Manager usekevin scam signature campaign payment.

[usekevin]

[
Oh anyway

Actually the participant had send the address we had send the payment to the address.We had a proof of pm from the participants,if you need proof we can submit upon the request.How you claim his transaction with our reputation.I am confused upon your fake alligation again.

[KingsDen]

Lol

You can cross verify each and every one.

If you still not satisfied,

We will add the trx id of all the transaction in the spreadsheet and you will check their once completed

I looked at a few addresses, and they don't match what you're saying.
If what you're saying is true, the transactions should have already been completed. How long does it take for you, and why so long?
btw. You can leave tx links here too, it doesn't have to go through a spreadsheet

We will submit the sheet with transaction id here.You can check each after we submit the spreadsheet link


Reference:

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/10fJzEKZAmQVGJBKvTNVkSFscQUnWQUCF1VJAovShjTc/edit

Oh! You finally had a spreadsheet and you are able to make it public. Even if you have paid all the participants, you never had a clear intention to pay them, maybe you are coerced by the community to do so. I must say it, you were too careless about handling your campaign. You ran the campaign like a cult, hide the spreadsheet from the public, threatened your participants not to speak out of your delayed payment. You said you are warming up to lunch a review campaign, it seems that is not going to happen because you spoilt everything yourself. I found it so difficult to believe that it took you 9 months to convince a project to run a campaign in the forum, when the opportunity finally came, it took you only 2 weeks to ruin it.

My advice:
If you have any addiction issues such as gambling addiction, I will advice you go for rehabilitation and take care of yourself before thinking of managing another campaign in the forum, else it will continue to end in shame. Peace!

[Eternad]

@usekevin, why are you posting separately in continuum? This behaviour is not expected from a senior member like you. Are you not aware of the posting rules? This indicates something else. I am not against giving a second chance, but the chance must be deserved by the real owner of the account.

If you will check most of his post on his profile, He seems not behaving based on his current rank. I’m not assuming that his account is bought account rather maybe he just reach that rank due to the old ranking system that doesn’t need merit.

The way he manage the campaign seems like he never learn from the other campaigns that he joins which is managed by professional campaign manager.

[DiMarxist]

[
Oh anyway

Actually the participant had send the address we had send the payment to the address.We had a proof of pm from the participants,if you need proof we can submit upon the request.How you claim his transaction with our reputation.I am confused upon your fake alligation again.

Guy this was an avoidable problem which was clearly at your feet. You see it and still ignore it. When you launched the campaign the first thing I checked from your profile was the trust list and it was not bad. There was no read but now you have two red tags with 3 neutral tag just from the third of the month March, 2025. And with all these comments here and there and  with the tags, you have damage your reputation.
And all what you have to do is when you luckily have a campaign again. Pay the workers/participants as still in the campaign rules. You have to build your trust without PMing anyone again. Trust is from the mind and not bought or lobby.

[usekevin]

Oh! You finally had a spreadsheet and you are able to make it public. Even if you have paid all the participants, you never had a clear intention to pay them, maybe you are coerced by the community to do so. I must say it, you were too careless about handling your campaign. You ran the campaign like a cult, hide the spreadsheet from the public, threatened your participants not to speak out of your delayed payment. You said you are warming up to lunch a review campaign, it seems that is not going to happen because you spoilt everything yourself. I found it so difficult to believe that it took you 9 months to convince a project to run a campaign in the forum, when the opportunity finally came, it took you only 2 weeks to ruin it.

My advice:
If you have any addiction issues such as gambling addiction, I will advice you go for rehabilitation and take care of yourself before thinking of managing another campaign in the forum, else it will continue to end in shame. Peace!

At the end of the campaign itself we share the spreadsheet,we just waited for the address to send the payment.Since the payment was claimed as escrow,I had the funds for the campaign.You also check the spreadsheet each every people was paid with additional 1$ for the delay.If I had no intention to pay,why should I pay them.LOL

And I don't have any gambling addiction,if any claim I had gambling addiction.Why should I accept the fake alligation, already the funds was in escrow and release upon the address submission.

