The main thing is to stop in time.

[Julien_Olynpic]

I don’t even know if this can be called a separate strategy or something that can be defined as a trick that can be combined with other strategies or even used alone without any strategy. But this trick can be combined, for example, with Martingale.
Imagine that you decided to play according to the Martingale system, but with one condition: you use a trick called “The main thing is to stop in time”. It can be roulette or sports betting, it doesn’t matter. And you set a rule for yourself to stop after 3 consecutive wins. In some cases, you are unlucky, but one day, imagine, you won 3 times in a row an amount that suits you perfectly.
What is more rational in this situation? To believe in luck and continue playing or to apply the rule “The main thing is to stop in time”? Obviously, the second. And if you are not an addicted player, you can be in profit with the help of this simple trick.
I know that many gamblers apply this rule to a one-time win as well.

[Sticky Bomb]

I don’t even know if this can be called a separate strategy or something that can be defined as a trick that can be combined with other strategies or even used alone without any strategy. But this trick can be combined, for example, with Martingale.
Imagine that you decided to play according to the Martingale system, but with one condition: you use a trick called “The main thing is to stop in time”. It can be roulette or sports betting, it doesn’t matter. And you set a rule for yourself to stop after 3 consecutive wins. In some cases, you are unlucky, but one day, imagine, you won 3 times in a row an amount that suits you perfectly.
What is more rational in this situation? To believe in luck and continue playing or to apply the rule “The main thing is to stop in time”? Obviously, the second. And if you are not an addicted player, you can be in profit with the help of this simple trick.
I know that many gamblers apply this rule to a one-time win as well.

Yes, knowing when to stop even when winning has a way to help us not to chase loses when encountering loses. In everything we do, gambling inclusive, it's best we know when to leave so as to avoid excesses and possible unwanted long-term effect. If I was the one and experienced the three times win, I would do any of these two things

• Already having a gambling budget and disciplined not to deposit more than once, I'll simply withdraw those wins and continue gambling with my normal budget until my gambling session terminated

OR

• I would quit and enjoy my winnings, to return another time and continue the fun

Each of the above patterns works well for the gambler.

[viljy]

Probably, for most gamblers who are not addicted, this is not even a trick or strategy, but a standard behavior. In general, using this example, you can see the difference between a healthy person and a patient with gambling addiction. If a person is constantly losing and has lost the entire bankroll, it does not mean that he is addicted. If a person wins (that is, he has achieved his goal) and, nevertheless, continues to play, then, as in the first case, he loses everything, then this person is addicted.

[TheUltraElite]

Quitting is the real win in gambling. Because it is the regular spending of money on a casino that leads to a huge loss over a single decent loss once a month.

But since you bring in Martingale to the context, I dont see how that works here. You cannot say that stopping at some point during the Martaingale will be profitable. It only runs just like any other auto-play method. You might get a big win, but you have to stop there, so that becomes a condition - you might never actually hit that and your bankroll will wash away or you will hit a max bet limit.

You can try being on your toes while playing - trying that 3wins and stop, but it will induce vigilance and lead to anxiety when it does not hit or hits 2wins and then a loss.

[Smartprofit]

I don’t even know if this can be called a separate strategy or something that can be defined as a trick that can be combined with other strategies or even used alone without any strategy. But this trick can be combined, for example, with Martingale.
Imagine that you decided to play according to the Martingale system, but with one condition: you use a trick called “The main thing is to stop in time”. It can be roulette or sports betting, it doesn’t matter. And you set a rule for yourself to stop after 3 consecutive wins. In some cases, you are unlucky, but one day, imagine, you won 3 times in a row an amount that suits you perfectly.
What is more rational in this situation? To believe in luck and continue playing or to apply the rule “The main thing is to stop in time”? Obviously, the second. And if you are not an addicted player, you can be in profit with the help of this simple trick.
I know that many gamblers apply this rule to a one-time win as well.

It seems to me that the player can wait for this event (three wins in a row) for a very long time. According to the mathematical theory of probability, such an event will definitely happen. However, it can be very distant in time, that is, this event may not happen very soon. At the same time, the consequences of gambling before this event can be catastrophic for the player.

