False Fire: 5 Reasons to Doubt the Nuclear Bomb

[BADecker]

Here it is, the info about the fake news that there are nuclear bombs. The devastation shown from pictures of nuke bombs, could easily be made from models and graphics editing. You decide.


False Fire: 5 Reasons to Doubt the Nuclear Bomb


https://unorthodoxy.substack.com/p/false-fire-5-reasons-to-doubt-the?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=1pdk48&triedRedirect=true
One of the greatest lies told to the world from WW2 — aside from the Holocaust — was the threat of nuclear weapons.

In my article, A Century of Lies is Unraveling, I exclaim my bewilderness in the blatant lies and fallacies that the ruling class put out to the public — not thinking they would ever be caught.

It's as if they never thought of their lies being cracked or of a phenomenon like the Internet, where people could connect and discuss the truth.

_____________________________________________________________________________

After a century of lying to the world, one of those first blatant lies is making a reoccurrence. That lie is that of nuclear weapons.

_____________________________________________________________________________

With this war that the media is telling us about between the US, Iran, and Israel, we're told that the US just bombed three of Iran's nuclear sites. Whenever anything nuclear is in the air, it brings worldwide terror to the masses.

But before we go any further, let's ask ourselves: Do nukes even exist?

Here are five reasons why they don't.
...

[jvanname]

Please watch this video every day for the rest of your life because of how badass it is.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ULSA5wktywI

I’ll wait for the night to come
So far, suicide at home
For I’m not the man you know
This love, it's about control

Regards,

-Joseph Van Name Ph.D.

[BADecker]

Please watch this video every day for the rest of your life because of how badass it is.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ULSA5wktywI

I’ll wait for the night to come
So far, suicide at home
For I’m not the man you know
This love, it's about control

Regards,

-Joseph Van Name Ph.D.

All fake. But you have been conditioned to fall for it.     

[Stalker22]

Yeah! I guess the submarines are also fake because of Jules Verne and his "20,000 Leagues Under The Sea" novel. Ive also heard that the Earth is actually flat because we cant see the curvature with the naked eye and supposedly all the pictures of our dear planet taken from space are fake and photoshopped. 

I think this forum should have a dedicated board for all the crazy conspiracy theorists and other lunatics here.

[BADecker]

Yeah! I guess the submarines are also fake because of Jules Verne and his "20,000 Leagues Under The Sea" novel. Ive also heard that the Earth is actually flat because we cant see the curvature with the naked eye and supposedly all the pictures of our dear planet taken from space are fake and photoshopped. 

I think this forum should have a dedicated board for all the crazy conspiracy theorists and other lunatics here.

Would you move over to that dedicated board? The website in the OP is only one of those that agree with this topic. There was a guy on Youtube who was a worker who worked with plutonium back in the day. He said it wasn't dangerous, and even carried a little of it around with himself wherever he went.

[jvanname]

All fake. But you have been conditioned to fall for it.     

You have no evidence of your claims.

Regards,

-Joseph Van Name Ph.D.

[BADecker]

All fake. But you have been conditioned to fall for it.     

You have no evidence of your claims.

Regards,

-Joseph Van Name Ph.D.

At least two evidences:
1. the article in the OP;
2. the fact that Joseph Van Name Ph.D. seems to be contradicting it.

[jvanname]

At least two evidences:
1. the article in the OP;
2. the fact that Joseph Van Name Ph.D. seems to be contradicting it.

You do not know what evidence even means because you are dumb. How sad!

Regards,

-Joseph Van Name Ph.D.

[montaga]

Yes, but Hydrogen bombs are real as used in Japan.

[BADecker]

Yes, but Hydrogen bombs are real as used in Japan.

The bombs used in Japan near the end of WW2, were not hydrogen bombs. They were said to be atomic bombs. Hydrogen bombs weren't even acclaimed to have been developed at that time.

But what the bombs used in Japan really were, was TNT or some form of plastic explosives. The reasons why they couldn't have been nukes, is listed in the article in the OP.

[jvanname]

The bombs used in Japan near the end of WW2, were not hydrogen bombs. They were said to be atomic bombs. Hydrogen bombs weren't even acclaimed to have been developed at that time.

But what the bombs used in Japan really were, was TNT or some form of plastic explosives. The reasons why they couldn't have been nukes, is listed in the article in the OP.