O.P had started the thread by saying,I had scammed the payment.By applying loan,how the O.P claim upon.I had used the payment for the gambling.LOL

[Z_MBFM]

At the end of the campaign itself we share the spreadsheet,we just waited for the address to send the payment.Since the payment was claimed as escrow,I had the funds for the campaign.You also check the spreadsheet each every people was paid with additional 1$ for the delay.If I had no intention to pay,why should I pay them.LOL

Paying anadditional 1$ could just be another new drama you're creating to protect yourself ? With only 10 users participating in your campaign, you could have manually completed the payment in minutes without understanding multi sending strategy. Where Bitcoin transaction free is now less than $1, why are you paying users an additional $1 USDT on the TRON chain instead of paying in Bitcoin?

And I don't have any gambling addiction,if any claim I had gambling addiction.Why should I accept the fake alligation, already the funds was in escrow and release upon the address submission.

Where are those dollars in Escrow why don't you share that wallet here?

O.P had started the thread by saying,I had scammed the payment.By applying loan,how the O.P claim upon.I had used the payment for the gambling.LOL

Whether you can take your personal work loan is no problem and whether you can gamble is entirely up to you. But why would you spend your personal expenses using the campaign's escrow fund? If you have not spent the Escrow Fund then why is it taking you more than two weeks to pay them? Where there are only 10 participants.

Where you post your campaign in the Services thread and promise to pay in Bitcoin. Why do you pay users in other currencies? I also have a lot of doubts about the participants you accepted, how did you selectively accept only bad reputation accounts from your campaign thread where there were many applications?  What are your benefits here? You do them because those accounts will never take any action against you even though you use their payments for a long time for your personal use. everything is your pre-plan. so don't try to make yourself innocent.

[usekevin]

Whether you can take your personal work loan is no problem and whether you can gamble is entirely up to you. But why would you spend your personal expenses using the campaign's escrow fund? If you have not spent the Escrow Fund then why is it taking you more than two weeks to pay them? Where there are only 10 participants.

Kindly check the spreadsheet before posting, it's not 10 participants.Totally 17 participants of various rank and we paid high amount of 130$ to the reputed member of our campaign.The delay of the payment is not the Bitcoin transaction fee or the money was used as like your fake assuming.After a week campaign, the client was not satisfied with the output.On the signature campaign applying day the casino get the registration.After that their is no registration.So it some day to explain about this.Later we paused the campaign.And planned to launch a Review campaign.

But you have started a fake accusations because I had taken a loan.So we get the address and paid additional 1$ to all.It's am compensation for the people waited for the payment.So we wait and complete the entire payment and back to the explanation.We had all the transaction details in the spreadsheet itself.You can check on your own.

[xLays]

I really feel bad for betkin announcement thread. It’s flooded with post about how usekevin unprofessionally managed the signature campaign instead of how the betkin casino should be discuss. Can a forum moderator help delete some of the posts about usekevin reputation and campaign management on that thread? I think they are off-topic. I did reported some post that I think off topic and until now those reported post still visible.

Also, I’m surprised that betkin plan to start a review campaign, and usekevin will still be managing it. OP Will you still join that campaign, knowing how he handles his campaign/services.

[BABY SHOES]

I really feel bad for betkin announcement thread. It’s flooded with post about how usekevin unprofessionally managed the signature campaign instead of how the betkin casino should be discuss. Can a forum moderator help delete some of the posts about usekevin reputation and campaign management on that thread? I think they are off-topic. I did reported some post that I think off topic and until now those reported post still visible.

Also, I’m surprised that betkin plan to start a review campaign, and usekevin will still be managing it. OP Will you still join that campaign, knowing how he handles his campaign/services.

Though I see Betkin is always active every day but in some days does not make any clarifications.

It's better to give clarification in his casino thread or here by saying:
I'm done working with usekevin... and will use another manager - let's say that.
Or
I will stay with Usekevin to manage the review campaign... then the drama will be even longer and the casino's bad image will be even worse.

[Ultegra134]

At the end of the campaign itself we share the spreadsheet,we just waited for the address to send the payment.Since the payment was claimed as escrow,I had the funds for the campaign.You also check the spreadsheet each every people was paid with additional 1$ for the delay.If I had no intention to pay,why should I pay them.LOL

And I don't have any gambling addiction,if any claim I had gambling addiction.Why should I accept the fake alligation, already the funds was in escrow and release upon the address submission.

