🔥 Cave0x — The Ultimate Crypto Gambling Directory | Earn $2 for Each Submission

[Zoomic]

Welcome to the forum.
If you don't mind, you can get a copper membership so that you will be able to display images and make your announcement thread more appealing.
I have visited your site on mobile phone and it looks complex. I might be wrong because I have seen people applauding you here, but from my end I think it's not a simple design.

What criteria do you use to list casinos in your site. We want to be sure any casino listed in your site is legit and not money influenced.

[cave0x]

Thank you for your interest — the amount of discussion in our thread shows that we’re moving in the right direction.

According to the owner, they are currently adding new sites, and they are manually reviewing those casinos. They will later check those websites by playing and testing withdrawals as well. Also, when they launch the 2nd version of their website, users will be able to report anything, such as the website is not operating, scam, or other things.

I found this initiative as unique. I haven't seen such website before. So, I expect them to stay around and I think I will be one of their regular user. I hope they won't close the website suddenly.

Honestly that seems like a lot of manual work! Also spending this much money without any profit doesn't seem right. In the future it would be hard to keep up with the expenses without any revenue generating from the site. They must need some sorts of sponsor or ads to able to survive. 

I don't believe them to be unique in any way. Similar sites already exists and even better. For example casino guru. You can get all the information you need from that site. So my question is why would user want to use a site that only offers a little much information? I understand they are new and in their beta phase. But without in depth information it would be hard for them to attract visitors.

Our project is still in its early stages, and for now, we’re fully self-funded and able to continue without sponsorship. That being said, this doesn’t mean there won’t be ads or partnerships in the future. But our primary goal is to establish ourselves in this niche and build a truly valuable platform.

Casino Guru and similar websites have been around for years — it would be unrealistic to assume we could outdo them right away. Right now, our website provides the essential minimum of information for users who are specifically interested in crypto-only gambling platforms. In our view, the two most critical factors are:
(1) whether a project requires KYC, and
(2) how fast withdrawals are.

What sets Cave0x apart is that we personally test and verify every platform before listing it.
Most casino directories like Casino Guru or AskGamblers publish information provided directly by the casinos themselves, which often turns out to be inaccurate — especially when it comes to withdrawal times.
We created Cave0x to address exactly this issue. And yes, we are still in the beta phase — more data and features will be added over time.

Welcome to the forum.
If you don't mind, you can get a copper membership so that you will be able to display images and make your announcement thread more appealing.
I have visited your site on mobile phone and it looks complex. I might be wrong because I have seen people applauding you here, but from my end I think it's not a simple design.

What criteria do you use to list casinos in your site. We want to be sure any casino listed in your site is legit and not money influenced.

As for the mobile version — you’re right. The current site is not fully optimized for mobile, but that will change once we launch the new version.

For now, we use two simple but important criteria:
Does the project actually pay out? And if so, how quickly?
You can rest assured that no project in our list has paid us to be included.

[God Of Thunder]

I don't believe them to be unique in any way. Similar sites already exists and even better. For example casino guru. You can get all the information you need from that site. So my question is why would user want to use a site that only offers a little much information? I understand they are new and in their beta phase. But without in depth information it would be hard for them to attract visitors.

Why do you even compare them with Casino.Guru? Casino.guru is a mediator company and has a different target audience. Casino.guru lists all the casinos while Cave0x is exclusive for crypto users only. You know what? Even casino guru has listed around 600 crypto casino and rest of them are fiat casinos. Cave0x has already listed more than 800 projects.

One more thing is, Cave0x is community driven website and people even make money by submitting new casinos. Don't you see any differences? They have a different goal. Specifically I found their website useful for me.

[DYING_S0UL]

I don't believe them to be unique in any way. Similar sites already exists and even better. For example casino guru. You can get all the information you need from that site. So my question is why would user want to use a site that only offers a little much information? I understand they are new and in their beta phase. But without in depth information it would be hard for them to attract visitors.

Why do you even compare them with Casino.Guru? Casino.guru is a mediator company and has a different target audience. Casino.guru lists all the casinos while Cave0x is exclusive for crypto users only. You know what? Even casino guru has listed around 600 crypto casino and rest of them are fiat casinos. Cave0x has already listed more than 800 projects.

One more thing is, Cave0x is community driven website and people even make money by submitting new casinos. Don't you see any differences? They have a different goal. Specifically I found their website useful for me.

Chill man, don't get all hyped up. It was just a constructive criticism. My two sats actually....

Btw what did you meant by community driven? I haven't noticed any kind of social media links in their ANN page.

What sets Cave0x apart is that we personally test and verify every platform before listing it.

Quite expensive and time consuming I suppose. 

[Zoomic]

Welcome to the forum.
If you don't mind, you can get a copper membership so that you will be able to display images and make your announcement thread more appealing.
I have visited your site on mobile phone and it looks complex. I might be wrong because I have seen people applauding you here, but from my end I think it's not a simple design.

What criteria do you use to list casinos in your site. We want to be sure any casino listed in your site is legit and not money influenced.

