Holydarkness and Casino Disputes—Something’s Fishy

[Horsbyname]

It’s been a while since I joined this forum. I have been watching Holydarkness how he jumps into  cases against casinos and defend them.

at first I thought it is just in my case, but I have noticed a pattern, when someone’s raise voice against a casino specially against BC.Game.io holydarkness will step in and suddenly it feels like the casino is on right side and the OP is scammer.

When holydarkness get involved in a case that’s basically a casino win. Casino will stop responding to the thread as holydarkness took over it now, and casino will continue it with holydarkness in private.

I feel like holydarkness coaches them, like what to post now, what to excuse, dodge the hard questions. And then holydarkness will appear in the post with a ton of questions making a way for the casinos to get a point and make it an excuse. Am I wrong? Check my case you will see how he ignore to ask from duckdice.io representative to prove his accusations, instead he asked me to prove that you are not a scammer and duckdice.io is falsely accusing you, Which I did and he dropped that after.

Once a casino says that the user is scammer holydarkness rubber-stamps it against the user without asking for proof from the casinos.

In my case Duckdice.io representative popped up, he accused me of being the scammer and blackmailer, the representative asked my permission to post the evidences of me being blackmailing them and scamming them, I said, go ahead show em, but he post nothing. then holydarkness appear and he fought like a brave warrior defended duckdice.io by asking me with 100s question instead of asking them to prove it now. And once the representative of Duckdice.io got another point during holydarkness questions from me, he come again with another excuse.
I can prove that

He claims he got direct connections with casinos to speed up things, ok cool, but why do the casino go silent after you step in?
If you have connection with them, shouldn’t you be pushing them to answer us here,  publically, instead of letting them ghost?  The casino will walk away and we are left arguing with hoydarkness while he calls it solved in his list-----

If he got these private lines, why are we even bothering bitcointalk? Isn’t the point of bringing a case to this forum is to things out in open? Why don’t he message them and say Hey, this issue is raised against you and respond or….  And if the casino doesn’t take it seriously the community should back the user until the casino take it serious. But it will be all behind the forum and the casino get a free pass.


I am not saying he is taking money from casinos but this private messaging things… you know.

[holydarkness]

It’s been a while since I joined this forum. I have been watching Holydarkness how he jumps into  cases against casinos and defend them.

at first I thought it is just in my case, but I have noticed a pattern, when someone’s raise voice against a casino specially against BC.Game.io holydarkness will step in and suddenly it feels like the casino is on right side and the OP is scammer.

It's bc.game, bc.game.io was not part of their mirror sites,

When holydarkness get involved in a case that’s basically a casino win. Casino will stop responding to the thread as holydarkness took over it now, and casino will continue it with holydarkness in private.

Been like that for a while; they stopped responding. Their support account only being active again [I guess they assign it to other coworker who handle it better] recently. Before that, it was me who informed, pushed, and chased BC to get things moving until things are resolved and the player told me [or I told the forum through a post on the thread] that their situation got cleared.

About basically the casino win... well, wow, I must have done a very poor job to ensure that, given at most cases, if the players were not found guilty, I managed to push BC to pay. For example:

BC v. Azasapos, 350,000 USD
BC v. Mikaela13, 7,800 USD
BC v. Neymar5, 14,000 USD
BC v. CBGAM, 13,000 USD

And let's not forget one of the most epic case in SA board, though I'll have to say I don't really remember how huge of the effort I poured in that case and how active the player in chasing the resolution from his side, BC v. justincase78, 7,000,000 USD

So... the casino win? By having to pay those [subjectively] significant amount of fund? You have a very weird description of "win".

Or were you referring the winning from cases where the players are caught doing abusive behavior, that --at times-- not only proven here, but also by ADR? Is it fair to call it a winning because I got involved? Wouldn't it be more appropriate to call it that facts got unearthed and things get resolved by evidences? Where I only help get to the bottom of the case and revealing the truth?

[DuckDice issue]

Will skip as it's been beyond exhaustively explained throughout several threads OP have, to the point that I got tired and just watch OP... well, do things with the marbles that he have.

