Old Multibit Classic & Schildbach Bitcoin Wallet Recovery Services

[Promocodeudo]

Sure, review seems fine too. Our inbox is open!

/KX

Are you trying to say you guys inbox is open for the reviews to come in or are you saying that your inbox is open to accept application from managers in this forum that'll want to manage the campaign? Since you guys are here present, I think the best way to handle a review campaign here in this forum is just for you guys to get to know more about the forum atleast you can pm a good review campaign manager that can do the job for your organization or better still if you want a recommendation then I can recommend some of them that I have worked with, who are reputable members of this forum with some years of experience in such role, although the decision is yours to make.

[Obari]

Sure, review seems fine too. Our inbox is open!
/KX

There are many  good marketing strategy out there and I have seen some projects explore them. For mixers and casinos, they use reviews for people to use their platform and give feedbacks. But for the kind of service you are offering, I'm finding it hard understanding how you could possibly run a review campaign since it is specialized kind of thing that requires people actually losing access to their wallet.

Exactly, I was also wondering how will the review look like since their service has to do with wallet recovery which implies that, for them to get a genuine response for reviews, then one must have to lose access to their wallet which I’m sure no one would Intentionally want to lose access to their wallet for the sake of a review and as such, I don’t think seeking for a review would be nice except from previous users.
And since you’re already in the forum, and want to utilize the marketing tools here, then you should try a signature campaign which I think would create more awareness for your brand than just a mere review.

[Mr Reporter]

Snip

Most of the campaigns launched here on the forum is majorly casinos and exchanges and I've not seen a service like wallet recovery launching a campaign. If this happens then that would be the first time I will be seeing a wallet recovery service a running signature campaign. The best thing any wallet recovery service can do is to make sure they build their reputation and be active in this forum to answer users inquiries.

Well why not, if anyone interested drop us a line.

/KX

There are so many campaign managements in this forum and if you are thinking of launching a signature campaign then that will be welcome. Many signature campaigns are running in this community and the most have seen is casinos and exchange but having a recovery service here with a signature campaign will be good also just like others here.

Running a signature campaign in the forum is a very good suggestion, but come to think of it, it is really necessary for KeychainX a crypto wallet recovery company to run a signature campaign in the forum? I know running a signature campaign in the forum is a better way for them to be notices by other members no doubt. But you should also know that to run a signature campaign required huge funds , because you  have to be paying the campaign manager and the staffs who are wearing the signature and avatar on a weekly basis. I know that some members here will take my words as words of discouragement but they're not, am just looking out for them, but if they feel that they are capable of running a signature campaign that's fine, because by running a signature campaign is another way they can be notices by other members.

@Joy maker i can see what you are trying to say here which i think weighing the pros and cons of Keychainx running a signature campaign in the forum can increase more viewers pulse visibility and awareness about Crypto recovery wallet services, well on the other hands i think it should requires significant funding to pay campaign manager and staff, aspects their are planning to run a free signature campaign, so now i think the question that should be asked is if Keychainx can afford the costs associated with running a signature campaign.

On a second throughs ultimately the decision of running a signature campaign depends on Keychainx specific goals resources and targets audience well if they believe the benefits outweigh the costs i think might be worth exploring.

[Proty]

Sure, review seems fine too. Our inbox is open!
/KX

There are many  good marketing strategy out there and I have seen some projects explore them. For mixers and casinos, they use reviews for people to use their platform and give feedbacks. But for the kind of service you are offering, I'm finding it hard understanding how you could possibly run a review campaign since it is specialized kind of thing that requires people actually losing access to their wallet.

I believe it won't be that easy for the company to run a review campaign because of the nature of service they render. It is unlike other services that people can try out there service for fun. It is only when someone has lost their wallet passwords that is when they will try to petronise service rendered by recovery service. This will help to improve the trust people have for the company, they can also work with members that is recognised in the forum. This will definitely help more than review campaign.

[CryptSafe]

Sure, review seems fine too. Our inbox is open!
/KX

There are many  good marketing strategy out there and I have seen some projects explore them. For mixers and casinos, they use reviews for people to use their platform and give feedbacks. But for the kind of service you are offering, I'm finding it hard understanding how you could possibly run a review campaign since it is specialized kind of thing that requires people actually losing access to their wallet.