Unfortunately, in my opinion, the rule "the main thing is to stop in time" is not able to ensure the player's win in the long term. Also, the application of this rule is not able to guarantee the minimization of the player's loss. In addition, in a situation when the player is really seized by excitement, he will not be able to apply the rule "the main thing is to stop in time" even psychologically.

Moreover, even if he applies this rule, it will still not make his game more successful. In my opinion, any formalized strategy in games based on luck leads to the player's loss.

Let's consider another situation ... If the player has a real competitive advantage over the online casino or over other players, then why should he apply the rule "the main thing is to stop in time" at all?

[Kelward]

'The main thing is to stop in time ' is a strategy that every responsible gambler should have in mind so that they don't over gamble. Knowing when to stop while gambling is being in control, you're not moved by emotion and greed to keep chasing what might not happen. Where I apply my 'main thing is to stop ' is when my budgeted bankroll is exhausted, I stop whether I'm winning or losing. I don't focus on winning any amount of money first before I stop because I might be chasing loses to meet the target. Not knowing when to stop in gambling is like driving a car without a brake system, you can't control yourself until you hit a brick wall and that is addiction.

[Hatchy]

I don’t even know if this can be called a separate strategy or something that can be defined as a trick that can be combined with other strategies or even used alone without any strategy. But this trick can be combined, for example, with Martingale.
Imagine that you decided to play according to the Martingale system, but with one condition: you use a trick called “The main thing is to stop in time”. It can be roulette or sports betting, it doesn’t matter. And you set a rule for yourself to stop after 3 consecutive wins. In some cases, you are unlucky, but one day, imagine, you won 3 times in a row an amount that suits you perfectly.
What is more rational in this situation? To believe in luck and continue playing or to apply the rule “The main thing is to stop in time”? Obviously, the second. And if you are not an addicted player, you can be in profit with the help of this simple trick.
I know that many gamblers apply this rule to a one-time win as well.

We not just apply it to wins but losses as well. Having up to 3 consecutive wins or losses, one should be able to stop himself from any further activity. That's simply because you might just have been lucky or unlucky and if you fail to stop at some point, it's either it begins to get bad or even worse. Even for someone that's not addicted, you can apply the simple rule to your gambling and just cash out ones you are able to make a reasonable amount of wins. Remember a little drop of water makes a mighty ocean, we don't have to be too greedy.

[Cryptmuster]

I don’t even know if this can be called a separate strategy or something that can be defined as a trick that can be combined with other strategies or even used alone without any strategy. But this trick can be combined, for example, with Martingale.
Imagine that you decided to play according to the Martingale system, but with one condition: you use a trick called “The main thing is to stop in time”. It can be roulette or sports betting, it doesn’t matter. And you set a rule for yourself to stop after 3 consecutive wins. In some cases, you are unlucky, but one day, imagine, you won 3 times in a row an amount that suits you perfectly.
What is more rational in this situation? To believe in luck and continue playing or to apply the rule “The main thing is to stop in time”? Obviously, the second. And if you are not an addicted player, you can be in profit with the help of this simple trick.
I know that many gamblers apply this rule to a one-time win as well.

Do you also use the Martingale strategy when you win, that is, with each win you double your bet?
I never did this, when I was playing with this strategy, I only doubled the bet in case of a loss, and when a win followed, the next bet was normal, without doubling. In this case, you can stop after three wins without Martingale. It is difficult for me to understand how this can work for roulette, because I am a bettor, and after several wins I will stop anyway, because I do not make many bets in one day.)

[harapan]

Imagine that you decided to play according to the Martingale system, but with one condition: you use a trick called “The main thing is to stop in time”. It can be roulette or sports betting, it doesn’t matter. And you set a rule for yourself to stop after 3 consecutive wins. In some cases, you are unlucky, but one day, imagine, you won 3 times in a row an amount that suits you perfectly.
What is more rational in this situation? To believe in luck and continue playing or to apply the rule “The main thing is to stop in time”? Obviously, the second. And if you are not an addicted player, you can be in profit with the help of this simple trick.
I know that many gamblers apply this rule to a one-time win as well.

It may look like a trick but it's a simple strategy that should be applied by most gamblers to stop when necessary and I know so well that this rule of stopping in time go along way in helping the gamblers minimize losses. It's not just about winning but being able to control ones ability of being addicted so definitely the main thing is to stop in time and avoid story that touches.