Your first two sentences are correct. But your last two sentences are questionable. The bomb that fell onto Hiroshima had the yield of about 15 kilotons of TNT. How are you supposed to carry 15 kilotons of TNT on a plane? 15 kilotons of TNT is far too heavy for a single plane to carry. You need to account for a single mushroom cloud over Hiroshima and another one over Nagasaki which is easy to do if there is one plane.

Hmm. If nuclear fission and nuclear fusion cannot be made into weapons, how does the sun work? Does the sun even exist? What about nuclear power? Does a nuclear power plant gets its power from magic instead of nuclear fission?

Regards,

-Joseph Van Name Ph.D.

[BADecker]

The bombs used in Japan near the end of WW2, were not hydrogen bombs. They were said to be atomic bombs. Hydrogen bombs weren't even acclaimed to have been developed at that time.

But what the bombs used in Japan really were, was TNT or some form of plastic explosives. The reasons why they couldn't have been nukes, is listed in the article in the OP.

Your first two sentences are correct. But your last two sentences are questionable. The bomb that fell onto Hiroshima had the yield of about 15 kilotons of TNT. How are you supposed to carry 15 kilotons of TNT on a plane? 15 kilotons of TNT is far too heavy for a single plane to carry. You need to account for a single mushroom cloud over Hiroshima and another one over Nagasaki which is easy to do if there is one plane.

Hmm. If nuclear fission and nuclear fusion cannot be made into weapons, how does the sun work? Does the sun even exist? What about nuclear power? Does a nuclear power plant gets its power from magic instead of nuclear fission?

Regards,

-Joseph Van Name Ph.D.

Were you there? I wasn't. So, how do you know that history of those bombs is written correctly?

Nobody knows how the sun works. We have a bunch of guesses and ideas. But they really have not been proven.

Revelation 19:17: "And I saw an angel standing in the sun, who cried in a loud voice to all the birds flying in midair, 'Come, gather together for the great supper of God...'" Ask the angel standing in the sun how the sun works. Things that are portrayed as science are often a bunch of bullhonkey, designed to turn people away from God.

[jvanname]

Were you there? I wasn't. So, how do you know that history of those bombs is written correctly?

Nobody knows how the sun works. We have a bunch of guesses and ideas. But they really have not been proven.

Revelation 19:17: "And I saw an angel standing in the sun, who cried in a loud voice to all the birds flying in midair, 'Come, gather together for the great supper of God...'" Ask the angel standing in the sun how the sun works. Things that are portrayed as science are often a bunch of bullhonkey, designed to turn people away from God.

The sun works because atoms fuse. At high enough pressures and temperatures, there is nuclear fusion.

Regards,

-Joseph Van Name Ph.D.

[BADecker]

Were you there? I wasn't. So, how do you know that history of those bombs is written correctly?

Nobody knows how the sun works. We have a bunch of guesses and ideas. But they really have not been proven.

Revelation 19:17: "And I saw an angel standing in the sun, who cried in a loud voice to all the birds flying in midair, 'Come, gather together for the great supper of God...'" Ask the angel standing in the sun how the sun works. Things that are portrayed as science are often a bunch of bullhonkey, designed to turn people away from God.

The sun works because atoms fuse. At high enough pressures and temperatures, there is nuclear fusion.

Regards,

-Joseph Van Name Ph.D.

I bet you got a lot of that from your university training. You know, the university training you constantly condemn as crazy or worse, right? But I'm almost sure you got some of it from other university trained Ph.D.'s, right? You know, the universities that you always complain about as being WRONG.

So, how do you know which training is right and which is wrong? Be like that joker who built the rocket and took off to see if the earth was flat or not. But head for the sun so that you can check it our for yourself. And bring back proof so that we all know.

[jvanname]

I bet you got a lot of that from your university training. You know, the university training you constantly condemn as crazy or worse, right? But I'm almost sure you got some of it from other university trained Ph.D.'s, right? You know, the universities that you always complain about as being WRONG.

So, how do you know which training is right and which is wrong? Be like that joker who built the rocket and took off to see if the earth was flat or not. But head for the sun so that you can check it our for yourself. And bring back proof so that we all know.

