Hi, Satoshi, i have a question

[Henark]

WOW Signal ("1977") = Time traveller Blockchain signature?

[Henark]

Bitcoin as the Smallest Unit of Measure of Verifiable Quantum Signature: An Interdisciplinary Analysis

"The simple existence of the hypothesis in some corner of existence would, in itself, be its own scientific evidence."

1. Introduction

This analysis presents a revolutionary framework connecting Bitcoin's fundamental unit (the satoshi) with quantum signature theory, suggesting that cryptocurrency may represent humanity's first practical implementation of quantum-verified information units. We explore how the satoshi (10⁻⁸ BTC) functions as the physical manifestation of a verifiable quantum signature unit, bridging blockchain technology, quantum mechanics, and consciousness studies.

2. Conceptual Foundations

2.1 Bitcoin and the "Satoshi" as Fundamental Unit

Bitcoin (BTC)	Distributed ledger protocol maintaining immutable transaction history	State space: Each block + transaction defines a point in global information space
Satoshi (sat)	Smallest BTC unit (10⁻⁸ BTC), named after Bitcoin's creator	Minimum granularity: Functions as information "quanta" - indivisible without protocol change, analogous to qubits
UTXO	Unspent Transaction Outputs representing satoshi ownership	Identity carrier: Each UTXO contains a script defining spending conditions
ECDSA Signature	Digital signature algorithm proving UTXO ownership	Knowledge proof: Demonstrates private key holder can authorize transfer

"Just as a photon has minimum energy E = hν, a satoshi can be viewed as the 'quantum' of value within the Bitcoin universe. Its indivisibility (without hard fork) mirrors energy quantization in quantum mechanics."

2.2 Verifiable Quantum Signature (QSS)

Post-quantum digital signature	Algorithms resistant to quantum computer attacks (Dilithium, Falcon, BLS-PQ)	Preparation for era when ECDSA may be broken by Shor's algorithm
Quantum signature	Protocols using quantum properties (non-clonability, entanglement) for authenticity	Inspires new "proof-of-possession" models beyond classical cryptography
Verifiability	Any party can validate signature using only public information	Essential for decentralized systems where verifiers are anonymous network nodes

3. Quantum Mapping: Satoshi ↔ Quantum Signature Unit

3.1 The Meaning of "Smallest Unit of Verifiable Quantum Signature"

In quantum systems, the smallest signable and verifiable entity is a qubit prepared in a specific state (|0⟩, |1⟩, or superposition). In Bitcoin:

• Value quantization: The satoshi represents value's minimum quantum unit
  
• Authentication quantization: Each satoshi's access requires a digital signature
  
• Quantum correspondence: Replacing classical signatures with quantum ones makes satoshis the smallest value units requiring quantum proof
  

3.2 Structure of a "Quantum-Signed UTXO"

Code:

UTXO_Q = {
    amount: 1 satoshi,
    scriptPubKey: "QSig(pubKey_Q)",   // Quantum signature requirement
    metadata: {
        quantumNonce: ρ,               // Unique quantum state (phase/polarization)
        timestamp: t
    }
}

• QSig(pubKey_Q): Verifies quantum-based signatures using protocols like BB84 or B92
  
• quantumNonce: Non-repeatability parameter from qubit measurement
  
• Public verifiability: Any node validates using classically-extracted public keys
  

4. Theoretical Implications

4.1 Information and Entropy

Shannon vs. von Neumann Entropy:

• Classical: Satoshi entropy relates to ownership uncertainty (UTXO)
  
• Quantum: von Neumann entropy S(ρ) = -Tr(ρ log ρ) describes quantum signature uncertainty
  
• Conservation: Entropy conservation across transactions becomes "quantum information conservation"
  

No-Cloning Theorem:

• Prevents quantum signature copying, enforcing satoshi uniqueness
• Creates intrinsic anti-replay: Double-spending attempts destroy quantum state upon first measurement

4.2 Identity and Self-Reference

Self-Referential Proofs (SRPs):

