Parents who send their kids to public schools are child abusers.

[jvanname]

Looks like the problem is starting to fix itself.

Good. Those institutions are the worst, and the graduates of those institutions are uneducated bastards who know absolutely nothing and are mentally retarded! UNIVERSITIES PROMOTE VIOLENCE! AND THOSE GRADUATES ARE TOO FUCKING STUPID TO UNDERSTAND THAT BITCOIN HAS A MINING ALGORITHM THAT WAS NEVER DESIGNED TO ADVANCE SCIENCE!

Regards,

-Joseph Van Name Ph.D.

[Nothingtodo]

Public schools are absolutely horrendous evil environments for kids. Public schools are fucking violent. Parents that send their kids to public schools need to reconsider their bad decisions in life. THERE IS NO FUCKING EXCUSE!

Regards,

-Joseph Van Name Ph.D.

There is nothing wrong with attending public school if it is of good quality and provides a conducive environment for learning. In my country, most people live below the poverty line, and public schools are definitely suitable for them. They don't have the means to afford private school fees for their children. Moreover, the condition of public schools in our country is poor, but parents force their children to enroll in public schools, of course, because of their poverty.

[Supreme Donvic]

Public schools are absolutely horrendous evil environments for kids. Public schools are fucking violent. Parents that send their kids to public schools need to reconsider their bad decisions in life. THERE IS NO FUCKING EXCUSE!

Regards,

-Joseph Van Name Ph.D.

There is nothing wrong with attending public school if it is of good quality and provides a conducive environment for learning. In my country, most people live below the poverty line, and public schools are definitely suitable for them. They don't have the means to afford private school fees for their children. Moreover, the condition of public schools in our country is poor, but parents force their children to enroll in public schools, of course, because of their poverty.

Yes some public schools are very good some public schools in some countries are even better than private schools, it all depends on how the country operates in some countries they don’t even have private schools they only have public schools, if a public school is very good with good teachers there’s nothing wrong if a child goes to a public school. When we have public schools and private schools in a country and the public schools are not standard and low quality while the private schools are very good with high quality children should go to private schools but I’m sure it’s very expensive so those parent who don’t have money to take there children to private schools can take them to public schools as long as they will learn something there.

[BADecker]

Public schools can make one street smart, way beyond what a private school might.

[jvanname]

Public schools can make one street smart, way beyond what a private school might.

You are mentally retarded just like most public school graduates.

Regards,

-Joseph Van Name Ph.D.

[BADecker]

Public schools can make one street smart, way beyond what a private school might.

You are mentally retarded just like most public school graduates.

Regards,

-Joseph Van Name Ph.D.

You only say that, because you are street smart.     

[jvanname]

You only say that, because you are street smart.      

I mean, I try to be smart on the streets where there are dumbass drivers who will definitely go to HELL and be sexually abused by demons there for driving so horribly.

Regards,

-Joseph Van Name Ph.D.

[Rubuchi]

Public schools are absolutely horrendous evil environments for kids. Public schools are fucking violent. Parents that send their kids to public schools need to reconsider their bad decisions in life. THERE IS NO FUCKING EXCUSE!

Regards,

-Joseph Van Name Ph.D.

There is nothing wrong with attending public school if it is of good quality and provides a conducive environment for learning. In my country, most people live below the poverty line, and public schools are definitely suitable for them. They don't have the means to afford private school fees for their children. Moreover, the condition of public schools in our country is poor, but parents force their children to enroll in public schools, of course, because of their poverty.

I did a mixed of both and I can tell you categorically that public school offered me more value than the private one although it still depends on which public school or private school because there are public schools who are still strictly maintaining good standards regardless of they are managed by government and even the government is paying more attention to them than others and there are private schools which are battling with keeping standards because they do not possess a strong administrative structure and capacity and that makes them weaker in function.

Whether it is a public school or private school, two things are usually important, one is funding and the other one is management, if your school has a good funding and lacks a good management, those funds will end up becoming useless because it won’t help the school and the same thing with when there is a good management and lacks of funding, it affects the scalability of the management no matter how hard they try to keep standards.

[Berry2d]

Public schools can make one street smart, way beyond what a private school might.

Thank for your understanding, 80 percent of citizens in the 80s where not buoyant financially that sending there children to a good private schools was very difficult and the only answer to education then was public schools, yet over the years are lot of targets, people filled with knowledge and all needed academically where produced from the same public schools we now speak against in our current generation. Im schooling what matters is the parents dedication towards monitoring there children's academic life's to no when they are going astray or not and not channelling blames to schools, once children may go to private schools but still finda it difficult understanding what is done over there if parents don't sacrifice there times to monitor them

[Ishicryptic]

Public schools can make one street smart, way beyond what a private school might.

