Use simple logic to win in sports betting..

[Russlenat]

Can you explain this in your own words, if you truly believe that simple logic can help you win in sports betting?
Tell me how you analyze games in a simple way and still manage to win consistently, something that most of us struggle with.

They say you need to analyze thoroughly and consider tons of data to make the right decisions… but if we’re just using the word "logic," then all of that might not even be necessary anymore.

What do you think, is that really possible?

[Fortify]

You are looking for a "secret to making money" which, even if it did exist, would be extremely foolish for anyone to share. If an earning opportunity of the kind you describe does exist, then it would rapidly diminish to zero when everyone else jumps on it if it's published publicly. I assume that someone has worked very hard, tested many variations and spent a lot of money if they did discover such a strategy, so what makes you think they would dump it here? In truth, there will be a very small minority of people who are able to beat bookmakers (at least for a short time) but the vast majority will be losers. Bookmakers are in business to make money too, and that comes from offering odds that make them a profit.

You ask for logic.. this is the hard reality.

[Botnake]

You ask for logic.. this is the hard reality.

It’s not really a secret anymore since it’s being shared openly, it’s more like bait to lure people in, either to scam them or get them to buy a subscription. As for me, the simple logic I’ve learned in sports betting is: don’t overanalyze. Sometimes the best move is to just read the lines and avoid overthinking things. No need for complicated handicapping as often, the smarter play is just to go against the public, because public perception is usually off.

[Kelward]

There's no logic, strategy or whatever we like to call it that can give us guaranteed win in sports bet, every gambler should choose whatever logic that works for them. But the question mark is whether there is such a logic in sports bet or gambling generally, I sincerely don't think so. I don't worry about logics in gambling because at the end of the day you still need luck to win. I have seen experienced analysts fail in their predictions many times so I stopped putting my hopes in gamblers logics. I analyze what I can and bet with small amounts that is my strategy for gambling generally.

[YOSHIE]

What do you think, is that really possible?

In sports betting we need to compile thoughts on analysis, predictions and so on to the team that we want to bet, of course the basics cannot be separated from the science of sports we have and the ability To make good decisions before placing sports bets, of course all of that cannot be separated from the role of the application of logic or logic in a philosophy.

Of course, gambling sports or betting sports does use logic thinking and thinking logic is normal, especially in sports activities so as not to be mistaken in drawing conclusions when betting.

[bitbollo]

there is no logic in gambling hence in any sport. you will always see the super underdog that will beat the super favorite.
Where is the logic here? Both activities are unpredictable. You can have some estimates (that with large numbers) can give you an advantage.
But bear in mind. You're betting against giant that are analizing data and so on. Even with marketing they can influence your gambling style.
I think really hard to see "logic" on this process...

[freedomgo]

The logic is simple: since the majority of gamblers lose in the long run, that means the chances of success are slim, so don’t follow what most gamblers are doing. If they’re relaxed, then you can’t afford to be. If they’re just going with their gut and not doing deep research, you should do the opposite.

I’m not a consistent winner myself but I believe that’s the right mindset, there’s no easy path to winning in sports betting, especially if you're aiming for long-term consistency. It takes discipline, strategy, and doing what most people aren’t willing to do.

[Lucius]

One can analyze as much as one wants using all possible methods, but there is the expression "the ball is round" which means that there is no method that can predict how a match will end - unless the match is fixed and you have that information. Therefore, even logical reasoning does not have to be of help in something where the outcome changes literally in a fraction of a second because the ball went half a meter to the left or right and bounced off the body of a player and ended up in the net.

Can you explain this in your own words, if you truly believe that simple logic can help you win in sports betting?
Tell me how you analyze games in a simple way and still manage to win consistently, something that most of us struggle with.
~snip~

Someone may be lucky and have a lucky streak, but that doesn't mean that there are people who consistently manage to be successful in sports betting. Whoever says otherwise is not telling the truth. However, as with everything else, a good strategy, enough time and financial discipline can bring results in the long run.

[Wapfika]

If we are just using our logic then we will frequently choose a pick which the odds is low because it means that there’s a higher winning percentage for that pick to win based on the stats.

Odds was carefully analyzed by odds provider to come up with those numbers so logically they knew what’s the high chance to win that’s why they assign low payout on that pick.

I think this is how I think logically when betting in sports.

[Pandu Geddon]

They say you need to analyze thoroughly and consider tons of data to make the right decisions… but if we’re just using the word "logic," then all of that might not even be necessary anymore.

Simple logic is certainly used by some bettors, but it still doesn't consistently increase the chances of winning. For example, a simple bet determines the winner of a match. If we only use simple logic, we will simply predict who will win and bet on them without considering the advantages of the odds offered. Simply put, a bet will be placed on the favored team or individual. We know that such a bet may or may not be successful. There is still a risk of loss.

[Rockstarguy]

There's no logic, strategy or whatever we like to call it that can give us guaranteed win in sports bet, every gambler should choose whatever logic that works for them. But the question mark is whether there is such a logic in sports bet or gambling generally, I sincerely don't think so. I don't worry about logics in gambling because at the end of the day you still need luck to win. I have seen experienced analysts fail in their predictions many times so I stopped putting my hopes in gamblers logics. I analyze what I can and bet with small amounts that is my strategy for gambling generally.