I believe it won't be that easy for the company to run a review campaign because of the nature of service they render. It is unlike other services that people can try out there service for fun. It is only when someone has lost their wallet passwords that is when they will try to petronise service rendered by recovery service. This will help to improve the trust people have for the company, they can also work with members that is recognised in the forum. This will definitely help more than review campaign.

I do not think a review campaign would be the option here, because what are we reviewing? Are we reviewing the already recovered assets from the wallet?  Or are we reviewing the process involved in recovering the assets from the wallet, which we have no knowledge about, or are we reviewing the services that are already done in our absence?

Doing a review campaign is more of you taking part in the whole process from stage one to the final stage by sharing your experience and how you feel about the whole process you have undergone. So, how do you want to review a process you are not part of, or do you think the organisation would allow you to know the process that is more of their secret and meant to be handled discreetly?

[Agbamoni]

I do not think a review campaign would be the option here, because what are we reviewing? Are we reviewing the already recovered assets from the wallet?  Or are we reviewing the process involved in recovering the assets from the wallet, which we have no knowledge about, or are we reviewing the services that are already done in our absence?

It's like many persons do not understand the meaning of review. If a review have to be done, then we have to bring a stolen wallet or lost wallet for the team to recover, and every process will be documented reputation sake. And yeah, we actually dont need to be the one recovering the service, it has to be the service renders, all we go to do is to follow the process from tart to finish. However, I dont think a review campaign is what these recovery services needs. Fake reviews can be paid, you know?

[Bushdark]

Sure, review seems fine too. Our inbox is open!

/KX

Are you trying to say you guys inbox is open for the reviews to come in or are you saying that your inbox is open to accept application from managers in this forum that'll want to manage the campaign? Since you guys are here present, I think the best way to handle a review campaign here in this forum is just for you guys to get to know more about the forum atleast you can pm a good review campaign manager that can do the job for your organization or better still if you want a recommendation then I can recommend some of them that I have worked with, who are reputable members of this forum with some years of experience in such role, although the decision is yours to make.

You don't have to misinterpret in a different tone. I don't think he's pointing at signature campaign. Our inbox is open for review could be implying to those that want to understand more about their service and want to retrieve their lost wallet.
If that's not the case then maybe he's talking about writing a review about KeychainX for those that are interested in using their services.
Anyhow, whatever be the case he is not totaling pointing at launching a signature campaign.

[Zackz5000]

Most of the campaigns launched here on the forum is majorly casinos and exchanges and I've not seen a service like wallet recovery launching a campaign. If this happens then that would be the first time I will be seeing a wallet recovery service a running signature campaign. The best thing any wallet recovery service can do is to make sure they build their reputation and be active in this forum to answer users inquiries.

Yes, they have to concentrate on building larger customer bases, gaining the trust of potential clients has more importance than trying to launch a signature campaign, plus a wallet needs to need password recovery before companies like this can get customers and launching a signature campaign without knowing the exact or a relatively good number of potential clients that they are going to have, attention should be more on what they can offer, a good company's work advertises itself without stress, and word of mouth goes a long way to boost customer confidence in companies like this.

[MainIbem]

Most of the campaigns launched here on the forum is majorly casinos and exchanges and I've not seen a service like wallet recovery launching a campaign. If this happens then that would be the first time I will be seeing a wallet recovery service a running signature campaign. The best thing any wallet recovery service can do is to make sure they build their reputation and be active in this forum to answer users inquiries.

Yes, they have to concentrate on building larger customer bases, gaining the trust of potential clients has more importance than trying to launch a signature campaign, plus a wallet needs to need password recovery before companies like this can get customers and launching a signature campaign without knowing the exact or a relatively good number of potential clients that they are going to have, attention should be more on what they can offer, a good company's work advertises itself without stress, and word of mouth goes a long way to boost customer confidence in companies like this.

