The Problem of America

[Alik Bahshi]

Alik Bahshi

The Problem of America

       

After a number of articles written by me (1-8), I came to the conclusion that after John Kennedy and Ronald Reagan, the American people have clearly consistently made mistakes with presidential elections, and this is not a problem most clearly demonstrated by the example of Trump, but in my opinion, an American problem. Undoubtedly, the reason for this lies in the two-party system, represented by irreplaceable parties, whose bosses have become so confident in their constancy that they have lost the sense of reality with the changes taking place in the world, both in politics and in the economy. The apotheosis of the existing two-party political system is represented by the image of Donald Trump, who has become the subject of ridicule and humor, causing Homeric laughter, which for a politician is the worst assessment of his activities. With my article "The Problem of Trump", I was somewhat mistaken. No, this is not Trump's problem - this is America's problem.

1. A camel for the president. https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/5271.html
2. America Needs Change. https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/7191.html
3. Obama, Bring Back America's Conscience and Save Israel. https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/7628.html
4. Obama's Ignominious Departure. https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/30784.html
5. On America's Hypocrisy. https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/115552.html
6. Putin's Hand in the White House. https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/124179.html
7. Something Is Wrong with America. 07/10/2024. https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/113511.html
8. The Trump Problem. https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/125491.html

06.03.2025

[Obulis]

Looking at other countries with several party, two party system might not really be one of  the problem of American. In some of this countries, even New parties can be register but say one or two of this parties are the winners in almost all the elections or top tiers elections making it by implications a one or two party system just like America.

[letteredhub]

Is two party system actually the problem of America today? Not that I know of. Op you should extend your tentacles to other parts of the world where multi-party system is said to exist and relate it to the American political system, just maybe you would understand how the two party perhaps could be just what America needs in its political arrangements to keep elections running smoothly. Unlike in states with multi parties but in real sense those others are a mere shadows of the ruling party.

There are other important issues that bothers on America problems which the two party system isn't a product of it but by far in the least of them all.

[Reatim]

Undoubtedly, the reason for this lies in the two-party system, represented by irreplaceable parties

lol i believe there is many things wrong in america but i can see how the two party system may be one of them

i think the problem lies in the fact that usa is too divided into left and right but personally from someone not in the us there are actually some good points from the left and right both no matter which one i am more inclined to

but because of the party system i think many americans are forced to take one side and ignore all the other good points the other side are offering my point is the separation is too extreme

[Alik Bahshi]

A new economic union of the West is being created. This is Canada and the EU, excluding the US as an unpredictable partner.

Is two party system actually the problem of America today? Not that I know of. Op you should extend your tentacles to other parts of the world where multi-party system is said to exist and relate it to the American political system, just maybe you would understand how the two party perhaps could be just what America needs in its political arrangements to keep elections running smoothly. Unlike in states with multi parties but in real sense those others are a mere shadows of the ruling party.

There are other important issues that bothers on America problems which the two party system isn't a product of it but by far in the least of them all.

   I meant that the problem is the constancy of these two parties, not the two-party electoral system. Read more carefully what I wrote in the article: "Undoubtedly, the reason for this lies in the two-party system, represented by irreplaceable parties, whose bosses have become so confident in their constancy that they have lost their sense of reality with the changes taking place in the world, both in politics and in the economy."

[moderator's note: consecutive posts merged]

[BADecker]

Is two party system actually the problem of America today? Not that I know of. Op you should extend your tentacles to other parts of the world where multi-party system is said to exist and relate it to the American political system, just maybe you would understand how the two party perhaps could be just what America needs in its political arrangements to keep elections running smoothly. Unlike in states with multi parties but in real sense those others are a mere shadows of the ruling party.

There are other important issues that bothers on America problems which the two party system isn't a product of it but by far in the least of them all.

   I meant that the problem is the constancy of these two parties, not the two-party electoral system. Read more carefully what I wrote in the article: "Undoubtedly, the reason for this lies in the two-party system, represented by irreplaceable parties, whose bosses have become so confident in their constancy that they have lost their sense of reality with the changes taking place in the world, both in politics and in the economy."

Why should America have anything to do with the problems of other countries? All countries have their own problems to take care of. Everybody has Internet. If countries want to see how and why America has what it has, all they need do is get on the Internet, and copy the US Constitution... and work it into their own government. Why should America have anything to do with that?

