Stablecoin bill regulation thread

[zasad@]

@zasad@. However, the occurrences on those politicians is a different story and I reckon this cannot be compared to the assassination attempt on the Donald. There are certainly very powerful people in America who do not want the Donald to become president, the most powerful political position in the world.

I speculate that because the assassination attempt failed, these powerful people against the Donald will have other attempts to get him. The most effective attack is on a person's bank accounts hehehe.

It doesn't matter at all who wants what. If these influential people couldn't remove their opponent, then they are not so influential.
Now Trump is the most influential figure in the world, that's a fact, and now he can create a lot of problems for those whom you call influential people. Now these people will sit quietly and wait for Trump's term to end. And they are lucky that in the US a citizen can only be president for 2 terms

[bbc.reporter]

@zasad@. I disagree. They cannot remove their opponent because it is not easy and this is also not a very simple mission. We are talking about the Donald! He might make himself appear similar to an idiot, however, this man has won the presidency which implies that he is not really stupid. This man should not be underestimated and I am quite certain his political opponents are very much of this.

In any case, you are correct, these opponents of Trump has much more difficulty in assassinating him because he is president of the most powerful country in the world, however, they can assassinate the Donald's allies like Charlie Kirk.

[zasad@]

@zasad@. I disagree. They cannot remove their opponent because it is not easy and this is also not a very simple mission. We are talking about the Donald! He might make himself appear similar to an idiot, however, this man has won the presidency which implies that he is not really stupid. This man should not be underestimated and I am quite certain his political opponents are very much of this.

In any case, you are correct, these opponents of Trump has much more difficulty in assassinating him because he is president of the most powerful country in the world, however, they can assassinate the Donald's allies like Charlie Kirk.

If Charlie Kirk's murder is another warning to Trump, it seems foolish. Trump is no coward and won't be intimidated by the threat of assassination. If it's now legal to assassinate US presidents or their supporters and blame it on a sick hater, then I don't envy the next president.
You haven't mentioned the situation in Germany. Is there an official crackdown on parliamentary candidates there?

[bbc.reporter]

@zasad@. However, the message of the masterminds behind the assassination is telling the Donald and his team that they are not afraid of him even if he is holding the most powerful government position on this planet. This might also imply that the Donald's enemies are also inside the government or they have influence over many people inside of the government.

On Germany, I do not know this news. You should share this if you have the information and also share your analysis, speculations and predictions.

[zasad@]

@zasad@. However, the message of the masterminds behind the assassination is telling the Donald and his team that they are not afraid of him even if he is holding the most powerful government position on this planet. This might also imply that the Donald's enemies are also inside the government or they have influence over many people inside of the government.

On Germany, I do not know this news. You should share this if you have the information and also share your analysis, speculations and predictions.

You write about interesting and complex topics: power, influence, and threats. But we don't know about all the behind-the-scenes wars that go on there.
First, there was an assassination attempt on Trump, then a Trump supporter was killed. And the third step will be the killing of Trump's dog or cat. If these events don't change Trump's policies, then they are ineffective.

News about Germany in this post.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5542218.msg65778670#msg65778670

[bbc.reporter]

@zasad@. You are correct. It might not be effective, however, this is not the argument. What was being implied was there are groups that are comprised of powerful people who are the enemy of the Donald and they are not afraid of the Donald even if he is holding the most powerful political position in the world.

In Germany, I did not know that the politics there has become similar to the politics of Colombia when Pablo Escobar was still the most powerful man there heheh.

[zasad@]

@zasad@. You are correct. It might not be effective, however, this is not the argument. What was being implied was there are groups that are comprised of powerful people who are the enemy of the Donald and they are not afraid of the Donald even if he is holding the most powerful political position in the world.

In Germany, I did not know that the politics there has become similar to the politics of Colombia when Pablo Escobar was still the most powerful man there heheh.

Let's look at this situation from a different perspective. We first need to understand who Trump is and whose interests he represents. You write that there are very influential people who are Trump's enemies, but there are also influential people who are Trump's friends.
If Trump's enemies start shooting at him again, then Trump's friends should shoot at his enemies, otherwise they will lose their credibility.

[bbc.reporter]

@zasad@. What you say might be correct, however, this is also speculative. This will be another argument. What I am saying is on what has occurred already and these occurrences are not arguable because there was already an assassination attempt on the Donald which the mainstream media has not directly called it an assassination attempt and there was an assassination on the Donald's ally, Charlie Kirk.

We cannot argue against the occurrences and we cannot say that this is nothing or that Trump's enemies are not influential. The proof has been shown to us to witness already.

