Open question to Dr.Bitcoin_Strange

[Ambatman]

the mods know what they are doing.

The fact that the user was banned and later unbanned means at least one Mod didn't know what he was doing

Well Human error. Nobody is above that. The flaws in his story wasn't even noticed by other members until it was pointed out by Brahmahatyaa

If @Dr.Bitcoin_Strange did accidentally copy and paste, then why are some of the words he wrote different from the original post?

In the terms and policies of some centralized exchange, they state that they don't accept Bitcoins from  an untrusted source such as mixers or a wallet that has been flagged, some exchange even state that they don't accept Bitcoins from casinos.

So, if any customer disobeys those rules and send Bitcoin from the mixer on any sources that the exchange doesn't want, they will block the persons account and the customer could lose their coins.
The exchange are doing so to protect their self too from government policies, I guess.
So, when they cease those coins, how sure are we that they will take it to the government?

Sometimes, after making such deposit, before the exchange detects it, you must have traded the Bitcoin to Fiat and withdraw it to your account, so what will the exchange do after you have already withdrawn the money to your account before they later found out that the coins was tainted?

In the terms and policies of some centralized exchange, they stated that they don't accept Bitcoins from  an untrusted source such as mixers or a wallet that has been flagged, some exchange even stated that they don't accept Bitcoins from casinos.

So, if any customer disobeys those rules and send Bitcoin from the mixer or any sources that the exchange doesn't want, they will block the persons account and the customer could lose their coins forever.
The exchange are doing so to protect their image too based on the government policies, I guess.
So, when they cease those coins, how sure are we that they will take it to the government?

Sometimes, after making such deposit, before the exchange detects it, you must have traded the Bitcoin to Fiat and withdraw it to your account, so what will the exchange do after you have already withdrawn the money to your account before they later found out that the coins was tainted?

Another thing that just popped in my head now is, what if after you deposited the Bitcoin because you needed some money and wanted to convert the Bitcoin to Fiat, but you later changed your mind and you decided to withdraw back the money to a newly created address, will the casino report that your address to be flagged?

If @Dr.Bitcoin did not intentionally copy paste the post, the writing should be the same. But in this case @Dr.Bitcoin seems to have done it on purpose.

It looks like the ban was a good decision, because it looks like a copy paste with word spinners.

I don't think it was plagiarism but will support JollyGood on this that's it might be an alt account.

Why?

What Dr strange posted was the post made that wasn't worked on before been posted by Mrbluntzy.

When he was making the post with Mrbluntzy, the one posted by strange was made first but after reviewing felt that it was lacking in quality and corrected where lapses maybe coming from.
Then when he logged in with strange he posted the unrevised version without knowing.
There are times I have made a response then preview and felt like the grammar was poor
And had to edit. Maybe that's what happened here.


P.S I have no evidence nor experience here so could be wrong
But I guess the Pro's on this can check out my theory.



If I'm not mistaken, having an alt account doesn't warrant been banned, so likely not a case of plagiarism.


Again Could be wrong.

[Dr.Bitcoin_Strange]

Knowing fully well that this was what the consequences of the act would be, do you think I would have intentionally do that? If that's the case, as some people thinks that it was an intentional Plagerism, don't you think I would have done it so long before now?

You wrote a lot about why you wouldn't do plagiarism, and that makes sense, but it doesn't answer OP's question. If I copy some text on my phone, wordings don't magically change.

It was a copy and paste error, I didn't spin words or international edit the post. I was distracted and absent minded that I don't know what transpired at that moment. I didn't intentionally committe plagerism, it was a mistake.

Knowing fully well that this was what the consequences of the act would be, do you think I would have intentionally do that? If that's the case, as some people thinks that it was an intentional Plagerism, don't you think I would have done it so long before now?

you would if you thought you could get away with it. you would not be the first to overestimate himself.

i was one of the many people who gave you the benefit of the doubt and asked the mods to give you a break and unban you. so stop going on a rant and explain how did some of the wording changed if you simply copied/pasted the text by mistake.

if you read that post which was delete because of the Plagerism report, you would see that the reply was not even in any way related to what the person was saying. Have you read the reply?

You're lying here because you created a post between the time you received a notification for the @Mrbluntzy thread and the time you posted the quote text.

Do you create multiple posts, save them, and then post them at a different time?

Despite everything that's happened, you haven't changed your habit of creating multiple posts and then disappearing.