As for the mobile version — you’re right. The current site is not fully optimized for mobile, but that will change once we launch the new version.

For now, we use two simple but important criteria:
Does the project actually pay out? And if so, how quickly?
You can rest assured that no project in our list has paid us to be included.

Good that we are expecting another version to be launched. The developers should pay more attention to mobile responsiveness as you know that the majority of the internet users are on their mobile phones.

The two criteria are cool;
But then, your team should also have a follow up. A casino that paid out quickly today is not a guarantee that they will keep paying out quickly. Some changes on the way.

[joeperry]

One good thing I like about your directory is how you manually review each gambling site and that you don't include your own referral to the site unlike other directories. I was wondering what could be the other info you going to add? Maybe like the minimum deposit or minimum withdrawal, aside from KYC this is one of the things a player like me are looking for as some casinos don't have minimum deposit but have a little bit high withdrawal requirement.

Aside from that looking forward fore more info like (risky, neutral, safe) gambling site info from you (based on your assessment of course).

[God Of Thunder]

Chill man, don't get all hyped up. It was just a constructive criticism. My two sats actually....

I am chilling man, you didn't get my tone.

Btw what did you meant by community driven? I haven't noticed any kind of social media links in their ANN page.

Don't you think Bitcointalk is a community? Also, they may consider their users as a community. Since the users of this website is basically adding the new websites, and they will be able to suggest updates like, site down, closed or other updates, of course they can claim themself as a community driven service. Or maybe I am getting it wrong?

[CoffeeSipper64]

Is there any way that the users can see the newly added projects for example , in this long long list?

For example if I visited the site the previous week and I visit it again today , there should be about 30sites/projects added.

How is the user supposed to spot them amongst the previous 860projects that one has already reviewed?

[DYING_S0UL]

Chill man, don't get all hyped up. It was just a constructive criticism. My two sats actually....

I am chilling man, you didn't get my tone.

Btw what did you meant by community driven? I haven't noticed any kind of social media links in their ANN page.

Don't you think Bitcointalk is a community? Also, they may consider their users as a community. Since the users of this website is basically adding the new websites, and they will be able to suggest updates like, site down, closed or other updates, of course they can claim themself as a community driven service. Or maybe I am getting it wrong?

Maybe lol. These days I can't figure out anyone anymore.

I didn't realize you meant bitcointalk. I thought you meant something like discord channel or telegram community with a large userbase.

Is there any way that the users can see the newly added projects for example , in this long long list?
For example if I visited the site the previous week and I visit it again today , there should be about 30sites/projects added.
How is the user supposed to spot them amongst the previous 860projects that one has already reviewed?

Actually that's a good idea. The Cave0x team should consider including the date of adding a site to their platform. As well as a option to sort out the sites according to older to newer and visa versa.

[virasog]

Actually that's a good idea. The Cave0x team should consider including the date of adding a site to their platform. As well as a option to sort out the sites according to older to newer and visa versa.

Adding the date as when the project is added, will surely help to find out the new projects much easily specially for those who are regularly visiting the site. As of now, is there any order in the sites the added, i mean if the latest sites are added on the top or at the bottom?

Secondly, I like the initiative that you have started, that anyone who submits a new crypto gambling site will earn $ 2$. Obviously, this will help find many new sites and already the list has grown to 919. I will suggest that they expand this to crypto-related sites and not just the gambling ones. This way, we will come to know about the many new marketplaces or services using crypto. 

[DYING_S0UL]

Actually that's a good idea. The Cave0x team should consider including the date of adding a site to their platform. As well as a option to sort out the sites according to older to newer and visa versa.

Adding the date as when the project is added, will surely help to find out the new projects much easily specially for those who are regularly visiting the site. As of now, is there any order in the sites the added, i mean if the latest sites are added on the top or at the bottom?

Secondly, I like the initiative that you have started, that anyone who submits a new crypto gambling site will earn $ 2$. Obviously, this will help find many new sites and already the list has grown to 919. I will suggest that they expand this to crypto-related sites and not just the gambling ones. This way, we will come to know about the many new marketplaces or services using crypto. 

I'm guessing they are adding the sites in order (newer on the very top). I am saying this because I saw some well known gambling sites (not gonna mention them, don't wanna look like a shiller), and they were not previously there but when I visited the site again, I saw they were already listed. Someone must have submitted those sites and they got listed.

The ANN title says their current goal "Ultimate Crypto Gambling Directory".

[cave0x]

One good thing I like about your directory is how you manually review each gambling site and that you don't include your own referral to the site unlike other directories. I was wondering what could be the other info you going to add? Maybe like the minimum deposit or minimum withdrawal, aside from KYC this is one of the things a player like me are looking for as some casinos don't have minimum deposit but have a little bit high withdrawal requirement.

Aside from that looking forward fore more info like (risky, neutral, safe) gambling site info from you (based on your assessment of course).

You’re absolutely right — minimum deposit and withdrawal amounts, as well as things like wagering requirements, are just as important to players as withdrawal speed and KYC policies. Unfortunately, we realized this a bit late. We can guarantee that wager requirements, minimum deposit, and withdrawal info will be included on our updated website. However, implementing this on the current version is more difficult, though we’ll try to introduce it as soon as possible.