[Wiwo]

I don’t even know if this can be called a separate strategy or something that can be defined as a trick that can be combined with other strategies or even used alone without any strategy. But this trick can be combined, for example, with Martingale.
Imagine that you decided to play according to the Martingale system, but with one condition: you use a trick called “The main thing is to stop in time”. It can be roulette or sports betting, it doesn’t matter. And you set a rule for yourself to stop after 3 consecutive wins. In some cases, you are unlucky, but one day, imagine, you won 3 times in a row an amount that suits you perfectly.
What is more rational in this situation? To believe in luck and continue playing or to apply the rule “The main thing is to stop in time”? Obviously, the second. And if you are not an addicted player, you can be in profit with the help of this simple trick.
I know that many gamblers apply this rule to a one-time win as well.

Very well mate because setting a stop limit can be said to be a personal risk management in both sides, that is to say you sto limit when you win-win-win or you stop at lose-lose or you stop at win-lose-win.

So regardless of what directions the outcome of the games is in terms of the results, you stop at three points, this is what is the most important at this point in time, this approach is highly effective in all games.

[stompix]

Imagine that you decided to play according to the Martingale system, but with one condition: you use a trick called “The main thing is to stop in time”. It can be roulette or sports betting, it doesn’t matter. And you set a rule for yourself to stop after 3 consecutive wins.

Doesn't work!
I'll skip over the math since I've talked this like 100 times, the thing is that for 4 rounds you're losing at a 22 cents loss every $100, for 3 rounds you have a 21 loss.
By the time you actually hit 3 consecutive wins you have already played more than x15 games, which means you have already lost more than you will be winning.

It simply doesn't work, since you win only 1 time your bet despite going through multiple bets, so while you might feel like you're only winning the problem is that you're winning less than a cumulative los, the only theoretical way to avoid this would be to raise your bet so than when you lose once you next win gives you 2 instead of 1, if you have a chain of 6 losses raise your bet each time so the time you win the 7th time you win 7, but that would also increase losses making this impossible.

Also, what happens if you lose 5 times from the start?  What are the 3 consecutive winnings going to make up for?

[Outhue]

You are even extra lucky if you win three times in a row, I have done this before and I messed up on the second try, three times in a row is still not safe unless you really have money left that you can keep risking.

My method is kinda different from yours, I've managed to quench my taste for further winnings when gambling by stopping once and for all if I win, let's say I am prepared to go ten rounds on a slot and my second push on button brings in money I will quit..

I have managed to have better result in gambling simply by following this method, the desire of trying more you can still win more is something I don't like when gambling, I care less about jackpot unlike others who believe that since you are winning in a row a jackpot could be around the corner.

I've watched this brought havoc on few gamblers that I know.

[Tungbulu]

I don’t even know if this can be called a separate strategy or something that can be defined as a trick that can be combined with other strategies or even used alone without any strategy. But this trick can be combined, for example, with Martingale.
Imagine that you decided to play according to the Martingale system, but with one condition: you use a trick called “The main thing is to stop in time”. It can be roulette or sports betting, it doesn’t matter. And you set a rule for yourself to stop after 3 consecutive wins. In some cases, you are unlucky, but one day, imagine, you won 3 times in a row an amount that suits you perfectly.
What is more rational in this situation? To believe in luck and continue playing or to apply the rule “The main thing is to stop in time”? Obviously, the second. And if you are not an addicted player, you can be in profit with the help of this simple trick.
I know that many gamblers apply this rule to a one-time win as well.

Most of the losing streak usually starts immediately after a series of wins. And that’s the problem with some gamblers, not able to stop when they’ve made a few significant wins, particularly when the wins are consecutive, I’ve also fallen victim of this trap a couple of times in the past and I can say that it doesn’t always end well when the losses starts coming.

I think this strategy is a good one, and can be very effective when it comes to regulating how frequent or how much time a gambler spends in gambling which is a very good way to avoid more losses.

