Every board in the forum is important to signature campaign

[Ojima-ojo]

 I have seen few signatures campaign manager limiting their accepted participants to particular board in the forum and I believe this is a abuse of a signature campaign participants right, and for sure as long as you as a participant in a signature campaign have made posts in boards where the signatures are displayed it should be considered as an acceptable posts.

Campaign manager need to intervene to have a review on their acceptable norms and donts, and the reason most Church dont succeeded is because of a close tie.

[Bitcoin Smith]

Nobody is forcing anyone to join if they don't agree with rules and boards restrictions.

[_act_]

This is not about this forum but about campaign participants and signature campaign which are managed by a campaign manager. This supposed to be on reputation board and not on meta board.

Can you see how trashes are made up of almost all posts on off-topic? Should campaign managers count posts on such board?

Also you can decide not to join a signature campaign if the manager do not allow you to post on the board that you visit often.

[icopress]

[...]

No one limits you. You can publish as many posts as you want in those sections where posts are not counted. In general, you can also pay attention to the fact that when the manager sees that the user pays excessive attention to the sig campaign, its rules, etc., then this is an excellent sign that the user is a member of the forum for the sake of the campaign, and not for pleasure. As a result, the attractiveness of such a member decreases.

[Hatchy]

One thing you should know on the forum is that you shouldn't only have the mentality to post just for your signature campaign. I guess this is why we have low quality posters on the forum as after they rank up and join campaigns, they only focus on completing their weekly post quota and not focusing on also making quality posts anymore on the forum.

Every campaign has a target, and a campaign manager is responsible to help them meet up those target or service audience. When they say post in certain boards are not going to be counted, your campaign manager doesn't limit your post or restricts you. He simply isn't going to add those boards to you weekly post count. So it depends on you as a forum user who wish to contribute even when you are wearing a paid signature.

[Churchillvv]

All I see in your query is misinterpretation of Rules.

I think the Rules are bent towards the type of campaign.

You can't be participating in a gambling campaign and expect not to be attractive enough on gambling posts/section. Same as participating on Altcoins campaign you must be more attractive on Altcoins discussions hence to qualify for the campaigns or after joining you're required to advertise towards that board.

And the most part "If you understand the rules by campaign managers they don't for any reason stop you from posting in areas which they don't count towards there campaign post but only do not count the posts that are from those boards.

[EFS]

Each signature campaign has different rules. The campaign manager sets these rules. Forum members are free to apply any signature campaign they want. Don't apply to campaigns whose rules you don't like.

The campaign you are promoting may be focused on certain sectors. For example for a casino company the Gambling section is very valuable but the Mining section is not that important. The opposite is true for a company that sells mining equipment. In the end impressions and click-through rates matter. If the campaign doesn't get the return it expects in the sections it allows, there is no point in advertising there.

[PX-Z]

I have seen few signatures campaign manager limiting their accepted participants to particular board in the forum

I guess you misunderstood those rules. And it doesn't mean that they should never posts on any of these boards. It's still on the poster itself to post or not on where they used to posts, but they need to consider that those will not be paid.

[Catenaccio]

I have seen few signatures campaign manager limiting their accepted participants to particular board in the forum and I believe this is a abuse of a signature campaign participants right

It's not a rights but it is priviledge, let's remember that man.

You don't have any rights to wear avatar, signature in this forum, because it's not your rights, it's only your priviledge when the forum admins still allowing you wearing those things.

You don't have any rights to join any signature campaign and force the company, the campaign manager doing what you like. They have signature campaign rules that you must read and accept before making your application and joining it. In campaign rules, there is term like the company and campaign manager have full rights to stop the campaign any time, change its rules any time.

This is about siganture campaign, not about Forum issues, you can discuss it in 📝[Discussion topic] Overview of Bitcointalk Signature-Ad Campaigns📝

[Vod]

I have seen few signatures campaign manager limiting their accepted participants to particular board in the forum and I believe this is a abuse of a signature campaign participants right

I can see your issue right here.  You don't actually have a right (whether human or otherwise) to participate in a signature campaign.

[Free Market Capitalist]

What a bullshit post. If forum members have the right to signature campaigns, they should have the same right while we're at it, no? That way we prevent the world from being unfair. All boards counting equal and all members equal right to campaigns, it's clear where that mentality comes from.

[Apocollapse]

I don't see anything wrong because there's no punishment if you post in uncounted board.

IIRC there was a campaign where the newbie manager give punishment to user who post in uncounted board, this obviously wrong because it's completely limiting the user to post on the board they like.

You can't ask campaign manager to count all the boards, but if you someday become a campaign manager, then you can do whatever you like including accept the post in any boards.

