|
Vod
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4396
Merit: 3606
Licking my boob since 1970
|
 |
March 28, 2025, 04:14:18 AM |
|
For the past two weeks I've been using AI to help me with a completely new tool. I find it easy (and am now reliant on) how AI can take my existing code and eliminate every single point of failure, using layers of if...then logic I would never had thought of, not being a professional programmer. I don't see this as cheating any more than Grammarly - the fixes are common sense and it frees my mind to do other things. Using AI to delve into more complicated issues is where I find the value. I know what I want to do, but I can't explain it (again, lack of education) so I can write using Trump (small) words and let the AI tell me what the terms are for what I want to do  Still the AI cannot write this customized code for me, so I still have to know how to program - take the examples the system gives me and incorporate it into my idea. Sometimes the AI even gives me advice that leads to future ideas! AI can be used on your blog in the same way. Just type the thoughts you want to convey, and the AI may tell you that the your thought process is called "x", remind you of where you may have got your thoughts or give you other random information that may make you think differently. It's not a copy/paste tool for people who have real thoughts to share.
|
|
|
|
|
boyptc
|
 |
March 29, 2025, 01:33:44 PM |
|
I do not blog but I am playing these AI features like with chatgpt. I'm seeing that it keeps on growing and there are more features now even for free.
There is even that feature I've seen, not sure if it's with the paid subscription that it's now able to humanize its own content.
Maybe the crypto news websites are using AI or the authors of it.
|
|
|
|
|