If he got these private lines, why are we even bothering bitcointalk? Isn’t the point of bringing a case to this forum is to things out in open? Why don’t he message them and say Hey, this issue is raised against you and respond or….  And if the casino doesn’t take it seriously the community should back the user until the casino take it serious. But it will be all behind the forum and the casino get a free pass.

They can, I didn't prohibit them to address things directly by themselves. They just didn't do that. Why? I don't know. Besides, is there any need to force them to address the matters, while the whole discussion I have in private with them basically goes like:

HD: horsbyname, UID 12345678, his withdrawal got locked
BC: yeah, our provider asked for investigation following his big win. But first, he need to complete KYC
HD: can you perhaps get it expedited?
BC: We're currently validating the documents
HD: Ok

HD: horsbyname, UID 12345678, he said that his KYC got verified [show them a picture given by horsbyname that his account is fully verified]
BC: yeah, now we're waiting for the provider to finish with their investigation
HD: ok, I'll tell him to wait for the ongoing investigation to be done

HBN: [announce that he got his fund released]
HD: congratulate him for having his fund, asked him to mark it as resolved and lock the thread

I guess BC.Game Support can jump in whenever they want to on above illustration, but I guess they find it redundant. Hence, they don't. Though, they do jump in from time to time when they feel the need to give official announcement from BC. Usually after I had my discussion with my contact and they tell me that they'll update for the matter.

I am not saying he is taking money from casinos but this private messaging things… you know.

The private messaging things... what? Other than very helpful and efficient in tackling cases against BC, since [as can be witnessed by many who commented on those thread against BC] their live support kinda... inefficient. Between having to sit down peacefully and silently [literally, as I don't have to write notes in my notebook and remember details of cases and made follow ups and all, on daily basis, I can spend those time chilling and watch movies] and see how they waited for BC to respond, or DMing my contacts everyday, pushing and terroring them to get things done ASAP, which one do you think is better?

So, what's with them? It'll be nice if you can spell it out, since I surely don't know.

Based from previous interaction with you where explanation has been made in abundance and yet it still failed to penetrate your mind, I hope that lengthy explanation above can help you understand, because this is the only instance I'll address this matter. I've made my position clear, as clear as I can get without any crayons to make it easier for you. Feel free to try spin those into a pool of muds to be thrown at me.

A little advice as a parting words though: make sure the muds dirty and sticky enough. Otherwise, it won't stick no matter how hard you throw them. Oh, the straw you grasped won't help the mud to stick too. Straw, as proven in strawmen, is not a good adhesive and tends to crumble easy.

[BenCodie]

About basically the casino win... well, wow, I must have done a very poor job to ensure that, given at most cases, if the players were not found guilty, I managed to push BC to pay. For example:

Now, why does bc.game, a casino with a +20 / 0 / 0 reputation on the forum have to be "pushed to pay"?

What about all of the people who don't have you to "push them to pay"? Do they get their funds? I doubt it...This is one of the things that were the basis for this recent thread which lead to icopress grossly abusing their power by leaving negative feedback on my profile just for stating the simple facts that you just validated with your post.

It's amazing how much fear people have to speak about what is going on in this forum, and how much power people like icopress have to be able to silence people...just as he has done with my profile.

[nutildah]

Isn’t the point of bringing a case to this forum is to things out in open?

Absolutely. It seems to be one of the best use cases for Bitcointalk at the moment. Kudos to you for not using ChatGPT this time.

It's amazing how much fear people have to speak about what is going on in this forum, and how much power people like icopress have to be able to silence people...just as he has done with my profile.

Clearly you haven't been silenced.

[Horsbyname]

Since you claim you push casinos, let me remind you something When Duckdice.io representative accused me and says that my email is one letter off from the blackmailer emails address and he asked me 4 times to give him permission to show the proof of his accusation.

Here

2.

And 2. Do I have permission to publicly show the email address you've been in contact with us? that way I can show the blackmailer's email address, and let bitcointalk give their oppinion on it .
Kirito89,
Duckdice Support.

Here you Stepped in Saying: Give consent for DuckDice to share your email… or send it to me, I’ll screenshot it censored.