Don't you think launching a signature campaign is a way of attracting customers to themselves here in the forum, why do you think those casinos and exchanges are launching campaign here? If not to get more traffics from here to their sites, some members of this community wearing their avatar and sig or personal texts would cause other members to be curious and try to know more about the KeychainX and even patronise them if they have any issues relating with the service KeychainX offers, don't you think about it, a company that offers such service and have a campaign here and the one that doesn't, which would you patronize? Owning a campaign is even a form of building reputation and advertising their service better.

[Mr Reporter]

I do not think a review campaign would be the option here, because what are we reviewing? Are we reviewing the already recovered assets from the wallet?  Or are we reviewing the process involved in recovering the assets from the wallet, which we have no knowledge about, or are we reviewing the services that are already done in our absence?

It's like many persons do not understand the meaning of review. If a review have to be done, then we have to bring a stolen wallet or lost wallet for the team to recover, and every process will be documented reputation sake. And yeah, we actually dont need to be the one recovering the service, it has to be the service renders, all we go to do is to follow the process from tart to finish. However, I dont think a review campaign is what these recovery services needs. Fake reviews can be paid, you know?

I do not think a review campaign would be the option here, because what are we reviewing? Are we reviewing the already recovered assets from the wallet?  Or are we reviewing the process involved in recovering the assets from the wallet, which we have no knowledge about, or are we reviewing the services that are already done in our absence?

It's like many persons do not understand the meaning of review. If a review have to be done, then we have to bring a stolen wallet or lost wallet for the team to recover, and every process will be documented reputation sake. And yeah, we actually dont need to be the one recovering the service, it has to be the service renders, all we go to do is to follow the process from tart to finish. However, I dont think a review campaign is what these recovery services needs. Fake reviews can be paid, you know?

I think we need to understand the concept if review in the context of recovery services such as retrieving stolen funds now jumping to the part were you made mention of emphasizing the importance of following a through process, documenting every step to ensure transparency and accountability for any worng movement, pulse you note that the recoveries services should be the one to handle the retrieval  and while the client follows the process from the start to finish i think the ideas is a better one for the company.

[Futurexxx]

Yes, they have to concentrate on building larger customer bases, gaining the trust of potential clients has more importance than trying to launch a signature campaign, plus a wallet needs to need password recovery before companies like this can get customers and launching a signature campaign without knowing the exact or a relatively good number of potential clients that they are going to have, attention should be more on what they can offer, a good company's work advertises itself without stress, and word of mouth goes a long way to boost customer confidence in companies like this.

You are right here and I also share the same sentiment buddy,  attention should first be on how trustworthy they are, how reliable they are and how efficient they are in their services rendered, and it's because of that I think that right now, a signature campaign is not a good idea, what they need to do right now is a review campaign, with that, people can testify how efficient and effective they are in discarding their duties, and if they can't do it as they claimed, we are all going to know, because anyone can claim to know how to do anything, but till proven right, you just can't conclude yet.

[Promocodeudo]

I believe it won't be that easy for the company to run a review campaign because of the nature of service they render. It is unlike other services that people can try out there service for fun. It is only when someone has lost their wallet passwords that is when they will try to petronise service rendered by recovery service. This will help to improve the trust people have for the company, they can also work with members that is recognised in the forum. This will definitely help more than review campaign.

Mate I disagree with you on somethings you said here, don't you think there are people that have lost hold to their wallets that wouldn't know that services as this wallet recovery stuff do exist, just as i have said in one of my post, this service of wallet recovery is one of it's kind in this space so I believe such will attract people more to do the review, ask questions and also give possible feedbacks on what the think about the organization and things they really needs to improve on, working with reputable members of this forum is good but review campaign aren't bad too.

[Gentle_Soul]

Office= where we have accounting documents, meetings, light equipment
Lab = secret location with servers and customer data, never meet IRL, just just address for dropping hardware in those countries

Its a security risk to bring people to lab

/KX

I will not even advise any organisation to do such because these days funny things happen, as you do not know the intention of the person you are taking to the lab when such a person is not a staff member or is affiliated with your organisation, and not even a government official on official duty. It is better if the person stays at your office than to let them into your lab. Labs are basically for major work, and most discreet activities of the organisation's production capacity and abilities are kept there, and I do not believe any reasonable organisation would just take or allow any individual to enter without any prior notice or not follow procedures before accessing the lab.

