Billionaire Nicolas Maduro $700M in assets seized!

[Free Market Capitalist]

From jets to Florida luxury homes: U.S. seized a fortune from Maduro

All these leaders who preach against the rich and capital are all the same; what they dislike is the wealth of others. They create societies where poverty and misery are widespread among the population, who tend to flee the country in their millions, if they are allowed to and no walls are built to prevent them from escaping, while they continue to accumulate more and more wealth, at the same time as continuing with their rhetoric against the rich and capitalism.

This is nothing new. After staging a coup following their defeat in the elections just over a century ago, the first thing the Bolsheviks did was to take over the dachas for their own personal use.

It never fails: the more radical a leader's rhetoric against wealth and capital is, the richer he is himself. What he doesn't like is for others to get rich.

[Perfectbaby]

It never fails: the more radical a leader's rhetoric against wealth and capital is, the richer he is himself. What he doesn't like is for others to get rich.

I might not know more about this story but from experience with what is happening within our country it could be said those in power would never allows others to outshine them, rather they wouldn't mind trying all their possibilities to make sure everything works under their control and still have a total over people who under them. Other I have observed is that they don't want to others to get rich because they felt when they are Rich they wouldn't be that submissive and humble to them but are wanting in a way to have a total control over everyone whom they think are subjected to them.

[Alpha Marine]

I don't take anyone who is against capitalism and democracy seriously.
Capitalism may be flawed, but it's still better than the alternatives. There is no single concept of an economic system that is not flawed. The same can be said for democracy. You can't point out any form of government that is not flawed, but democracy remains the superior choice.

The US is a "land of opportunity" because of capitalism. There is a reason they have more millionaires and billionaires than any other country. There is a reason every corporation wants to have its business there. Any leader who is against capitalism, people should be wary of him because they should know better. Even China and Russia, which claim to be socialist, are not following strict socialist ideas; there is often a mix of capitalism.

[abhiseshakana]

From jets to Florida luxury homes: U.S. seized a fortune from Maduro

All these leaders who preach against the rich and capital are all the same; what they dislike is the wealth of others. They create societies where poverty and misery are widespread among the population, who tend to flee the country in their millions, if they are allowed to and no walls are built to prevent them from escaping, while they continue to accumulate more and more wealth, at the same time as continuing with their rhetoric against the rich and capitalism.

This is nothing new. After staging a coup following their defeat in the elections just over a century ago, the first thing the Bolsheviks did was to take over the dachas for their own personal use.

It never fails: the more radical a leader's rhetoric against wealth and capital is, the richer he is himself. What he doesn't like is for others to get rich.

When discussing US-Venezuelan relations, it's most appropriate to use a geopolitical, geostrategic, and geoeconomic perspective. Venezuela possesses vast oil reserves, particularly extra-heavy oil. Anyone who influences Venezuela's oil exports automatically controls global oil supply and prices. Venezuela is America's backyard; for America, Venezuela is a testbed for the modern Monroe Doctrine and a stage for competition with Russia, China, and Iran in the Western Hemisphere.

Venezuela also provides a strategic fulcrum in the Caribbean/South America for Russia. Although there are no permanent military bases, easy access for bomber flights, military training visits, and joint exercises signals Russia's ability to penetrate a region previously under US influence. Rosneft, a Russian entity, has for years been a vital financial and commercial channel for Venezuela, including loans and oil marketing schemes designed to circumvent sanctions. Russia is also Venezuela's largest arms supplier, deepening Venezuela's military-technical dependence on Russia.

Trump wants to limit the money and weapons that support the Maduro regime, as a first step to maintain the stability of domestic oil prices and global supplies (hence the push-and-pull policy on oil sanctions), reduce regional migration flows, and contain the influence of Russia, China, and Iran in the Western Hemisphere. America knows that Russia uses Venezuela as a diversified front in global politics, Venezuela being a valuable piece on the global chessboard, despite the high costs/risks for Russia.

[ultrloa]

From jets to Florida luxury homes: U.S. seized a fortune from Maduro

All these leaders who preach against the rich and capital are all the same; what they dislike is the wealth of others. They create societies where poverty and misery are widespread among the population, who tend to flee the country in their millions, if they are allowed to and no walls are built to prevent them from escaping, while they continue to accumulate more and more wealth, at the same time as continuing with their rhetoric against the rich and capitalism.