[Zwei]

I have seen few signatures campaign manager limiting their accepted participants to particular board in the forum and I believe this is a abuse of a signature campaign participants right, and for sure as long as you as a participant in a signature campaign have made posts in boards where the signatures are displayed it should be considered as an acceptable posts.

was there a declaration of signature campaign participants rights that i'm not aware of? wtf are you talking about?

as a participant in a signature campaign, you either follow the campaign rules or you don't apply/join.
no one is forcing you not to post in certain boards, you just won't get paid for those posts. so please tell us where is the abuse? do you even know the meaning of that word?

you sound kinda entitled saying this shit, tbh.
and you seem to forget that signature campaigns are not charities, they are an ad campaign meant to generate an ROI. so of course they are not going to pay for posts in places that do not benefit them.

Campaign manager need to intervene to have a review on their acceptable norms and donts, and the reason most Church dont succeeded is because of a close tie.

what?

[CryptopreneurBrainboss]

I have seen few signatures campaign manager limiting their accepted participants to particular board in the forum and I believe this is a abuse of a signature campaign participants right,

Which right dear? Signature campaign is a privilege and not a right. You can be banned from participating in signature campaign but can still be positing on the forum. There are other campaigns that accept post on boards that you're frequent on so it isn't a must to join the ones that has restrictions on those specific boards. It's the advertisers money being used to fund the campaign so their money, their rules. You can't detect for someone who's spending his money to hire you. Everybody board is important to the forum not the projects advertising here because you don't expect a casino to based their advertisement on the politics board and same goes for a Bitcoin focused project advertising on the altcoins board.

Ps: Signature management business is open to everyone, if you think the current managers aren't doing a great job, you can launch your services and do better.

[DYING_S0UL]

It's funny you should say that. Mate is this signaturecampaign.org or bitcointalk.org? Lol. Nobody is forcing you to do sigs. If you think a brand/company/sig doesn't aligns with your believes or knowledgebase, then don't do it, simple. Also you can't just tell managers what to do and what not to. They set the rules not you. And nobody said about limiting yourself in posting only in certain boards, you may post anywhere that interests you. But when it comes to getting paid, posts that are in specified board will be counted. Another thing you said "signature campaign participants right", I mean what rights? I believe you are old enough to know, "Signature is a privilege not a right ".

I suggest you read this topic [Guide] Factors to consider before joining paid signature campaigns

[5]: Consider boards post count are accepted in.
I notice many forum users joins signature campaign without considering the boards they're most active in. I recommend you join a signature campaign based on the boards you're active in, currently I won't join a campaign that doesn't consider Beginner and help board as an acceptable baord for post count. Reason been that that's the board I'm most active and familiar with and enjoying answering questions ask and assisting newbie on the board. Lets say there's a campaign focus on accepting participants only posting on Development & Technical Discussion baord I won't apply for such campaign since I'm not that familiar with the board and most of my post would be considering off topic as I'll be struggling to meet my post count which might lead to spamming the board and might end up getting ban or removed from campaign.

[AVE5]

So sorry, signature campaign participants are just like the employees in the labour and economy market who doesn't who doesn't have personal rights to decide what what to do and what not to the in their respective places of employment.
You're subject to work according to the companies goal and you're being instructed by the organizational manager and all you just need to do is to work as being directed.
Here in the forum, signature campaigns differs which is either casino or crypto related promoting campaigns.
You as a users in the forum knows that the boards in the forum do have it points of discussions that has the quality of promoting the signatures Campaign respectively.
The companies are already aware of the bitcointalk forum then only needed more experienced forum users to handle it for them as their manager.
Already they've designated what board in the forum they finds quality to reach their goal so the campaign manager is just to govern participants accordingly.
So, participants has no choice on the decision and if also the manager is not comfortable by the companies requirements, then they'd look for other management member.
This is why signature managements is best suited for reputable users.
You can as well check out how the differ post counts of the signature campaigns which some are 15-60 posts per week. It's being projected between the companies and the manager and the participants just need to abide by the management guides.

[TheUltraElite]

You can approach this problem in a different manner and make sure you post in different sections of the forum.

Like I have a weekly quota on Gambling sections, so I make sure to follow that but at the same time I do visit many other sections and our local board and post in threads which I find interesting.

You are not entitled to be a part of any campaign, you want to be in one you have to follow their terms.

[Charles-Tim]

Like I have a weekly quota on Gambling sections, so I make sure to follow that but at the same time I do visit many other sections and our local board and post in threads which I find interesting.

This reminds of the time I was in Bestchachange campaign. Bestchachange did not count local board but I found it interesting to post on my country's local thread at the time which are not counted on Bestchachange campaign. It was just a local thread at the time and not a board but not counted as it was on the 'Other languages/locations' at the time.

[ABCbits]

I have seen few signatures campaign manager limiting their accepted participants to particular board in the forum

Few? AFAIK all signature campaign have limitation on board that not counted for payment. "Off-Topic" board, "Serious Discussion" board and thread where signature isn't displayed never counted.

and the reason most Church dont succeeded is because of a close tie.

I fail to see any correlation between church and board that not counted for payment by signature campaign. But you're doing great if your goal to be added on other member ignore list.

[Mitchell]

Of course you say that, lol.