Regarding risk level — this is inherently subjective. Some users might agree with our assessment, while others may criticize it. Still, we already mark projects as “High Risk” if we encounter clear red flags, such as deposits not arriving, withdrawals being denied, unreasonable KYC requirements, or other signs of potentially problematic behavior.

Is there any way that the users can see the newly added projects for example , in this long long list?

For example if I visited the site the previous week and I visit it again today , there should be about 30sites/projects added.

How is the user supposed to spot them amongst the previous 860projects that one has already reviewed?

At the moment, newly approved projects are added to the end of the list, which we agree is not very user-friendly. We plan to fix this soon — thank you for the suggestion.

Actually that's a good idea. The Cave0x team should consider including the date of adding a site to their platform. As well as a option to sort out the sites according to older to newer and visa versa.

Adding the date as when the project is added, will surely help to find out the new projects much easily specially for those who are regularly visiting the site. As of now, is there any order in the sites the added, i mean if the latest sites are added on the top or at the bottom?

Secondly, I like the initiative that you have started, that anyone who submits a new crypto gambling site will earn $ 2$. Obviously, this will help find many new sites and already the list has grown to 919. I will suggest that they expand this to crypto-related sites and not just the gambling ones. This way, we will come to know about the many new marketplaces or services using crypto. 

As mentioned earlier, sorting functionality will be added, although not with exact timestamps or dates. First, it’s technically harder to implement on the current site, and second, the date we add a project does not reflect the age of the project itself.

Expanding into other crypto-related websites is an interesting idea, but we first need to organize and improve the core focus of our platform — crypto gambling projects — before branching out.

[DYING_S0UL]

but we first need to organize and improve the core focus of our platform — crypto gambling projects — before branching out.

Some of the listed sites doesn't contain any kind of informations. No KYC requirements nor the withdrawal time. Better fix those.
At the same time, I don't see why the user needs to provide their telegram/discord account in order to contact you guys. The platform should have their own user support like telegram, discord, simpleX, social media handle or forum representative like the one here, etc. I believe it's better that way!

[Haunebu]

Some of the filters like KYC and withdrawal time are extremely variable filters op since they tend to change based on different factors/reasons for literally all of the sites that your team listed.

For example, a site like 1xbit does KYC their customers excluding the fact that they are scammers. Y'all should have chosen more reliable and consistent filters instead.

[Airwalker10]

Do you accept poker sites ?

 

[goldkingcoiner]

interesting website.

If I might add a suggestion that may prove to be a bit more profitable to you: Instead of linking directly to the online gambling casinos, why not use your own referral links? That way you can make some money if somebody uses your link and signs up with an account for gambling.

Otherwise my only other suggestions are: Be careful not to include any scam/phishing websites. Also, the green color of the website is a bit vivid and strange; maybe add shading?

[gunhell16]

Welcome to the forum.
If you don't mind, you can get a copper membership so that you will be able to display images and make your announcement thread more appealing.
I have visited your site on mobile phone and it looks complex. I might be wrong because I have seen people applauding you here, but from my end I think it's not a simple design.

What criteria do you use to list casinos in your site. We want to be sure any casino listed in your site is legit and not money influenced.

As for the mobile version — you’re right. The current site is not fully optimized for mobile, but that will change once we launch the new version.

For now, we use two simple but important criteria:
Does the project actually pay out? And if so, how quickly?
You can rest assured that no project in our list has paid us to be included.

Good that we are expecting another version to be launched. The developers should pay more attention to mobile responsiveness as you know that the majority of the internet users are on their mobile phones.

The two criteria are cool;
But then, your team should also have a follow up. A casino that paid out quickly today is not a guarantee that they will keep paying out quickly. Some changes on the way.

Yes, you're right there dude, because in this era, more people are using mobile devices, and they are the main target for games like this, and the internet is everywhere,
so the community can avail it anytime they want actually.

So, I hope their team can better organize the more appropriate ones for the sake of their users on their platform website so that they can support
them even more now and in the near future as well.

[Airwalker10]

10 new site added

[Koadharber]

interesting website.

If I might add a suggestion that may prove to be a bit more profitable to you: Instead of linking directly to the online gambling casinos, why not use your own referral links? That way you can make some money if somebody uses your link and signs up with an account for gambling.

Otherwise my only other suggestions are: Be careful not to include any scam/phishing websites. Also, the green color of the website is a bit vivid and strange; maybe add shading?

People wont care about whether making use of referral or affiliate links into their links specially on what they've been posted or shared up or just like this on having that directory. The only problem that we can possibly see on here is that we wont be able filter out into those entries on which it might be ending up into those shady casinos that might be listed.

I do agree with some users been saying that we should be that careful on still dealing up with the sites being listed not unless if admin will be having that approval in speaking about legitimacy check or something.
We do know that it will be just that too hard for you to see those inputs 1 by 1. This is the only thing on which im that concerned on with.

[Airwalker10]

Thank you so much for your quick review and fast payment — you’re truly the best.