Countries don't need America to work out their problems for them. There are plenty of wealthy 'benefactors' who would gladly donate time and money to other countries, in return for some say in their governments. America as a whole is not needed. In fact, that's what MAGA is all about. Get America out of the other countries.

[Alik Bahshi]

Is two party system actually the problem of America today? Not that I know of. Op you should extend your tentacles to other parts of the world where multi-party system is said to exist and relate it to the American political system, just maybe you would understand how the two party perhaps could be just what America needs in its political arrangements to keep elections running smoothly. Unlike in states with multi parties but in real sense those others are a mere shadows of the ruling party.

There are other important issues that bothers on America problems which the two party system isn't a product of it but by far in the least of them all.

   I meant that the problem is the constancy of these two parties, not the two-party electoral system. Read more carefully what I wrote in the article: "Undoubtedly, the reason for this lies in the two-party system, represented by irreplaceable parties, whose bosses have become so confident in their constancy that they have lost their sense of reality with the changes taking place in the world, both in politics and in the economy."

Why should America have anything to do with the problems of other countries? All countries have their own problems to take care of. Everybody has Internet. If countries want to see how and why America has what it has, all they need do is get on the Internet, and copy the US Constitution... and work it into their own government. Why should America have anything to do with that?

Countries don't need America to work out their problems for them. There are plenty of wealthy 'benefactors' who would gladly donate time and money to other countries, in return for some say in their governments. America as a whole is not needed. In fact, that's what MAGA is all about. Get America out of the other countries.

 You said it well: countries don’t need America: Afghanistan, Vietnam, and America deceived Ukraine by promising security.

[BADecker]

~

Why should America have anything to do with the problems of other countries? All countries have their own problems to take care of. Everybody has Internet. If countries want to see how and why America has what it has, all they need do is get on the Internet, and copy the US Constitution... and work it into their own government. Why should America have anything to do with that?

Countries don't need America to work out their problems for them. There are plenty of wealthy 'benefactors' who would gladly donate time and money to other countries, in return for some say in their governments. America as a whole is not needed. In fact, that's what MAGA is all about. Get America out of the other countries.

 You said it well: countries don’t need America: Afghanistan, Vietnam, and America deceived Ukraine by promising security.

However, you miss the most important point. When America messed in those other countries, promises broken or not, what happened is that the Bible and Christianity was introduced in those countries.

You see? The point is that you and me and everybody dies, whether it is in war or from sickness or from old age or from something else. When America messed with those countries and brought the Bible to them (even though this was not intentional), it gave the people of those countries the chance to believe in Jesus Christ and be saved from death.

Sure, people still die. But the promise that God gives to all people through Jesus, is resurrection at the last day when Jesus returns. Then it will be shown who believed the Bible and who didn't, and who didn't have the chance.

You have the chance... as does Russia and Ukraine, and as did those other countries. So, what are you going to do? Will you get into the Bible and find salvation? Or will you simply die without it?

The death of the Ukrainian troops - and some Russians - is the death of people who generally won't accept Jesus in their hearts. Ukrainians especially are of the stock who rejected Jesus where the people who crucified Him said "Let His blood be on us and our children." Ukrainians (and some Russians) are of the bloodlines of those Jews - their 'children' - and are receiving the destruction they asked for.

If you don't start to understand this, where will you stand in the last day when you face Jesus-God? It isn't an America problem. It's your problem and the problem of all who reject Jesus-salvation.

[Alik Bahshi]

~

Why should America have anything to do with the problems of other countries? All countries have their own problems to take care of. Everybody has Internet. If countries want to see how and why America has what it has, all they need do is get on the Internet, and copy the US Constitution... and work it into their own government. Why should America have anything to do with that?

Countries don't need America to work out their problems for them. There are plenty of wealthy 'benefactors' who would gladly donate time and money to other countries, in return for some say in their governments. America as a whole is not needed. In fact, that's what MAGA is all about. Get America out of the other countries.

 You said it well: countries don’t need America: Afghanistan, Vietnam, and America deceived Ukraine by promising security.

However, you miss the most important point. When America messed in those other countries, promises broken or not, what happened is that the Bible and Christianity was introduced in those countries.

