BTCHello community.I want to share my story with you, which I believe deserves attention from those who deeply understand how Bitcoin works and the importance of its origins.
My name is Paul Alexander Cárdenas Solís, I'm from Arequipa, Peru, and I'm 30 years old.
From a very young age, I realized I wasn't going to fit into the system. I never did well in school; I always passed with the minimum grade. My mind was always looking for something more. I didn't like the system, the governments, or the banks. I went to many psychologists, took many exams and tests, and later quit many jobs because I didn't fit in.
That's how one day Bitcoin came to me and gave me what the traditional world couldn't: an opportunity. I immersed myself in technology to the limit, to the point of constantly updating the news every day. And although events like the one in China in 2017, the merger of Bitcoin and the S&P 500 markets, and other major indices that generated correlations and declines, occurred, the truth is that we survived, and we will survive. We absorbed Trump trying to ruin the crypto market, and we will survive BlackRock.
That's why I stayed. Because Bitcoin isn't an asset, nor just money. If you think that, you're stuck at the first layer. Bitcoin is revolution, it's fighting the system, it's changing the status quo. I've gone bankrupt over Bitcoin many times, and I don't regret it. Every decision I made brought me here. Now I need your support, because I can't do it alone.
Solving the PuzzleFor the past four years, I've analyzed the blockchain from the genesis block to many of Satoshi Nakamoto's earliest public transactions and communications. Using a purely mathematical approach, using combinatorial methods, binary pattern analysis, modular transformations, and other classical and quantum cryptography techniques, I was able to isolate what appear to be three master keys.
On March 29, 2024, these keys allowed me to access, in a completely logical and reproducible (although not yet publicly provable) manner, the legendary email address:
satoshin@gmx.com.
I have been to numerous psychologists since I was a child. After telling my parents that I managed to access Satoshi Nakamoto's email after four years of research, they revealed that all those tests and sessions were to corroborate that I have an IQ of 145.
I have double neurodivergence, I am TDAH and ACC, for some it is a gift, for others a problem,What I mean is that I process information differently.
Yes, but please don't stray from the topic. Satoshi Nakamoto's email was opened. IQ is the least relevant.
My lawyers have advised me not to publicly reveal the procedure or the keys for the time being, as we are evaluating the legal framework for digital succession, international rights, and potential criminal or property implications. What I can affirm is that every step is documented and mathematically justified, from data collection to obtaining a working password. However, I have encrypted the email password in this very message in case anything were to happen to me. My family would contact the person with the correct password, and that person would pursue the case. I ignored my lawyers on this point because I believe this goes beyond legality: it's a matter of legacy and truth.
As a small preview, I can tell you that the email password was in Spanish.
GMX and Satoshi's AccountI have direct messages with GMX confirming that I had access to the account. I had to provide information about the last access; they verified it in their database, and it matched. They responded specifically. We have up to three conversations where the email
satoshin@gmx.com is directly mentioned, an email that is currently marked as nonexistent if you want to log in from gmx.net.
I am the only person in the world who has had direct communication with GMX about this account. I'm convinced that a company like GMX would never admit to something like this without real evidence, otherwise it would represent a serious internal security breach.
This is real and should be taken seriously. We must consider the impact it will have on the currency's value, so it should be treated with caution, not mockery. If you react with mockery, you're only revealing the envy you carry in your heart. If you're not envious and are serious, share the news, open a debate, don't stay silent. Give your point of view. Give your opinion.
We're coordinating with a crypto newspaper that's investigating the case. I wanted to share the news with you first.
It should be noted that GMX would never respond to anyone without verifying the information from the last login with the information we provided and it matching. If GMX responds, it means that these two pieces of information match. Otherwise, it would represent a failure in GMX security by revealing sensitive user data, and even worse with Satoshi's email.
What's at StakeI'm convinced that within that account are documents, private keys, and possibly access to more than a million bitcoins, which would currently exceed $70 billion. But beyond the economic value, what drives me is the hidden knowledge that Satoshi may have left behind, and which could transform our understanding of Bitcoin.
I'm not seeking to profit from this information irresponsibly. My intention is to secure legal and institutional support so that the content can be shared with the community, publicly and verifiably, when the time is right. I'm currently seeking the support of lawyers specialized in Bitcoin, blockchain, and encryption, who can defend this case and help me regain access with a formal lawsuit against GMX, arguing for the right to digital succession under the European framework.
Ask the communityWhat impact would it have on the currency's value if it were confirmed that Satoshi potentially left 1 million bitcoins as a reward for whoever solved this encryption? How would this affect the current narrative about his identity, intent, and the future of decentralization in Bitcoin? Would this be seen as a legitimate succession, or would it open a legal and philosophical Pandora's box about ownership, merit, and technical access?
I know many won't understand what's going on. Let me explain: Satoshi not only created Bitcoin, he also left a kind of game. A treasure chest, and that treasure chest was the email address mentioned in the white paper. The game consisted of solving the clues he left in his communications and thus finding the access to
satoshin@gmx.com.
