Bitcoin Forum
January 11, 2026, 10:30:01 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 30.2 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 [13]  All
  Print  
Author Topic: Bitcoin in the next decade  (Read 2765 times)
JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 4326
Merit: 13810


Self-Custody is a right. Say no to "non-custodial"


View Profile
January 09, 2026, 11:15:57 PM
 #241

and it is pretty unlikely that the BTC price is going back to any of those pre-2021 price levels between $5k and $50k... it is pretty unlikely that we are ever seeing bitcoin prices in that range, ever again.  It is possible, but not likely.

Many of us in bitcoin for a long time prepare for extremes on the upside and the downside, and many of us do no like downward trajectory bitcoin prices, yet if they happen we are either buying  or just holding through those periods... at least once we have gotten used to investing in bitcoin and not trying to trade it.
Well said, and anyone who reads your posts can tell this comes from learned and lived experience. I was 'late' coming in 2016/2017 but even I feel thats enough to understand the same things:
> We will never see another x10. For this to happen we need to dip below $50k and like you I don't think this happens again

You took the logic of my bottom assertion into another direction related to the top, and top analysis is different from bottom analysis.  I doubt that we can put those kinds of top limits on bitcoin even though the dynamics for getting tops is ongoingly changing with the entrances of new kinds of financial instruments, the size of the players and the kinds of manipulation that are happening.

Regarding my own bottom analysis, historically the BTC price had never really gone below the 200-WMA - however, in 2022, the BTC price had spent nearly 16 months at or below the 200-WMA and had gotten as low as 35% below the 200-WMA when it hit the low of $15,479 in November 2022, even during those so far historically low BTC prices relative to the 200-WMA, the 200-WMA continued to go up at about $10 per day and for that lowest period the annualized percentage that the 200-WMA was going up stayed above 18% annualized.

Since the 200-WMA is a lagging indicator, we can attempt to use that lagginess to our advantage so that if BTC prices were to start to get to levels of lows in which it was no longer moving up, then we likely realize that the BTC price is in quite a bad place.  Right now, the BTC spot price of $90,400 is 58% higher than the 200-WMA of $57,200, and the 200-WMA is continuing to move up between $35 and $45 per day, which annualized is about 32.5%.

For sure, I don't claim to be any kind of expert, yet in regards to top analysis, we likely need to consider bitcoin's total addressable market, which currently is right around $1 Quadrillion dollars, and since bitcoin has a market cap that is slightly less than $2 trillion, we can see that bitcoin has an upside of 500x, and so we do not even need to believe the total of the 500x in order to see that bitcoin continues to have quite a bit of upside potential - so it can do 10x from here and even more than 10x, even though 10x or more price appreciation could still take time to play out.

I am not even sure what value comes from suggesting that top price measured from down prices, unless we are thinking in terms of trading bitcoin rather than investing in bitcoin.

I would think that guys invest into bitcoin based on their thinking that bitcoin continues to have relatively great upside potential, and just to reach gold parity, bitcoin would need to appreciate around 15x, and if bitcoin is currently ONLY 1/15 the market cap of gold, yet bitcoin is likely in the neighborhood of 1,000x or more better than gold, so sure, it could take 50-200 years for the market to accurately valuate bitcoin as compared to gold, yet we should be able to recognize and appreciate bitcoin's price (valuation) as compared to gold's.

> We don't like to see bears, but if we choose DCA this is less of a worry and a small 'bonus' in fact so that we gain more in the longterm

For sure if we are still accumulating, then lower prices should not make us feel good, and we should see the positive in them, even though surely all holders of bitcoin appreciate seeing prices go up in order to show the correctness of bitcoin's investment thesis and as a form of vindication in being correct in the uppity trajectory of that investment thesis.

> We understand trading is speculation. Holding is patience.

Unlikely to find new people with this thinking since, after all, this thinking comes with living through the whole cycle over and over Smiley

Some people learn faster than others, and surely anyone brand new to bitcoin, might consider that they are ONLY going to be accumulating bitcoin for 4 years or more, so they are not even very concerned about price, even though they would like the BTC price to go up in the next 4 years and especially after they have spent a decent amount of time investing into it.

