Has Anyone Tried This Red-Black Roulette Pattern Strategy?

[stadus]

In my opinion, the fact we even dare to assure there is some pattern to be exploited while playing roulette is a complete contradiction to the theory of chaos and the laws of chances and entropy, so I don't think there is any science behind this.

You said it right, because if there was really a method that worked, casinos wouldn’t be happy, and they’d go bankrupt in the long run.

But nope, that doesn’t happen. Roulette is still one of the most popular games in the casino, and it’s called a game of luck for a reason.
In reality, no strategy can truly beat the house, that edge is always there.

So its better to accept the reality and stop wasting time experimenting on a method that will never work.

[rachael9385]

If there were really patterns everyone would become rich in gambling, the problem most people have is that they try to make casino gambling a source of income. You might get lucky using this strategy but at the long run you are going to lose more than you gain from it. The person who said the success rate is 99 percent is obviously trying to get attention. People who advertise such things online are just deceiving people

[danherbias07]

So it's like Martingale, just longer. Use a series of bets in one amount, and then if it loses, add more money for the next series of bets. I doubt it will work, and it's going to be expensive in the long run. Also, everyone will be playing roulette if there's really a working strategy.

After playing different casino games, I don't believe in any strategy anymore. In online casinos, it is the losses, wins, and history of the gambler's account that will be considered what he might get next. If you lose 100 sets, you might get back 90 sets in one or a couple of bets. Somehow, the casino will make a profit using the house edge rule.

[Smartprofit]

This strategy you have provided is a modified Martingale strategy. It consists of sticking to the same game tactics and consistently doubling the bet size.

Yes, this strategy is effective and in theory gives the player a chance to win. However, theory is not practice, and the map (as we know) is not the territory. Casino organizers are well aware of the Martingale strategy and will not allow the player to use it effectively. The main limitation in using this strategy is that it assumes that the player has an infinite amount of money and an infinite number of opportunities to place a bet. In practice, this is not the case.

That is why Artificial Intelligence recommends this game strategy. After all, Artificial Intelligence does not play roulette and does not know what is really happening in the real world.

Well, besides, when using the Martingale strategy, you need to increase each subsequent bet by two times, not five. If you increase each subsequent bet by five times, then your money will run out very soon. Your deposit will not withstand a long series of failures.

[Dunamisx]

The roulette strategy tester said in the video that this strategy was simulated 3,000 times through AI, and the success win rate was around 99%

Everyone will be cashing out money by now if this is true and gambling sites will go bankrupt.

What you explained is nothing more than martingale that many people on this forum have tried, especially when they are new to gambling. The end result is massive loss of money.

I don't even believe in some of these strategies because they only triggers to gamble the more with the hope of winning, while on the reality your chances of winning is far below that of losing, am not saying this to discourage others to use the same strategy or more, but we should try to understand what is at stake for us when we do so, that they are not hundred percent effective.

[YOSHIE]

Has Anyone Tried This Red-Black Roulette Pattern Strategy?

You need to know whatever pattern strategy you use and do there is no guarantee for you to win in the long run including pattern strategies The red/ black roulette you mean, I have often played a red/ black roulette game, there is no 100% guarantee for victory.

But you can try to do it, how you know you can be lucky in the Roulette Red-Black-Blalette game.
Very easy.
First: Choose the color you want to bet red or black, it's up to you which you want, wait for the Roulette ball to spin, if you choose red and then the ball landed on the color The red you choose, take your money to win and vice versa, if you're not lucky the next round you can change the color, the process is the same.

Conclusion: Every gambling game has a risk, especially when you bet, so there is no imagination to get a lot of playing roulette, for that playing responsibly Answer, if you are unable to lose back, don't bring any strategy in gambling, there is no guarantee you can win.

[DaNNy001]

I don't really play roulette often but reading this almost made me believe that it can actually work lol... casino gambling doesn't have a pattern or strategy that can put you in profit... it's a game of chance and luck, when you play at the right timing you would get lucky..if this is something that can work a lot of gamblers would have made themselves financially stable with it... gamble for fun and enjoy the game

[Beparanf]

Success rate of 99% on 3000 times seems high suspicious since it’s less 50% winning chance because of the green(0) as potential outcome while we just talking about a 6 times lose streak here.

I encounter more than 6 lose streaks even on 60% winning percentage even if I bet randomly with the same manner of this experiment.

Casino will surely go bankrupt if the success rate of this strategy is 99%.