There is no need for bankroll management in a game of luck

[Botnake]

I believe that if we're playing a game with a house edge, where winning depends purely on luck, then bankroll management doesn’t really matter.

What you deposit is already intended for gambling, so whether you go all-in or divide it into smaller bets, the reality is that bankroll management won’t change the odds. It just adds an extra layer of stress in making decisions that, in the end, won’t really affect the outcome of a luck-based game.

[nullama]

I believe that if we're playing a game with a house edge, where winning depends purely on luck, then bankroll management doesn’t really matter.

What you deposit is already intended for gambling, so whether you go all-in or divide it into smaller bets, the reality is that bankroll management won’t change the odds. It just adds an extra layer of stress in making decisions that, in the end, won’t really affect the outcome of a luck-based game.

I think this is right. In the end, the odds are against the gambler, so in the long term the gambler will lose all the money they are betting.

Of course you need to be aware of this reality, because otherwise you will end up losing all your money in total.

There are many gamblers that think that they can recover the money that they have lost by continuing betting. It's a bit strange that the mind tricks us into thinking that the actual thing that made us lost our money in the first place will make it back.

[Maslate]

It’s more of a superstitious belief if you’re gambling on luck-based games. While it’s true that bankroll management doesn’t improve your odds of winning, it helps you last longer in the game which is important because gambling isn’t just about winning, it’s also about having fun.

I don’t know if there’s any gambler who goes all-in every single time even if they win sometimes, that doesn’t seem enjoyable at all. Let’s be realistic .. gambling is about sustaining the experience, not just betting recklessly for the thrill of an all-or-nothing play.

[Odohu]

Bankroll management is not a practice reserved for those involved in sports betting and other games based on skill. It is generally applicable to all types of gamble, and if not properly applied, gambling can be devastating. My understanding of bankroll management has to do with how much to gamble with per day or per time and what percentage of the balance to withdraw when there is winning. Those who lack proper bankroll management end up not knowing when to stop and when they win,  they continue gambling until they give the money back to the casinos. Even luck base games can give a gambler massive winning but when such user lacks proper bankroll management,  the feeling that such luck will tarry will overwhelme him and in the end he might end up turning that day into a very terrible day by losing all that money.

[stadus]

Those who lack proper bankroll management end up not knowing when to stop and when then win,  they continue gambling until they give the money back to the casinos.

We know when to stop, but knowing when to win - that’s the tricky part.

So in reality, bankroll management isn’t about knowing when to stop, but more about having a structured strategy where we bet only a certain percentage of our bankroll. It’s a way to measure discipline, if we stick to the rules we set for ourselves, that means we’re gambling responsibly.

For example, if we decide on a 5% per wager rule, we need to strictly follow it. If we start going aggressive, that’s a clear sign that we lack discipline, and that’s where most gamblers end up losing control.

[Apocollapse]

The most important point of bankroll management is set up an appropriate budget for gambling and stick with it, so if you only deposit intended for gambling, you're already applying bankroll management.

What I read from many articles, when they talk about bankroll management, the point is stick with budget and the rest of are just bullshit motivation.

1. Work out an appropriate budget
2. Build a unit size and scale accordingly
3. Stick to your budget, regardless of wins and losses
4. Bet with your head, not your heart
5. Hunt for budget enhancements and promos, but be wary of parlays

[Jody.Drummer]

I believe that if we're playing a game with a house edge, where winning depends purely on luck, then bankroll management doesn’t really matter.

What you deposit is already intended for gambling, so whether you go all-in or divide it into smaller bets, the reality is that bankroll management won’t change the odds. It just adds an extra layer of stress in making decisions that, in the end, won’t really affect the outcome of a luck-based game.

sorry if i'm wrong.
I understand what you mean, but I myself think that money management in gambling is still quite important and must be considered, such as the money that we will deposit at the casino to be gambled, of course it must be money that is not intended for other things. There are people who gamble with poor money management so that they deposit money that is basically money for other things, such as money for savings or for other needs but is used for gambling. It is true that this does not affect the results of the game which is based on luck, but when you gamble without good money management, what can happen is that you can gamble excessively. This must be avoided and one way is with good money management.