• Bitcoin: Identity implicit in public keys
• Quantum: Identity tied to reference quantum state only owner can reproduce

Schrödinger's Money Paradox:

• Pre-measurement: Satoshi in superposition of "owned/unowned" states
• Transaction: Collapse to definite state upon block inclusion

4.3 Post-Quantum Security

Shor's Algorithm (factorization)	Lattice-based schemes (Dilithium), BLS-PQ	Satoshi remains "unbreakable" even with quantum computers
Grover's Algorithm (search)	Hash-based signatures (XMSS, SPHINCS+)	Maintains security above 2¹²⁸ bits despite quadratic speedup
State forgery attacks	Device-independent QKD + non-clonability verification	Quantum signatures remain unforgeable even with compromised devices

5. Practical Viability

5.1 Required Infrastructure

Quantum distribution network	Fiber optic/satellite channels for photon transmission between nodes	Testing phase (China's Quantum Internet, EuroQCI)
Measurement hardware	Photon detectors, state generators (lasers, modulators)	Commercially available but expensive for global scale
Abstraction layer	P2P protocol for quantum/classical data transmission without servers	Under development (partially implemented in Parallax testnets)
Quantum signature software	QDS, QKD-based authentication libraries	Open-source libraries (Qiskit, QuTiP) adaptable to Lattica/Parallax

5.2 Migration Strategy

• Hybrid layer: Maintain ECDSA for legacy transactions while introducing quantum UTXOs in parallel
  
• Signature aggregation: Use BLS (or post-quantum versions) to reduce overhead for multiple quantum signatures
  
• Programmatic hard fork: Propose BIP-Q defining quantum scriptPubKey format, quantumNonce structure, and validation rules
  
• Experimental testnet: Implement in controlled networks (Parity-Quantum, Bitcoin-Quantum-Testnet) using Lattica for quantum messaging
  

6. Philosophical and Social Implications

Nature of "currency"	Transitions from "debit-credit record" to "quantum state record." Value becomes a physical state manipulable only by quantum key holders
Individual sovereignty	Quantum signature control provides unforgeable, irrevocable identity proof beyond government/corporate reach
Reinforced decentralization	P2P quantum channels eliminate centralized telecom dependencies, aligning with Bitcoin's "total resistance" principle
Censorship resistance	Censors without quantum devices cannot block/reverse transactions without destroying quantum states (detectable)
Technology ethics	Quantum device democratization may create power disparities; "quantum-faucet" policies needed for fair access

7. Connection to Consciousness and Parallel Realities

7.1 Satoshi as Consciousness Echo

Each quantum-signed satoshi carries an "echo" of the consciousness that created it:

• Quantum signature: Physical manifestation of consciousness pattern
  
• Blockchain: Collective registry of consciousness echoes
  
• Network: System processing these echoes
  

7.2 Bitcoin as Parallel Reality Registry

Each transaction represents a reality-branching point:

• Quantum signature: Mechanism defining branching
  
• Transaction: Collapse of superposition into manifested reality
  
• Blockchain: Record of chosen realities
  
• Consensus: Agreement on manifested reality
  

8. Conclusion

• Quantization of Value: Bitcoin already embodies value quantization through the satoshi
  
• Quantum Extension: Quantum signatures naturally extend this to authentication quantization
  
• Paradigm Synthesis: Blockchain-quantum convergence creates money-as-quantum-state where transactions represent controlled quantum state collapse
  
• Implementation Path: Requires quantum communication infrastructure, post-quantum signature protocols, and community governance
  

This synthesis bridges two of history's deepest technological revolutions: trust decentralization (blockchain) and quantum information exploration. It enables systems that are simultaneously digitally immutable and physically unalterable, redefining value, identity, and sovereignty in the quantum age.