Basically the lab weather in the medical sector , pharmacitical or organizational settings is not a place for every one to just enter because you have a job to do with the facility rather it's supposed to be strictly for lab staff .
There can be an outer office where people come and lay there complains make payments if necessary but definitely not in the lab, for me there is absolutely no difference with this lab and every other because a lot will be exposed to the public if it's public and left  for anyone to access at anytime .

Informations are to be designated to different aspects of the office for people to know where exactly they are supposed to be and where to channel there   request to at every given time

[mvdheuvel1983]

Every company have their way of going Abuja their marketing and can chose whichever method they deem fit to achieve their target. Running a signature campaign here will depend on how big they are and if they have the finances to fund that but it will definitely worth it as it will show that they are serious. It's all about what they consider important to them and that is where they will channel their marketing resources to.

A signature campaign is certainly a smart marketing idea but it is also a choice to make, plus password recovery is different from other campaigns here, you need to have problems with your wallet to require their services and that doesn't happen everyday and they haven't exactly said anything against starting a signature campaign anytime in the future
I believe starting one would definitely increase their reach though.

Seeing a signature campaign from a wallet recovery service is very strange because people that have problem with wallet recovery issues are minimal and it's not like regular campaigns that we do see large numbers of people subscribing and carrying accounts to test the signature of campaign websites for their functions and some other things.
This is a wallet recovery service and for you to test the service, you must have issue with your wallet whether forgotten password or incomplete seed phrases.

[Obari]

Most of the campaigns launched here on the forum is majorly casinos and exchanges and I've not seen a service like wallet recovery launching a campaign. If this happens then that would be the first time I will be seeing a wallet recovery service a running signature campaign. The best thing any wallet recovery service can do is to make sure they build their reputation and be active in this forum to answer users inquiries.

Yes, they have to concentrate on building larger customer bases, gaining the trust of potential clients has more importance than trying to launch a signature campaign, plus a wallet needs to need password recovery before companies like this can get customers and launching a signature campaign without knowing the exact or a relatively good number of potential clients that they are going to have, attention should be more on what they can offer, a good company's work advertises itself without stress, and word of mouth goes a long way to boost customer confidence in companies like this.

Don't you think launching a signature campaign is a way of attracting customers to themselves here in the forum, why do you think those casinos and exchanges are launching campaign here? If not to get more traffics from here to their sites, some members of this community wearing their avatar and sig or personal texts would cause other members to be curious and try to know more about the KeychainX and even patronise them if they have any issues relating with the service KeychainX offers, don't you think about it, a company that offers such service and have a campaign here and the one that doesn't, which would you patronize? Owning a campaign is even a form of building reputation and advertising their service better.

Exactly, they need a signature campaign to create more awareness and visibility of their services and I only got to find out that, the wallet recovery services are already getting some sort of competitions and the best form of marketing they need especially on the forum is a signature campaign for more visibility because you never can tell how many people who might be needing their services but because they aren’t visible, they couldn’t get the patronage and secondly, running’s signature campaign with a trusted manager will also burst their trust score as a lot of people with recovery issues would want to try them out because of reputation of the manager(just my thoughts though.)

[Gentle_Soul]

I believe it won't be that easy for the company to run a review campaign because of the nature of service they render. It is unlike other services that people can try out there service for fun. It is only when someone has lost their wallet passwords that is when they will try to petronise service rendered by recovery service. This will help to improve the trust people have for the company, they can also work with members that is recognised in the forum. This will definitely help more than review campaign.

Mate I disagree with you on somethings you said here, don't you think there are people that have lost hold to their wallets that wouldn't know that services as this wallet recovery stuff do exist, just as i have said in one of my post, this service of wallet recovery is one of it's kind in this space so I believe such will attract people more to do the review, ask questions and also give possible feedbacks on what the think about the organization and things they really needs to improve on, working with reputable members of this forum is good but review campaign aren't bad too.

Yes you are totally correct I agree with you there are lots of people who do not know about wallet recovery infact they do not have an idea that wallets can actually be recovered especially without your seed phrase .