This is nothing new. After staging a coup following their defeat in the elections just over a century ago, the first thing the Bolsheviks did was to take over the dachas for their own personal use.

It never fails: the more radical a leader's rhetoric against wealth and capital is, the richer he is himself. What he doesn't like is for others to get rich.

US also sanction those officials who support Maduro before https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/jy27783

So it seems that US step up on this situation so that it will not escalate any further huge trouble in that country.

US also have $50M bounty set for him  https://news.meaww.com/pam-bondi-slammed-after-announcing-50-m-bounty-for-venezuelans-nicolas-maduro-extraordinarily-silly its seems that they really like to take down the dude and want him to be powerless.

Let see if they can make this situation to happen since as what I read US is eager to dismantle the criminal network in Venezuela and want get back the democratic order in that country.

[Coyster]

He is the Venezuelan president, so he is in Venezuela, why place a $50m bounty for information on his whereabouts when we know exactly where he is, lol. I don't know what the U.S. are trying to do with this, topple the Venezuelan government? And get them a leader of their own choosing, sounds familiar. All of this just seems to be a well orchestrated smokescreen to cover the controversy of the Epstein files, maybe they should focus on matters at home.

[Free Market Capitalist]

I don't take anyone who is against capitalism and democracy seriously.
Capitalism may be flawed, but it's still better than the alternatives. There is no single concept of an economic system that is not flawed. The same can be said for democracy. You can't point out any form of government that is not flawed, but democracy remains the superior choice.

The US is a "land of opportunity" because of capitalism. There is a reason they have more millionaires and billionaires than any other country. There is a reason every corporation wants to have its business there.

That's right. In the same way, I see many people on the forum who are bothered by the fact that there are billionaires who have created companies, but they don't seem to be bothered by the fact that they have done so by impoverishing the entire population, causing famines, exoduses, and political repression. Although shortly after criticizing US billionaires they place their order on Amazon from their iPhone, lol.

He is the Venezuelan president, so he is in Venezuela, why place a $50m bounty for information on his whereabouts when we know exactly where he is, lol. I don't know what the U.S. are trying to do with this, topple the Venezuelan government? And get them a leader of their own choosing, sounds familiar. All of this just seems to be a well orchestrated smokescreen to cover the controversy of the Epstein files, maybe they should focus on matters at home.

I haven't really understood the bounty thing either, nor have I stopped to look at the details, just as I think the Epstein thing is a mess, to say the least. But in this case, any president they put in place who isn't a fucking genocidal communist will be better than the current one. The fact is that you won't see any Americans fleeing the US to go to Venezuela, while millions are doing the opposite.

[Alpha Marine]

That's right. In the same way, I see many people on the forum who are bothered by the fact that there are billionaires who have created companies, but they don't seem to be bothered by the fact that they have done so by impoverishing the entire population, causing famines, exoduses, and political repression. Although shortly after criticizing US billionaires they place their order on Amazon from their iPhone, lol.

I'd be worried about a career politician who is a billionaire with many luxury assets before I get worried by a businessman billionaire. They get what they work for. Hating on billionaires simply because they're billionaires is just funny because deep down, we all want to have that much money too.
Whenever I hear statements like "how can one person have so much money when there are people homeless and starving", I shake my head, because why is the blame not on the government but the billionaires? The government is responsible for making sure there are jobs and education for these people, the government is responsible for keeping things less expensive and housing affordable, so your anger should be on the government and not people who made the most of what they're given.

[DeathAngel]

That’s ridiculous but sadly doesn’t surprise me. The real people in charge don’t want anybody to have significant wealth, they want us all to have nothing & be little worker bees, not complaining whilst they suck up all the wealth. Sounds like a real Communist type move, hopefully he has a way of getting it back.

[Free Market Capitalist]

I'd be worried about a career politician who is a billionaire with many luxury assets before I get worried by a businessman billionaire. They get what they work for. Hating on billionaires simply because they're billionaires is just funny because deep down, we all want to have that much money too.
Whenever I hear statements like "how can one person have so much money when there are people homeless and starving", I shake my head, because why is the blame not on the government but the billionaires? The government is responsible for making sure there are jobs and education for these people, the government is responsible for keeping things less expensive and housing affordable, so your anger should be on the government and not people who made the most of what they're given.