Universities are insane places that promote violence, but it does absolutely no good to completely misdiagnose the problems. Universities are problematic because they pander to the students who scream in the middle of class and threaten the professor with violence. Universities are not the places that get basic facts about astronomy and cosmology wrong. But in any case, we all need to think critically about the information that we receive from university research just like we need to think critically about all sources of information. If you need help with critical thinking skills, I am willing to give you a non-free consultation for $90/hr; it makes no sense to criticize established facts in science while simultaneously blindly accepting whatever you see at newscruncher.com (I made this site up).

But sending a probe to the sun tells us what is happening at and above the surface of the sun, but nuclear fusion happens at the core. To try figure out what happens at the core, we need to make stellar models that are consistent with the data from the sun and other stars (just don't overfit to the data because that is not cool). In particular, we need a source of energy that can power the sun for billions of years. But we have plenty of fusion experiments including nuclear weapons tests and small amounts of fusion that we get when we propel atoms at very high speeds and subject them to very high temperatures.

Regards,

-Joseph Van Name Ph.D.

P.S. I got my degree in Mathematics, so nuclear fusion is only marginally related to what I have studied.

[BADecker]

I bet you got a lot of that from your university training. You know, the university training you constantly condemn as crazy or worse, right? But I'm almost sure you got some of it from other university trained Ph.D.'s, right? You know, the universities that you always complain about as being WRONG.

So, how do you know which training is right and which is wrong? Be like that joker who built the rocket and took off to see if the earth was flat or not. But head for the sun so that you can check it our for yourself. And bring back proof so that we all know.

Universities are insane places that promote violence, but it does absolutely no good to completely misdiagnose the problem. Universities are problematic because they pander to the students who scream in the middle of class and threaten the professor with violence. But sending a probe to the sun tells us what is happening at and above the surface of the sun, but nuclear fusion happens at the core. To try figure out what happens at the core, we need to make stellar models that are consistent with the data from the sun and other stars. In particular, we need a source of energy that can power the sun for billions of years. But we have plenty of fusion experiments including nuclear weapons tests and small amounts of fusion that we get when we propel atoms at very high speeds and subject them to very high temperatures.

Regards,

-Joseph Van Name Ph.D.

P.S. I got my degree in Mathematics, so nuclear fusion is only marginally related to what I have studied.

The sun is shrinking https://duckduckgo.com/?q=The+sun+is+shrinking&t=ffab&ia=web

[jvanname]

The sun is shrinking https://duckduckgo.com/?q=The+sun+is+shrinking&t=ffab&ia=web

I see that you seem to be referring to some posts by the Institute of Creation Research (ICR) and other creationists. I am aware of the creationist proposal that the sun and stars are powered by gravitational collapse instead of nuclear fusion. Gravitational collapse gives the sun some of its energy, but it seems to only have enough energy to power the sun for about 20 million years. This is easy to calculate and has been done in the 1800's. But the sun is older than 20 million years. With nuclear fusion, we get e=mc^2 energy where c is the speed of light (though only a portion of the mass is converted into energy). With gravitational collapse, we get approximately (up to a small constant factor) (1/2)m v^2 energy where v is approximately the escape velocity of the surface of the sun which is about 617000 meters per second. c is about 300,000,000 meters per second. So fusion wins. Fusion gives you more energy.

Regards,

-Joseph Van Name Ph.D.

P.S. I used to be a lot more accepting of creationists, but that was a much different era back then before January 2020 and December 2024 came along. We are living in a very dangerous era where biological laboratories will be able to make some truly f#@#ed up pathogens such as mirror bacteria. Mirror bacteria will be able to reproduce and evolve at a much higher rate than humans, so we need to learn how to deal with evolving mirror bacteria so we don't go extinct. And a good way to start this is to understand the theory of biological evolution. Of course, the ICR does not just question evolution; they question all parts of science that require a long timeline. But if you really want to have fun, you can try to find some bullshit in the Technical Report on Mirror Bacteria. I certainly did. https://purl.stanford.edu/cv716pj4036

[BADecker]

The sun is shrinking https://duckduckgo.com/?q=The+sun+is+shrinking&t=ffab&ia=web

I see that you seem to be referring to some posts by the Institute of Creation Research. I am aware of the creationist proposal that the sun and stars are powered by gravitational collapse instead of nuclear fusion. Gravitational collapse gives the sun some of its energy, but it seems to only have enough energy to power the sun for about 20 million years. This is easy to calculate and has been done in the 1800's. But the sun is older than 20 million years. With nuclear fusion, we get e=mc^2 energy where c is the speed of light (though only a portion of the mass is converted into energy). With gravitational collapse, we get approximately (up to a small constant factor) (1/2)m v^2 energy where v is approximately the escape velocity of the surface of the sun which is about 617000 meters per second. c is about 300,000,000 meters per second. So fusion wins. Fusion gives you more energy.