You see? The point is that you and me and everybody dies, whether it is in war or from sickness or from old age or from something else. When America messed with those countries and brought the Bible to them (even though this was not intentional), it gave the people of those countries the chance to believe in Jesus Christ and be saved from death.

Sure, people still die. But the promise that God gives to all people through Jesus, is resurrection at the last day when Jesus returns. Then it will be shown who believed the Bible and who didn't, and who didn't have the chance.

You have the chance... as does Russia and Ukraine, and as did those other countries. So, what are you going to do? Will you get into the Bible and find salvation? Or will you simply die without it?

The death of the Ukrainian troops - and some Russians - is the death of people who generally won't accept Jesus in their hearts. Ukrainians especially are of the stock who rejected Jesus where the people who crucified Him said "Let His blood be on us and our children." Ukrainians (and some Russians) are of the bloodlines of those Jews - their 'children' - and are receiving the destruction they asked for.

If you don't start to understand this, where will you stand in the last day when you face Jesus-God? It isn't an America problem. It's your problem and the problem of all who reject Jesus-salvation.

  What kind of nonsense is this? : "But you are missing the most important point. When America intervened in those other countries, whether the promises were broken or not, what happened was that the Bible and Christianity appeared in those countries."

Please indicate which countries the USA brought the Bible and Christianity to.

You then squeak: "When America intervened in those countries and brought them the Bible, it gave the people of those countries a chance to believe in Jesus Christ and be saved from death."

When America intervened in other countries, it brought death, not salvation, because it was a military intervention.

You write: "The death of Ukrainian soldiers - and some Russians - is the death of people who, as a rule, do not accept Jesus into their hearts."

Excuse me, do you have proof that the Ukrainians rejected Christ? Your fantasies are very selective. Maybe it was the Russians who brought war to Ukraine who rejected Christ, right? However, for some reason you are focusing on Ukrainians.

You have recalled the Bible, but isn't the commandment "thou shalt not kill" from the Bible?

It seems to me that you are very cautious in supporting Fuhrer Putin with your reasoning. You have never accused Russia of its aggressive intentions, and this is against the background of general support for Ukraine as a victim of this aggression. This is my conclusion from all your posts as an opponent of my articles. Of course, this is your right, here on the forum, but it is good to know what is hidden behind it.

[BADecker]

~

However, you miss the most important point. When America messed in those other countries, promises broken or not, what happened is that the Bible and Christianity was introduced in those countries.

You see? The point is that you and me and everybody dies, whether it is in war or from sickness or from old age or from something else. When America messed with those countries and brought the Bible to them (even though this was not intentional), it gave the people of those countries the chance to believe in Jesus Christ and be saved from death.

Sure, people still die. But the promise that God gives to all people through Jesus, is resurrection at the last day when Jesus returns. Then it will be shown who believed the Bible and who didn't, and who didn't have the chance.

You have the chance... as does Russia and Ukraine, and as did those other countries. So, what are you going to do? Will you get into the Bible and find salvation? Or will you simply die without it?

The death of the Ukrainian troops - and some Russians - is the death of people who generally won't accept Jesus in their hearts. Ukrainians especially are of the stock who rejected Jesus where the people who crucified Him said "Let His blood be on us and our children." Ukrainians (and some Russians) are of the bloodlines of those Jews - their 'children' - and are receiving the destruction they asked for.

If you don't start to understand this, where will you stand in the last day when you face Jesus-God? It isn't an America problem. It's your problem and the problem of all who reject Jesus-salvation.

  What kind of nonsense is this? : "But you are missing the most important point. When America intervened in those other countries, whether the promises were broken or not, what happened was that the Bible and Christianity appeared in those countries."

Please indicate which countries the USA brought the Bible and Christianity to.

You then squeak: "When America intervened in those countries and brought them the Bible, it gave the people of those countries a chance to believe in Jesus Christ and be saved from death."

When America intervened in other countries, it brought death, not salvation, because it was a military intervention.

You write: "The death of Ukrainian soldiers - and some Russians - is the death of people who, as a rule, do not accept Jesus into their hearts."