[zasad@]

@zasad@. What you say might be correct, however, this is also speculative. This will be another argument. What I am saying is on what has occurred already and these occurrences are not arguable because there was already an assassination attempt on the Donald which the mainstream media has not directly called it an assassination attempt and there was an assassination on the Donald's ally, Charlie Kirk.

We cannot argue against the occurrences and we cannot say that this is nothing or that Trump's enemies are not influential. The proof has been shown to use to witness already.

I agree that there were assassination attempts on Trump, but based on the investigation, there's no official evidence yet that powerful individuals attempted to assassinate Trump.

If you have such evidence, please provide a link to it; I don't follow it. Otherwise, we'll be discussing conspiracy theories.

[bbc.reporter]

@zasad@. This what makes these powerful group of people powerful. The assassination attempt cannot be connected to them. They have all types of connections or even own a part of mainstream media, they have people in government under their influence including law enforcers, judges, congressmen and senators. There are also times that they control the president.

You mention conspiracy theories hehehe. Do you really trust that the mainstream media and the government are always telling the truth? It would be very headshaking if you trust what the mainstream media and the government are telling you.

In any case, according to Tether, USDT will have more than $1 trillion of total amount of stablecoins onchain. This will be very good inflows heheheheh.



Just a month after announcing its arrival in the US, Tether’s CEO, Paolo Ardoino, is already painting a bullish future for the venture’s newest digital dollar.

The industry’s largest stablecoin issuer is launching a new stablecoin, USAT, specifically for the American market. Bo Hines, formerly the head of the White House’s Council of Advisors on Digital Assets, is helming the enterprise as its CEO.

During a panel discussion at the crypto confab Token2049 in Singapore on Thursday, Ardoino has little doubt his newest token will be a success.

“My target for USAT in the next three to five years would be about $1 trillion,” Ardoino said. “It’s realistic because of the velocity at which we are seeing USDT grow.”

Read in full https://www.dlnews.com/articles/markets/why-tether-ceo-says-new-us-stablecoin-will-hit-1-trillion-usd/

[zasad@]

@zasad@. This what makes these powerful group of people powerful. The assassination attempt cannot be connected to them. They have all types of connections or even own a part of mainstream media, they have people in government under their influence including law enforcers, judges, congressmen and senators. There are also times that they control the president.

You mention conspiracy theories hehehe. Do you really trust that the mainstream media and the government are always telling the truth? It would be very headshaking if you trust what the mainstream media and the government are telling you.

In any case, according to Tether, USDT will have more than $1 trillion of total amount of stablecoins onchain. This will be very good inflows heheheheh.



Just a month after announcing its arrival in the US, Tether’s CEO, Paolo Ardoino, is already painting a bullish future for the venture’s newest digital dollar.

The industry’s largest stablecoin issuer is launching a new stablecoin, USAT, specifically for the American market. Bo Hines, formerly the head of the White House’s Council of Advisors on Digital Assets, is helming the enterprise as its CEO.

During a panel discussion at the crypto confab Token2049 in Singapore on Thursday, Ardoino has little doubt his newest token will be a success.

“My target for USAT in the next three to five years would be about $1 trillion,” Ardoino said. “It’s realistic because of the velocity at which we are seeing USDT grow.”

Read in full https://www.dlnews.com/articles/markets/why-tether-ceo-says-new-us-stablecoin-will-hit-1-trillion-usd/

I agree that your theory is valid, but let's try to analyze this information. You believe there's a very influential and secret group, whose activities are known only to a select few, and which the 20-plus US secret services are unaware of. And this group hires people to assassinate the US President.
We can assume such a group exists, but if we look at the several unsuccessful assassination attempts on Trump, I would conclude that it's a group of failures.

Regarding lying, I want to say that now many politicians are changing their rhetoric, and they are trying to tell the truth where possible.

[bbc.reporter]

@zasad@. You say they are telling the truth where possible? Does this imply they lie where possible, also? Heheheheeh.

In any case, there was one assassination attempt for the Donald, it was not several. Assassination attempts against a very high political figure is not very easy. They only had once chance and they failed, yes. However, if you have forgotten, it was also almost successful. The bullet has touched the ear of the Donald.

The Donald's enemies will have a very difficult time to attempt this again because he will be ready and he already has the most powerful political position in the world.

Also, they know already that Trump will fight fight fight hehehehehe.

[zasad@]

@zasad@. You say they are telling the truth where possible? Does this imply they lie where possible, also? Heheheheeh.

In any case, there was one assassination attempt for the Donald, it was not several. Assassination attempts against a very high political figure is not very easy. They only had once chance and they failed, yes. However, if you have forgotten, it was also almost successful. The bullet has touched the ear of the Donald.

The Donald's enemies will have a very difficult time to attempt this again because he will be ready and he already has the most powerful political position in the world.

Also, they know already that Trump will fight fight fight hehehehehe.

