Has Anyone Tried This Red-Black Roulette Pattern Strategy?

[DragonSlots]

Design Created With ChatGPT

Hi, I would like to talk about a roulette strategy that I came across, and I'm hoping some of you can tell me if you’ve heard about it and whether it’s really profitable, or just a lie.
Well, it's a roulette strategy based on sequences and tested by AI. According to the roulette strategy tester (on youtube), the concept is based on following a fixed sequence of colors, which is: Red, Black, Red, Red, Black, Black. You start with a small bet, and if you lose, you increase your bet and move to the next color in the sequence. The goal is to recover losses and earn a small profit with each cycle.
Here’s a simple step-by-step of how it works:
You bet 1 unit on red
If you lose, bet 5 units on black
If you lose again, bet 25 units on red
If still losing, bet 50 units on red
Then 100 units on black
And if necessary, 200 units on the next bet
Until now, I'm not convinced, but I’ll complete my explanation... The roulette strategy tester said in the video that this strategy was simulated 3,000 times through AI, and the success win rate was around 99%, though I’m not sure if it’s the truth. Logically, any strategy that asks players to keep increasing their bets after consecutive losses doesn’t fall under my definition of responsible gambling. Well, that’s just my opinion!
This guy didn’t mention the name of the strategy. Has anyone tried these sequences before? Is there any secret behind them
P.S. I'm not encouraging you to follow this strategy, I just like sharing things I come across with you guys

[Charles-Tim]

The roulette strategy tester said in the video that this strategy was simulated 3,000 times through AI, and the success win rate was around 99%

Everyone will be cashing out money by now if this is true and gambling sites will go bankrupt.

What you explained is nothing more than martingale that many people on this forum have tried, especially when they are new to gambling. The end result is massive loss of money.

[bitbollo]

If I am not wrong, this is called "martingale" where a gambler double each bet (in case of a loss).
Well, I don't know how he has tested but this is one of the stupid think that can be done by a gambler since in the BEST option he will just recover initial wagering, in the worst he will loss likewise ALL.
It is really worth the risk? No of course no. Even note that he is gambling x200 starting from x1 in just 6 runs.
Totally crazy... this is not a strategy but just a lame way for betting. Also in this strategy they are not considering 0 (or 00). This means a clear 3% of negative chances not considered...

[MAAManda]

Honestly, I just heard about this strategy. But if we look at the basics, it's just a martingale strategy that requires players to keep doubling their bet size every time they lose. There are a lot of strategies out there & I've tried almost all of them, know how it went? It doesn't completely work. Gambling is a game of luck, no matter how much bankroll you have, if you don't have luck, it will all be gone in a matter of minutes, hours or days.

[Upgrade00]

I'm curious to know how much data was fed to the AI during those simulations and what AI program was used.
Any strategy requiring you to keep multiplying your stake is not recommended and will not work over time; when you calculate several rounds of following this strategy, you'll likely discover that the gambler is already at a loss, despite some isolated wims.

[Porfirii]

The fundamentals of this strategy are well known and have been discussed already several times in this forum in previous threads. And even if you mention AI as a novelty, in fact, there is no need for any complex AI to check that strategy: a simple calculator online will do the work.

I think that you have more chances of winning if you simply go all-in to the red or black, than if you follow any strategy like the one described. Of course, exceptions exist, but nobody should trust in systems like these to make guaranteed money: they simply don't exist.

[Fortify]

Hi, I would like to talk about a roulette strategy that I came across, and I'm hoping some of you can tell me if you’ve heard about it and whether it’s really profitable, or just a lie.
Well, it's a roulette strategy based on sequences and tested by AI. According to the roulette strategy tester (on youtube), the concept is based on following a fixed sequence of colors, which is: Red, Black, Red, Red, Black, Black. You start with a small bet, and if you lose, you increase your bet and move to the next color in the sequence. The goal is to recover losses and earn a small profit with each cycle.
Here’s a simple step-by-step of how it works:
You bet 1 unit on red
If you lose, bet 5 units on black
If you lose again, bet 25 units on red
If still losing, bet 50 units on red
Then 100 units on black
And if necessary, 200 units on the next bet
Until now, I'm not convinced, but I’ll complete my explanation... The roulette strategy tester said in the video that this strategy was simulated 3,000 times through AI, and the success win rate was around 99%, though I’m not sure if it’s the truth. Logically, any strategy that asks players to keep increasing their bets after consecutive losses doesn’t fall under my definition of responsible gambling. Well, that’s just my opinion!
This guy didn’t mention the name of the strategy. Has anyone tried these sequences before? Is there any secret behind them
P.S. I'm not encouraging you to follow this strategy, I just like sharing things I come across with you guys
[/center]