Excuse me, do you have proof that the Ukrainians rejected Christ? Your fantasies are very selective. Maybe it was the Russians who brought war to Ukraine who rejected Christ, right? However, for some reason you are focusing on Ukrainians.

You have recalled the Bible, but isn't the commandment "thou shalt not kill" from the Bible?

It seems to me that you are very cautious in supporting Fuhrer Putin with your reasoning. You have never accused Russia of its aggressive intentions, and this is against the background of general support for Ukraine as a victim of this aggression. This is my conclusion from all your posts as an opponent of my articles. Of course, this is your right, here on the forum, but it is good to know what is hidden behind it.

When America intervenes in other countries, who does it? I mean, it isn't that the literal American country gets up and goes to that other country. Rather, it is some people that go to that country. Some of the people are troops. Some are business people. Some are government people. But all of them are Americans. And individually they bring their Bibles to these other people.

Sure, it may not be a formal 'bringing'. But they bring their Bibles with them. But if they don't, they still bring their knowledge of Jesus-salvation in their hearts and minds. Because of the history of America, they can't help but live the Bible in their lives, because that is how the whole country exists... a Bible country.

So, other nations have the chance to gain Jesus-salvation from Americans.

Sure, not all Americans are Bible people. But the Bible comes, and some of the people of the other nations accept Jesus, even though they are against the imperialism of the US. And that is what is most important. Why? Because all people die, and all people will be raised to life in the Resurrection at the last day when Jesus returns. And all will be judged by their faith in Jesus-salvation.

Without American individuals going to these other countries, many who come to believe in Jesus would never have the chance, and would be judged with damnation at the last day.



Now, YOU. Where do you stand? If you don't accept Jesus-salvation, you will be damned with all the rest of the people who won't accept. It will go worse for you, because you had such a great chance, and still rejected. Remember, all people die, whether it is from being killed, or whether it is from old-age, or whether it is from something else. Note that those who die young have not had as much time to sin, and therefore don't have as much to be paid for in the torment of Hell after the resurrection.

[montaga]

The Military has been in charge for several years now, the last two Presidents are only puppets.
Lots of things happening in the background, don't be fooled by the media circus.

Anyway Lombard St. Ca.1970-2024

[virasog]

A new economic union of the West is being created. This is Canada and the EU, excluding the US as an unpredictable partner.

When US is putting the tariffs it's obvious that the countries to whom the tariffs are applied, they would not be with America and they can make alliance with themselves and this is what is happening. Canada, Mexico and the whole of Europe is on one side and America alone standing isolated with the trump vision of making America great (at any cost). India is also affected badly by these tariffs.
USA have to pay the debt too and at the same time control the inflation. A tough time for the new administration.

[BADecker]

A new economic union of the West is being created. This is Canada and the EU, excluding the US as an unpredictable partner.

When US is putting the tariffs it's obvious that the countries to whom the tariffs are applied, they would not be with America and they can make alliance with themselves and this is what is happening. Canada, Mexico and the whole of Europe is on one side and America alone standing isolated with the trump vision of making America great (at any cost). India is also affected badly by these tariffs.
USA have to pay the debt too and at the same time control the inflation. A tough time for the new administration.

America alone standing isolated? Lol. Don't you realize that America is made up of 50 States and several territories. All these are like countries, and in hard times will stand together against the rest of the world if necessary.

If America doesn't have something, one or more of these 50 countries will figure a way around the problem... for all of America.

Meanwhile, the rest of the countries of the world will be haggling over the ways that they should get together. America won already, no matter what they decide to do.

[Alik Bahshi]

A new economic union of the West is being created. This is Canada and the EU, excluding the US as an unpredictable partner.

When US is putting the tariffs it's obvious that the countries to whom the tariffs are applied, they would not be with America and they can make alliance with themselves and this is what is happening. Canada, Mexico and the whole of Europe is on one side and America alone standing isolated with the trump vision of making America great (at any cost). India is also affected badly by these tariffs.
USA have to pay the debt too and at the same time control the inflation. A tough time for the new administration.

America alone standing isolated? Lol. Don't you realize that America is made up of 50 States and several territories. All these are like countries, and in hard times will stand together against the rest of the world if necessary.

If America doesn't have something, one or more of these 50 countries will figure a way around the problem... for all of America.