Thank for your understanding, 80 percent of citizens in the 80s where not buoyant financially that sending there children to a good private schools was very difficult and the only answer to education then was public schools, yet over the years are lot of targets, people filled with knowledge and all needed academically where produced from the same public schools we now speak against in our current generation. Im schooling what matters is the parents dedication towards monitoring there children's academic life's to no when they are going astray or not and not channelling blames to schools, once children may go to private schools but still finda it difficult understanding what is done over there if parents don't sacrifice there times to monitor them

Good upbringing starts from the homes not schools, if you can afford to send your children to the most expensive private schools but refuce to give them moral upbringing they will carry that character to their schools and adult life. Most of us attended public schools and we are responsible people in our societies, it is mainly about what our parents taught us at our homes that is our guiding principles till today. Anywhere you go you will see the good and bad, whether it's in schools, work places and in the society at large whether they attended the best schools or not. Children of corrupt politicians who went to the best schools can choose to be corrupt like their fathers despite attending the best schools.

[Mr Reporter]

Public schools can make one street smart, way beyond what a private school might.

Thank for your understanding, 80 percent of citizens in the 80s where not buoyant financially that sending there children to a good private schools was very difficult and the only answer to education then was public schools, yet over the years are lot of targets, people filled with knowledge and all needed academically where produced from the same public schools we now speak against in our current generation. Im schooling what matters is the parents dedication towards monitoring there children's academic life's to no when they are going astray or not and not channelling blames to schools, once children may go to private schools but still finda it difficult understanding what is done over there if parents don't sacrifice there times to monitor them

Good upbringing starts from the homes not schools, if you can afford to send your children to the most expensive private schools but refuce to give them moral upbringing they will carry that character to their schools and adult life. Most of us attended public schools and we are responsible people in our societies, it is mainly about what our parents taught us at our homes that is our guiding principles till today. Anywhere you go you will see the good and bad, whether it's in schools, work places and in the society at large whether they attended the best schools or not. Children of corrupt politicians who went to the best schools can choose to be corrupt like their fathers despite attending the best schools.

Good upbringing's definitely rooted at home, not just about the price tag of the school.well some family members failed this part when rising a child and this has caused the social issues well sometimes I feel it more like family members should properly educate their children than expecting the teachers to do the role of a parent….

[Berry2d]

If you say parents send there children to public schools to be abused, are you also aware that the way our faces are different so also is our financial capability or strength. You may be buoyant financially, doing things in a good way all to be helpful to your children while others hardly see one time feeding for there family and does things according to what there strengths can accommodate, and the reasons for different level of schools is also because of our financial capability. So i don't think its right to generalise parents that send there children to public schools as children abusers because that is the only one there financial strength can accommodate after all most successful people today never went to a rich and good school rather the same public schools we are talking about what matters is knowing why you are in school and nothing more.

That is a stupid lazy ass excuse. If mommy can't afford a private school, mommy should keep her kids at home and make them read books and stuff.

Regards,

-Joseph Van Name Ph.D.

Thank you for your wonderful advice, keeping children at home because one lacks the capacity to take children to private good schools but enrolled them into public schools. You may be buoyant today and wealthy believing those that have not been blessed are not hardworking or lazy but let me tell you something, years back some that are wealthy today where not but where remembered maybe because of there relentless effort towards what they want or favour, same also will those that can't afford good schools for now will be remembered on a very good day  so you may call it excuse or what so ever you think but let them breath after all those public schools where established for children to go for there studies

[Roseline492]

That is a stupid lazy ass excuse. If mommy can't afford a private school, mommy should keep her kids at home and make them read books and stuff.

Regards,

-Joseph Van Name Ph.D.

Thank you for your wonderful advice, keeping children at home because one lacks the capacity to take children to private good schools but enrolled them into public schools. You may be buoyant today and wealthy believing those that have not been blessed are not hardworking or lazy but let me tell you something, years back some that are wealthy today where not but where remembered maybe because of there relentless effort towards what they want or favour, same also will those that can't afford good schools for now will be remembered on a very good day  so you may call it excuse or what so ever you think but let them breath after all those public schools where established for children to go for there studies

Children can't learn anything at home, the most things they start reading at home are the alphabet and some minor things if the parents are consistent in teaching them otherwise they wouldn't no much. A child who only schools at home will missed so many exposure that would help there learning foundation and if there parents are the types that speaks only there native language they will only no that language and nothing more so there communication is also going to be affected. It doesn't matter if a child must go to private school but the only thing that matters is being able learn regardless of the school.