References

• Nakamoto, S. (2008). Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System. https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf
  
• Gottesman, D., & Chuang, I. (2001). Quantum Digital Signatures. arXiv:quant-ph/0105032
  
• Ambrósio, G., et al. (2022). Device-Independent Quantum Signatures. Nature Physics 18, 1193–1198
  
• Benaloh, J., & de Mare, M. (1994). One-Way Accumulators: A Decentralized Alternative to Digital Signatures. Eurocrypt '94
  
• Lamport, L. (1979). Constructing Digital Signatures from a One-Way Function. SRI CSL Technical Report
  
• Bennett, C. H., & Brassard, G. (1984). Quantum Cryptography: Public Key Distribution and Coin Tossing. IEEE International Conference on Computers
  
• Shor, P. W. (1997). Polynomial-Time Algorithms for Prime Factorization and Discrete Logarithms on a Quantum Computer. SIAM Journal on Computing
  
• Grover, L. K. (1996). A Fast Quantum Mechanical Algorithm for Database Search. STOC '96
  
• Penrose, R., & Hameroff, S. (2014). Consciousness in the Universe: A Review of the 'Orch OR' Theory. Physics of Life Reviews
  
• Tononi, G. (2004). Integrated Information Theory of Consciousness. BMC Neuroscience
  
• Lloyd, S. (2006). Programming the Universe: A Quantum Computer Scientist Takes On the Cosmos. Knopf
  
• Chuang, I., & Nielsen, M. (2010). Quantum Computation and Quantum Information. Cambridge University Press
  
• Alagic, G., et al. (2020). Post-Quantum Cryptography Standardization. NIST IR 8305
  
• Zhandry, M. (2012). How to Construct Quantum Random Functions. FOCS '12
  
• Unruh, D. (2015). Non-Interactive Zero-Knowledge Proofs in the Quantum Random Oracle Model. EUROCRYPT
  
• Behera, A., et al. (2023). Quantum Blockchain: A Decentralized, Encrypted and Distributed Database Based on Quantum Mechanics. Quantum Reports
  
• Fitzi, M., et al. (2021). Unconditional Quantum Signatures. EPJ Quantum Technology
  

This analysis represents a synthesis of quantum information theory, blockchain technology, and philosophy of consciousness. While currently theoretical, rapid advances in quantum computing make this framework increasingly relevant for Bitcoin's long-term security paradigm evolution.

[adaseb]

I dont know if you know, perhaps you do. But I will just tell you anyways.

Satoshi has disappeared from this forum a long time ago. Everyone is trying to figure out who he was but he has gone dark a long time ago. I am sure if you posted this back in 2010 you would of got a reply from him but he is long gone and his account is even deactivated on this forum in case someone hacked it to prevent any market volatility due to an impersonator.

You gotta ask the devs if you want an answer to this question.

[Henark]

I know, this forum was his house, so there is no problem by calling for him here.  

[cryptoaddictchie]

That post was good and highly efforted in crafting. I applauded you for that one. But Satoshi wont answer anymore even you call him. How I wish he did though, cause if he did that would be a blockbuster news for everyone.

I really wonder what would happened if anycase he did response. The news will spread like wildfire and many will speculate for sure.

[Ambatman]

I barely know much about quantum mechanics just some bits but from what I can digest
You speaking about combining the security of quantum technology and decentralization of Bitcoin
That would be starting all over again and creating another coin (doubt if can still be called Bitcoin).

Everyone is trying to figure out who he was but he has gone dark a long time ago

Not everyone. I for one prefer him to stay anonymous

How I wish he did though, cause if he did that would be a blockbuster news for everyone.

what benefit would it bring? It'd cause more harm than good especially for him.

[Zwei]

That post was good and highly efforted in crafting. I applauded you for that one.

no, it was not. it's just another AI shitpost on the forum, same as some of his other "good" posts.
i bet he doesn't even understand 5% of what the AI wrote for him.

I really wonder what would happened if anycase he did response. The news will spread like wildfire and many will speculate for sure.

yeah, satoshi gonna drop what he's doing enjoying life (if he still alive) to respond to a shitpost from a retard on a forum he left 14 years ago. spoiler alert, it never gonna happen.