Meanwhile, the rest of the countries of the world will be haggling over the ways that they should get together. America won already, no matter what they decide to do.

 The US is one country, not 50 independent countries like the EU. No US state has any foreign policy. For example, not a single US state is represented in the UN. Your reasoning is no different from that of a child.

[BADecker]

~

America alone standing isolated? Lol. Don't you realize that America is made up of 50 States and several territories. All these are like countries, and in hard times will stand together against the rest of the world if necessary.

If America doesn't have something, one or more of these 50 countries will figure a way around the problem... for all of America.

Meanwhile, the rest of the countries of the world will be haggling over the ways that they should get together. America won already, no matter what they decide to do.

 The US is one country, not 50 independent countries like the EU. No US state has any foreign policy. For example, not a single US state is represented in the UN. Your reasoning is no different from that of a child.

he States are independent of the US government in many ways. Check out the 10th Amendment. It is only by agreements with the Federal government that they do not act as independent countries at times.

Representation in the UN is a protection for the States that the Federal offers. Nobody in his right mind would want to be in the useless UN. Besides, all the States are represented in the UN through the Federal.

[Alik Bahshi]

~

However, you miss the most important point. When America messed in those other countries, promises broken or not, what happened is that the Bible and Christianity was introduced in those countries.

You see? The point is that you and me and everybody dies, whether it is in war or from sickness or from old age or from something else. When America messed with those countries and brought the Bible to them (even though this was not intentional), it gave the people of those countries the chance to believe in Jesus Christ and be saved from death.

Sure, people still die. But the promise that God gives to all people through Jesus, is resurrection at the last day when Jesus returns. Then it will be shown who believed the Bible and who didn't, and who didn't have the chance.

You have the chance... as does Russia and Ukraine, and as did those other countries. So, what are you going to do? Will you get into the Bible and find salvation? Or will you simply die without it?

The death of the Ukrainian troops - and some Russians - is the death of people who generally won't accept Jesus in their hearts. Ukrainians especially are of the stock who rejected Jesus where the people who crucified Him said "Let His blood be on us and our children." Ukrainians (and some Russians) are of the bloodlines of those Jews - their 'children' - and are receiving the destruction they asked for.

If you don't start to understand this, where will you stand in the last day when you face Jesus-God? It isn't an America problem. It's your problem and the problem of all who reject Jesus-salvation.

  What kind of nonsense is this? : "But you are missing the most important point. When America intervened in those other countries, whether the promises were broken or not, what happened was that the Bible and Christianity appeared in those countries."

Please indicate which countries the USA brought the Bible and Christianity to.

You then squeak: "When America intervened in those countries and brought them the Bible, it gave the people of those countries a chance to believe in Jesus Christ and be saved from death."

When America intervened in other countries, it brought death, not salvation, because it was a military intervention.

You write: "The death of Ukrainian soldiers - and some Russians - is the death of people who, as a rule, do not accept Jesus into their hearts."

Excuse me, do you have proof that the Ukrainians rejected Christ? Your fantasies are very selective. Maybe it was the Russians who brought war to Ukraine who rejected Christ, right? However, for some reason you are focusing on Ukrainians.

You have recalled the Bible, but isn't the commandment "thou shalt not kill" from the Bible?

It seems to me that you are very cautious in supporting Fuhrer Putin with your reasoning. You have never accused Russia of its aggressive intentions, and this is against the background of general support for Ukraine as a victim of this aggression. This is my conclusion from all your posts as an opponent of my articles. Of course, this is your right, here on the forum, but it is good to know what is hidden behind it.

When America intervenes in other countries, who does it? I mean, it isn't that the literal American country gets up and goes to that other country. Rather, it is some people that go to that country. Some of the people are troops. Some are business people. Some are government people. But all of them are Americans. And individually they bring their Bibles to these other people.

Sure, it may not be a formal 'bringing'. But they bring their Bibles with them. But if they don't, they still bring their knowledge of Jesus-salvation in their hearts and minds. Because of the history of America, they can't help but live the Bible in their lives, because that is how the whole country exists... a Bible country.

So, other nations have the chance to gain Jesus-salvation from Americans.

Sure, not all Americans are Bible people. But the Bible comes, and some of the people of the other nations accept Jesus, even though they are against the imperialism of the US. And that is what is most important. Why? Because all people die, and all people will be raised to life in the Resurrection at the last day when Jesus returns. And all will be judged by their faith in Jesus-salvation.