Lie? Here

And oh, perhaps give your consent for FJ DuckDice to share your email? To prove or disprove their rebuttal about similar email address with the scammer? If you feel uncomfortable with your account being publicly disclosed, I'd like to offer an option where they send it to me, for-my-eyes-only basis, and I'll reproduce a screenshot of that proof they have me, with several characters of the email being censored. I'll give my best to find a balance where it's enough to maintain privacy yet also prove [or disprove] the similarities.
 

Again Holydarkness :You told Kirito: “I’ve got consent from OP… provide me the evidence of those email similarities,


Ok where is kirito89 proofs? Where did you pushed him for his accusations? Where’s that “Chase” you barge about? A single time you asked him to prove his accusations? Mention it.


Then You asked me a lot questions and one of them was

edit: Oh, almost forget, where were we with that review removal from TP? Did they send you an email explaining why it got deleted?

Even thought I had explained that earlier to you many times but you was trying to give Duckdice.io representative another point to make excuse which he did.
Kirito89 duckdice.io representative flips the script says I posted multi trustpilot reviews, confirmed it was me, he said when he was going to link me by email, and I delete those reviews.

I told to both of you it was not me who deleted the review it was deleted by trustpilot as per their policy/rules.

Kirito89 and you demanded to post the email that I received from trustpilot where it showing my email as well that my review was deleted by trustpilot not by me.

I provide that proof as well. That Screeshot had my email too, out there for everyone to see.

Where is you push? Where’s his Trustpilot “link”?


At all you saw me put it all out there, the email, the trustpilot, the email from duckdice.io, the lot.

Kirito accused me and I keep stating he is lying, instead of you, I demanded him to prove his claims he never, as he don’t have any but your open support.
You Mr Direct Connections went from ‘Let’s see the emails” to eating up his review dodge without a peep. You are cool with his empty hands?


You were the one who was answering question instead of Kirito89 you were the one who was making excuses of “Red taps” Burned papers. he wasn’t having a single proof of his claims.


You wanna talk about “Mud & Straw” I believe my mud’s sticking, You and all got my emails, my screenshot, Proof Kirito89 bailed when I called em out.

I think your straw’s the one falling apart, cleaning kirito89 kirito89 shts, You are so much buddy to duckdice.io right now, why didn’t you make him show somethings, Like emails? Truspilot reviews proof? Connection of mine and the blackmailer?

Who is the straw man? Who is falling apart?

[JollyGood]

Why on earth do some members post continuous walls upon walls of text as they either try to make as strong case for being right or they try to bore the life out anybody reading.

I understand the OP does not like holydarkness, I think we all understand that but the OP must have some ulterior motives for his conduct. His first ever post using the "Horsbyname" account certainly does not look as though it was posted someone new to the forum and his post history shows this was probably not his first account or only account:

Bitcoin is faaaar better than cash   as bitcoin can be sent and received anywhere in the world with an internet connection, providing greater accessibility compared to physical cash,which is limited by geographic location.

[Shishir99]

So, at first in private, and now in public you started accusing holydarkness. That is not something good. I do not know any of you guys personally and I never had any private conversation with holydarkness, but you sent me several PMs because I once criticized Duckdice casino support member kirito89 in your thread. I had to spend and waste my time reading your thread and understanding your case, and I shared my honest opinion. In a PM, you said holydarkness is siding with Duckdice which I don't believe.

I do believe that he is a reputed forum member who helped several other forum members get their funds. This simply proves that those casinos have room for improvement. If you are not satisfied with his help, go for professional mediators.

You just created this thread because he was not able to help you, am I right? or am I right?

[holydarkness]

[...]

First, I can't believe I have to retract my own words that my previous post will be the last I replied you here. But... well, second, reading your rambling above made me very curious, to a point I can't help but have to ask: what's the point to show me the evidence at this... well, point?

I assume you understand that showing to public is a no-no, red bar or steel [if you can't understand that, you're beyond help]. So, the only way left and feasible to satisfy your dire demand will have to be through my private eyes, as per the original arrangement. But seeing your narrative [at least when I read them] gave an impression that I am a bunk bed mate of Kirito89, wouldn't it also be useless?