[viljy]

I believe that if we're playing a game with a house edge, where winning depends purely on luck, then bankroll management doesn’t really matter.

What you deposit is already intended for gambling, so whether you go all-in or divide it into smaller bets, the reality is that bankroll management won’t change the odds. It just adds an extra layer of stress in making decisions that, in the end, won’t really affect the outcome of a luck-based game.

I disagree with this for two reasons. First of all, what is luck? This is the variance of the result. Roughly speaking, where is the chance to catch the variance higher: bet all the money on 1 spin or bet 10 times and make 10 spins? In the second option. But that means bankroll management.

The second reason is that bankroll management is of great importance as a factor that disciplines the gambler and helps him not to become addicted to gambling.

[alani123]

Of course there is a need for bankroll management. Especially since it's a game of luck, you have to get the sense of stretching your luck and when you're trying more probable scenarios.

When playing blackjack there's a prime example of bankroll management. In this game you can perform some basic card counting to see when you have better odds. At this stage it's more probable to win so it makes sense to make larger bets only then. In the meantime you need to perform bankroll management with small or even minimum bets so you're not kicked off the table for not betting.

If you want to leave it up to luck completely, you still need some common sense. Would you go all in on blackjack with a hand of 14? Doesn't sound like a good idea probably. It goes this way for many games also.

[Wiwo]

I believe that if we're playing a game with a house edge, where winning depends purely on luck, then bankroll management doesn’t really matter.

What you deposit is already intended for gambling, so whether you go all-in or divide it into smaller bets, the reality is that bankroll management won’t change the odds. It just adds an extra layer of stress in making decisions that, in the end, won’t really affect the outcome of a luck-based game.

You spoke from the direction of gambling for profits and not gambling for fun and even if you are gambling to make profits you still need to manage your bankroll properly because the longer you play the more chances of your luck to win, let's say for example if you have $100 as your deposit balance and you go all in at once with staking to the total amount and you get unlucky to lose, you end your gambling session then.

But if you have bankroll management, you will not be under any pressure since you will still have some balance remaining because you did not stake your first bet with all your balance.

You can see that it's a two-way thing, and individuals choose what and how they play and how long they intend to remain in the game.

[michellee]

If you play gambling games based on luck, you must have bankroll management to prevent the bad thing happen. Gambling games based on luck can make you forget about limitation in gambling so that make you use too big money which can impact to the big loss.

You only deposit some amount of money you can afford to lose so you can prevent the big lose that can happen anytime. That is the important thing that you must do when you gambling so you don't have to feel sad if you lose.

The other thing that you must remember is never go all-in in gambling because that make your bet bigger than before. It is better to use smallest bet to prevent the big lose by using limitation.

[peter0425]

I believe that if we're playing a game with a house edge, where winning depends purely on luck, then bankroll management doesn’t really matter.

I would disagree. It does not matter what game you are playing, a bankroll can still be useful to any gambler.

What you deposit is already intended for gambling, so whether you go all-in or divide it into smaller bets, the reality is that bankroll management won’t change the odds. It just adds an extra layer of stress in making decisions that, in the end, won’t really affect the outcome of a luck-based game.

Bankroll management is not just for maximizing profits. It is also to make sure that you remain on budget and that you do not go rogue and start gambling irresponsibly. It is also a way to prolong your playing time. If you bet everything on one game and you lose, how else will you play after that without needing to deposit more?

[WeedGoW]

Yes, the post seemed important to me because the bank roll is very important in making it bad. If you bet through the bank roll system you will do it within your limit. And if you’re within your limits, you don’t have a chance. And you’ll proceed according to your limit. It won’t affect the actual effect of addiction on you. And if you don’t use the bank system, you’ll fall into additional addiction and you’ll lose your money and you can be discharged in the last. I think the bank roller system is good for that.