Without American individuals going to these other countries, many who come to believe in Jesus would never have the chance, and would be judged with damnation at the last day.



Now, YOU. Where do you stand? If you don't accept Jesus-salvation, you will be damned with all the rest of the people who won't accept. It will go worse for you, because you had such a great chance, and still rejected. Remember, all people die, whether it is from being killed, or whether it is from old-age, or whether it is from something else. Note that those who die young have not had as much time to sin, and therefore don't have as much to be paid for in the torment of Hell after the resurrection.

I asked you specifically to which countries America, as you say, brought the Bible and Christianity as an ideology? There is no answer. Instead of an answer, there are lengthy discussions about war and death, hiding behind the name of Christ. By the way, about Christianity as an ideology, no other religion has brought so much death in this world. Remember how the Christian religion was imposed by fire and sword by the Spaniards in South America and the Pacific Islands, by the French and other European countries during the Crusades, and this is an entire era. Two world wars with millions of victims were organized by Christian countries. With the cry God is with us they sowed only death. And isn't it a Christian country, Russia, that came with war to a Christian country, Ukraine? And aren't Nazis like Hitler and Putin Christians who bring premature death? And don't you talk about how all people are mortal. Yes, people are mortal, but the whole point is to live the time allotted by nature and do many useful things during this time, and another thing is to do nothing and leave life prematurely. Premature death and life are completely different things. Putin calls on thousands of young people to go to their deaths and kill others like themselves, for the sake of his Nazi ideas. And you, as a follower and defender of Putin, justify this!

[BADecker]

~

When America intervenes in other countries, who does it? I mean, it isn't that the literal American country gets up and goes to that other country. Rather, it is some people that go to that country. Some of the people are troops. Some are business people. Some are government people. But all of them are Americans. And individually they bring their Bibles to these other people.

Sure, it may not be a formal 'bringing'. But they bring their Bibles with them. But if they don't, they still bring their knowledge of Jesus-salvation in their hearts and minds. Because of the history of America, they can't help but live the Bible in their lives, because that is how the whole country exists... a Bible country.

So, other nations have the chance to gain Jesus-salvation from Americans.

Sure, not all Americans are Bible people. But the Bible comes, and some of the people of the other nations accept Jesus, even though they are against the imperialism of the US. And that is what is most important. Why? Because all people die, and all people will be raised to life in the Resurrection at the last day when Jesus returns. And all will be judged by their faith in Jesus-salvation.

Without American individuals going to these other countries, many who come to believe in Jesus would never have the chance, and would be judged with damnation at the last day.



Now, YOU. Where do you stand? If you don't accept Jesus-salvation, you will be damned with all the rest of the people who won't accept. It will go worse for you, because you had such a great chance, and still rejected. Remember, all people die, whether it is from being killed, or whether it is from old-age, or whether it is from something else. Note that those who die young have not had as much time to sin, and therefore don't have as much to be paid for in the torment of Hell after the resurrection.

I asked you specifically to which countries America, as you say, brought the Bible and Christianity as an ideology? There is no answer. Instead of an answer, there are lengthy discussions about war and death, hiding behind the name of Christ.

The question as you asked it cannot be answered. America is a nation of many people. America does not act together in anything. So, like any other country, America does and doesn't do anything. The question is too general.

In addition, this is the first time I see the word 'ideology'. If you previously asked it as such, it was totally unclear. However, the Bible and Christianity might be an ideology, but it is also religion, reality, and eternal life for those who believe it.


By the way, about Christianity as an ideology, no other religion has brought so much death in this world. Remember how the Christian religion was imposed by fire and sword by the Spaniards in South America and the Pacific Islands, by the French and other European countries during the Crusades, and this is an entire era. Two world wars with millions of victims were organized by Christian countries. With the cry God is with us they sowed only death.

Wake up. People die from all kinds of things. If they happen to die believing in Jesus as their Savior from death, they will arise on the last day. So, even if you were right about Christianity bringing death to people, it was also bringing eternal life to all those who believed in Jesus. So, you tell me. Is eternal life worth being killed? It's when people die without Jesus that there is no eternal life.