[rachael9385]

I don’t even know if this can be called a separate strategy or something that can be defined as a trick that can be combined with other strategies or even used alone without any strategy. But this trick can be combined, for example, with Martingale.
Imagine that you decided to play according to the Martingale system, but with one condition: you use a trick called “The main thing is to stop in time”. It can be roulette or sports betting, it doesn’t matter. And you set a rule for yourself to stop after 3 consecutive wins. In some cases, you are unlucky, but one day, imagine, you won 3 times in a row an amount that suits you perfectly.
What is more rational in this situation? To believe in luck and continue playing or to apply the rule “The main thing is to stop in time”? Obviously, the second. And if you are not an addicted player, you can be in profit with the help of this simple trick.
I know that many gamblers apply this rule to a one-time win as well.

Some gamblers don't know when to stop and that can be a problem for them, winning three consecutive times can be very unlikely but it's possible, knowing how to control yourself when you are winning is important but what would help you reduce losses more as a gambler is knowing when to stop when you are losing. This is more important because it's easy to lose consistently when you are chasing your losses. It takes discipline to stop when you are winning or losing.

[Questat]

If our purpose is to avoid big losses, quitting is the best way. Whatever strategy we use, if we don't know how to stop, we are going to lose. Gambling is not just like when we enjoy betting, we keep on betting. But the fact that money is involved, we really need to think over every losing bet.

Some say the martingale strategy is good, but no. Chasing losses will never succeed but failures. It is still a thing why we need to manage our gambling habits. Staying within our limits is very important unless we have unlimited funds.

[maydna]

The temptation to continue playing will be there especially if we already won 3 times in a row. Our greediness will be bigger and make us difficult to stick to our rule before. Many people fall because of this so they continue playing gambling for one round but unfortunately, that is the time they lose their money.

Those who doesn't remember that it is their mistake will not think stop gambling immediately. They will just keep playing because they want to recover their losses. The rule will be the rule and no means for them because they decide to recover their loss and not stop gambling.

[Sim_card]

This is what we call discipline knowing the right time to stop your game. If you're not discipline and after profits, you'll not be able to see this strategy as a good one because of your greed. Of course, healthy gamblers already know this and they're applying it. However, it isn't compulsory that it must be a win but it also applies to losses too.

[radjie]

When you win and decide to stop playing, it is much better than being tempted to chase a bigger win, in the end the win that has been obtained does not increase but instead only leaves the initial capital that is owned. Maybe only a few people can stop in time when they win, and of course they are not included in those who are addicted to gambling. Unlike greedy people, they will never be satisfied after being given a win, they will continue to play in order to pursue a bigger win, but the results certainly depend on luck.

[SmartGold01]

I don’t even know if this can be called a separate strategy or something that can be defined as a trick that can be combined with other strategies or even used alone without any strategy. But this trick can be combined, for example, with Martingale.
Imagine that you decided to play according to the Martingale system, but with one condition: you use a trick called “The main thing is to stop in time”. It can be roulette or sports betting, it doesn’t matter. And you set a rule for yourself to stop after 3 consecutive wins. In some cases, you are unlucky, but one day, imagine, you won 3 times in a row an amount that suits you perfectly.
What is more rational in this situation? To believe in luck and continue playing or to apply the rule “The main thing is to stop in time”? Obviously, the second. And if you are not an addicted player, you can be in profit with the help of this simple trick.
I know that many gamblers apply this rule to a one-time win as well.

Have you also reasoned the opposite?
Let say you applied this same rule and it happens that you lose 3 consecutive times without any winning what would you do at this point? Quit or what actions to take from this process. Please don't be mad at me because sometimes when we think something positively we should also think the other way to equate the gravitational force and magnitude of what are doing. There is no possibility that if Mr D uses the martingale principles he must win straight three times in a role without loses, which you and I knows that winning is by chances.

[xenomorfo]

Probably, for most gamblers who are not addicted, this is not even a trick or strategy, but a standard behavior. In general, using this example, you can see the difference between a healthy person and a patient with gambling addiction. If a person is constantly losing and has lost the entire bankroll, it does not mean that he is addicted. If a person wins (that is, he has achieved his goal) and, nevertheless, continues to play, then, as in the first case, he loses everything, then this person is addicted.

That's right, when it starts to enter your real life it means that it creates a problem.
Unfortunately i understood from reading that everything happens for money, yes ok, but above all for the dopamine rush you get when you win, that makes you feel invincible. This in fact makes gambling a form of addiction that is difficult to eliminate