Gig workers — employees or employers?

[Stella Mese]

Is being a gig worker worth all the cons mentioned? or do you still find being a traditional employee more appealing?

but I think freelancer will be more perfect to run, because it will provide a lot of desired time space and wider in providing more income to enjoy, which of course must master a variety of work in running it. it is much better to give the impression that is not boring in taking a profession as a freelancer. but for some people it is very burdensome.

[coin-investor]

Is being a gig worker worth all the cons mentioned? or do you still find being a traditional employee more appealing?

It depends on the industry you are working in, whether you are good at what you do, and whether there are few gig workers with high demand. In such cases, you can command a reasonable price. If you're a gig worker, you have to check the industry and reassess yourself.
Usually, gigs are work that you love to do, but if in your assessment, it cannot provide your basic needs, then you have to work as a traditional employee and do your gigs during a weekend, or if you have more free time.

[shinratensei_]

Is being a gig worker worth all the cons mentioned? or do you still find being a traditional employee more appealing?

Can't deny for most of people traditional employee is the more appealing option because it's more stable.
Gig can land you big money if you're hard working enough but the instability is what keeps people from doing this, also the living expenses disparity between developed and developing country is a concern since they can offer same service for significantly less money. You're essentially competing in an unfair competition.

[yhiaali3]

The answer to your question: Are temporary workers employees or employers? Of course, they are employers not employees. We can call them temporary employees because they perform temporary work, get paid and that's it.

As for which is better, temporary work or a job, the answer varies from person to person. Some people are better suited to freelancing, while others are only suited to jobs. This depends on the individual's situation and skills. However, for me, I prefer freelancing to a job.

[Reatim]

Is being a gig worker worth all the cons mentioned? or do you still find being a traditional employee more appealing?

Can't deny for most of people traditional employee is the more appealing option because it's more stable.
Gig can land you big money if you're hard working enough but the instability is what keeps people from doing this, also the living expenses disparity between developed and developing country is a concern since they can offer same service for significantly less money. You're essentially competing in an unfair competition.

i believe it also depends a lot on what kind of skills do you have

you can't really expect someone who graduated with a nursing degree to be part of the gig economy as they have graduated and are fit for white collar jobs but if someone learned skills like vulcanizing, or web developers then most likely you are to find yourself in a gig economy

[Helena Yu]

No, it is more complicated than that with gig work. If you are trying to start as a freelancer, quantity is currently winning. Websites are saturated with workers. Quality works well in a competitive situation but only if you are already an established worker. The current situation with this kind of work is that it makes it very difficult for someone new to start, regardless of their quality of work. Clients are scared of low quality work, and naturally prefer to pay less. Are they going to hire you, a quality worker with no reviews for $100 or one of the 50 other offers that ask $20 each. 

You're correct at some point.

The higher quantity, the higher the experience and portfolio. But, if they can show their unpaid portfolio, I would consider to hire them. I ever looking for artists to draw for me, the experienced one is usually better. But, not all inexperienced artists are bad, as long as they can show few of their previous drawing.

you can't really expect someone who graduated with a nursing degree to be part of the gig economy as they have graduated and are fit for white collar jobs but if someone learned skills like vulcanizing, or web developers then most likely you are to find yourself in a gig economy

Why? they actually can offer home care. Not all patients can go to hospital, some of them willing to pay extra as long as the nurse can go to their home and give treatment.

[viljy]

From a global point of view, the emergence of such a class of workers was due to the systematic continuing destruction of the middle class. Such workers can be called freelancers or gig workers, but they all make up the Precariat class, the main characteristic of which is unstable employment and, as a result, unstable existence. This class is very convenient for exploitation by the rich, since the Precariat is very fragmented and cannot unite (for example, in trade unions), unlike ordinary full-time employees, and therefore does not pose a threat.

Therefore, such a work activity for an ordinary person is definitely worse than traditional full-time employment, since it is impossible to project the creative activities of individual talents (writers, musicians, artists) onto the general public and structure their regular work according to the principles of creative activity. However, this is very convenient for the ruling class, which is why this phenomenon will continue.

[AbuBhakar]

Is being a gig worker worth all the cons mentioned? or do you still find being a traditional employee more appealing?