I mean, I'll stake my reputation here that I'll 100% tell what my eyes see. If it's a no, then I'll say no, and if it's a yes, then I'll say yes. But that's become useless since you're convinced we're besties. It's a win-win scenario for you [at least from what's been playing in your head].

If I see the evidence [privately] and I say "No, Kirito is wrong", you win. If I see the evidence and see a compelling signs of your misconduct and I reported it to the public, you'll just say, "he fabricated it. They're besties," we'll go back to square one and you win.

So, again, what's the point of showing me the proof in private at this point? It's a moot situation.

But, let's cross all of them. Frankly, I got exhausted by you and your antique. So let's metaphorically forget everything for a minute, let's start a whole new page, let's say I can get Kirito89 to show me what's allowed by DuckDice to be seen by a third party [me] that will prove beyond doubt that you do tried to extort the casino, that you're not as clean and a poor victim of DuckDice as you try [and failed] to portray, do we [the public here is the witness] have your consent to let DuckDice release that info to me, as well as your words that you trust that I'll stand on neutral ground and reported to the public what I see 100% based on what I see, be it in favor of you or to DuckDice?

[Horsbyname]

I am glade you are back-Back with the same thing that I already cleared publicly.

BTW this is funny you are asking ‘what is the point of showing you proof now,’ like this is a new game. Man, I already gave Kirito89 permission to post my email and the blackmailers email pblicaly, and you said send it to me private, I will check it-which I said is fine, and PM’d you the okay, but later, I was done waiting on your ‘private eyes’ because I smelled something weird. So I posted my email myself . full screenshot showing my conversation with Duckdice, my email, all of it publicly.

And I told kirito89 very straigt up (“since he was asking to post it publicly”. you can’t deny it right?)

His request

And 2.  Do I have permission to publicly show the email address you've been in contact with us? that way I can show the blackmailer's email address, and let bitcointalk give their oppinion on it .[/b]

My permission

To clarify, you have my full permission to share both the email addresses and the conversations publicly. I believe this transparency will help ensure clarity and allow everyone to evaluate the situation fairly.

Kirito89 you got my permission to post the emails, the blackmailers email-let the public see it instead of a single person with direct connections.

You were also waiting to see it and call me a scammer,but guess what? Kirito89 get disappeared instead of posting any evidence. Becauseeeee

And then after kirito89 sent you some private messages, you tossed him that lifeline after his email flop “Where were we with that TP review removal? This was you trying to give him a new excuse, which he picks very quickly.
Guess what? I destroy that excuse as well and posted the screenshot showing my review was deleted by trustplit due to old time, not by me along showing my email, as you both demanded.

Again Kirirto89 made excuse of having holidays and get disappeared and guess what?,who? Mr. Direct connection appear.


Now you are pulling this-New-Page act, asking for my consent again like I didn’t already give it?

Holydarkness I went past you, I already posted it myself and asked Duckdice.io multiple times to match me. They’ve nothing, but empty accusations, and you are still playing “what’s the point”.


Your “Mud and straw” is not sticking –mine is sticking hard- emails, screenshots, proof they flaked after said yes. You are baking kirito89 empty accusations while he vanishes and you mo up.
I’ve been public, they are hiding.

[holydarkness]

[A rant from someone with marbles, trying to make simple things difficult]

At this point I really wonder if it is actually that hard for you to comprehend complex sentences or are you just pretending to be unable to grasp the context conveyed when things doesn't work in your favor and not aligned with the narrative you want to drive.

The point of why I asked is very clear, you even brushed upon it in your attempt to swerve the point I proposed. But let me try to do you an ELI5:

1. Providing evidence to public is not an option. Red bar of steel. No-no. Dead end. Mission Impossible. Over one's dead body. choose whichever expression fits you. DuckDice's policy [probably] prohibit this.

2. Due to point number 1, the only possible method is back to the original arrangement: providing to private eyes. Why? Refer to the extensive meaning explained on the other threads. Bottom line is: privacy policy.

3. You believe Kirito89 and me are besties, thus, there is a collosal likelihood that you'll automatically assume that I'll lie for him. Thus, even when the result, in all honesty, shows in favor of duckdice, when I conveyed this to the overseers, you'll just say "he lied. he's covering for DuckDice". The only acceptable answer [for you] that I can say, will thus a "Kirito89 lied, there is no connection between the extortion email with Op's address". Hence, useless.