[mvdheuvel1983]

Children can't learn anything at home, the most things they start reading at home are the alphabet and some minor things if the parents are consistent in teaching them otherwise they wouldn't no much. A child who only schools at home will missed so many exposure that would help there learning foundation and if there parents are the types that speaks only there native language they will only no that language and nothing more so there communication is also going to be affected. It doesn't matter if a child must go to private school but the only thing that matters is being able learn regardless of the school.

Is not a big deal if the kids go to school you already know that parents will not have all the time to teach them the things they need to know at infant age and some parents who do 9-5 jobs will not have enough time for the kids to begin to follow them up to teach them the necessary things they ought to know. You can not compare a child that goes to school and the kids you teach at home the difference will surely be there. Parents may find it difficult to follow the required curriculum to teach the kids is they wish to try but if they go to school whether public schools or private they get the opportunity to learn not just their books but the ability to communicate with people and get exposed to other things they need to know.

[Berry2d]

That is a stupid lazy ass excuse. If mommy can't afford a private school, mommy should keep her kids at home and make them read books and stuff.

Regards,

-Joseph Van Name Ph.D.

Thank you for your wonderful advice, keeping children at home because one lacks the capacity to take children to private good schools but enrolled them into public schools. You may be buoyant today and wealthy believing those that have not been blessed are not hardworking or lazy but let me tell you something, years back some that are wealthy today where not but where remembered maybe because of there relentless effort towards what they want or favour, same also will those that can't afford good schools for now will be remembered on a very good day  so you may call it excuse or what so ever you think but let them breath after all those public schools where established for children to go for there studies

Children can't learn anything at home, the most things they start reading at home are the alphabet and some minor things if the parents are consistent in teaching them otherwise they wouldn't no much. A child who only schools at home will missed so many exposure that would help there learning foundation and if there parents are the types that speaks only there native language they will only no that language and nothing more so there communication is also going to be affected. It doesn't matter if a child must go to private school but the only thing that matters is being able learn regardless of the school.

Learning at home with the help of parents and without going to school is never an option because parents have are lot of responsibility to meet up to and add full scale teaching to our schedules will be very challenging, stressful or may not even be possible except you are ready to have an illiterate as a child. Choosing to teach your children from home can only work when you can hire a home teacher that will  be responsible for the job and even if that is done they won't do they would have done while going to either private or public schools according to once financial capability.

[HelliumZ]

Public schools are absolutely horrendous evil environments for kids. Public schools are fucking violent. Parents that send their kids to public schools need to reconsider their bad decisions in life. THERE IS NO FUCKING EXCUSE!

Regards,

-Joseph Van Name Ph.D.

Yes, it may sound bad, but in reality it is true because the current situation in public schools does not improve education. Public school teachers, especially in my country Bangladesh, neglect their responsibilities more than in other countries.
If there is no improvement in the children's progress in public schools, then we, as guardians, have definitely subjected our children to a kind of torture by enrolling them in public schools.

[Roseline492]

Children can't learn anything at home, the most things they start reading at home are the alphabet and some minor things if the parents are consistent in teaching them otherwise they wouldn't no much. A child who only schools at home will missed so many exposure that would help there learning foundation and if there parents are the types that speaks only there native language they will only no that language and nothing more so there communication is also going to be affected. It doesn't matter if a child must go to private school but the only thing that matters is being able learn regardless of the school.

Learning at home with the help of parents and without going to school is never an option because parents have are lot of responsibility to meet up to and add full scale teaching to our schedules will be very challenging, stressful or may not even be possible except you are ready to have an illiterate as a child. Choosing to teach your children from home can only work when you can hire a home teacher that will  be responsible for the job and even if that is done they won't do they would have done while going to either private or public schools according to once financial capability.

Even if the parents has no work they do, they cannot become the teacher to there children because that is not what they do and besides they are not trained for that, from the time lectures start and close for the day is up to 6hrs so I doubt any parents could spend 6hrs of there time everyday to teach there children at home and besides what if the parents are not educationally good how would they even make an attempt of teaching them, so actually sending them to the school is the only good thing they would do for them because children also need to have a social life so that in the time of higher advancement of schooling it will not affect them.