O.P had started the thread by saying,I had scammed the payment.By applying loan,how the O.P claim upon.I had used the payment for the gambling.LOL

The spreadsheet should be public for transparency reasons. You delayed payments and make a huge deal of the extra $1 you added to their weekly payments that had been delayed over a week, probably more. It doesn't concern me if you have a gambling addiction or not, but you failed to present evidence of actually escrowing the funds. You're sounding like $1 is a huge deal of money, I find that pathetic and an insult to your campaign participants.

I really feel bad for betkin announcement thread. It’s flooded with post about how usekevin unprofessionally managed the signature campaign instead of how the betkin casino should be discuss. Can a forum moderator help delete some of the posts about usekevin reputation and campaign management on that thread? I think they are off-topic. I did reported some post that I think off topic and until now those reported post still visible.

Also, I’m surprised that betkin plan to start a review campaign, and usekevin will still be managing it. OP Will you still join that campaign, knowing how he handles his campaign/services.

Although I understand what you mean, as Baby shoes already mentioned, Betkin should have made an announcement regarding Usekevin's management in an attempt to clear their name and also find a replacement manager.

[KingsDen]

I really feel bad for betkin announcement thread. It’s flooded with post about how usekevin unprofessionally managed the signature campaign instead of how the betkin casino should be discuss. Can a forum moderator help delete some of the posts about usekevin reputation and campaign management on that thread? I think they are off-topic. I did reported some post that I think off topic and until now those reported post still visible.

I also think those posts there are off topic but it's no one's fault but the campaign manager. Those complaints would have been in the signature campaign thread but it seems he locked the campaign thread and the campaign participants resorted to using the Betkin Ann thread for complaints.

[Free Market Capitalist]

I have received a PM from the person concerned, which is a good thing, as I can be wrong and I am willing to change my feedback. But he missed the main point. My feedback was not about payment. Rather that regardless of whether payment was made or not, the user had shown enough red flags to think that dealing with him has a high risk of ending badly. In this payment case it seems to have ended well but I don't invalidate the above. Plus I see a couple of negative feedback after mine (and some negative spirit neutral) that I'm sure they got a PM too and haven't changed it.

[ABCbits]

I really feel bad for betkin announcement thread. It’s flooded with post about how usekevin unprofessionally managed the signature campaign instead of how the betkin casino should be discuss. Can a forum moderator help delete some of the posts about usekevin reputation and campaign management on that thread? I think they are off-topic. I did reported some post that I think off topic and until now those reported post still visible.

I don't think it's off-topic. In real-life, it's very common to see people critic company when it's worker or contractor doing poor job or commit crime while on job.

Also, I’m surprised that betkin plan to start a review campaign, and usekevin will still be managing it. OP Will you still join that campaign, knowing how he handles his campaign/services.

Did i miss something? Looking at https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5530458.msg65090164#msg65090164, there's no mention they continue to use usekevin service.

[nutildah]

Did i miss something? Looking at https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5530458.msg65090164#msg65090164, there's no mention they continue to use usekevin service.

It appears its the same person. Their crappy writing style is identical to usekevin:

Thanks for your word.We are happy to promote our casino in this forum.We will launch the review campaign in the upcoming weeks.So it will help us to get more review from all.So stay tuned for the review campaign in upcoming weeks

I'm thinking the only reason a casino would hire a bounty manager whose abilities and communication skills are this bad is because they plan on running an exit scam relatively soon.

I would avoid associating myself with this person and casino at all costs.

[Free Market Capitalist]

I'm thinking the only reason a casino would hire a bounty manager whose abilities and communication skills are this bad is because they plan on running an exit scam relatively soon.

I would avoid associating myself with this person and casino at all costs.

Don't you think that deserves a neutral tag?

[Little Mouse]

I'm thinking the only reason a casino would hire a bounty manager whose abilities and communication skills are this bad is because they plan on running an exit scam relatively soon.