But, yeah, it can be difficult to figure out the newbies perspective in regards to ongoingly accumulating bitcoin, since it tends to take some time to really become more acquainted with bitcoin, even though some people are more receptive than others in terms of understanding the reasons why bitcoin exists and why it has value. 

I would imagine that most newbies come to bitcoin and they do not have any other investments, so they are ONLY able to invest from their discretionary income as it comes in.  Yet, there are other guys who come to bitcoin and they already have other investments, so they could reallocate from some of their other investments into bitcoin (which gives them more ability to put higher percentages of their annual income into bitcoin in a shorter period of time).   Not all bitcoin newbies are alike, even though I don't presume the newbies profile beyond understanding that an overwhelming majority of normies do not have assets, savings and/or investments, so they likely have to build their bitcoin investment size from scratch..and they also likely need to build emergency (back up) funds too, in the event that they want to protect their bitcoin and to be able to hold their bitcoin 4-10 years or longer.....

Privacy starts to fade once the government steps in with regulations. What usually follows is that institutional investors take more control, making the market less volatile.

We’ll be moving away from the original ideals, but in return, the market becomes more stable and adoption grows faster.

The thing is, this isn’t what many of us envisioned in the beginning. We thought we were building something outside government control.. decentralized, private, and free. That’s the core idea of decentralization, and now it feels like we’re slowly drifting from it.
Decentralization was never meant to ask for permission, yet as governments step in the system slowly starts to look like the one it was built to challenge, Adoption may grow, volatility may reduce but the question remains, are we gaining users or losing the soul of the idea?
Regulation may calm the market but it also tames the rebellion, what we gain in stability we risk losing in freedom,  Decentralization was about no gatekeepers now the gates are slowly being rebuilt.

The gates seem to be being build quite rapidly.

There seems to be various levels of desperation coming from the powers that be in trying to control bitcoin in a variety of ways (including paper bitcoin) while they are trying to act as if they are friendly to bitcoin.  That is bullshit.  They want to control and contain bitcoin and to put out various products to control onramps and off ramps that are "stable coins" that are more or less privately run CBDCs.. .. so we have to be careful in our interactions with some of the "approved products."

1) Self-Custody is a right.  Resist being labelled as: "non-custodial" or "un-hosted."  2) ESG, KYC & AML are attack-vectors on Bitcoin to be avoided or minimized.  3) How much alt (shit)coin diversification is necessary? if you are into Bitcoin, then 0%......if you cannot control your gambling, then perhaps limit your alt(shit)coin exposure to less than 10% of your bitcoin size...Put BTC here: bc1q49wt0ddnj07wzzp6z7affw9ven7fztyhevqu9k
Abiky
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3808
Merit: 1487


www.Crypto.Games: Multiple coins, multiple games


View Profile
January 10, 2026, 01:59:22 AM
Merited by d5000 (2), JayJuanGee (1)
 #242

Decentralization was never meant to ask for permission, yet as governments step in the system slowly starts to look like the one it was built to challenge, Adoption may grow, volatility may reduce but the question remains, are we gaining users or losing the soul of the idea?
Regulation may calm the market but it also tames the rebellion, what we gain in stability we risk losing in freedom,  Decentralization was about no gatekeepers now the gates are slowly being rebuilt.

We are definitely losing the soul of the idea. People's greed has caused them to be blind about the risks of censorship and centralization. These days, nobody cares about decentralization. By opening the gates to "Wall Street", we've essentially introduced the "single point of failure" Bitcoin was meant to avoid in the first place. It's like bringing traditional finance back again. The number of centralized exchanges continue to increase each day. Meanwhile, governments tighten their regulations to keep Bitcoin (and other cryptocurrencies) under their grasp. So far, it seems that their efforts are working. Even if the core Blockchain network remains decentralized and censorship-resistant.

I mean, what use will it be if Bitcoin is decentralized when governments control who buys/sells it through centralized exchanges. It's why institutional investment companies have been rushing to buy all of the circulating supply. If they achieve this, it will be impossible to buy/sell BTC outside of centralized exchanges. You'd be forced to comply with KYC/AML, effectively becoming a "slave" to the system. Between Bitcoin and banks, there would be no difference. We'll see what happens in a decade from now.