4. That is why, I ask for your consent that you'll accept my findings, with me guaranteeing that I will 100% be neutral, with my long standing reputation here as collateral, as a binding ruling.

That are the points of the post. Understand now?

[Horsbyname]

1. Providing evidence to public is not an option. Red bar of steel. No-no. Dead end. Mission Impossible. Over one's dead body. choose whichever expression fits you. DuckDice's policy [probably] prohibit this.

My expression: You are more of a Duckdice.io representative than kirito89 was ever, Man he couldn’t defend duckdice.io half as good as you are out here swinging-you are doing great dude! Any way who fed you that line? Kirit89? In private? Not sure if he can do as good as you did.

Why Kirito89 not saying it himself? Why’s Duckdice.io main account not stepping up to say their representative screwed up? You are tossing this policy line like it is a gospl, Where from its coming?

You are not one of them right?
You are carrying their water like a champ, but where is Duckdice.io team? 



Your long standing reputation here as collateral is too....at this point.

[Kirito89]

Hey OP,

To be fair I find it amusing at this point and can't keep up with all the threads you're creating.   Now you're going after holydarkness? A member who's been on this forum for 9 years, and well trusted and established for providing support amongst bitcointalk members- casinos... it's kind of hilarious.


Also OP, stop sending us emails asking for money, like I've said you will not receive a single cent, regardless of how many fake accusations you make and blackmail attempts.


https://imgur.com/a/rSwOm2X



Kirito89,

Duckdice Support.

[Horsbyname]

Hey OP,

To be fair I find it amusing at this point and can't keep up with all the threads you're creating.   Now you're going after holydarkness? A member who's been on this forum for 9 years, and well trusted and established for providing support amongst bitcointalk members- casinos... it's kind of hilarious.


Also OP, stop sending us emails asking for money, like I've said you will not receive a single cent, regardless of how many fake accusations you make and blackmail attempts.


https://imgur.com/a/rSwOm2X



Kirito89,

Duckdice Support.

Alright, Kirito89, Duckdice.io preventative finally here after me asking things from holydarkness.

Now you are cackling like this is a joke and hiding behind someone’s 9 years’ badge?

You are crying about me emailing you for the money I lost unfairly? Ofcourse I did, and that’s what I made that thread for, genius! I mailed for proof of fairness for proof of Accusations you made. You didn’t post em but you posted the email where I asked for my money or proof, Like its some “Blackmail”? got you, But you did not even posted the email fully-wait I will drop it, and let the public see the whole thing not just a part.

Here what I mailed: https://imgur.com/a/8wSxYM9  it was mailed first time Feb 1-2025 why was you silent for the whole month and you didn’t post that time? But you post it right now when I am asking 9 years badgers?

Where’s your blackmailer emails? The trustpilot “link”? I gave you permission to post it all, you drop that and Holydarkness called it “Steel Bar” Red tap” but you are posting my emails which you think is in your fever.

[Kirito89]

Alright, Kirito89, Duckdice.io preventative finally here after me asking things from holydarkness.

Now you are cackling like this is a joke and hiding behind someone’s 9 years’ badge?

You are crying about me emailing you for the money I lost unfairly? Ofcourse I did, and that’s what I made that thread for, genius! I mailed for proof of fairness for proof of Accusations you made. You didn’t post em but you posted the email where I asked for my money or proof, Like its some “Blackmail”? got you, But you did not even posted the email fully-wait I will drop it, and let the public see the whole thing not just a part.

Here what I mailed: https://imgur.com/a/8wSxYM9  it was mailed first time Feb 1-2025 why was you silent for the whole month and you didn’t post that time? But you post it right now when I am asking 9 years badgers?

You're missing the part where we actually have proof of your bets, your streaks your everything.  Where you were supposed to contact AG about it, but you send them an unrelated complaint. Well I know why, and you know why aswell. Cause that streak you claimed never happened,  heck you did not even bet on 15.5% as you've said,  you played 33% .

