Would you allow your underage kid to use your detail for KYC after a big win.

[Ever-young]

The world is dynamic. There is no one way rule for everything, so there is absolutely no reason to be very rigid in life.
What am I saying in essence. I have read somewhere in the forum, where a poor Christian father rejected a huge win from by his son from gambling because his faith doesn't support gambling. The amount of money involved would change the life of the family but the man rejected it. I blamed the man very well because he was so rigid with himself. He even refused to acknowledge that the God he allegedly serves might be the one that authorized the win.

So, comparing the situation to the one in this thread, if I were the parents, I will used my KYC and withdraw the money and plan how the money will be spent.

Everyone should have principles and standards, because man is nothing without them, if accepting money from gambling goes against his principles as a man, then I wouldn't blame him for doing so, sometimes maintaining one's principles I believe is more than any amount of money, this doesn't only apply to religious beliefs and practices, it goes beyond that.

Again, I don't believe there's any amount of money that can change a person's life for good, it is how those people choose to manage that money,l that'll determine how long it'll stick around. I've seen people win millions from gambling and some of them are no longer millionaires today, some has even gone broke, so it's not always about the money but the mindset and principles.

[Jody.Drummer]

Some parents may scold their children, but I believe it's true that money can change a person's behavior and character.
I would provide the necessary documentation, even if it were my neighbor's child, but that doesn't mean I'm encouraging them to continue gambling to win or chase winnings. I think it would be hypocritical not to help underage children complete the KYC requirements for withdrawals.

For fellow gamblers, watching the victories obtained by others certainly brings us joy, especially if the one winning a large amount is our child. It may be a bad response for parents who do not like gambling, but for gamblers, winning is always delightful.
Although we can provide our data for KYC verification in the withdrawal process, we must advise them not to bet larger amounts, as those who may not have an income only bet with the small amount they set aside. Just help them enjoy their winnings.

Yes, that's right. For those who have gambled, they are likely happy when they hear about a win, especially if the winner is someone we know and they know us, so that's good news. As you said, maybe for people who don't like gambling, they might not find it fun to hear things related to gambling, even if they win. But I think even if they don't like gambling, if the win is large, they will enjoy it, or maybe at least feel happy, especially if the winner is a family member.

[Dunamisx]

With the way things are going with the present generation, we are going to discover that they are every fast and quick in learning, not only this, they can make a use of the Internet beyond our imagination because of how versatile they have always been in learning new things, they also easily show interest in all these and now it's very common to see what a young child can achieve conveniently with gambling, an adult might not, but still yet, am not in support of underage gambling.

[Zoomic]

The world is dynamic. There is no one way rule for everything, so there is absolutely no reason to be very rigid in life.
What am I saying in essence. I have read somewhere in the forum, where a poor Christian father rejected a huge win from by his son from gambling because his faith doesn't support gambling. The amount of money involved would change the life of the family but the man rejected it. I blamed the man very well because he was so rigid with himself. He even refused to acknowledge that the God he allegedly serves might be the one that authorized the win.

So, comparing the situation to the one in this thread, if I were the parents, I will used my KYC and withdraw the money and plan how the money will be spent.

Everyone should have principles and standards, because man is nothing without them, if accepting money from gambling goes against his principles as a man, then I wouldn't blame him for doing so, sometimes maintaining one's principles I believe is more than any amount of money, this doesn't only apply to religious beliefs and practices, it goes beyond that.

Again, I don't believe there's any amount of money that can change a person's life for good, it is how those people choose to manage that money,l that'll determine how long it'll stick around. I've seen people win millions from gambling and some of them are no longer millionaires today, some has even gone broke, so it's not always about the money but the mindset and principles.

I understand with you and i respect principles but then I also question principles. Someone might make wrong decisions based on wrong principle they cultivated over the years. That is why we are humans, we are adaptive and are expected to self appraise at every point in time. It is not good to be extremely rigid, as I avoid to make deal with people who are so rigid and doesn't understand that the world is so deep.