It really depends on the person's own preference. My mother always says it's always better being a traditional employee since you have many benefits when you retire but for me, I prefer to have control of my time so I chose to be a gig worker or what I call freelancer. You can find jobs online now with the right skillset and you can even earn more than what your country's minimum wage if you live in Asian country.

As for the benefits, you can voluntary apply for it and pay them yourself. Not all mandatory deductions of a regular employee is worth paying for me because here in our country it just goes to the corrupt government. Being a gig-worker, I don't feel that I am a mouse running on an endless wheel. With my current job, I have proper life-work balance.

[gunhell16]

The answer to your question: Are temporary workers employees or employers? Of course, they are employers not employees. We can call them temporary employees because they perform temporary work, get paid and that's it.

As for which is better, temporary work or a job, the answer varies from person to person. Some people are better suited to freelancing, while others are only suited to jobs. This depends on the individual's situation and skills. However, for me, I prefer freelancing to a job.

Most people in this era are more confident in being employed until they are old, because they are used to it and they prefer those who have a secure job and pay every month or twice a month. They rarely or only rarely want to work temporarily.

Because there are others who just use their employment as a stepping stone to their desire to have their own business in the near future and when they are up to speed,
they will decide if they want to let go of their employment.

[indah rezqi]

The answer to your question: Are temporary workers employees or employers? Of course, they are employers not employees. We can call them temporary employees because they perform temporary work, get paid and that's it.

As for which is better, temporary work or a job, the answer varies from person to person. Some people are better suited to freelancing, while others are only suited to jobs. This depends on the individual's situation and skills. However, for me, I prefer freelancing to a job.

Most people in this era are more confident in being employed until they are old, because they are used to it and they prefer those who have a secure job and pay every month or twice a month. They rarely or only rarely want to work temporarily.

Because there are others who just use their employment as a stepping stone to their desire to have their own business in the near future and when they are up to speed,
they will decide if they want to let go of their employment.

If given a choice, everyone would certainly choose to have their own business, and open up employment opportunities to others. However, everyone life journey is certainly different, sometimes let alone opening their own business, being an employee with a permanent job is very difficult in today era. The situation demands that they continue to be employees until they are old, we know that is beyond everyone wishes. Luckily, if at this time, we have a permanent job in addition to having a side job. One day, when we have the capital to open our own business, we can stop working for others. Usually people who have gone through the process of going through various stages, when they open their own business, they will find it easier to develop their business.

[Alphakilo]

Is being a gig worker worth all the cons mentioned? or do you still find being a traditional employee more appealing?

Well for people who have many years of experience in a particular field they wouldn't mind being a gig worker because these people are almost likely to want to start their own organization but are unable to. Gig workers can make more money in few months than they used to do in a yearly when they worked the traditional jobs.
Gig workers have more flexibility and more work-life balance which is what the traditional employee craves for. And lastly, it is worth it.

[harapan]

Okay if I get you correctly you're more or less talking about people that get involved in things that seems like a remote jobs, where they feel at the comfort of their home to render services to people that needs them. I think there's so much money in this work but the only thing that can separate it  from the rest is that you have much time to spend and there's no much spare time for you to rest due to the work load or something.

[Alpha Marine]

Is being a gig worker worth all the cons mentioned? or do you still find being a traditional employee more appealing?

For the employee, I think it's worth it. At the beginning, it may be difficult when you're not getting enough gigs, but as time goes on, if you remain consistent and keep getting better, you will get a lot of better-paying gigs, so that's not exactly a problem. All you need to work on is the discipline and drive to work hard unsupervised.

For the employer, it may not be worth it if your employee is difficult to work with. If they probably don't work hard enough, don't communicate well or are not understanding, it can be an issue, but if the employee is good, there's no big deal. Calls (audio and video), text or emails will solve whatever problems you people or whatever discussion that is needed.

[cabron]

When you are in this gig economy for some time, you get used to it that it becomes your 2nd or 3rd job anymore. Often times these guys works part time somewhere else. I know a guys who just visit the apartment next to me as his job is just to throw the garbage, taking them out from each apartment in the building.

But morning that day also he works with the pest control company for hours.