I posted this screenshot to show to bitcointalk, that there are other intentions behind this smokeshow, behind the 15 different directions and 15 different threads you create.  Its a simply tactic, that sadly worked in the past for you,  make so much noise with fake accusations, badger trustpilot with negative reviews, create countless fake threads on bitcointalk to create as much pressure on the casino, you get paid. You resurface after a few months with another new account, another fake scenario... its rinse and repeat.



For full disclosure to Bitcointalk,  in the past, we've dealt with similar situations,  we've got bombarded with fake trustpilot reviews tanking our ratings,  bombarded with fake bitcointalk accusations like now, that when you simply googled Duckdice, the bitcointalk thread would pop up, and at point in time, management has decided that its better to give the blackmailer a few hundred $ what he was requesting, if it meant our online presence, statistics are clean of fake reviews.  I consider that one of the biggest mistake ourselves as Duckdice have done, as it simply opened the gate with him returning every few months with different scenarios, like this current one OP is on.

For refference, we have provably fair verified the seed he played on, was confirmed here by a 3d party member of bitcointalk, aswell as recovered the bet archive which shows what OP has actually played, thus why we were urging him to start an askgambler's dispute, so I can provide inside company data to prove this,  though OP is not interested in this, he sent an unrelated dispute to Askgamblers which was denied by them..    So now he's resorting to his usual tactics, spam bitcointalk, hoping that at some point we will "crack" under the pressure of it, and pay him something to make all this negative publicity go away....  So OP, I will re-iterate for the 50th time, I'm personally handling everything related to you, bitcointalk etc, and I can once more guarantee that you will not receive a single cent, regardless how long you continue, and how many other fake threads you create.





Kirito89,

Duckdice Support.

[holydarkness]

Overseers, skip this part and jump to the part below the next line

1. Providing evidence to public is not an option. Red bar of steel. No-no. Dead end. Mission Impossible. Over one's dead body. choose whichever expression fits you. DuckDice's policy [probably] prohibit this.

My expression: You are more of a Duckdice.io representative than kirito89 was ever

Unfortunately, I am not DuckDice's representative. Ackk... what a wasted potential.

,Man he couldn’t defend duckdice.io half as good as you are out here swinging-you are doing great dude!

Why, thank you. That's a very nice word! You hear that, Kirito89? And one part above? Mind to tell me where I can apply to work for DuckDice? What's their pay rate, by the way? I'll probably be replacing you if you tell me those info, though, since apparently I am doing much better job than you. But hey, bunk-mate, world is harsh, competition and all, dude.

Any way who fed you that line?

Umm... me and myself? We kinda discuss it overnight, quite a thorough discussion that involves chart and graphs and a very heated debate. Myself and I even discussing the need of buying some crayons to help convey the post to be more understandable for you. Marbles.

Kirit89? In private?

Ackk... now you confuses me. I thought you said earlier that I did a better job than Kirito? If he supplied that to me, then it means he's doing his job nicely.

Not sure if he can do as good as you did.

What a roller coaster of statements. But damn right he doesn't. I'll be replacing him soon. I'll send my resume later today to DuckDice.

Why Kirito89 not saying it himself?

Uhh... because... he doesn't know what I have in mind? How could he wrote something that I drafted in my mind to address someone's question addressed to me? Duhh...

Why’s Duckdice.io main account not stepping up to say their representative screwed up?

Because that's why they hire a rep? To speak for them? And not sure about screwing up part, it looks like you slipped, based from the freshly supplied image above by their rep. Your hand's red?

You are tossing this policy line like it is a gospl, Where from its coming?

Their site? GDPR? Logic?

You are not one of them right?

I am not, but then even after I say that, I am sure you'll just doubt it. After all, if it's hard to penetrate your diamond-hard of a skull with fact, I believe it's even harder for that statement to penetrate it.

You are carrying their water like a champ, but where is Duckdice.io team?

 

How do you expect me to know where they are? My educated guess will be: in their office, working.

Your long standing reputation here as collateral is too....at this point.

Too what?

Ok, all those satirical response aside [yes, I do think I need to point it out and make it obvious that all of the above were a satire and I am not a bunk-bed mate with Kirito89, nor has any intention to apply to work for DuckDice, because I doubted you'll understand that the part above was meant to be what it meant to be] let's move to the serious matter.