That man might have been giving his had earned money to his son and he might be using it to gamble and lose. Luckily he won big and you reject it. Why? did he still it? Didn't the son commit his own money to win? I question some principles...

[Satofan44]

The world is dynamic. There is no one way rule for everything, so there is absolutely no reason to be very rigid in life.
What am I saying in essence. I have read somewhere in the forum, where a poor Christian father rejected a huge win from by his son from gambling because his faith doesn't support gambling. The amount of money involved would change the life of the family but the man rejected it. I blamed the man very well because he was so rigid with himself. He even refused to acknowledge that the God he allegedly serves might be the one that authorized the win.

So, comparing the situation to the one in this thread, if I were the parents, I will used my KYC and withdraw the money and plan how the money will be spent.

Everyone should have principles and standards, because man is nothing without them, if accepting money from gambling goes against his principles as a man, then I wouldn't blame him for doing so, sometimes maintaining one's principles I believe is more than any amount of money, this doesn't only apply to religious beliefs and practices, it goes beyond that.

Again, I don't believe there's any amount of money that can change a person's life for good, it is how those people choose to manage that money,l that'll determine how long it'll stick around. I've seen people win millions from gambling and some of them are no longer millionaires today, some has even gone broke, so it's not always about the money but the mindset and principles.

This is funny because I can assure you that the majority of people have no principles. From the ones that think they have, they have very stupid and irrational principles that just shows that they are dumb. Very few people have smart principles, ones that are based on education and knowledge gained in their lives. If you are sticking to some old principles from very early in your life, you have probably not learned or changed much in recent years.

In this particular example, what is better? To reject the money and take your children to terrible and poor doctors and skip some expensive lab tests, or take the money and improve their health by going to good doctors and doing deeper tests when needed? For people with a rational brain or smart principles, the answer is obvious.

[taufik123]

-snip-
In this particular example, what is better? To reject the money and take your children to terrible and poor doctors and skip some expensive lab tests, or take the money and improve their health by going to good doctors and doing deeper tests when needed? For people with a rational brain or smart principles, the answer is obvious.

I don't want to be a hypocrite with big wins when it comes to my son and gambling without my knowledge.
Winnings up to hundreds of thousands of dollars I would certainly take and do KYC with my data,
but then leave that gambling and supervise my son so that he doesn't play with gambling anymore.

Hypocrites might say about education or anything and refuse the money, but then think about taking it too.

[tread93]

This thread reminds me of the argument I was having a few days ago.

When we talk about minors not being allowed to gamble, it's a general rule everywhere, not just in some countries, so if a child who is below 18 years has been gambling without the knowledge of the parent and he or she happensto win an amount which requires advanced KYC to be passed, if the child uses his real ID card, it will be noticed that he's not yet of age.

As a parent to the child, can you allow the child to use your details to pass KYC verification, if asked? And if you do that, does it also mean that you are supporting underage gambling?

I for sure know my dad would have. What parent is going to turn down free money chips? Even if they were not exactly won by them and that isn't exactly ethical a casino wouldn't know the difference anyways and how could they? I would do it probably and just claim as my own winnings and act as the username and email was my own on my kids behalf because why the hell not. I mean honestly people youre gonna tell me that's not a good option? In this situation I think that's quite alright 👍 now my kid just learned a valuable lesson not to gamble underage and I found a golden ticket 😉

[Ever-young]

This is funny because I can assure you that the majority of people have no principles. From the ones that think they have, they have very stupid and irrational principles that just shows that they are dumb. Very few people have smart principles, ones that are based on education and knowledge gained in their lives. If you are sticking to some old principles from very early in your life, you have probably not learned or changed much in recent years.

In this particular example, what is better? To reject the money and take your children to terrible and poor doctors and skip some expensive lab tests, or take the money and improve their health by going to good doctors and doing deeper tests when needed? For people with a rational brain or smart principles, the answer is obvious.