I  use to also think that once your seed phrase is lost then your account is lost but have read through some real recovery journals and I see that technology can actually make it possible in this our contemporary times, so any form of mobilization is bring people's knowledge to the fact that there wallet can actually be recovered is worth it as such a champagne is not entirely out of place as the forum space houses more people who can be venerable and may require this services.

[Promocodeudo]

A signature campaign is certainly a smart marketing idea but it is also a choice to make, plus password recovery is different from other campaigns here, you need to have problems with your wallet to require their services and that doesn't happen everyday and they haven't exactly said anything against starting a signature campaign anytime in the future
I believe starting one would definitely increase their reach though.

Yea it is a choice, no organization or should I say company that want to either make their brand to be known or market the service they rendered for people to see what it looks like will be forced or be persuaded to run any campaign or review, we can suggest things to them but they have the finally say afterall it is their brand, I think every organization knows what's good for them, just as I said earlier anything that relates to taking decision in regards to this particular discussion they remain the right people to champion it, if that's really what they want.

[Proty]

I believe it won't be that easy for the company to run a review campaign because of the nature of service they render. It is unlike other services that people can try out there service for fun. It is only when someone has lost their wallet passwords that is when they will try to petronise service rendered by recovery service. This will help to improve the trust people have for the company, they can also work with members that is recognised in the forum. This will definitely help more than review campaign.

Mate I disagree with you on somethings you said here, don't you think there are people that have lost hold to their wallets that wouldn't know that services as this wallet recovery stuff do exist, just as i have said in one of my post, this service of wallet recovery is one of it's kind in this space so I believe such will attract people more to do the review, ask questions and also give possible feedbacks on what the think about the organization and things they really needs to improve on, working with reputable members of this forum is good but review campaign aren't bad too.

Well I really do understand were you are going, and you have shed light on some things I believe are important. However am still of the opinion that reviews campaigns for this kind of service wouldn't be a good idea. The issue here or what is involved is too sensitive i.e lost wallets and private keys.so many people won't like the idea of coming to public to talk about recovered wallet especially when the money that was recovered is a huge sum. So for security purposes it will be unwise for people to make it publicly that  they make used of such service.
I also accept the fact that awareness is really necessary. Since alot of people don't really have an idea that such service do exist, that's the reason why I said it will be best if they work with trusted forum members. Unless it will not be the kind of reviews campaigns I do see with casinos, however if the person that wants to give a testimony about the service can be anonymous or a case study without bringing the identity of the customer to public. This I believe will definitely be of great help in developing trust without embarrassing the users.

[Odohu]

Sure, review seems fine too. Our inbox is open!
/KX

There are many  good marketing strategy out there and I have seen some projects explore them. For mixers and casinos, they use reviews for people to use their platform and give feedbacks. But for the kind of service you are offering, I'm finding it hard understanding how you could possibly run a review campaign since it is specialized kind of thing that requires people actually losing access to their wallet.

I believe it won't be that easy for the company to run a review campaign because of the nature of service they render. It is unlike other services that people can try out there service for fun. It is only when someone has lost their wallet passwords that is when they will try to petronise service rendered by recovery service. This will help to improve the trust people have for the company, they can also work with members that is recognised in the forum. This will definitely help more than review campaign.

There could be other marketing strategy they can explore to create visibility for their services, it must not be the conventional one we already know such as signature and reviews. I remember they already had some reviews in Trustpilot,  if they encourage their users to also post those good reviews in other platforms, that will help spread their awareness a lot. I team indeed know what is best for their services and how to go about it.

[Hazink]

Talking about market, it's a total different thing to trusting a company ability in showing capacity and competency in what they do, so for popularity they should be going for a signature campaign, but for everyone in this forum to have a clear idea of their ability before hand they should go for a review campaign, because it's true a review campaign we can attest to their services through the feedback of those that participated in the review, but in my own opinion, I think that they should go for a review campaign first before thinking of a signature campaign.

Talking about the review campaign, how do you propose this is done? Since it’s all about wallet recovery for users who have an old wallet to which they have lost access, who would agree to offer it for use in test running the review before a public, honest publication about their own experience. This is not just like an exchange or platform where anyone can just make use of the service and conduct their review based on the experience they got from the website. I get your point and understand how reviews can help determine how a service works, but in this type of service, I just wonder how it can be done.