Using simple logic to place bets is not a bad idea, because gambling is all about using strategies, experience, history, and other tools to try to determine if one can stand a chance of winning. However, even with all these tools, there is no guarantee that it will result in a win at the end of the day. Gambling is a game of luck, and while it is beneficial to apply logic in gameplay, it is very important never to rely on it, as it will not always provide the desired outcome.

It is expected that gamblers should be creative in their thinking while betting, but one thing to understand is that whatever methods or strategies one may use in predicting bets, it doesn't make winning in gambling certain.

[yahoo62278]

Sports betting is not "simple" by any means. There is no real "simple logic", there is educated and uneducated betting IMO. Those that take the time to look at stats, injuries, home filed, record vs the team, new players, new coaches, playoffs, weather, and tons of other stuff are going to do better than those that do 0 research in the long run.

It's not as easy as picking the team with the better record or something like that. You gotta use the info available and make an educated bet. Even then it's not a guaranteed win.

[Japinat]

It's not as easy as picking the team with the better record or something like that. You gotta use the info available and make an educated bet. Even then it's not a guaranteed win.

Sometimes, records alone aren’t enough,  you have to analyze carefully because the lines can be misleading. When you see a line that looks like an easy pick for the public, that’s usually a red flag. Either stay away or consider going the other way. A lot of us don’t realize this because we rely on basic info when betting, and since we’re not wagering big amounts, we don’t really push ourselves to dig deeper with the analysis.

[terrific]

Analyzing games doesn't mean that you're guaranteed to win. And to win consistently, I don't think that someone is.
Maybe win some and lose more is what's happening to the majority of the sports bettor.
With all of the strategies that we've got, it's still not enough to win consistently because that's what gambling is all about.
So using a logic is applicable when we're already in a losing streak and quitting is the logic that we need to stop the continuous losses that we might have.

[salad daging]

Is it enough to bet with logic? I'm not sure that simple logic can help you win at sports betting, even though some people do it.

We still place bets using thoroughly analyzed data, but that only increases the chances of winning, let alone winning consistently. For us, that's impossible because thinking logically alone is not enough.

I think there are people who bet with their logic, but I'm not sure this will win in the long run.

[Slow death]

Can you explain this in your own words, if you truly believe that simple logic can help you win in sports betting?
Tell me how you analyze games in a simple way and still manage to win consistently, something that most of us struggle with.

They say you need to analyze thoroughly and consider tons of data to make the right decisions… but if we’re just using the word "logic," then all of that might not even be necessary anymore.

What do you think, is that really possible?

Predicting the outcome of a game is the same as analyzing probabilities. There's no certainty that everything we predict will happen in the event we're betting on. We must be aware that we're analyzing past and present events to predict future events. For example, in today's game between Chelsea and PSG, when you analyze both teams, you're looking at the past and current performances of both teams to predict the outcome. So, there's no certainty that you'll be right. It's not something simple where you can say, "It's logical that PSG will win because they're the favorite." The chances of PSG losing still exist, and the chances of a draw also still exist.

[mindrust]

It is nearly impossible to win consistently just by analyzing games. If you want to win consistently, unless you are an expert at analyzing everything about the game you are going to bet on, you only have 2 options.

1- EV betting
2- Arbitrage betting

As you know casinos don’t like either.

Have you watched the movie “casino” ? If you want to win all the time you gotta be like DeNiro (Sammy) in that movie. There isn’t many guys like that around for a reason.

It ain’t no easy.

[Solodoski]

Logic cannot guarantee multiple wins. I believe the only time someone should claim they have won the house is when they are winning in the long term, not judging through one, two or few bets. The purpose of logic in sports to is have a better chance at winning, by analyzing the right  data.  When you use logic to bet on short term and you get profits from the few bets it might mislead you or whoever you keep telling about your wins. So, logic is all about reducing the risk and near misses and not to guarantee us a win. If it was so, many of us would be on winning streaks by now. You should also know that, there is no perfect strategy to gamble, everyone has their own way and they know how they manage it so we can be profitable at times.

[Webetcoins]

Sports betting is not "simple" by any means. There is no real "simple logic", there is educated and uneducated betting IMO. Those that take the time to look at stats, injuries, home filed, record vs the team, new players, new coaches, playoffs, weather, and tons of other stuff are going to do better than those that do 0 research in the long run.

It's not as easy as picking the team with the better record or something like that. You gotta use the info available and make an educated bet. Even then it's not a guaranteed win.

Day by day sportsbetting is getting interesting because many well-mind peoples are involved in this which are bringing new strategies for helping punters to win some rewards. Still it's not easy to have profit from sportsbetting because you need to understand many things related matches and players which increase your chances then checking stats and then checking with history is surely a lot of hassle but worth to take.

Gamblers are hard working like increasing knowledge base even many feel there is no secret about this, but few are using inside news still its never been easy for betting in any market without checking all details related to various factors assuming secrets will work. Sometimes these works and also give good results because everyone is working hard on their own way for better chances.

[happybitcoinph]

Tell me how you analyze games in a simple way and still manage to win consistently, something that most of us struggle with.

I'm sure no sports bettor is winning consistently. As you said, most of us struggle with.

We might see some sports bettor enthusiasts or influencers making a good number of wins, but we are not aware of how much they also lose at the same time. What they are showing us is only a win. If consistent wins in sports betting exist, it won't lead to the question that you have asked.

What matters is that, try our best to maintain a good winning percentage over a losing percentage.