Why PvPvE Games Like Elderglade Could Be the Future of Crypto Gaming

[Phoenixtrader]

Elderglade is quickly becoming one of the hottest GameFi projects out there — and it’s not just hype.

It’s an AI-powered, retro-style online game that mixes PvP and PvE looter gameplay in a fresh way. But what really makes it stand out is the ecosystem built around its token, $ELDE

Here’s why people are paying attention:

* It’s growing faster than Axie Infinity, Pixels, and STEPN combined
* The game is already making $1M to $2M in revenue every month
* It has handled over 3.7 million transactions
* The potential market is huge — over $150 billion
* $ELDE powers the whole ecosystem sitting at $83m mcap rn


With strong numbers and real user activity, Elderglade looks like more than just another GameFi project. They seem to be building something serious. What do you think? Or are you familiar with their ecosystem?

[Taskford]

Elderglade is quickly becoming one of the hottest GameFi projects out there — and it’s not just hype.

It’s an AI-powered, retro-style online game that mixes PvP and PvE looter gameplay in a fresh way. But what really makes it stand out is the ecosystem built around its token, $ELDE

Here’s why people are paying attention:

* It’s growing faster than Axie Infinity, Pixels, and STEPN combined
* The game is already making $1M to $2M in revenue every month
* It has handled over 3.7 million transactions
* The potential market is huge — over $150 billion
* $ELDE powers the whole ecosystem sitting at $83m mcap rn

With strong numbers and real user activity, Elderglade looks like more than just another GameFi project. They seem to be building something serious. What do you think? Or are you familiar with their ecosystem?

They are far to became the next Axie and even if they succeed at this point still there's no guarantee that it will last long even if they show promising progress.

Lots of NFT's already undergo in that process and claims to be that they are more bigger than Axie, but all of them is already gone but that top NFT game still surviving. Although I don't encourage anyone to try Axie since I believe they are also done at this point since I don't think that there players still profitable knowing that there are lots of changes happened that affect the profitability of their players.

But let see what Elderglade could offer and also if they could even last at least  for one year.

[Phoenixtrader]

Elderglade is quickly becoming one of the hottest GameFi projects out there — and it’s not just hype.

It’s an AI-powered, retro-style online game that mixes PvP and PvE looter gameplay in a fresh way. But what really makes it stand out is the ecosystem built around its token, $ELDE

Here’s why people are paying attention:

* It’s growing faster than Axie Infinity, Pixels, and STEPN combined
* The game is already making $1M to $2M in revenue every month
* It has handled over 3.7 million transactions
* The potential market is huge — over $150 billion
* $ELDE powers the whole ecosystem sitting at $83m mcap rn

With strong numbers and real user activity, Elderglade looks like more than just another GameFi project. They seem to be building something serious. What do you think? Or are you familiar with their ecosystem?

They are far to became the next Axie and even if they succeed at this point still there's no guarantee that it will last long even if they show promising progress.

Lots of NFT's already undergo in that process and claims to be that they are more bigger than Axie, but all of them is already gone but that top NFT game still surviving. Although I don't encourage anyone to try Axie since I believe they are also done at this point since I don't think that there players still profitable knowing that there are lots of changes happened that affect the profitability of their players.

But let see what Elderglade could offer and also if they could even last at least  for one year.

Let's see, but preliminary bias is bullish and from my writeup you can see they're doing well statistically. Beating AXIE isn't a small feat but if they continue growing, innovating and gaining exposure from their partners and users.. they could really do well imo.

[dumpsterhawk]

It’s an AI-powered, retro-style online game that mixes PvP and PvE looter gameplay in a fresh way. But what really makes it stand out is the ecosystem built around its token, $ELDE

This already tells you that it is a bad project that uses cheap buzzwords to generate hype. There is no reason for a game to use blockchain technology at all, and the wider gaming industry does not care about that at all.

With strong numbers and real user activity, Elderglade looks like more than just another GameFi project. They seem to be building something serious. What do you think? Or are you familiar with their ecosystem?

Just another lazy idea that was copied from other places. Strong pass as an investment.

[gunhell16]

How can you say that Elde is growing faster than Axie when it has not yet become a trending or talked about issue in the crypto space, unlike Axie, which in its time was really noisy
and talked about in various parts of the world?