Your assumption that it was the Christian religion that brought death to people is wrong. It may have been conquerors using the name of Christianity, but it was not Christianity. True Christianity does not act like that. You are mistaken, or you lie.


And isn't it a Christian country, Russia, that came with war to a Christian country, Ukraine?

No. You are mistaken. It was the Ukraine puppet of some people of the West that brought a war to some of their own people, and some people of Russia along Russia's borders. Russia simply attempted to stop this corrupt Ukrainian war. Russia is still doing that activity. Depending on the way Ukraine acts, Russia might have to conquer all of Ukraine to stop the Ukraine aggression.


And aren't Nazis like Hitler and Putin Christians who bring premature death? And don't you talk about how all people are mortal. Yes, people are mortal, but the whole point is to live the time allotted by nature and do many useful things during this time, and another thing is to do nothing and leave life prematurely.

If you happen to look a little closer at Ukraine, you will see that it is mainly Ukraine that is using the Nazi's. And it is Z who is acting like Hitler as much as he has the ability. It's just a good thing that he doesn't have nukes, or the world would have been in nuclear war long ago. So, your question doesn't match reality.


Premature death and life are completely different things. Putin calls on thousands of young people to go to their deaths and kill others like themselves, for the sake of his Nazi ideas. And you, as a follower and defender of Putin, justify this!

I don't know enough about what is going on behind the scenes to justify anything about the war.

However, Putin was simply attempting to protect his country against an aggressive, Hitler-like Ukraine government, that was attacking Russia more and more since before 2014.

What is the leader of ANY country supposed to do? Sit back and let some other nation conquer their country? Putin was only acting in self-defense of his country. And you know it. You are simply an arm of the Western people who are trying to steal Russia from the Russians. And this means that you are a criminal just like Zelensky is.

[Alik Bahshi]

~

When America intervenes in other countries, who does it? I mean, it isn't that the literal American country gets up and goes to that other country. Rather, it is some people that go to that country. Some of the people are troops. Some are business people. Some are government people. But all of them are Americans. And individually they bring their Bibles to these other people.

Sure, it may not be a formal 'bringing'. But they bring their Bibles with them. But if they don't, they still bring their knowledge of Jesus-salvation in their hearts and minds. Because of the history of America, they can't help but live the Bible in their lives, because that is how the whole country exists... a Bible country.

So, other nations have the chance to gain Jesus-salvation from Americans.

Sure, not all Americans are Bible people. But the Bible comes, and some of the people of the other nations accept Jesus, even though they are against the imperialism of the US. And that is what is most important. Why? Because all people die, and all people will be raised to life in the Resurrection at the last day when Jesus returns. And all will be judged by their faith in Jesus-salvation.

Without American individuals going to these other countries, many who come to believe in Jesus would never have the chance, and would be judged with damnation at the last day.



Now, YOU. Where do you stand? If you don't accept Jesus-salvation, you will be damned with all the rest of the people who won't accept. It will go worse for you, because you had such a great chance, and still rejected. Remember, all people die, whether it is from being killed, or whether it is from old-age, or whether it is from something else. Note that those who die young have not had as much time to sin, and therefore don't have as much to be paid for in the torment of Hell after the resurrection.

I asked you specifically to which countries America, as you say, brought the Bible and Christianity as an ideology? There is no answer. Instead of an answer, there are lengthy discussions about war and death, hiding behind the name of Christ.

The question as you asked it cannot be answered. America is a nation of many people. America does not act together in anything. So, like any other country, America does and doesn't do anything. The question is too general.

In addition, this is the first time I see the word 'ideology'. If you previously asked it as such, it was totally unclear. However, the Bible and Christianity might be an ideology, but it is also religion, reality, and eternal life for those who believe it.


By the way, about Christianity as an ideology, no other religion has brought so much death in this world. Remember how the Christian religion was imposed by fire and sword by the Spaniards in South America and the Pacific Islands, by the French and other European countries during the Crusades, and this is an entire era. Two world wars with millions of victims were organized by Christian countries. With the cry God is with us they sowed only death.

Wake up. People die from all kinds of things. If they happen to die believing in Jesus as their Savior from death, they will arise on the last day. So, even if you were right about Christianity bringing death to people, it was also bringing eternal life to all those who believed in Jesus. So, you tell me. Is eternal life worth being killed? It's when people die without Jesus that there is no eternal life.

