Some Airdrop Projects Fail

[Yanghudi]

 Why some airdrops projects are destroyed 
 Is it the user's fault 

-Most of today's projects are duplications with little innovation, wrapped in complicated sentences to make them look cool. Is it a problem solver  No !!! So it's only natural that people work on them just to get airdrops and then sell them, because maybe they don't care about this "ordinary" technology. if the project is good, even if all airdroppers sell, there will still be new people who see the future opportunities who will buy and hold the tokens.

-Today's projects, the marketing is good at just making airdrops to build a community, after the airdrop phase is over, they are confused about what else to do, so after there is high selling pressure, they are confused about how to get users and new holders

-A small number of today's projects focus on winning the hearts of venture capital. The adoption issue is just a spice of false imagination.

-Today's projects, the airdrop allocation is over, the effect is that holders have gotten too much for free, what is the effect  ​​when launching the project, they lose buying pressure

So it has nothing to do with the user.

Sorry i not a developer so i only good at comment

[Mrbluntzy]

Airdrop is just a marketing scheme used by both genuine and scam project owners to spread information around the crypto community about the project they have developed. There are other marketing schemes used for fast reach of investors who can buy into the projects idea and starts to invest. The project failed not because they promoted themselves via airdrop, so it should have been "some projects fail" If they were bound to fail, it doesn't matter whether they did airdrop or not. A scam projects is definitely bound to fail regardless of how they did their marketing via bounty, signature, contest, or airdrop.
Most projects failed because the developers didn't have the quality to make the project stand and some of them are generally build based on scam intention.

[Dunamisx]

There could be many reasons to why an airdrop project failed, these reasons could varies from various challenges ranging to others, some have been as a result of these developers incompetency or lack of utility for the project, though it is also expected that we know what some of these airdrops are built for, and we should not expect much from them as rewards, as we have discovered many to turned being a scam at the end.

[coin-investor]

Why some airdrops projects are destroyed
 Is it the user's fault

Whether it's an airdrop or an ICO, it all comes down to use case. If it's not bringing something to the community, it will eventually be destroyed, and all the blame should be on the developers.

Airdrop participants will do the things you asked them to, promote your project, and test your platform; however, everything depends on the developers' roadmap and whitepaper.

It's easy to build a community of promoters now because of airdrops, but that's all they can do: support and promote your project. For the project to go further, it's in the hands of the developers.

[passwordnow]

It's better if you will use the normal fonts that we do, or simply don't use any fonts and not that

Code:

[pre][/pre]

Why some airdrops projects are destroyed
Is it the user's fault

The fault comes with the developers that they anticipate a lot and expect that their projects will become successful on an instant. The users have nothing to do with it. Because the common goal of users is to participate, be eligible and dump the tokens. The developers are aware of that cycle and that's why they have to break the cycle if they don't want to get dumped after their rewards given to all the users.

[Kavelj22]

There could be many reasons to why an airdrop project failed, these reasons could varies from various challenges ranging to others, some have been as a result of these developers incompetency or lack of utility for the project, though it is also expected that we know what some of these airdrops are built for, and we should not expect much from them as rewards, as we have discovered many to turned being a scam at the end.

Most airdrop projects are scams, and almost all of them are scams, with the exception of airdrop campaigns launched by active projects with a valuable product or service. Airdrop-based projects have not been successful, and you can review the entire Bounty board for projects launched only since 2017, none of which are active today.

[Taskford]

Airdrop is just a marketing scheme used by both genuine and scam project owners to spread information around the crypto community about the project they have developed. There are other marketing schemes used for fast reach of investors who can buy into the projects idea and starts to invest. The project failed not because they promoted themselves via airdrop, so it should have been "some projects fail" If they were bound to fail, it doesn't matter whether they did airdrop or not. A scam projects is definitely bound to fail regardless of how they did their marketing via bounty, signature, contest, or airdrop.
Most projects failed because the developers didn't have the quality to make the project stand and some of them are generally build based on scam intention.

This is how scammers spread their project without spending any dime for their project and this is effective to make their scam plans happen since there are so many fools around is willing to participate and waste their time on unsure matters.

Although I can say that some gives reward but the effort we spend is to much compare on the money they release to their participants.

So to avoid getting stressed out and help scammers better for people to find other valuable things to do since there are more better ways to earn money on crypto than these airdrop thing out there.

[TastyChillySauce00]

In my opinion, the fault always at the developer, airdrop is just marketing stunt and to kick start the market for this specific project.

Whether it will be sustainable or not, depends on the project itself, if the project is just yet another same project, it will not sustain.
So, it was never user's fault, the user aren't the one making decisions.

[mich]

Well there is alot of the air drop projects that does fail. Or they tokens that we earn we can not sell them on the exchanges.
I do think we know this now alot of the air drop projects are only scams. They want to get our information and then we can get scammed.
I do think there is some projects where they do not want to become a scam. It is only they do not know how to make the project one to make profit from it.

[doubletheprof]

Airdrop projects are just useless imho

[dunfida]

Why some airdrops projects are destroyed
 Is it the user's fault

-Most of today's projects are duplications with little innovation, wrapped in complicated sentences to make them look cool. Is it a problem solver No !!! So it's only natural that people work on them just to get airdrops and then sell them, because maybe they don't care about this "ordinary" technology. if the project is good, even if all airdroppers sell, there will still be new people who see the future opportunities who will buy and hold the tokens.

-Today's projects, the marketing is good at just making airdrops to build a community, after the airdrop phase is over, they are confused about what else to do, so after there is high selling pressure, they are confused about how to get users and new holders

-A small number of today's projects focus on winning the hearts of venture capital. The adoption issue is just a spice of false imagination.