And oh, by all means, you can just ignore this part, concentrate on below part instead.

Overseers, start here

I find it very funny and confusing and bewildering and ambiguous, not to mention very contradictive, as you now said,

[...]
You are crying about me emailing you for the money I lost unfairly? Ofcourse I did, and that’s what I made that thread for, genius! I mailed for proof of fairness for proof of Accusations you made. You didn’t post em but you posted the email where I asked for my money or proof, Like its some “Blackmail”? got you, But you did not even posted the email fully-wait I will drop it, and let the public see the whole thing not just a part.
[...]

But earlier you said,

[...] my intention remains unchanged to share my personal experience and raise awareness about the issues i encountered with duckdice.io. i encourage you to focus on investigating my original concerns rather than conflating them with unrelated actions from other individuals.

and,

[...] I want to emphasize that I have never contacted your team to demand money or bonuses, and I urge you to stop bringing up unrelated accusations to divert attention from this issue. While your provably fair system may work theoretcally, these inconsistencies and reports from other users suggest possible manipulation within your platform, and I stand by my concerns, seeking clarity on these issues.

or,

I have never demanded money or bonuses; your accusations aim to distract from my valid concerns. I’m seeking transparency and fairness, not compensation.

and more importantly,

Stop making baseless accusations. I have already made it clear that I do not want you to pay anyone a single penny, and I stand by that. [...]

that's further clarified and emphasized much later,

[...]
Since I have already shared the relevant information publicly, it’s no longer an issue if Kirito89 decides to DM that information to you or anyone else. Transparency is my priority in this matter, and I hope this clears up any ambiguity.

so, what happened? Now you abandoned all of those priority, transparency, what you want and don't want? Has your intention changed from the initial point? Those "my intention remains unchanged" are now abandoned? Or were you just... slipped?

[...]
It’s clear you’re grasping at straws. Only a mindless scammer would create an email with the same name as mine to get something from you.
 I’ve already stated very clearly before: I never demanded money. What I have always asked for is fairness—something you’ve repeatedly avoided while coming back here with irrelevant claims that make no sense.[...]

Use a wrong email, perhaps? Help us understand here. You stressed on so many posts that your intention is transparency and fairness and never demanded money and urge DuckDice to never pay anyone a single penny? And now... the reason you made the thread is for money... that you demanded though email to DuckDice?

And oh, full disclosure, I did not stalk your post one by one, I don't have much time for that, I simply mostly recycled what you asked nutildah here and here.

On the bright side, I guess, instead of

Nutildah why did you ignore this? [...]

now we can ask you to address them instead.

[Horsbyname]

You're missing the part where we actually have proof of your bets, your streaks your everything.  Where you were supposed to contact AG about it, but you send them an unrelated complaint. Well I know why, and you know why aswell. Cause that streak you claimed never happened,  heck you did not even bet on 15.5% as you've said,  you played 33% .

Kirito89,

Duckdice Support.

The Novel written by duckdice.io representative is containing so many accusations but he can’t stand by it if I ask him a single question even, He will drop it and move to other accusations.

I’m not missing any part, You are screaming about the proof that I didn’t played on 15.5% wining chances but played on 33% wining chances- don’t forget that I provide you the screenshot of the bet
which luckily was taken at a wining moment and it was provided when you decline my registration in duckdice.io. This helped me to disprove your claims.

Here what you stated:

Look, I'd like to give you the benefit of the doubt, but there are so many things about your post, that make me very doubtful, starting with the username.So there is a way in which we can asses from your side, if at least you are telling a part of the truth, in your mail account, which you used to register on duckdice, you will have emails from Duckdice that state the username aswell, please attach here publicly a screenshot of an email that shows its from duckdice, containing the username SEZMISENK41 you claim this happened on. Even if the account was deleted by us as you claim (we never delete accounts without an user's request) we can not delete the emails from your personal account .
Kirito89,
Duckdice Support.

So the Proof you have is actually not from you but from me and what for it was given to you describe that as well-no half half.