..

Of course, politicians lie, but lately I've noticed that some of them have started telling more of the truth.

I've read about several assassination attempts on Trump.
The first attempt was on July 13, 2024, in Pennsylvania, and you posted a photo from that event.
The second attempt was on September 15, 2024, in Florida. The perpetrator was unable to fire because the US Secret Service opened fire and eventually apprehended the shooter.

[bbc.reporter]

@zasad@. If you are beginning to trust what they are telling you, I reckon there is an argument that you are beginning to being tricked ehehe.

Politicians are very much similar to these influencers in the cryptospace. They will tell you some useless truths to cause you to also trust their lies. If you begin to believe them, you should begin asking yourself if they have really changed.

Have they really changed? If your answer is yes, this would be headshaking hehehehehe.

[zasad@]

@zasad@. If you are beginning to trust what they are telling you, I reckon there is an argument that you are beginning to being tricked ehehe.

Politicians are very much similar to these influencers in the cryptospace. They will tell you some useless truths to cause you to also trust their lies. If you begin to believe them, you should begin asking yourself if they have really changed.

Have they really changed? If your answer is yes, this would be headshaking hehehehehe.

I didn't say there were big changes among politicians. You're absolutely right that we can't trust politicians.
I'll emphasize that some politicians have started telling the truth a little more. That's a good trend. In today's digital age, it's very difficult to lie.
To give you an idea, five years ago, information about the pension fund budget shortfall in my country would have been hushed up, but now it's publicly available.

[bbc.reporter]

@zasad@. Are telling me that if this is a good trend, then these politicians you say that are telling the truth are becoming trustworthy? Can you name 3 politicians that have begun to have this good trend of telling the truth?

The argument against this is when you becoming more trusting on the government, this is when they hide the truth again from their people. This is politics, game where everyone needs to tell a lie to continue their agenda hehehe.

[zasad@]

@zasad@. Are telling me that if this is a good trend, then these politicians you say that are telling the truth are becoming trustworthy? Can you name 3 politicians that have begun to have this good trend of telling the truth?

The argument against this is when you becoming more trusting on the government, this is when they hide the truth again from their people. This is politics, game where everyone needs to tell a lie to continue their agenda hehehe.

We are too different and have completely different mentalities to understand each other. In Russia, people say that you can only trust your mother. In Russia there are no guarantees that your partner or friend will not deceive you, although before that he was honest with you.
"Trust is the most valuable currency." (C)

John Magufuli, the late President of Tanzania. In 2020, he famously tested a goat and a pawpaw (papaya) for COVID-19 as a part of his skepticism towards the effectiveness of the COVID-19 tests. He claimed that the tests produced positive results for the goat and fruit, which he used to criticize the reliability of testing methods and the handling of the pandemic. This incident drew significant international attention and sparked discussions about COVID-19 testing protocols in various countries.

[bbc.reporter]

@zasad@. I am not arguing against trust as the most valuable currency. I am arguing against trusting the government and if they are really telling the truth or are they lying.

This discussion of ours begun when you told me my speculations are conspiracy theories only. I asked you do you reckon that the government is always telling the truth. We can be quite certain that they are much of the time lying. Their lies has caused the people to speculate and the government invented the words conspiracy theory to put fud on the people who ask questions.

[zasad@]

@zasad@. I am not arguing against trust as the most valuable currency. I am arguing against trusting the government and if they are really telling the truth or are they lying.

This discussion of ours begun when you told me my speculations are conspiracy theories only. I asked you do you reckon that the government is always telling the truth. We can be quite certain that they are much of the time lying. Their lies has caused the people to speculate and the government invented the words conspiracy theory to put fud on the people who ask questions.

We have already come to a consensus that sometimes governments lie and sometimes tell the truth.

I called your speculation a conspiracy theory (it was a bit ironic) because you believe that the assassination attempt on July 13, 2024, in Pennsylvania was organized by an influential group of individuals who hate Trump and his policies.
Perhaps it would be more accurate to use the term "hypothesis" instead of "speculation." So, your hypothesis is a conspiracy theory because you believe that these events (the assassination attempts on the president) were controlled by a secret group or organization, but you can't prove it. The shooter has been killed, and the investigation is ongoing.

[bbc.reporter]

@zasad@. You can call this a conspiracy theory because according to the official news update on this occurrence is the assassination attempt was an operation of 1 person only. This might be the truth, however, because of the many lies and the many coverups that was done in the past, the people will begin to ask questions because they do not anymore trust in the statements of the government and the mainstream news media outlets.

Similar to what you have said, the government also spread lies and they are also lying to their citizens. This implies that the conspiracy theory might not really be a conspiracy theory. These are speculations to find the truth.