Isn't this a violation of human rights against the people of a country?

[arzuo]

Maximum Countries government inflation money to control public and their own political party that's mean money inflation is extra power for them,
So they don't interest that type of technology which make problem against for their ( Corruption) inflation, And Blockchain project ( btc) is that if of technology which can able to stop Money inflation and government corruption,

So most of the Government don't like it and banned! BTCBTCBTCBTC

[Mate2237]

Op when writing try and make your point clear so that everyone can understand the message what you are trying to pass over to the forum because I can't really tell the meaning of your thread.


The when writing there are different boards and this board is dedicated to bitcoin and not politics so when you want to write about things related to politics don't bring it here because it's not ment for political threads

[Smartvirus]

~snipe~

I take it that you are not from an English speaking nation else, what is this! I literally couldn’t make sense of what you are saying as, each sentence ended like a phrase that needed me to complete them and even make out some words.

Are you trying to say that, governments having to control the issuance of fiat notes and its stance in making it either readily available or scarce to create certain conditions to living within the nation is a violation of human right since, it leads to control of its citizens… is that it?

Because in the end, it’s government owned currency and you can’t decide for them how they issue it. Nothing is being violated there!

[Jegileman]

Maximum Countries government inflation money to control public and their own political party that's mean money inflation is extra power for them,
So they don't interest that type of technology which make problem against for their ( Corruption) inflation, And Blockchain project ( btc) is that if of technology which can able to stop Money inflation and government corruption,

So most of the Government don't like it and banned! BTCBTCBTCBTC

If I may understand what you’re trying to say; you mean the government banned bitcoin because they don’t want the technology to override their own, like not having a competitor which will also not allow them to steal and cause inflation in their own country right? What bitcoin is all about is very clear, transparent and decentralized. The government doesn’t like any of that, so by the power willed on them, they can chose to agree or not agree to it and we already seen their stance about it long ago. Maybe just, there might be an overall change of such mindset and approach the government has over bitcoin.

[Orpichukwu]

There are a lot of ill things that have been done by the government which are more cruel than causing inflation, but the government doesn't care, and if you want to talk about human rights and their violation, the government is good at stepping on them. Banning Bitcoin in some countries is the least of the kinds of things that they have been doing.

[bitterguy28]

Are you trying to say that, governments having to control the issuance of fiat notes and its stance in making it either readily available or scarce to create certain conditions to living within the nation is a violation of human right since, it leads to control of its citizens… is that it?

Because in the end, it’s government owned currency and you can’t decide for them how they issue it. Nothing is being violated there!

if that really is what op is saying we already know that

fiat is controlled by the country’s government because it allows them to control their economy it has always been like this and it will continue that’s why bitcoin is an alternative decentralized currency

[Zwei]

one of the perks of not being a native english speaker is that somehow i did understand what OP is trying to say, but i had to ask AI just to make sure:

The text argues that governments intentionally cause money inflation to gain more control over the public and strengthen their political power.
It suggests that inflation gives governments extra power through corruption, and they are resistant to technologies like Bitcoin (BTC) and blockchain, which could prevent inflation and corruption by decentralizing financial control.
As a result, many governments dislike and ban such technologies to protect their interests.

as to answer OP question.
is banning bitcoin a violation of human rights? idk tbh since bitcoin can't really be banned. a goverment can make it harder for you to use bitcoin, but they can't stop you. also like which human right is being violated exactly?

[Alpen]

Maximum Countries government inflation money to control public and their own political party that's mean money inflation is extra power for them,
So they don't interest that type of technology which make problem against for their ( Corruption) inflation, And Blockchain project ( btc) is that if of technology which can able to stop Money inflation and government corruption,

So most of the Government don't like it and banned! BTCBTCBTCBTC

Most governments simply don't like uncontrolled capital flows. And to be fair, crypto has played a major role in enabling that. That's exactly why Bitcoin was banned in China — and then gradually restricted in many other countries.

It's not just about inflation or ideology. It's about control.

[kotajikikox]

The concept of controlling fiat currencies is seen as an economic move so is that a violation of human right? Does adjusting the price of a product a violation of human right? What kind of human rights are you thinking that are being violated here?

You might say that privacy is a human right and you will be right but the government also says they have a right towards their citizens' personal information to some extent under the guise of national security. Anyway, I really can't tell what you are trying to say. Just assuming you think that inflation is somehow a violation of human rights. There could be a lot that is a violation of human rights but inflation is simply just a result of certain economic factors.

[Darker45]

The good thing, OP, is that however hard these governments try to deprive their people access to Bitcoin, all their efforts can never be enough. The beauty of decentralization. They could go all-in on an aggressive offense; they will fail. Always. They don't know where to attack, what to attack.

So, forget about governments. I guess the most important thing is to spread the word, the gospel according to Satoshi. Once people begin to become interested, there's actually no stopping them.