Regards,

-Joseph Van Name Ph.D.

P.S. I used to be a lot more accepting of creationists, but that was a much different era back then before January 2020 and December 2024 came along. We are living in a very dangerous era where biological laboratories will be able to make some truly f#@#ed up pathogens such as mirror bacteria. Mirror bacteria will be able to reproduce and evolve at a much higher rate than humans, so we need to learn how to deal with evolving mirror bacteria so we don't go extinct. And a good way to start this is to understand the theory of biological evolution.

God made this universe in 6 days. How much work can you do in a week?

We totally don't know the power of God. We don't have a clue about some universe He might have been working on for a thousand years... or if there are thousands of them that He has been working on for a thousand years... and how many thousands of other universes He has made over what we might consider to be time unending... and if there is even 'time unending' in His ultra Heaven.

Jesus accessed (in human form) God's Heaven of Heavens. And Jesus offers to take us there when this universe is destroyed... if we only accept His joy filled offer. Otherwise we go down with the ship, staying in this universe and its forever destruction... because FOREVER is simply a tiny aspect of what God the ALMIGHTY really is and does.

[jvanname]

God made this universe in 6 days. How much work can you do in a week?

We totally don't know the power of God. We don't have a clue about some universe He might have been working on for a thousand years... or if there are thousands of them that He has been working on for a thousand years... and how many thousands of other universes He has made over what we might consider to be time unending... and if there is even 'time unending' in His ultra Heaven.

Jesus accessed (in human form) God's Heaven of Heavens. And Jesus offers to take us there when this universe is destroyed... if we only accept His offer. Otherwise we go down with the ship, staying in this universe and its forever destruction... because FOREVER is simply a tiny aspect of what God the ALMIGHTY really is and does.

That is great. But we also need to use the scientific method, and by using the scientific method, we have developed the theory of evolution. Now, do you want to be a creationist who is ill-equipped to handle problems like the problem of mirror bacteria, or do you want humanity to actually survive the threat of mirror bacteria? Because by accepting the theory of biological evolution, we will be better equipped to combat the mirror bacteria that can evolve much faster than we can.

Regards,

-Joseph Van Name Ph.D.

[BADecker]

God made this universe in 6 days. How much work can you do in a week?

We totally don't know the power of God. We don't have a clue about some universe He might have been working on for a thousand years... or if there are thousands of them that He has been working on for a thousand years... and how many thousands of other universes He has made over what we might consider to be time unending... and if there is even 'time unending' in His ultra Heaven.

Jesus accessed (in human form) God's Heaven of Heavens. And Jesus offers to take us there when this universe is destroyed... if we only accept His offer. Otherwise we go down with the ship, staying in this universe and its forever destruction... because FOREVER is simply a tiny aspect of what God the ALMIGHTY really is and does.

That is great. But we also need to use the scientific method, and by using the scientific method, we have developed the theory of evolution. Now, do you want to be a creationist who is ill-equipped to handle problems like the problem of mirror bacteria, or do you want humanity to actually survive the threat of mirror bacteria? Because by accepting the theory of biological evolution, we will be better equipped to combat the mirror bacteria that can evolve much faster than we can.

Regards,

-Joseph Van Name Ph.D.

The Theory of Evolution totally disproves itself. How? It suggests that there are random mutations. Yet Cause and Effect shows us that there isn't any 'random'. What we call random is really a nice way of saying that we are ignorant.

Play the game with random if you want. It's part of university training. Random can exist outside of this universe. But the universe is a machine made up of loads of other machines. Machines have makers who make them according to Cause and Effect. So, there is a universe Maker. We call Him God. We call Him 'Him' because that's how He describes Himself in His book He gave us, the Bible.

There isn't any 'random'. There is only human ignorance regarding 'random'.