I open threads that i am interested on writing a comment for, I open them on the same tab on my phone. If for example am on the gambling board and I see up to five different topics or mentions that caught my attention and I want to respond to those topics or quote, I will open them respectively on the same tab and reply one after another. That comment I submitted, I wrote it before that notification but I forgot to submit it then. If I create multiple post and save them to submit at different time, I could make mistake of submitting the wrong post at the wrong thread,  that's why I respond respectively but I forgot to submit that one. I was distracted and absent minded.

If am offline, I didn't disappear, it only means am attending to something outside the forum that is also of importance to me. I have a life outside the forum.

[LoyceV]

It was a copy and paste error

I find that hard to believe. You don't accidentally change words on multiple locations inside a text.

I was distracted and absent minded

And yet, you had to post that empty-minded text to earn from Stake's spam campaign.

I don't know what transpired at that moment. I didn't intentionally committe plagerism, it was a mistake.

I believe it was a mistake. I just don't believe it's the kind of mistake you want us to believe.

[Free Market Capitalist]

It was a copy and paste error

I find that hard to believe. You don't accidentally change words on multiple locations inside a text.

It's simply false.

My advice to Dr.Bitcoin_Strange is to remain silent from now on and don't answer any more questions if he doesn't want to end up with more tags on his profile related to this issue. The forum has lifted the ban and for the moment I will respect that but as long as he doesn't try to pull the wool over our eyes.

[SamReomo]

Well, after reading the OP and most of the posts in this thread I will say that whatever LoyceV said seems fully legit to me. In the meta board thread I personally thought that there might be auto changes in the wording from application like Grammarly but that doesn't seems to be a good guess.

As LoyceV said, it sounded more like use of text spinning rather than grammar correction. However, the user is now unbanned so I think he got another chance from the moderator. I hope that in future OP will not make such mistakes intentionally or unintentionally, and he will write his posts with full focus not with an absent mind.

[Zwei]

It was a copy and paste error, I didn't spin words or international edit the post. I was distracted and absent minded that I don't know what transpired at that moment. I didn't intentionally committe plagerism, it was a mistake.

i'm kinda pissed that you think we are stupid or something. if it was just a simple copy/paste error, then how the fuck did some of the words change on their own if you did not intentionally do it?
you already replied twice here, and you are dodging the main question of this thread for some reason, hmmm...? maybe because you did do it intentionally.

[nutildah]

It's simply false.

My advice to Dr.Bitcoin_Strange is to remain silent from now on and don't answer any more questions if he doesn't want to end up with more tags on his profile related to this issue.

Too bad (for him) Bitcointalk doesn't have any kind of Miranda rights... "You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of Reputation. You have a right to a DT attorney, a phone call, a glass of water, and some other stuff."

Kind of makes me wonder how many hundreds or thousands of posts there are out there that are basically just text spun versions of other posts.

[NotATether]

Too bad (for him) Bitcointalk doesn't have any kind of Miranda rights... "You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of Reputation. You have a right to a DT attorney, a phone call, a glass of water, and some other stuff."

LMAO 

I'd make a terrible attorney though. I'm not Mike Ross from Suits.

[Brahmahatyaa]

Knowing fully well that this was what the consequences of the act would be, do you think I would have intentionally do that? If that's the case, as some people thinks that it was an intentional Plagerism, don't you think I would have done it so long before now?

Of course you can do it. You are in one of the biggest spam campaigns on this forum. You can make this mistake to fulfil your campaign payment quota.

I was explore the forums to see some plagiarism issues and found a plagiarism case of Leviathan.007 from the same campaign. As a DT member he can make mistakes like that. It's possible that you can.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5527690.0

[LoyceV]

My advice to Dr.Bitcoin_Strange is to remain silent from now on and don't answer any more questions if he doesn't want to end up with more tags on his profile related to this issue.

So you're saying he probably deserves more tags.

"You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of Reputation.

This part we have on Bitcointalk
From what I've seen, the users who can't give a proper explanation are usually the guilty ones.

[Free Market Capitalist]

So you're saying he probably deserves more tags.

Not exactly. He will probably deserve more tags if he keeps trying to fool us.

This part we have on Bitcointalk
From what I've seen, the users who can't give a proper explanation are usually the guilty ones.

Yeah, those who you don't usually tag.

[Shishir99]

Copy from forum > paste to text spinner > copy from text spinner > paste to the forum. That shouldn't take more than 20 seconds.