It seems that people who post "strategies" like this struggle with understanding how basic math works, it's an almost identical but even worse idea than the martingale "strategy" because you are going to lose your money at a much higher rate. The casino will always have deeper pockets than you and be able to outlast the highest bets that you could afford to make. You call them "units" but they are actually cents and dollars or equivalent currency, which hides the fact that you are throwing money into a game where any online guide will tell you the house has a built in advantage. So even if you did keep this double (or quadruple) down strategy going, they would still be taking a few percentage points away from your bet on each go. It's really poor form to call this a strategy, it's comparable to an army charging across an open field into machine gun fire - there's a tiny chance you'll win but it's more likely you'll get completely wiped out.

[mindrust]

It won’t work. If you think this works, go try it and become a millionaire or even a billionaire. Erase casinos out of existence. Clear them all out.

Why don’t you do it?

Because it won’t work and you know it that’s why.

If it was possible to win like that, everyone would do it and casinos would go out of business. Since casinos are still operating and printing money, your strategy is crap. (Like every other strategy)

[Agbamoni]

Until now, I'm not convinced, but I’ll complete my explanation... The roulette strategy tester said in the video that this strategy was simulated 3,000 times through AI, and the success win rate was around 99%, though I’m not sure if it’s the truth.

Seriously!. You believe the 99% success rate?

Don't trust that strategy because anything AI-tested is flawed. And there is no perfect way to test something that basically depends on luck and randomness. Online casinos will always have the hedge in long run not even the martingale strategy can help here.

[jas0190]

Nope doesn't work. There are no patterns in roulette other than after the fact. He's certainly lying about it having a 99% success rate but even if he's telling the truth, 3,000 spins is a laughably small sample size. It's just noise.

You would need to test it on like at least 100,000 spins, 1,000,000 more preferably but none of that is necessary because roulette is the most dead-simple game in the casino to figure out the math. You don't need to test, it's obvious. Not sure what AI would have to do with it, basic math doesn't change because it's AI. AI is just a dumb buzzword for people who don't know any better.

Whoever told you that is either a scammer or an idiot.

People claiming to have a roulette system is as old as the game. It's real simple to prove it, just go turn $100 into $1,000,000. That would be very easy to do with even a tiny edge but nobody can because it's impossible.

[swogerino]

That is plain stupid and AI is not mature enough to give us winning strategy, the ML or LLM are not enough feed to any of AI processors as of yet, they are all missing a lot of data from gambling and especially strategies in games of luck like martingale. We have talked a lot about martingale in this forum and in this very specific board and we have come to the conclusion, a huge majority of gamblers here that the only way martingale works is if you have unlimited balance and keep betting on the same outcome while doubling the bet. Another bad news is that in software controlled roulette like we play on online casinos there is no guarantee that if we bet 100 times on red one time it will come red otherwise we could have all beat the casino if we used a low enough initial bet, so real bottom line is martingale does not work unless used in perfect parallel universe where we have unlimited balance.

[stadus]

AI is definitely useful but if you start treating it like your personal gambling guru, that’s where things go sideways.

You really think casinos aren’t aware of those “magic” strategies? If they actually worked, people would be walking out of roulette tables rich every night. What you shared kinda sounds like a Martingale strategy and we all know how that ends for most.

I’d probably believe you more if you ran the experiment yourself and showed us it works... many times. At least that way, if it fails, it’s your wallet on the line not just theories.

[Julien_Olynpic]

It is interesting that the author describes the Martingale strategy, but does not name it directly. In addition, he does not know or hides the shortcomings of this strategy. And it is sad that artificial intelligence feeds the ignorance and naivety of the author. How can it be that the Martingale strategy is successful in 99% of cases out of 3000 simulated games? Even if this is so (although this is doubtful), in a real game, oddly enough, everything will be a little different. For some reason, real games are almost always different from those simulated in strategy testers. The first thing that will happen in a real game is a long series of seemingly incredible coincidences. For example, black will fall out 10-15-20 times. No matter how big your budget is, it will not cover such big losses. Unfortunately, this is reality.