[WeedGoW]

Yes, the post seemed important to me because the bank roll is very important in making it bad. If you bet through the bank roll system you will do it within your limit. And if you’re within your limits, you don’t have a chance. And you’ll proceed according to your limit. It won’t affect the actual effect of addiction on you. And if you don’t use the bank system, you’ll fall into additional addiction and you’ll lose your money and you can be discharged in the last. I think the bank roller system is good for that.

[_act_]

What you deposit is already intended for gambling, so whether you go all-in or divide it into smaller bets, the reality is that bankroll management won’t change the odds. It just adds an extra layer of stress in making decisions that, in the end, won’t really affect the outcome of a luck-based game.

There is no stress in bank management. All you need to do is to set aside the money you need for gambling and not spend more than that. It also helped in other places. People use it to make sure they do not spend more than necessary on something, like gambling. Gambling is in a way that a gambler might lose and keep on depositing more money, but bankroll management will help the person to know that he should not spend more than the money he has initially deposited.

[Woodie]

It’s more of a superstitious belief if you’re gambling on luck-based games. While it’s true that bankroll management doesn’t improve your odds of winning, it helps you last longer in the game which is important because gambling isn’t just about winning, it’s also about having fun.

Without taking the valuable input you have shared, it would be nice to know what kind of gambling you prefer..is it casino based 🎰 or sports gambling ⚽️ 🥅..I ask because if I was sports betting it's more likely that bankroll won't be necessary,  but should I opt to go with the casino, bankroll is everything here which is why volatility and RTP come into play when it comes to winning  

Let’s be realistic .. gambling is about sustaining the experience, not just betting recklessly for the thrill of an all-or-nothing play.

Right on the money, well said.

[Potato Chips]

It is indeed all luck however we also have to acknowledge that in some situations we could have specific goals.

For instance, when I'm trying to complete the wager requirement to be able to withdraw my bonus. I consider bankroll management as a pretty effective strategy that helped me up to a certain extent. Many times I was able to complete my wager requirement and withdraw. Especially at metawin.com where I only need an easy 1x wager lol.

[sunsilk]

I believe that if we're playing a game with a house edge, where winning depends purely on luck, then bankroll management doesn’t really matter.

What you deposit is already intended for gambling, so whether you go all-in or divide it into smaller bets, the reality is that bankroll management won’t change the odds. It just adds an extra layer of stress in making decisions that, in the end, won’t really affect the outcome of a luck-based game.

I disagree. You still need bankroll management. It's true that the money we've deposited in our account balances is intended for gambling. The situation might change in an instance that we're not expecting.

Some unforeseen events could happen, and that money is being needed for that purpose, so we can withdraw it anytime we wish to. Or, if we're in a losing streak, doesn't mean that we can let all of it lose.

The odds and luck won't change but the other situation could change where in decisions like this could help us effectively.

[Bushdark]

I believe that if we're playing a game with a house edge, where winning depends purely on luck, then bankroll management doesn’t really matter.

What you deposit is already intended for gambling, so whether you go all-in or divide it into smaller bets, the reality is that bankroll management won’t change the odds. It just adds an extra layer of stress in making decisions that, in the end, won’t really affect the outcome of a luck-based game.

The worth of your bankroll does not change the outcome in anyway and what will be will be. That's a good point but don't you thinking having a bankroll management could limit you from excessive losses? Instead of just losing all your bankroll at once without making any profit, do you know that splitting it could limit your loses and reduce the metal stress you might get after consecutive losses.
It is still better for you to use the bankroll gradually than to just burn immediately within a short period of time.

[Kelward]

I believe that bankroll management is essential in gambling whether it's 100% luck based or skill based, so far you're using money you need to manage your funds. Without a bankroll management you can use more than what you can afford to loose to play games and it'll be irresponsible gambling. With bankroll management you'll know when you've reached your limit for the day and quit. My understanding of bankroll management is having a budget for your gambling, without it you might continue to chase loses if it's not your lucky day to win and it can lead to addiction.