NEO and BEE talk (unmoderated)

[thekekk]

There is a Director change request at the Cyprus Company Registration Office, the request was submitted on 14/3/14

http://imgur.com/ZleKpAU (Alteration of officers)



The request can take up 1 month or more to complete so I guess by 14/4 we will know who replaced Danny

[NotLambchop]

What makes you think it's about a new CEO and not one of the other execs quitting?

[thekekk]

What makes you think it's about a new CEO and not one of the other execs quitting?

There is only one Director in the files LMB Subsidiaries Ltd signed by Danny

[bitcoin.newsfeed]

... 14/3/14 ...
...we will know who replaced Danny

So this was planned long before he got any "threats" and went to silence... the replacement will be some white horse.

Is he able to avoid potential criminal charges this way? Are you able to reject this request?

btw the company is replacing CEO and shareholders don't know anything about it ... what a classic here popcorn

[velacreations]

I guess that means a replacement has already been found?

[NotLambchop]

What makes you think it's about a new CEO and not one of the other execs quitting?

There is only one Director in the files LMB Subsidiaries Ltd signed by Danny

Maybe they hired on one of these?



Or a fall guy willing to do some time for some coin?
*I jest

[thekekk]

... 14/3/14 ...
...we will know who replaced Danny

So this was planned long before he got any "threats" and went to silence... the replacement will be some white horse.

Is he able to avoid potential criminal charges this way? Are you able to reject this request?

btw the company is replacing CEO and shareholders don't know anything about it ... what a classic here popcorn

Doesn't matter if he resigned he still liable.
Based on the memorandum shareholder is again Danny's UK company so I guess change is legal

@NotLambchop Company no need to inform the registration office for those changes. The request is for the director for sure  

[NotLambchop]

Where did this come from?  Linkable?
Also not familiar with Cyprus corp. law, is there a chapter&verse to substantiate what you said?

Finally, are you implying that Danny misspoke when he said he was looking for a buyer, who would, in turn, appoint a new CEO?

[thekekk]

Where did this come from?  Linkable?
Also not familiar with Cyprus corp. law, is there a chapter&verse to substantiate what you said?

Finally, are you implying that Danny misspoke when he said he was looking for a buyer, who would, in turn, appoint a new CEO?

You need Internet explorer site too old

https://efiling.drcor.mcit.gov.cy/DrcorPublic/SearchResults.aspx?name=neo&number=%25&searchtype=optStartMatch&index=2&lang=EN&tname=%25&sc=0

change page at footer to 1

i cannot say anything for sure yet we just need to wait to see who replaced the Director

LAW

http://www.olc.gov.cy/olc/olc.nsf/all/E1EAEB38A6DB4505C2257A70002A0BB9/$file/The%20Companies%20Law,%20Cap%20113.pdf?openelement

[velacreations]

where's TAT?  why hasn't he explained his actions?

[bitcoin.newsfeed]

where's TAT?  why hasn't he explained his actions?

TAT is ... somewhere very far away from this place  

Please ban me. I'm serious.

...

In short: Fuck you, motherfuckers.

Ban me.

[velacreations]

yeah, I saw that reaction, which made me immediately question the official story he gave.  He knows more than he's telling.  I wonder if it is better to spill the beans now or in a deposition?

[NotLambchop]

yeah, I saw that reaction, which made me immediately question the official story he gave.  He knows more than he's telling.  I wonder if it is better to spill the beans now or in a deposition?

He likely does, but there may be legal/ethical reasons preventing him from being as open as he's like (to paraphrase Danny)

[velacreations]

yeah, everyone always uses the legal/ethical excuse when they know something illegal/unethical was going on.

[velacreations]

remaining silent won't protect him legally, anyway.  if something illegal happened while he was fund manager, he's responsible and should be called out for it.  Withholding information from the shareholders, especially if he knew of serious/illegal actions, is unethical.

[NotLambchop]

Everyone seemed fine with Danny using that line with the Ukyo gig.  I remember folks questioning it not getting much love in this thread

[velacreations]

Everyone seemed fine with Danny using that line with the Ukyo gig.  I remember folks questioning it not getting much love in this thread

well, technically, it wasn't relevant to the Neo thread.

[NotLambchop]

Everyone seemed fine with Danny using that line with the Ukyo gig.  I remember folks questioning it not getting much love in this thread

well, technically, it wasn't relevant to the Neo thread.

If you suspect your CEO is bending the truth, it seems relevant.  Especially when he holds your money and you have next to no recourse if shit goes bad.

[NanoAkron]

TAT, are you still involved in other Havelock activity, or was it just NeoBee?

[velacreations]

If you suspect your CEO is bending the truth, it seems relevant.  Especially when he holds your money and you have next to no recourse if shit goes bad.

now, you're just trying to stretch it to be relevant. If he lies about what he had for dinner to friends, it has no relevance to a thread about the business he is involved in. Not everything he does is relevant to Neo.  

As I remember, a thread was opening specifically for the Ukyo issue, and Neo wasn't involved (Danny bought them out), talking about the Ukyo case on a Neo thread was irrelevant.

In any case, that's not what we are talking about, we're talking about something extremely relevant, TAT possibly knowing of wrongdoing and hiding it from Neo shareholders.