I have seen both of the posts mentioned in the OP. Text spinner does not work like this. Text spinner will change the entire grammar and rewrite in other words, but the meaning of the post will remain the same. You can copy a post from the forum and try any text spinner to verify what I am saying. A text spinner will change the wording at least 50%, and sometimes it could be more than 70%. In the post which was mentioned in the OP, there are slight changes, and it is less than 10%. So, either he changed the word by himself, or he probably used some tools that changed it automatically.

[lovesmayfamilis]

Well, after reading the OP and most of the posts in this thread I will say that whatever LoyceV said seems fully legit to me. In the meta board thread I personally thought that there might be auto changes in the wording from application like Grammarly but that doesn't seems to be a good guess.

If we assume that Dr.Bitcoin_Strange used the Grammarly app and corrected his spelling and punctuation with this tool, then there is a significant difference between the two posts. Anyone can check. So it is difficult to do "without looking." The fact that he ignores the real answer, which AB de Royse777 has not yet received, only says that he cannot admit it and is a coward, evading the answer like a cunning snake. But the fact that he takes everyone for blind idiots clearly indicates the need for a tag that he is a liar.

[hugeblack]

If I create multiple post and save them to submit at different time, I could make mistake of submitting the wrong post at the wrong thread,  that's why I respond respectively but I forgot to submit that one. I was distracted and absent minded.

Yes, but you know the topic by quoting part of it. If you've noticed, most of your posts begin with a quote.

In general, try to respect the forum, read your posts, and reply only when necessary.

[JollyGood]

There is a lot at stake (no pun intended) here for the Dr.Bitcoin_Strange account because he is a participant in the Stake campaign and getting a regular payment. He was banned but like other banned accounts he had to try to get the ban lifted because it was in a signature campaign. On some occasions the bans remain in place and on others it gets a reprieve. They decided to lift the ban on this occasion and I cannot understand why.

Another point that has relevance is that neither the Dr.Bitcoin_Strange and Mrbluntzy accounts have created a thread to content the neutral tag I gave them nor sent a PM asking me to remove it. That makes sense for the Dr.Bitcoin_Strange account as Stake have a habit (as a couple of campaign managers do too) for ignoring neutral and negative tags and enroll some dubious accounts on the campaign. As for the other, he was building up the Mrbluntzy account therefore probably prefers to avoid unwanted attention.

[memehunter]

neither the Dr.Bitcoin_Strange and Mrbluntzy accounts have created a thread to content the neutral tag I gave them nor sent a PM asking me to remove it. That makes sense for the Dr.Bitcoin_Strange account as Stake have a habit (as a couple of campaign managers do too) or ignoring neutral and negative tags and enroll some dubious accounts on the campaign. As for the other, he was building up the Mrbluntzy account therefore probably prefers to avoid unwanted attention.

I can see that you have given a neutral tag almost 4 days ago;

JollyGood

2025-04-25

Reference

I do not accept the version of events given by the "Dr.Bitcoin_Strange" account that led to it being banned then the ban lifted. I believe the "Dr.Bitcoin_Strange" and "Mrbluntzy" accounts are operated by the same puppeteer. I will gladly remove/revise this feedback if a situation for it occurs

Hmm, interesting, at least Mrbluntzy would have opened a thread against you since technically he was the first one to post, he can act completely innocent, blaming everything on Dr.Bitcoin_Strange. Since he has not done this yet, raises some serious questions and I am on the same page with you regarding your assessment.
Another thing that I want to add is that he simply locked the previous ban appeal topic. He should have posted some words of gratitude towards members as almost everyone was showing support (including me)  believing his innocence after the ban got lifted. If mods locked the thread then this point is not that valid.
Having said that, there is no direct proof to tag him yet. Either for plagiarism or for account farming. 

[robelneo]

If I create multiple post and save them to submit at different time, I could make mistake of submitting the wrong post at the wrong thread,  that's why I respond respectively but I forgot to submit that one. I was distracted and absent minded.

Yes, but you know the topic by quoting part of it. If you've noticed, most of your posts begin with a quote.

In general, try to respect the forum, read your posts, and reply only when necessary.

With or without displaying a signature, we should do that. We are lucky to be in a campaign; it's a privilege. The selection process is tough, and the managers, after choosing us, expect us to be good ambassadors of the project we are promoting, and the only way to do that is to give our best output.

What we learned here is to take your time, stay on topic, and make it a habit to use the preview tool; there will be some fresh ideas that will come out that you can add to your posts when reading the previewed post.