What has Elde proven that you are saying that it is? Because I have only just heard of this coin, to be honest, so I do not believe that it will surpass Axie, maybe it will surpass
what Axie has really done in this field of the cryptocurrency business industry.

[jaberwock]

This already tells you that it is a bad project that uses cheap buzzwords to generate hype.

I had the same impression earlier. How many times we will see a project or an approach like this? They can be good at the start but later on, they always fail. But knowing that pattern can allow us to ride them for a short period of time.

There is no reason for a game to use blockchain technology at all, and the wider gaming industry does not care about that at all.

You got a point here. I mean the other is mainly for financial purposes and the other is simply for gaming or entertainment purposes. Many have attempted to mixed them but we already witness the result. Both aren't just compatible with each other. There are still games that are Blockchain based that are successful. I'm talking about the ones that we see in a casino but still, they are not the same to the video games that we know. And the main use of Blockchain on them is to make the game more fairer or transparent, which make sense since they are under a casino. 

[markm]

There is no reason for a game to use blockchain technology at all, and the wider gaming industry does not care about that at all.

You got a point here. I mean the other is mainly for financial purposes and the other is simply for gaming or entertainment purposes. Many have attempted to mixed them but we already witness the result. Both aren't just compatible with each other. There are still games that are Blockchain based that are successful. I'm talking about the ones that we see in a casino but still, they are not the same to the video games that we know. And the main use of Blockchain on them is to make the game more fairer or transparent, which make sense since they are under a casino.  

I do not at all feel or think that they aren't compatible with each other.

Crypto seems to provide a possibility of imbuing game assets with "intrinsic" value, for example.

A magic sword constructed out of crypto coins, such as bitcoins, could be worth at least as much as the bitcoins it is composed of, provided some kind of scrapping or smelting or recycling skill available to characters could deconstruct it into its underlying ingredients.

Crypto seems also to at least tease with an idea that if done right it ought to be possible to help whatever coins one uses in the game to appreciate in value.

Thinking about that though it occurs to me that the type of market one often sees in games, in which one sees per buy or sell offer which character or faction or guild or race or whatever is making the offer, could help with that, since for instance it could allow rewarding players for having buy offers in place being as how it can tell which offers are whose.

A different kind of staking maybe, in a way, where your huge column of buy offers supporting the price and providing cushioning against "dumpers" gets rewarded.

Games often show who each offer is being made by because often players would prefer to buy from allies than from enemies, things like that.

-MarkM-

[el kaka22]

While it might be "good" enough for you, obviously the marketcap says that it is not good enough. "Growing" is just another name for saying it is so small that pump is easier. Making 1-2 million revenue isn't that big and I still highly doubt it even makes that.

So we can safely say that it is going to be very tough for this game to grow. I have played many games on SOL, this means I know what I am talking about and I can tell you that I have played games with 40+ million revenue in a single month and still ended up being bad so it is clear that we are not going to get this be a bad situation. If we can focus on how to make this work, so this game will be bad, because it is already not good and can2t grow bigger than all those other names.

[dumpsterhawk]

There is no reason for a game to use blockchain technology at all, and the wider gaming industry does not care about that at all.

You got a point here. I mean the other is mainly for financial purposes and the other is simply for gaming or entertainment purposes. Many have attempted to mixed them but we already witness the result. Both aren't just compatible with each other. There are still games that are Blockchain based that are successful. I'm talking about the ones that we see in a casino but still, they are not the same to the video games that we know. And the main use of Blockchain on them is to make the game more fairer or transparent, which make sense since they are under a casino.  

I do not at all feel or think that they aren't compatible with each other.

Crypto seems to provide a possibility of imbuing game assets with "intrinsic" value, for example.

This makes the game worse, not better. Have you not noticed that the inclusion of real money into games has caused a massive deterioration in quality? Quality games are rare compared to the total amount of games being released. Also, I didn't say that they are not compatible I said that the gaming industry does not care about it. You can see this by asking in gaming circles whether they want to see games based on blockchain technology, NFTs or so on. You will maybe even get banned for asking, that is how much they hate it.