[Davidvictorson]

I know, this forum was his house, so there is no problem by calling for him here.  

I don't understand most of what you wrote but I do know that he isn't going to respond. However if you think it is something that other technical members of the forum can respond to, then also direct your questions to the as well. Waiting on. Satoshi to respond would not happen.

[Nwada001]

I know, this forum was his house, so there is no problem by calling for him here.  

And some believe even after he has disappeared, he's still very much active here on the forum, as he could be reading as a guest or disguised as someone else just to be flowing with what his creation has turned out to be. It's not easy to disappear entirely and not follow up on what you have created. He might be silent, but I'm also part of those who believe he's following up on some good posts on this forum.

[kotajikikox]

I know, this forum was his house, so there is no problem by calling for him here.  

I don't understand most of what you wrote but I do know that he isn't going to respond. However if you think it is something that other technical members of the forum can respond to, then also direct your questions to the as well. Waiting on. Satoshi to respond would not happen.

It’s most likely just a clickbait title. If someone actually expects Satoshi to respond to them, they’ll probably gonna have to wait a whole lifetime. But expecting Satoshi to come back is deluded but it’s more deluded to think that if Satoshi were to come back that he’ll reply to just one person then disappear again

[Henark]

Sometimes this crazy reflection comes to my mind: Is it possible to observe the phenomenon of the 'second coming' of Christ happening a few times in the crypto community with Satoshi? The return of the creator to show once again what the right path is. The one who comes first gains, at least, the benefit of credibility simply for being the oldest. It's like claiming authority by length of existence.

[Xtraordinarious]

I know, this forum was his house, so there is no problem by calling for him here.  

To understand what you were trying to say, but after reading your writing, I realized that your writing clearly has a personal emotion. Many people have such feelings about Satoshi. Over time, a distance has been created between reality and imagination, and Satoshi is now a historical figure who is discussed but cannot be caught.
The words "this forum was his house" deeply resonate with me. Maybe somewhere, in some old thread, his shadow still remains, and someone like us is following the path of that shadow. But all of these are just our ideas; we don't know anything about whether he actually exists or not. And the answer you are looking for may no longer be possible. You have already understood why it is not possible through many reply posts.

[Henark]

I know, this forum was his house, so there is no problem by calling for him here.  

To understand what you were trying to say, but after reading your writing, I realized that your writing clearly has a personal emotion. Many people have such feelings about Satoshi. Over time, a distance has been created between reality and imagination, and Satoshi is now a historical figure who is discussed but cannot be caught.
The words "this forum was his house" deeply resonate with me. Maybe somewhere, in some old thread, his shadow still remains, and someone like us is following the path of that shadow. But all of these are just our ideas; we don't know anything about whether he actually exists or not. And the answer you are looking for may no longer be possible. You have already understood why it is not possible through many reply posts.

You got it. Empathy is one of theses things that make us almost imortal.

[m2017]

Satoshi has disappeared from this forum a long time ago. Everyone is trying to figure out who he was but he has gone dark a long time ago. I am sure if you posted this back in 2010 you would of got a reply from him but he is long gone and his account is even deactivated on this forum in case someone hacked it to prevent any market volatility due to an impersonator.

If Satoshi doesn't appear on the forum and doesn't respond to posts, this doesn't mean that he can't see these posts. Who knows, maybe he reads the forum. We don't know for sure. Therefore, there is nothing shameful in asking questions addressed to him. Again, who knows, maybe one of the posts / questions will interest him, which will prompt Satoshi to return to the forum and answer.

We don't know for sure whether he has left forever...

In extreme cases, other people can answer questions addressed to Satoshi, which can create an interesting discussion and finding the "truth" in the process.

You gotta ask the devs if you want an answer to this question.

For example, developers.

[goldkingcoiner]

I dont know if you know, perhaps you do. But I will just tell you anyways.