Your assumption that it was the Christian religion that brought death to people is wrong. It may have been conquerors using the name of Christianity, but it was not Christianity. True Christianity does not act like that. You are mistaken, or you lie.


And isn't it a Christian country, Russia, that came with war to a Christian country, Ukraine?

No. You are mistaken. It was the Ukraine puppet of some people of the West that brought a war to some of their own people, and some people of Russia along Russia's borders. Russia simply attempted to stop this corrupt Ukrainian war. Russia is still doing that activity. Depending on the way Ukraine acts, Russia might have to conquer all of Ukraine to stop the Ukraine aggression.


And aren't Nazis like Hitler and Putin Christians who bring premature death? And don't you talk about how all people are mortal. Yes, people are mortal, but the whole point is to live the time allotted by nature and do many useful things during this time, and another thing is to do nothing and leave life prematurely.

If you happen to look a little closer at Ukraine, you will see that it is mainly Ukraine that is using the Nazi's. And it is Z who is acting like Hitler as much as he has the ability. It's just a good thing that he doesn't have nukes, or the world would have been in nuclear war long ago. So, your question doesn't match reality.


Premature death and life are completely different things. Putin calls on thousands of young people to go to their deaths and kill others like themselves, for the sake of his Nazi ideas. And you, as a follower and defender of Putin, justify this!

I don't know enough about what is going on behind the scenes to justify anything about the war.

However, Putin was simply attempting to protect his country against an aggressive, Hitler-like Ukraine government, that was attacking Russia more and more since before 2014.

What is the leader of ANY country supposed to do? Sit back and let some other nation conquer their country? Putin was only acting in self-defense of his country. And you know it. You are simply an arm of the Western people who are trying to steal Russia from the Russians. And this means that you are a criminal just like Zelensky is.

 So, please provide the fact of Ukraine's attack on Russia, which you indicated.

[BADecker]

~

I don't know enough about what is going on behind the scenes to justify anything about the war.

However, Putin was simply attempting to protect his country against an aggressive, Hitler-like Ukraine government, that was attacking Russia more and more since before 2014.

What is the leader of ANY country supposed to do? Sit back and let some other nation conquer their country? Putin was only acting in self-defense of his country. And you know it. You are simply an arm of the Western people who are trying to steal Russia from the Russians. And this means that you are a criminal just like Zelensky is.

 So, please provide the fact of Ukraine's attack on Russia, which you indicated.

I want to thank you for asking for fact. You have written pages and volumes of info about how wicked Putin and Russia are. Where did you get that info about Putin and Russia? Now, you show us where you got it. How do you show us? By asking for fact about Ukraine's attack on Russia.

If you can't find fact about Ukraine's attack on Russia since before 2014, then you can't find fact about wicked Putin and Russia. This means that all your pages and volumes about wicked Putin and Russia are something that you made up in your head - fiction. Why? Because if you could research Putin and Russia to make all those pages and volumes, you could research the fact of Ukraine's attack on Russia since before 2014... because it's all over the Internet if you search a little.

You don't need me to find fact for you. All you need to do is research a little... or are all your words just fictional stories that you made up in your head, because you don't know how to do research? You condemn yourself.



EDIT: BREAKING! UKRAINE AGREES TO CEASEFIRE WITH RUSSIA... BUT THERE'S A BIG CATCH - https://rumble.com/v6qhn64-breaking-ukraine-agrees-to-ceasefire-with-russia...-but-theres-a-big-catch-.html

[justinlamode]

A new economic union of the West is being created. This is Canada and the EU, excluding the US as an unpredictable partner.

I don't see any partnership between EU and Canada as a serious problem to the US. What is the population of Canada and their GDP? One state in the US is bigger than Canada in everything so how will that bother America especially when such partnerships is aimed to replace the US with Canada. The truth is that such partnership if for economic purposes only, will not shake America one bit but for other things, it will affect them a lot.

America still need to be careful not to lose their partnership with the EU because they will lose more if the lose that partnership. America is strong and respected today is partly because of EU who they have always worked together with for a long time. They are better and stronger together than goin their separate ways.