Many focused solely on the asset; few understood the creator. Today, there is advanced research into trying to break Bitcoin's encryption and deduce private keys from public keys. But that is almost impossible; it requires immense computational power that we don't currently possess. However, what is possible is to deduce a password if the clues are there. And that's how I did it.
We must keep in mind that Bitcoin had a centralized alert system; that is, Bitcoin once had a centralized component. Satoshi wanted to play on both concepts, as this could prevent major thefts and money laundering. However, this system was withdrawn between 2016 and 2018, perhaps to protect his money-laundering empire.
I would deeply appreciate any guidance, ideas, or legal/technical references you could share. I'm aware of the impact this could have on the history of the project and the security of its foundations.
I am seeking lawyers who are willing to help me regain access to GMX through a digital succession rights lawsuit.
Photos from conversations with gmx
https://x.com/paulllex2099/status/1913941173212791039Sincerely,
Paul Alexander Cárdenas Solís
Contact:
paullex2099@proton.meX:
https://x.com/paulllex2099https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vsE0KtttoBs2 partSubject: Request for legal assistance to recover access to a potential digital legacy linked to Satoshi Nakamoto's email (
satoshin@gmx.com)
Dear Attorneys:My name is Paul Alexander Cárdenas Solís, a 30-year-old Peruvian citizen with National Identity Document (DNI) 71653135, an independent researcher in the Bitcoin ecosystem and blockchain technology. I am contacting you to request legal advice and possible representation in a civil litigation against the German company GMX, regarding the blocking of access to the email address
satoshin@gmx.com, which, according to our research, constitutes a digital legacy designed by Satoshi Nakamoto, the creator of Bitcoin.
Technical Context: Digital Assets and the Role of EmailBetween 2009 and 2012, the first users of Bitcoin were people with advanced technical knowledge. At that time, private keys (codes that grant access to Bitcoin funds) were not stored in mobile apps or modern custodians, but were saved manually in digital files, USB drives, hard drives, and even in email accounts as a personal security measure.
With the arrival of Bitcoin, digital assets (cryptocurrencies, tokens, keys, etc.) were consolidated as a new form of ownership. Access to them depends exclusively on cryptographic keys. Whoever holds the key owns the asset.
What is a private key?A private key is a secret code that allows you to spend the bitcoins associated with a specific address. Only whoever holds that key can move the funds. Losing it means losing all access. That's why these keys were stored in private and secure locations, such as personal emails.
Satoshi Not Only Created Bitcoin: He Also Designed a Digital LegacyOur evidence points to an extraordinary conclusion: Satoshi Nakamoto not only invented the Bitcoin protocol, but also designed a unique and modern form of digital legacy, based on puzzles, keys, clues, and encrypted messages. This design was intended to hand over his email account to whoever could decipher the signals distributed across the network.
For years, I have studied these hidden clues in:
The blockchain.
Historical forums like BitcoinTalk.
Old emails and messages signed by Satoshi.
Evidence indicates that he spoke of "information transfer," "future inheritance," and "leaving something to whoever can understand it," reinforcing the idea that his email is part of a hidden cryptographic legacy, intended for the first to solve the challenge.
Evidence of a digital legacy in his own words:Abstract
A purely peer-to-peer version of electronic cash would allow online payments to be sent directly from one party to another without going through a financial institution. Digital signatures provide part of the solution, but the main benefits are lost if a trusted third party is still required to prevent double-spending. We propose a solution to the double-spending problem using a peer-to-peer network. The network timestamps transactions by converting them into a continuous chain of hash-based proofs of work, forming a record that cannot be changed without redoing the proof of work. The longest chain not only serves as proof of the sequence of events witnessed, but also as proof that it comes from the largest pool of CPU power. As long as the majority of CPU power is controlled by nodes that do not cooperate to attack the network, they will generate the longest chain and outperform attackers. The network itself requires minimal structure. Messages are relayed on a best-effort basis, and nodes can leave and rejoin the network at will, accepting the longest proof-of-work chain as proof of what happened while they were gone.
Satoshi Nakamoto, in the whitepaper abstract, argues that Bitcoin seeks to eliminate reliance on financial intermediaries by enabling direct transfers of value between people. The phrase "would allow online payments to be sent directly from one party to another without going through a financial institution" supports the intention of creating a means of value transfer independent of banks or traditional systems. What did he want to transfer? Was Bitcoin created to transfer something to someone?
However, he acknowledges that digital signatures alone are not sufficient, as "the main benefits are lost if a trusted third party is still required." This suggests that, despite technological advances, there may still be a need for third parties in certain aspects, such as initial communication or the safekeeping of critical information. In this case, the trusted third party would be GMX.