Satoshi has disappeared from this forum a long time ago. Everyone is trying to figure out who he was but he has gone dark a long time ago. I am sure if you posted this back in 2010 you would of got a reply from him but he is long gone and his account is even deactivated on this forum in case someone hacked it to prevent any market volatility due to an impersonator.

You gotta ask the devs if you want an answer to this question.

There is always the hope that he is reading and posting on this forum under a different username. It is a nice image to have, especially for those of us who are deeply thankful to him and in awe of his creation.

And who knows, maybe one day he will return? Although I imagine many people would panic more than rejoice. The consensus currently being that Satoshi and his stash of Bitcoin have gracefully exited the stage forever...

[Henark]

Satoshi has disappeared from this forum a long time ago. Everyone is trying to figure out who he was but he has gone dark a long time ago. I am sure if you posted this back in 2010 you would of got a reply from him but he is long gone and his account is even deactivated on this forum in case someone hacked it to prevent any market volatility due to an impersonator.

If Satoshi doesn't appear on the forum and doesn't respond to posts, this doesn't mean that he can't see these posts. Who knows, maybe he reads the forum. We don't know for sure. Therefore, there is nothing shameful in asking questions addressed to him. Again, who knows, maybe one of the posts / questions will interest him, which will prompt Satoshi to return to the forum and answer.

We don't know for sure whether he has left forever...

In extreme cases, other people can answer questions addressed to Satoshi, which can create an interesting discussion and finding the "truth" in the process.

You gotta ask the devs if you want an answer to this question.

For example, developers.

As an scientist, Satoshi was/were looking for answers.

[Taskford]

That post was good and highly efforted in crafting. I applauded you for that one. But Satoshi wont answer anymore even you call him. How I wish he did though, cause if he did that would be a blockbuster news for everyone.

I really wonder what would happened if anycase he did response. The news will spread like wildfire and many will speculate for sure.

This post is not highly efforted crafter since if you copy those words then scan it on a AI detector tool you will find out that everything what he written is AI.

Sample from GPTzero.



Many people are curious to know the reason and whereabouts of satoshi, but hopefully we can get more valuable information or discussion and not those AI thing out there.

[Henark]

That post was good and highly efforted in crafting. I applauded you for that one. But Satoshi wont answer anymore even you call him. How I wish he did though, cause if he did that would be a blockbuster news for everyone.

I really wonder what would happened if anycase he did response. The news will spread like wildfire and many will speculate for sure.

This post is not highly efforted crafter since if you copy those words then scan it on a AI detector tool you will find out that everything what he written is AI.

Sample from GPTzero.



Many people are curious to know the reason and whereabouts of satoshi, but hopefully we can get more valuable information or discussion and not those AI thing out there.

Do you know the Satoshi's opinion about AI?

[nullama]

WOW Signal ("1977") = Time traveller Blockchain signature?

Although the Wow! signal is fascinating, it has been concluded that it was a natural phenomenon some years ago:

The results of this investigation, therefore, conclude that cometary spectra are detectable at 1420 MHz and, more importantly, that the 1977 "Wow!" Signal was a natural phenomenon from a Solar System body.

[Henark]

WOW Signal ("1977") = Time traveller Blockchain signature?

Although the Wow! signal is fascinating, it has been concluded that it was a natural phenomenon some years ago:

The results of this investigation, therefore, conclude that cometary spectra are detectable at 1420 MHz and, more importantly, that the 1977 "Wow!" Signal was a natural phenomenon from a Solar System body.

Yes, it was natural. The correlation I presented with the WOW signal was due to its inherent provocation. Thanks to blockchain, data transmission can be done over astronomical scales of distance. Decentralized nodes around the solar system would validate a fraction of reality compressed into time blocks.
The intention of this post was to raise this question: Blockchain was originally called TimeChain. Maybe Satoshi conducted a scientific analysis through the prism of quantum physics, not finance. When there was speculation that each unit of satoshi could be worth 1 dollar, perhaps it was about the moment when it would be realized that the smallest fraction of our own fabric of reality could fit into a single portion of satoshi.