[Mr. Magkaisa]

This is a good with small profit if you hit before you ran your pot out.
This is a very good strategy to gain back what you lose and earn a little from it.
But you can't rely on this as the cycle goes bigger and bigger.
To be honest, i use this strat in color game or th 50-50 chancec game. but there was a time that i hit X for 7 consecutive times end with a bankcrupt.

[hyudien]

..

This is the same as the martingale strategy and I am not sure that the success rate of winning reaches 99%, if it is shown for losses I might believe it, haha
basically continuing to double the bet on every loss will make you lose money quickly. For me this is not fun but ambition and maybe this strategy is only suitable for people with large capital.

[wakier]

In my opinion, this martingale strategy is very risky because we will continue to double the bet if we lose and hope to win the next bet, but if we continue to experience consecutive losses we will experience greater losses and this is quite bad for novice gamblers. For me, when playing roulette, I always use the same amount but alternately sometimes red and sometimes black and this is quite successful, I always get a profit even though it is a small amount, at least even though I lose it doesn't hurt me too much by not increasing the amount of the previous loss.

[viljy]

Until now, I'm not convinced, but I’ll complete my explanation... The roulette strategy tester said in the video that this strategy was simulated 3,000 times through AI, and the success win rate was around 99%, though I’m not sure if it’s the truth. Logically, any strategy that asks players to keep increasing their bets after consecutive losses doesn’t fall under my definition of responsible gambling. Well, that’s just my opinion!
This guy didn’t mention the name of the strategy. Has anyone tried these sequences before? Is there any secret behind them [/size]
P.S. I'm not encouraging you to follow this strategy, I just like sharing things I come across with you guys
[/center]

From a mathematical point of view, this "strategy" is nonsense. Actually, there's nothing more to say. Unless, why did the "Tester" "simulate" the games instead of testing them himself with his own money? Because he knows perfectly well that this is nonsense. And by the way, on what AI? If he used LLM, which are popular chatbots like GPT, Claude and others, then this can't cause anything but laughter, since they generally have a different purpose. If he has some kind of specialized model (like AlphaGo) for roulette, let him show this model on Hugging Face. If there is nothing like that, then this "tester" is just a charlatan.

[stompix]

Well, it's a roulette strategy based on sequences and tested by AI. According to the roulette strategy tester (on youtube), the concept is based on following a fixed sequence of colors, which is: Red, Black, Red, Red, Black, Black.

So, do you have a link to this, or are you inventing your own story to promote in disguise your casino under different topics and bend the rules of the board? Seriously, tone it down a bit!

Don't you realize how stupid this looks, a representative of a casino asking on a gambling forum if Martingale works?
Seriously? Seriously?

Seriously!. You believe the 99% success rate?
Don't trust that strategy because anything AI-tested is flawed. And there is no perfect way to test something that basically depends on luck and randomness. Online casinos will always have the hedge in long run not even the martingale strategy can help here.

The funny thing is that a 99% success rate is too low for martingale, especially such an exponential one as in this example, one wipeout and you're going to zero, you can win 1 million times $1 if you lose at one point 1 million, you're still going down to zero!
Martingale needs 100% win rates, on a loss on a single chain and it's game over, and nothing you have done previously matters.

So, no wonder this is written with AI by some 3$ per article freelancer, it's pure garbage!

[Hispo]

In my opinion, the fact we even dare to assure there is some pattern to be exploited while playing roulette is a complete contradiction to the theory of chaos and the laws of chances and entropy, so I don't think there is any science behind this. I am more inclined to believe this is some kind of social experiment or deceit being pulled off by someone on social media for the sake of getting view from people who should be know better when comes to casino games.

I would not dare to try this or any similar strategy, not matter whether it comes from a gambling guru or an artificial intelligence, not even mention there are some martingale elements on it, which makes it extra dangerous for one's bankroll.

[xenomorfo]

.

I assure you it doesn't work, this is the best way to lose a lot of money
it's called, if i remember correctly, martingale
you can't find a system to beat luck, it doesn't exist. Avoid using or sharing these systems that i assure you don't work. 100% not works and you lost everything