Bitcoin Forum
August 15, 2025, 02:19:41 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 29.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Anyone Interested:PoW/Hybrid PoS Decered with Kawpow and possibly Masternodes  (Read 24 times)
corpse911 (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 37
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 15, 2025, 12:24:34 AM
Last edit: June 15, 2025, 01:36:05 AM by corpse911
 #1

Thought Experiment: A Fair-Launch PoW Coin with Hybrid PoS Security



Hello everyone,

I've been thinking a lot about the state of new cryptocurrency launches in 2025 and wanted to float a hypothetical project idea to get some feedback from this community.

It seems like we're always forced to choose between two imperfect models:
1.  Pure PoW Coins: These offer a fair, decentralized launch, but are incredibly vulnerable to 51% attacks, especially in their early days.
2.  Pure PoS Coins: These can be more secure, but often suffer from centralized initial distribution through ICOs or pre-sales.

So, here's the thought experiment: What if a new project was created to specifically combine the best of both worlds?

The Hypothetical Coin's Architecture:
  • Base: A direct fork of Decred's codebase to inherit its battle-tested hybrid consensus engine and on-chain governance (Politeia).
  • PoW Algorithm: KawPoW, to make it ASIC-resistant and ensure a fair launch for GPU miners worldwide.
  • Consensus: A true hybrid. Every block found by a KawPoW miner would need to be validated and approved by PoS ticket holders to be added to the chain.
  • Tokenomics: A block reward split designed for sustainability, something like:
    • 50% to PoW Miners
    • 40% to PoS Stakers
    • 10% to a community-governed Treasury
The core idea is that the PoS layer acts as an "immune system," making 51% attacks nearly impossible from day one, while the KawPoW layer ensures fair, widespread distribution without a pre-mine or ICO. The treasury ensures the project can fund its own development forever.

I'm genuinely curious what this community thinks.

  • What are the potential flaws in this model?
  • Would the economics of the 50/40/10 split be compelling enough for both miners and stakers?
  • Is this a project you would find interesting enough to participate in (either mining or staking)?

Looking forward to the discussion. Also for any feature requests

Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!