There's another possibility as well. I can't talk for others but in my case, I have introduced bitcointalk to a few of my existing clients. Have shared how bitcointalk works. Most of the times, they asked me to manage their ANN but I ignored this because of the importance of having official rep here (different cases are there but I have hired forum users to manage ANN in such cases). Not everyone do this as they can charge extra.
It's possible that they don't know how bitcointalk works and why their official rep should be the one to manage official account.

[Awaklara]

Also, I’m surprised that betkin plan to start a review campaign, and usekevin will still be managing it. OP Will you still join that campaign, knowing how he handles his campaign/services.

Did i miss something? Looking at https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5530458.msg65090164#msg65090164, there's no mention they continue to use usekevin service.

Don't know if Betkin representative is aware of the case experienced by campaign manager usekevin or not. But usekevin claims that he is still trusted by the casino to manage their upcoming campaigns.

In the reputation thread,you can cross verify mate.I had paid all the participants without fail.I had paid all the participants additional 1$ to each participants from my own funds.And the Betkin team still trust myself,because we never scam anyone.So kindly don’t spam the Betkin announcement thread.I am already creating the design work for the BETKIN review campaign,So please wait.We will launch the review campaign for Betkin in few days.

Some users will still be interested in participating in the campaign he will launch regardless of his reputation. usekevin might be thinking of repairing his reputation with the campaign he is planning. I hope he won't cause any more trouble.

[Jawhead999]

Don't know if Betkin representative is aware of the case experienced by campaign manager usekevin or not. But usekevin claims that he is still trusted by the casino to manage their upcoming campaigns.

They should've know it because the last active of the representative account was yesterday.

Some users will still be interested in participating in the campaign he will launch regardless of his reputation. usekevin might be thinking of repairing his reputation with the campaign he is planning. I hope he won't cause any more trouble.

Just my own speculation.

You know, something can become popular not always because the project is very great or the best among others. But, being the worst or controversial can make them popular, in this case the manager make people aware with the project he promoted.

Although, some people take it negatively.

[usekevin]

Kindly read the entire message before trolling or coming to conclusions.

There are 3 negative trusts added to my account on the following reasons which includes false allegations as well.

1. Flagged for delaying and not paying the participants of the campaign. But, Since I have paid all the participants in full along with $1 extra as a token of apology for the hassle I am requesting @examplens to remove the red flag else it would be a false flag since I have paid.
2. Baseless allegations by @JollyGood that my account has changed hand without any proof. Also I have made th payment now and hence I don't deserve to be flagged, requesting you to remove the red flag
3. @Free Market Capitalist has added red flag unnecessary citing same reason mention by others. I agree that there has been hassle and delay in payment but I have cleared it off now.

I am requesting people who have given red flag to remove it since I have sorted out issues related to payment delay and paid everyone and also I am apologizing to the participants for the trauma, though delayed but I have kept my words by making the payment wherein we often see many so called reputed campaign managers (Bitcointalk forum mafia group) run bounty signature campaign and the owner doesn't pay but still no one talks about it because they want to be in good looks of these people for further campaigns.

I am not asking you all for an opportunity which I will create myself but requesting to remove these flags which don't stand valid as I want to grow in this forum and manage campaigns without any issue which should stand as proof of me learning from mistakes but if these flags stays in my profile it would be difficult to sustain and get new projects.

[Shishir99]

I am not asking you all for an opportunity which I will create myself but requesting to remove these flags which don't stand valid as I want to grow in this forum and manage campaigns without any issue which should stand as proof of me learning from mistakes but if these flags stays in my profile it would be difficult to sustain and get new projects.

Let's say your account did not change hands, so I would assume the feedback left by JollyGood does not have enough evidence. Do you think the negative feedback from Free Market Capitalist and examples are inaccurate? Even if you did not spend the funds, you delayed the payment of the campaign without any good reason, and this is not the first time. Also, you requested a loan at the same time. So people assume you spend the funds.

This is what is written on the feedback page

Negative - You think that trading with this person is high-risk.

After running two campaigns and seeing the delay in both campaigns, I do believe trading with you is high risk. So, the negative feedback's justified.

Anyway, I liked how your attitude changed now. I guess you were threatening some forum members to remove their posts from the Announcement thread, right?