I disagree with you on that last point, my friend. The best way for the government to ensure more jobs and housing is to get out of the way. Reduce regulations and lower taxes. A clear example of this can be found in the US. People are fleeing Democratic states, which are the ones with the most pro-poor rhetoric, and which are therefore the ones that create the most poverty, create the fewest jobs, and have the most expensive housing. People are leaving California for Texas.

[Zlantann]

I disagree with you on that last point, my friend. The best way for the government to ensure more jobs and housing is to get out of the way. Reduce regulations and lower taxes. A clear example of this can be found in the US. People are fleeing Democratic states, which are the ones with the most pro-poor rhetoric, and which are therefore the ones that create the most poverty, create the fewest jobs, and have the most expensive housing. People are leaving California for Texas.

The government has never been a good 'businessman'. Almost all nationalised businesses that were managed as public corporations in my country went bankrupt. These government-controlled firms were neither profitable nor offered quality services until they finally went bankrupt. Yet every year, a large chunk of the national budget was allocated to them.

The worst capitalism is better than the best socialism because I have experienced how government officials use these public firms as cash cows. Capitalism creates avenues for common people to become rich and also offers better services to the people.         

[rdluffy]

It is very sad to see what has happened to Venezuela and the Venezuelan people suffering, given that the country has such abundant oil reserves and was once one of the richest countries in the world
The hypocrisy of many is absurd when they prevent people from prospering, critisize other countries but live a life of luxury and excess, with all the best capitalist resources that they criticize so much
Meanwhile, the people there have to be strong to survive

I am not in a position to judge everything that is happening and whether it is fair or not, but it seems that the United States is closing in on Maduro and it is possible that something bigger could happen in the not too distant future

There's already a bounty of $50 million to capture Maduro 

 

[Eternad]

It never fails: the more radical a leader's rhetoric against wealth and capital is, the richer he is himself. What he doesn't like is for others to get rich.

~

Other I have observed is that they don't want to others to get rich because they felt when they are Rich they wouldn't be that submissive and humble to them but are wanting in a way to have a total control over everyone whom they think are subjected to them.

We call this in my country crab mentality. You don't want other people to get in or beyond your level so you try to pull them down similar what a crab does. Being rich means power in our society and those who lack it are being looked down.

I am not in a position to judge everything that is happening and whether it is fair or not, but it seems that the United States is closing in on Maduro and it is possible that something bigger could happen in the not too distant future

There's already a bounty of $50 million to capture Maduro 

According to the article that OP shared, he is one of the world's biggest drug traffickers. This happening reminds me of the stroy of Pablo Escobar, the famous drug leader in Columbia. As far as I know he became a leader too in his country and he controlled the authroties while running his illegal business.

In announcing the new bounty last week, Bondi said Maduro leads the Cartel of the Suns, a powerful narcotics organization that operates within Venezuela’s armed forces while ruling the country and maintaining partnerships with the nation’s notorious Tren de Aragua gang, Mexico’s Sinaloa Cartel and other international syndicates.

“He is one of the world’s biggest drug traffickers and a threat to our national security,” Bondi said. “That’s why we’ve doubled his bounty to $50 million.”

[Free Market Capitalist]

Bravo! The day of liberation has finally arrived for Venezuelans.

U.S. launches military strikes on Venezuela as Trump escalates pressure on Maduro regime, sources say

Let's see if Trump manages to shove a huge missile up the ass of that son of a bitch Maduro, who has starved his people, destroyed the country, and caused an exodus of 8 million Venezuelans.

Bad day for the fucking communists who defend this system where the same thing always happens: leaders like Maduro and his acolytes become multimillionaires by plundering everything and impoverishing and repressing the population.

[STT]

Madro is arrested for drug crime and trafficking, if they can prove that then they can hold him for the rest of his natural life I presume.   People have been speculating Venezuela and its military is funded by drugs for a decade but I have not seen much proof especially.
  He wasn't democratically elected but again that is something that has to be proven, on the face of it you cannot perform any of these military actions legally without justification so labelling this as a success could be premature but I hope the country is finally able to recover and prosper.

First lady Cilia Adela Flores de Maduro allegedly accepted hundreds of thousands of dollars in bribes to broker a 2007 meeting between a large-scale drug trafficker and the director of Venezuela’s national anti-drug office.