-Today's projects, the airdrop allocation is over, the effect is that holders have gotten too much for free, what is the effect ​​when launching the project, they lose buying pressure

So it has nothing to do with the user.

Sorry i not a developer so i only good at comment[/pre]

Airdrops is just that part of marketing of a certain project but its not the sole reason on why project do fail, but as small as some issue on which airdrops could give out some effect. Take for some example:

"Airdrop bounty hunters, didnt get their enough allocation or the amount given isnt that in line on whats being promised" - Then this is something that will be affecting out the entire project on which considering on how big the community of those marketers on which once that the project do make out some foolish moves that pertains about deceiving or lying then it will be surely be that making out such impact that would be leading out into projects demise or failure.

Speaking about success then its never been guarantee because no matter how revolutionary tech a certain project it would be in comparing into those projects that been built out of pure fun or simply being a meme coin. We've seen tons of situation that about those success about into those projects that doesnt have actual utility but it do able to succeed. Why? It all matters about recognition and hype on which it might sounds simple but this is the most effective way on lifting out the project.

[kotajikikox]

So it has nothing to do with the user.

I do not think anyone is thinking of that. When a project fails, you do not blame the
"consumers" for its failure. It is like if the quality of a product is bad and you decide to blame the consumers for it going bankrupt. The users are only receiving what is given to them. They are not really in control of anything in the project but themselves.

[btc_angela]

So it has nothing to do with the user.

I do not think anyone is thinking of that. When a project fails, you do not blame the
"consumers" for its failure. It is like if the quality of a product is bad and you decide to blame the consumers for it going bankrupt. The users are only receiving what is given to them. They are not really in control of anything in the project but themselves.

It's probably that they are looking to blame someone for the failure. And it's very easy, as we only have few entities involved, investors, developers and maybe those pump and dump groups. Nevertheless, as the market mature, it sure be the blame is for the people behind the project.

I mean if it is really good then there is a good chance that we might invest on them. But if the project is just there for the pump and dump, then it won't attract as it's obvious that it doesn't have a use case and it's just there to make money for the developers or could be used for manipulations.

[Stable090]

Airdrop projects are just useless imho

If you say airdrop projects are useless now, then I will agree with you, but we have seen lots of projects which did airdrop, and they were successful, but now most of the projects entering the crypto space are rubbish, some of them are scam projects so they do conduct airdrops  just to create awareness about their project, and when people invest, then they will steal investors money. I totally agree with you that recent airdrops are scam.

[jaberwock]

In my opinion, the fault always at the developer, airdrop is just marketing stunt and to kick start the market for this specific project.

Same goes with the ICO before. Remember that? A lot of people blame them too, without knowing that it is only just a type of selling the crypto/project. It is only more tragic because almost all people boycotted it and they literally demanded for a new type of selling and ICO's now are rarely being used because there are now those IPO's, IEO, and others.

Whether it will be sustainable or not, depends on the project itself, if the project is just yet another same project, it will not sustain.
So, it was never user's fault, the user aren't the one making decisions.

That is if the project is also bad but if it's good, then it can be like those other good projects too. Users can still make an influence. If they won't buy, then a project won't succeed. And if they dump their bags, the project will dump in value too. This is a popular occurrence in bounties and airdrops but it is just that a good project can recover as there is a reason on why people buys them.

[mk4]

Farm the right projects, and you won't have that problem.

Idk why anyone farms airdrops that require "social interaction" a.k.a. spam.

[ndutndut]

In my opinion, the fault always at the developer, airdrop is just marketing stunt and to kick start the market for this specific project.

Whether it will be sustainable or not, depends on the project itself, if the project is just yet another same project, it will not sustain.
So, it was never user's fault, the user aren't the one making decisions.

All the fault of the developers who make airdrops fail, sometimes developers do not have good intentions to develop their projects but only to cheat, often airdrops are only for cheating, unfair prize distribution, arbitrary rule changes, or problems with the wallet platform, there are even airdrops just to steal users' personal information, this is what often happens.

It can be said that Airdrop is a form of incentive shared by the Developer of the project itself to users (community) who have contributed to the project. Both need each other and should not underestimate each other. Without users (community) there will be no project, and vice versa, but Developers can create their projects just to make a profit and then run away. So we must always be careful if we want to join the airdrop.

[Accardo]

I don't think some fail, a lot of them are managed by time wasters and deceitful admins. Multiple dishonest developers use the airdrop marketing strategy to steal from both participants and investors in a recurring form. In as much as they don't pay, they still come back with a unique project and apply similar method of sharing airdrops to con users. It's always advisable to work with established or well known project owners who wish to share bonuses in turn for individual tasks or marketing.

[Callido]

These are reasons to be careful and selective for those investing in crypto projects, especially the ones using airdrop marketing. There are only few legitimate airdrop projects that still want to their market and stay. It was a thing back then when airdrop was a good way of earning crypto from the founders, it was worth a lot more compared to today, airdrops are now mostly useless because in the end they turn dust.

[albon]

The term "airdrop" is simply a marketing term for the project to attract users. The blame lies on the users who were attracted to the project and believed its team's promises without conducting their own research.

Yes, the projects that offer airdrops , especially Telegram mini-game bots, are mostly similar and do not offer any technology. For example, here is the BOME airdrop, the game developed by the Catizen project. The team scammed the game's community, and the token's price was disappointing, no user received more than half a dollar.



All of these bots have become a waste of time, and the real winners are the people behind the project, while the users are the losers, wasting their time for nothing.