Bitcoin Forum
January 14, 2026, 06:21:48 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 30.2 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 [14]  All
  Print  
Author Topic: Bitcoin in the next decade  (Read 2937 times)
betswift
Copper Member
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 672
Merit: 11


View Profile
Today at 01:20:11 PM
 #261


The worst part is, the core reason for the bitcoin creation is beginning to feel less important in the mind of the today's people. I mean, only few persons care about decentralization probably because they've been blinded by the fiat system for too long that they fail to grasp the importance of a decentralized currency. Aside the risk of getting scammed via p2p to buy or sell i don't see any reason for making use of a centralized exchange when you know that you'll be anti-decentralizing your bitcoin investment with the current regulations by the government on exchanges.  In a decade from now, I fear what the faith of bitcoin would be as regard decentralization or immunity from a third party's dealings. The regulation and tax implementation might result to a discouraging approach to DCA strategy on small capital investors, especially when they are taxed when buying and selling Bitcoin.
Strike CEO Jack Mallers in a press meeting highlighted that being the top holder of bitcoin is his goal this year, we dont know for sure what other institutions are planning but the idea of compelling everyone to comply to KYC in other to buy or sell in the future is very realistic.

DEXes are the way out, as well as the cold storages which are set up probably.

No matter what, we should be ready for any kind of development regarding the regulations.

SilentEcho
Copper Member
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4
Merit: 8


View Profile
Today at 03:01:31 PM
 #262

I feel like we’re losing Bitcoin’s soul—Decentralization and Privacy—just for a higher price tag. Most newcomers don’t care about the tech anymore; they’re just here for the "Number Go Up" gains.
​It’s alarming to see people on X calling privacy advocates "scammers" while cheering for KYC and ETFs. We keep making excuses for these compromises, but isn't this exactly how Bitcoin gets domesticated? We survived years without government validation—why are we so desperate for it now?
​I’m really worried we’re trading freedom for a spot in a Wall Street portfolio. Does anyone else feel like the original ethos is fading?
snowpega
Sr. Member
****
Online Online

Activity: 793
Merit: 297


TronZap.com - Reduce USDT transfer fees on TRON


View Profile WWW
Today at 06:05:46 PM
 #263

I did a quick glance through my post, and I don't see any spot where my post was erroneously quoting anything else.  If you want me to change something (or to edit something) then you might need to point out the specific location/part of my post to me more specifically, since I don't see any mistakes or any causing of confusion in my post.

Sure, dear, I can mention it for you, but that post is just mentioned above the most recent of above where I replied that last time, so I thought it would be easy for you to find, but I can understand and appreciate you on your best work as I see you, really reply every user with your best knowledge so this can be the reason that you are unable to locate that post easily.

[edited out]
I have seen a survey report a long time ago somewhere, and from that report, I came to know that only 7% of the world population has invested in the crypto space. This leaves a message for us that it is still not too late, and we are still early birds as part of this space. So, regrading on what we have missed already will demotivate us to move on and stop us from growing up. This is why I believe that we should keep investing in Bitcoin whenever the market gives the best opportunity to accumulate more or whenever we have spare available funds to invest in Bitcoin.

In this way, we can make our average best by investing in Bitcoin after different periods of time. Well, everyone has their own approach to investing in Bitcoin depending on their situation or condition. Like, if one has big amount of saving in the form of fiat and he want to covert in into bitcoin with the mindset of long term holding then he can do lump-sum but if is the one who invest in different peiode of time like whenever he/she has spare money to invest in bitcoin this can be consider as DCA and these different periods timeframe depends on that person like he/she gets sally on weekly basis or monthly basis, it vary condition to condition. CMIIW!

Of course, anyone who has already gotten accustomed to buying bitcoin can try to figure out what strategies that he would like to employ, and surely if a person is brand new to investing in bitcoin, they have absolutely no bitcoin, so the ONLY way to prepare for UP is to actually buy some bitcoin, and it seems that DCA is a very good way to get some initial exposure.

It also could be the case that some newbies to bitcoin have options other than merely DCA, even though surely many folks do not have a bunch of funds in order to give them options, so any person who has such funds, they will have options to consider the funds for DCA, lump sum or buying on dips (that might not happen).

A person who had already started DCA may well come across extra funds from time to time, and so if they suddenly find themselves with more funds they have the same options to consider such extra funds for DCA, lump sum or buying dips (that might not happen).

The more bitcoin that a person has accumulated, then likely the more options that they have, yet they might not necessarily be assured to be in profits in shorter timelines, even though there might be good chances for them to be in profits if they had been accumulating more than 4 years... especially if their accumulation had been regular, persistent, consistent, ongoing  and perhaps even aggressive (within their capacities). 

I surely don't recommend any attempts to trade bitcoin and surely not getting involved in shitcoins as you mentioned crypto as if shitcoins might be relevant from your point of view.  Anyone who might not be able to control their gambling tendencies and deciding to get involved in shitcoins and/or trading should at least attempt to limit their exposure to that nonsense to less than 10% of the size of their bitcoin investment (and without cheating since gamblers (ie traders and/or shitcoiners) might have challenges in controlling themselves).

I was talking about this post, as the whole post seems to be merged in a single quote if you look at it more. The reason for this can be that there is no closing quote of the second person mentioned above. I am talking about "cxtreenal" as there is no closing quote tag for this person's post, as he is also mentioned in the same post. Am I right here? CMIIW! And if this is the reason that is causing a kind of confusion while reading that post, then please edit it. Thank you!

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 [14]  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!