You took half part of that 3rd party verifier here like wise, Wasn’t it the 3rd party who said those numbers mean nothing since there is much data missing, like we can’t see if the bet placed is win or lose, If the bet is placed on high or low side, what is the bet amount. Since its not containing any of this you can’t call it a fair result- OK what about bet number 10015 is that a win or lose? Is that bet on high or low side? What is the bet amount? What is the bet wining chances? No nothing and yet you call it a result?


Askgamblers? You claimed my complaint at askgamblers was “unrelated” okay show what you sent them. you Got inside data? If so let’s see it- you are screaming fake fake fake with no cards down.

For full disclosure to Bitcointalk, in the past, we've dealt with similar situations, we've got bombarded with fake trustpilot reviews tanking our ratings, bombarded with fake bitcointalk accusations like now,
that when you simply googled Duckdice, the bitcointalk thread would pop up, and at point in time, management has decided that its better to give the blackmailer a few hundred $ what he was
requesting, if it meant our online presence, statistics are clean of fake reviews. I consider that one of the biggest mistake ourselves as Duckdice have done, as it simply opened the gate with him returning
every few months with different scenarios, like this current one OP is on.

Kirito89,
Duckdice Support.

Is it truly a coincidence that these emails always seem to appear conveniently after someone publicly calls you out? This raises serious questions about your narrative and whether these “blackmail
attempts” are being fabricated or manipulated as a tactic to discredit anyone who challenges your platform. If I may - When exactly did you last pay a blackmailer, and what was the specific issue they were using to blackmail you? What made you so afraid that you decided to pay them despite claiming their accusations were baseless?

You keep saying you have Proof’s but you never post them. Why?

[Kirito89]

You're missing the part where we actually have proof of your bets, your streaks your everything.  Where you were supposed to contact AG about it, but you send them an unrelated complaint. Well I know why, and you know why aswell. Cause that streak you claimed never happened,  heck you did not even bet on 15.5% as you've said,  you played 33% .

Kirito89,

Duckdice Support.

The Novel written by duckdice.io representative is containing so many accusations but he can’t stand by it if I ask him a single question even, He will drop it and move to other accusations.

I’m not missing any part, You are screaming about the proof that I didn’t played on 15.5% wining chances but played on 33% wining chances- don’t forget that I provide you the screenshot of the bet
which luckily was taken at a wining moment and it was provided when you decline my registration in duckdice.io. This helped me to disprove your claims.

The bet you provided is also played on 33% chance, like I've stated, but please continue to lie.

Like I've previously mentioned, we have the betting history you did, and 1. you did the bets on 33% chance, not 15.5 % how you claim.   2.   You've never encountered that betting streak.


So I'd like to oficially ask you 2 things right now.  1. Restart an askgambler's complaint, simply base the complaint on your "unfair streak" so I can provide askgamblers the data to prove you are a liar, or  number 2. Stop with this nonsense, and create a new account with a new fake story, cause this one is getting old already....



Kirito89,

Duckdice Support.

[BlackyJacky]

Problem is that @HolyDarkness is only a self-proclaimed online casino dispute mediator and isn't qualified!

He even don't know how the casino collects the house edge, but feels the necessity to psychologically abuse online casino victims!

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5517523.msg65117113#msg65117113


The question he isn't able to answer is the following:

How does the casino collect the house edge?

A) Reduce 0,5% from every bet

B) Reduce 0,5% from the total amount wagered

C) Via the number of bets a player loses

[memehunter]

@HolyDarkness, this is what you get for your voluntary services. Sometimes, an individual cannot look beyond personal interests and will falsely allege anyone  just to gain more attention, thinking this can somehow resolve their case. Let me be very clear, OP knows very well about you but is falsely creating a narrative to divert the attention back to his case.

[Shishir99]

@holydarkness, don't you think you are wasting too much time and energy in this thread for nothing? Do you see any kind of support for him? No. You don't have to respond to any baseless accusations. Now some trolls will join this thread and waste your time. I believe you time is precious as mine and I would suggest you to move forward and ignore these bullshits.

Everyone knows why this guy suddenly started to troll you. It is because you did not talk in his favor. I am also expecting some kind of personal attacks from him since I did not help him either. See you in another case.