The expression "Messages are transmitted with best efforts" suggests that Satoshi deliberately left clues or minimal structures that might require future interpretation, perhaps as a hidden message or intentional legacy for whoever might decipher it. In this context, an email such as
satoshin@gmx.com, controlled by a third party (GMX), could have been an intentional vehicle to store or transmit part of that legacy, using what was available at the time but without compromising the primary goal of eliminating the need for trust in financial institutions for the use of Bitcoin itself.
Therefore, there is a textual and philosophical basis to believe that:
Satoshi planned a hidden inheritance or "prize," perhaps because he understood that his days were near and his bitcoins would be lost, and he created a game to find a worthy heir.
He used external means such as email only as a practical necessity; it's like a digital USB drive with a password; only whoever finds the password would retain the email.
He left everything with the "best effort" possible, hoping that someone legitimate might one day claim it or understand its purpose.
Legitimate Access and Arbitrary Blocking of Digital InheritanceSince 2020, I have been conducting extensive research on Satoshi Nakamoto, analyzing old conversations, forum posts, patterns in the Bitcoin blockchain, and various theories shared by the community. Throughout this process, I discovered that Satoshi may have deliberately left a set of cryptographic clues so that whoever managed to decipher them would gain access to a specific email account:
satoshin@gmx.com.
My hypothesis is that it was a kind of cryptographic challenge, a digital inheritance encoded as a challenge, the prize of which was precisely access to said account.
Between 2020 and 2024, after years of analysis and after identifying three key clues, I was able to reconstruct a logical chain of keys that allowed me to derive the correct password for the email.
On March 29, 2024, I legitimately accessed the
satoshin@gmx.com account. This access was not the result of illicit techniques or social engineering, but rather a legitimate technical process, based entirely on public information left by the creator of Bitcoin himself. The fact that access was possible on the first attempt corroborates the validity of this investigation and reinforces the hypothesis that access was intended for whoever could solve the enigma.
It is important to note that Satoshi Nakamoto, in several of his writings, referred to mechanisms for transferring information without intermediaries and expressed a strong concern for the preservation of decentralized knowledge. This reinforces the idea that the delivery of his email and its access was intentionally designed as a digital succession mechanism, following cryptographic legacy principles.
However, after successful access, the GMX platform immediately blocked the account, without further explanation. Since then, I have attempted to contact the company, providing technical and documented evidence of the procedure followed. Despite this, the account remains blocked, and no clear response or resolution has been provided to the case.
I believe that this action by GMX represents a violation of my right to access a legitimately obtained digital inheritance, in accordance with modern principles of digital succession and ownership of computer assets. Email, in this context, should be understood as a digital asset left with purpose, linked to the legacy of one of the most significant projects of the technological era.
Therefore, I request that my right of access be recognized and respected, and that action be taken in accordance with emerging standards governing the inheritance of digital information, intellectual property, and the legitimate transfer of resources in decentralized environments.
Email Content and ValueThis email could contain:
Unpublished messages signed by Satoshi.
Instructions on the future of the Bitcoin protocol.
Encrypted documents of historical interest.
Private keys linked to part of the estimated fortune of 1 million BTC (today valued at over $70 billion).
The email itself already has a high symbolic and technical value, but if it contains private keys, its value multiplies exponentially. This would make it the largest digital inheritance ever recorded.
2014 Incident and Doubts About Its AuthenticityIn 2014, rumors circulated that the
satoshin@gmx.com email had been compromised by a hacker demanding bounties in exchange for information about Satoshi. However, GMX never publicly confirmed the hack. Sources and articles that reported on the incident subsequently withdrew their posts. Furthermore, after a single post from that email clarifying that Satoshi was not Dorian Nakamoto, the account was no longer used. This leaves open the possibility that the incident was part of a setup by Satoshi himself, perhaps to plant new clues, as he could have anticipated his disappearance.
Legal PetitionI formally request your support to:
Evaluate and substantiate the legitimacy of the access obtained, within the framework of digital inheritance and ethical transfer of digital assets.
Initiate legal action against GMX to demand the restoration of access to the email, which was arbitrarily blocked.
Set a legal precedent that recognizes the right to non-traditional digital inheritances, including those transmitted using cryptographic systems and public puzzles.
Contact InformationName: Paul Alexander Cárdenas Solís Age: 30 DNI: 71653135 Email:
paullex2099@proton.me Location: Arequipa, Peru
It is worth mentioning that I already notified the Streitbeilegungsstelle (German telecommunications dispute resolution authority) of this case, but their response was that they could not intervene because I am not a German or European Union citizen. This channel has been exhausted; therefore, what follows is a civil litigation or formal complaint.
I attach evidence of the communication with GMX and am willing to provide all the technical, chronological, and documentary evidence necessary to support this case.
I sincerely appreciate your attention and look forward to your prompt response. I am convinced that this case represents a unique opportunity to advance the legal defense of 21st-century digital rights.
Sincerely,
Paul Alexander Cárdenas Solís
Part 3
Satoshi Nakamoto's password
https://github.com/Paulllex/Investigacion/blob/main/cunerriuat