[Kelward]

The question whether a gig worker is an employer or employee depends whether it includes the gig worker to hire people to get the job done. If the gig hires assistants he becomes an employer, if not he is an employee of his client. It should be emphasized that the gig employee or employer status is for a short term. If gigs can earn you sufficient incomes and you are always getting new gigs or renewing contracts I will say that it's better than having a permanent  job that keeps you in a place. If you are your own boss you'll have more opportunities to grow because you're also an entrepreneur.

[traderethereum]

It still worth but with term and conditions that the employees should have a good skill and improve it time to time. He will have more jobs and earn more money. During his work, he may seen many new things from his client request but if he willing to learn and finish the request, more clients will come to him.

The new era is start and people can work by online and not just depend on a traditional company. They can search for the opportunities on the Internet while they can also search by offline. If they can search the opportunities and not give up, they will have a chance to earn money. Don't stop what you believe but still do that because you will not know how long you will through the process and making money.

[hyudien]

Is being a gig worker worth all the cons mentioned? or do you still find being a traditional employee more appealing?

Each type of job you choose has its own advantages and disadvantages so there is no definite answer to this but if possible choose both or if you have to choose one choose the one that suits your wishes, there are some people who are more satisfied and productive as odd jobs while others are more suited to conventional work because it provides stability, in my personal experience I have tried both and now only work odd jobs not because I don't want to work conventionally but in this day and age to get a job is quite difficult in my country, companies now include high quality criteria for applicants plus the competition is increasing.

[summonerrk]

The term 'gig' originated from musicians to refer to the performances they are paid to do. Gigs are typically short-term temporary jobs. Gig workers are usually paid not on contract but based on project done or sometimes by hourly work.

During the pandemic, the gig economy rose significantly. We saw an influx of gig workers since almost everyone was laid off from their jobs and had to find something to do remotely. Now, it has almost became the norm. The pros of being a gig worker is you control your time. You do not need to clock in or clock out. No need to leave the comfort of your own house. You have more flexibility as long as you meet the terms of the project.

But we can't forget about the cons as well. Gig workers are essentially both the employee and the employer. They provide their own material or equipment to be used for their jobs. They are the ones to take care of employee benefits like healthcare insurance. Legal expenses are also their burden. One of the biggest factors of being a gig worker is its instability. Unlike employees, you are not contracted for a long time. So if you fail to find a job for a certain amount of time, you will not be earning anything.

Is being a gig worker worth all the cons mentioned? or do you still find being a traditional employee more appealing?

In the modern world, you should not be afraid to look for part-time jobs and get the maximum amount of knowledge that may be needed tomorrow in a dynamically developing world. Even in poor countries, you can learn to program or draw, and this does not require large investments, but only perseverance and talent, and then you can get a remote job and receive a salary from a rich country. But you should not fall for the bait of those who are now advertising courses, because all courses are crap. The task of training courses is only to shake money out of you and give a stupid diploma that the employer will not need.

[kotajikikox]

From a global point of view, the emergence of such a class of workers was due to the systematic continuing destruction of the middle class. Such workers can be called freelancers or gig workers, but they all make up the Precariat class, the main characteristic of which is unstable employment and, as a result, unstable existence. This class is very convenient for exploitation by the rich, since the Precariat is very fragmented and cannot unite (for example, in trade unions), unlike ordinary full-time employees, and therefore does not pose a threat.

That is why companies now often target gig workers because they get the same quality of work without having to be fully responsible for the employees. They do not need to give the workers any benefits aside from the pre agreed amount of salary. No mistreatment of employees = no trade unions to worry about.

[WatChe]

Is being a gig worker worth all the cons mentioned? or do you still find being a traditional employee more appealing?

The advantage of working as freelancer is that your income grow exponentially means more you work, more you earn and your skill set increases with time. Once you start working as gig worker, you explore more things on which you can offer your services. But it's easier said than done, a gig worker need to work all the time and be ready to accept work all the time. There are no fixed working hours unlike in 9 to 5 job.

To me both traditional employee and gig workers have there own pros and cons, there is no fixed answer about which profession is best. I am following a hybrid model in which I do a job along with freelancing in spare time and that worked well for me.