The president’s son, Nicolas Ernesto Maduro Guerra, is a member of the country’s national assembly nicknamed “the prince.” Madura Guerra visited Margarita Island, Venezuela, about twice a month in 2014 and 2015 aboard a Falcon 900 plane that would be loaded with packages that allegedly held drugs. In 2017, he allegedly worked to ship hundreds of kilograms of cocaine from Venezuela to Miami.

Hector Rusthenford Guerrero Flores, the alleged leader of the crime gang Tren de Aragua. He is accused of engaging in murder, kidnapping, extortion, drug trafficking, gun trafficking, prostitution, sex trafficking, robbery and money laundering for more than a decade.

[AmoreJaz]

Bravo! The day of liberation has finally arrived for Venezuelans.

U.S. launches military strikes on Venezuela as Trump escalates pressure on Maduro regime, sources say

Let's see if Trump manages to shove a huge missile up the ass of that son of a bitch Maduro, who has starved his people, destroyed the country, and caused an exodus of 8 million Venezuelans.

Bad day for the fucking communists who defend this system where the same thing always happens: leaders like Maduro and his acolytes become multimillionaires by plundering everything and impoverishing and repressing the population.

I believe not only Venezuela has problem with their leader, there's a lot more out there waiting to be ousted by their people. I hope we can at least lessen corrupt government officials because up until now, there are so many corrupt officials who continue to take advantage of their position for their own profit. I hope Venezuelans have a better leadership after this controversial President.
And now, Trump admin is saying that beware of other nations as this is not the first and definitely not the last. Let us see who's next then...

[Hispo]

Bravo! The day of liberation has finally arrived for Venezuelans.

U.S. launches military strikes on Venezuela as Trump escalates pressure on Maduro regime, sources say

Let's see if Trump manages to shove a huge missile up the ass of that son of a bitch Maduro, who has starved his people, destroyed the country, and caused an exodus of 8 million Venezuelans.

Bad day for the fucking communists who defend this system where the same thing always happens: leaders like Maduro and his acolytes become multimillionaires by plundering everything and impoverishing and repressing the population.

While Maduro may be gone, this is far from being over here in Venezuela. The crooks who helped him to steal the lastest elections and those who have made billions of dollars by stealing from the people are still here, roaming free in the streets of Venezuela, and now they are being more cautious than ever after what happened to Maduro.
Democracy, true democracy is still due to reach politics in Venezuela and all we can do is to see and hope the military recognize there is no more room for crooks to rule this country any longer.

The next three days will be decisive and nobody knows what could happen, pray for us.

[Smack That Ace]

I hope Venezuelans have a better leadership after this controversial President.

No matter who becomes president of Venezuela, if they do not kneel and submit to the United States, their country will never find peace and progress. What has happened and is happening in Venezuela is simply the consequence of years of resistance against American imperialism. The cause is not solely due to incompetent and corrupt leaders, as the press has reported.

I bet that if they hold elections and the new government doesn't capitulate to the US. Don't be surprised if Trump sends in the US military and completely takes over Venezuela.

Don't let the Western media fool us, the sole purpose of this war is oil.


pic: x

[Free Market Capitalist]

I hope we can at least lessen corrupt government officials because up until now, there are so many corrupt officials who continue to take advantage of their position for their own profit. I hope Venezuelans have a better leadership after this controversial President.

Here's the thing: all these Bolivarians who proclaim themselves defenders of the poor have actually enriched themselves, starting with Maduro, while impoverishing the population, which is now living in misery.

Don't let the Western media fool us, the sole purpose of this war is oil.

You didn't say anything when China and Russia were also working with Maduro's regime for oil. And you don't mention that US oil companies were expropriated, which is what communists like best: stealing.

[STT]

If Trump were smart the action here would be incidental to his wider intended purpose of nudging Putin into accepting a proper peace deal but the problem is Trump or any of his administration are likely not considering the bigger problems.
    If we repeat Iraq and take away a terrible leader but get Isis then Maduro being absent now is immediately a terrible risk.   I don't assume there is an Iran Iraq power vacuum scenario duplication in any exact way but the historic warning for unintended consequences is clear.  The commonly accepted logic is you don't improve a countries prospects by interfering like has just happened.
  Im waiting to see the emergence of a wider better plan then just decapitating the regime and hope for the best.