█████████████████████████
███████▄▄▀▀███▀▀▄▄███████
████████▄███▄████████
█████▄▄█▀▀███▀▀█▄▄█████
████▀▀██▀██████▀██▀▀████
████▄█████████████▄████
███████▀███████▀███████
████▀█████████████▀████
████▄▄██▄████▄██▄▄████
█████▀▀███▀▄████▀▀█████
████████▀███▀████████
███████▀▀▄▄███▄▄▀▀███████
█████████████████████████
.
 CRYPTOGAMES 
.
 Catch the winning spirit! 
█▄░▀███▌░▄
███▄░▀█░▐██▄
▀▀▀▀▀░░░▀▀▀▀▀
████▌░▐█████▀
████░░█████
███▌░▐███▀
███░░███
██▌░▐█▀
PROGRESSIVE
      JACKPOT      
██░░▄▄
▀▀░░████▄
▄▄▄▄██▀░░▄▄
░░░▀▀█░░▀██▄
███▄░░▀▄░█▀▀
█████░░█░░▄▄█
█████░░██████
█████░░█░░▀▀█
LOW HOUSE
         EDGE         
██▄
███░░░░░░░▄▄
█▀░░░░░░░████
█▄░░░░░░░░█▀
██▄░░░░░░▄█
███▄▄░░▄██▌
██████████
█████████▌
PREMIUM VIP
 MEMBERSHIP 
DICE   ROULETTE   BLACKJACK   KENO   MINESWEEPER   VIDEO POKER   PLINKO   SLOT   LOTTERY
d5000
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4522
Merit: 10121


Decentralization Maximalist


View Profile
January 10, 2026, 05:04:22 AM
Merited by JayJuanGee (1)
 #243

These days, nobody cares about decentralization. By opening the gates to "Wall Street", we've essentially introduced the "single point of failure" Bitcoin was meant to avoid in the first place. It's like bringing traditional finance back again. The number of centralized exchanges continue to increase each day. Meanwhile, governments tighten their regulations to keep Bitcoin (and other cryptocurrencies) under their grasp.
I agree a bit with your worries. But there's a catch with this: As long as the Bitcoin user base is growing, their political power will grow too. It doesn't matter if they are CEX users at first and thus are bound to middlemen. In countries where more than 10% of the population own Bitcoin, it will be virtually impossible trying to ban it (in democracies), because any politician threatening a ban will fear to lose a substantial part of his electorate, because nobody will want to sell their BTC. This is true even more in a world where most democratic countries have fragmented party systems and 10% of the population is really an "asset" many parties will want to capture.

And while the user base increases, there will also be a slow movement towards "true" Bitcoin ownership, i.e. towards holding BTC on your own self-managed wallet with your own keys. Yes it's very slow afaik, but most Bitcoin influencers do talk about these things, so some of the people following them will know about the censorship-resistance concepts, even if most still ignore them.

The beautiful thing is that P2P trading and atomic swaps are techniques extremely difficult to control or block by governments.

So I continue to be optimistic, despite of the current centralization trend.

███████████████████████████
███████▄████████████▄██████
████████▄████████▄████████
███▀█████▀▄███▄▀█████▀███
█████▀█▀▄██▀▀▀██▄▀█▀█████
███████▄███████████▄███████
███████████████████████████
███████▀███████████▀███████
████▄██▄▀██▄▄▄██▀▄██▄████
████▄████▄▀███▀▄████▄████
██▄███▀▀█▀██████▀█▀███▄███
██▀█▀████████████████▀█▀███
███████████████████████████
.
.Duelbits PREDICT..
█████████████████████████
█████████████████████████
███████████▀▀░░░░▀▀██████
██████████░░▄████▄░░████
█████████░░████████░░████
█████████░░████████░░████
█████████▄▀██████▀▄████
████████▀▀░░░▀▀▀▀░░▄█████
██████▀░░░░██▄▄▄▄████████
████▀░░░░▄███████████████
█████▄▄█████████████████
█████████████████████████
█████████████████████████
.
.WHERE EVERYTHING IS A MARKET..
█████
██
██







██
██
██████
Will Bitcoin hit $200,000
before January 1st 2027?

    No @1.15         Yes @6.00    
█████
██
██







██
██
██████

  CHECK MORE > 
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 [13]  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!