[Gozie51]

Op, government is not banning btc because it stops their corruption, no it doesn't stop government official who is corrupt. The official can easily hide public money in btc through exchanges or transferring to trading platforms or brokers. I have read of high level government official who missing funds was traced to his foreign account and it was easy for him to say he is an online trader.

Government may ban btc for not having control over it because it is decentralised.

[Accardo]

Inflation only makes debts easier for the government to pay, but suffers businesses and consumers. In a scenerio where the government struggles to pay off what they owe, the only option is to print more money and raise interest rate for businesses. So producers increase the price of goods and services knowing that the government will charge them more in loan. While the money is printed the value also goes down, hence it doesn't affect them a lot. Only a good government will work hard to reduce inflation and spending costs for her citizens.

[hero_the_bossman]

Op, government is not banning btc because it stops their corruption, no it doesn't stop government official who is corrupt. The official can easily hide public money in btc through exchanges or transferring to trading platforms or brokers. I have read of high level government official who missing funds was traced to his foreign account and it was easy for him to say he is an online trader.

Government may ban btc for not having control over it because it is decentralised.

Leverage is always the thing that higher entities crave.

It's their nature - if they are not in control, why there are here in the first place?

[Lida93]

Maximum Countries government inflation money to control public and their own political party that's mean money inflation is extra power for them,
So they don't interest that type of technology which make problem against for their ( Corruption) inflation, And Blockchain project ( btc) is that if of technology which can able to stop Money inflation and government corruption,

So most of the Government don't like it and banned! BTCBTCBTCBTC

Trying to understand your writings and the message seems hard for everyone here. Can you next time make use of a translation tool to easily express your thoughts in a way that any user reading can get your message clearly with having to try to guess what you're implying.

However, you should be used to how the government works by now. It's a currency created by them so they can always control it in their interest as a tool to regulate the citizens financial life. But it's not like the government can completely stop every citizen from using bitcoin. No matter how they try to block available accesses the bitcoin enthusiast can always navigate his way. Am saying this base on experience with my own country government policies on cryptocurrency.

[pooya87]

What you are asking here is a complex question that a lawyer has to answer not regular people! Maybe there are some ways some sneaky lawyer can interpret the law to prove that banning Bitcoin is against some right and get it unbanned but there are also legal arguments the government is going to make to keep it banned (like money laundering and other criminal activities, regardless of how right or wrong they are, the government can make those legal arguments).

[AVE5]

So most of the Government don't like it and banned! BTCBTCBTCBTC

To an extent, I'll agree with you that the government are acting anti to bitcoin because of it decentralized potential that gives individuals the freedom to ride their portfolios without being regulated.
But on the other note, governments act strict to bitcoin rather Defi tech in the sense that they're still skeptic believe in the system in coherent not to misguide the masses. And while some countries has adopted the DeFi in their own countries, those who hasn't followed the suit are somewhere there surfing on how to understand the tech behind the DeFi. So without going Contrarily, every country love to explore and once they're convinced, they make U-turn and adopts the system.
For now let's say it's a gradual process and in quite a long time ahead, we'd advance to the level of those anti bitcoineers realizing their lapses and tends to take part in the system. Give it time.

[Spaceman1000$]

Op, government is not banning btc because it stops their corruption, no it doesn't stop government official who is corrupt. The official can easily hide public money in btc through exchanges or transferring to trading platforms or brokers. I have read of high level government official who missing funds was traced to his foreign account and it was easy for him to say he is an online trader.

Government may ban btc for not having control over it because it is decentralised.

If it ever comes to that point, at least to a large extent, we can use Blockchain technology to track down some of their transactions to see if it's stolen money or not, at least that will get them exposed a little. Most of this government guys prefer fiat because it's easy for them to steal without traces, they can just put millions of Dollars in a particular project and get kickbacks from it. If the government officials says he is a trader, then he has to bring a track record of his trade to prove his innocence, because it's not just enough to say your a trader, your profit margin needs to be seen as well.

[arzuo]

Govt banned crypto to control their economy as they desired which against people economy power

[arzuo]

one of the perks of not being a native english speaker is that somehow i did understand what OP is trying to say, but i had to ask AI just to make sure:

The text argues that governments intentionally cause money inflation to gain more control over the public and strengthen their political power.
It suggests that inflation gives governments extra power through corruption, and they are resistant to technologies like Bitcoin (BTC) and blockchain, which could prevent inflation and corruption by decentralizing financial control.
As a result, many governments dislike and ban such technologies to protect their interests.

as to answer OP question.
is banning bitcoin a violation of human rights? idk tbh since bitcoin can't really be banned. a goverment can make it harder for you to use bitcoin, but they can't stop you. also like which human right is being violated exactly?

The government is taking away the economic power of the people, which is terrible for the future.

[X-ray]

More like governments banned bitcoin because they are not confident with their own currency and afraid that it will get replaced by bitcoin.

So far the only plausible reasoning is that, in regard of government control, they already doing it through exchanges.