You're correct, but the truth is that, some folks' decisions, especially when it comes to matters like this, are mostly driven by greed, sure people can choose to make some compromises sometimes, even when it goes against their principles but this shouldn't always be the case, desperate times they say, calls for desperate measures, so if the time you are is actually a desperate one and calls for desperate measures, then I see no reason why one cannot make those compromises...

[summonerrk]

With the way things are going with the present generation, we are going to discover that they are every fast and quick in learning, not only this, they can make a use of the Internet beyond our imagination because of how versatile they have always been in learning new things, they also easily show interest in all these and now it's very common to see what a young child can achieve conveniently with gambling, an adult might not, but still yet, am not in support of underage gambling.

I agree that we can only be amazed at how quickly modern children learn about technology and start using it, but the fact is that gambling is a hobby that is very much influenced by psychology, and children's psychology is not yet strong.
This means that until they come of age, and I would even say until they are 20 years old, they should be very careful with gambling. And this is even with complete confidence that it is possible to develop a successful strategy.

[Satofan44]

I don't want to be a hypocrite with big wins when it comes to my son and gambling without my knowledge.
Winnings up to hundreds of thousands of dollars I would certainly take and do KYC with my data,
but then leave that gambling and supervise my son so that he doesn't play with gambling anymore.

That is good, as I said one has to be cautious on the parenting side but on the side of the rewards it is clear. The money has been earned, there is no need to reject it to try and prove a point. Everyone is worse off with the rejection of that money.
 

Hypocrites might say about education or anything and refuse the money, but then think about taking it too.

Their arguments are not smart because doing the wrong thing such as not taking the money does educate your children, but it educates them wrongly and encourages them to make wrong decisions.  

You're correct, but the truth is that, some folks' decisions, especially when it comes to matters like this, are mostly driven by greed, sure people can choose to make some compromises sometimes, even when it goes against their principles but this shouldn't always be the case, desperate times they say, calls for desperate measures, so if the time you are is actually a desperate one and calls for desperate measures, then I see no reason why one cannot make those compromises...

I don't think greed is the relevant emotion for the question that is being asked here. In this particular scenario greed would lead to different behavior. For example, seeing that your child was very successful with gambling you push him to gamble even more because you want even more money.

[Questat]

I would just for that certain time, so he can claim his winning amount. After that, there’s no more reason to let him allow doing the same thing, that’s already a big toleration if ever and it’s like you yourself as a parent is the one taking your kid into gambling addiction in the future.

Minors are strictly not allowed to gamble, and that’s very clear. So as much as possible, parents should monitor the online activities of their kids, or set limits for them, and never introduce gambling if they hardly understand it, just for their own sake.

[taufik123]

That is good, as I said one has to be cautious on the parenting side but on the side of the rewards it is clear. The money has been earned, there is no need to reject it to try and prove a point. Everyone is worse off with the rejection of that money.

Proof that is not even needed at all, Just take a big win, so much better and leave it later so there is no further game.

Those who refuse will simply return those winnings to the casino and the casino that makes more profits.
Being a realistic and non-hypocritical person is better and more open in seeing all the opportunities that exist.

[Sonia_123]

This thread reminds me of the argument I was having a few days ago.

When we talk about minors not being allowed to gamble, it's a general rule everywhere, not just in some countries, so if a child who is below 18 years has been gambling without the knowledge of the parent and he or she happensto win an amount which requires advanced KYC to be passed, if the child uses his real ID card, it will be noticed that he's not yet of age.

As a parent to the child, can you allow the child to use your details to pass KYC verification, if asked? And if you do that, does it also mean that you are supporting underage gambling?

As long as the child has gotten a big win, I will provide him with all the necessary details to get the money,and after which, will tell him not to gamble again he should wait till he his of age because of the consequences involved since he his still a minor.

 Stopping him entirely will be wrong because he will only pretend before you that he his not gambling but behind you he will still be gambling, remember you never taught him how to gamble, he learnt it outside, so all he needs is proper guidance and monitoring so that he will not go astray but becomes professional since from minor he has started winning big which means that his gambling future will be very bright.