Is AI Replacing Human Jobs

[Iamgoat]

The emergence of AI has sparked both excitement and fear. While many believe AI is about replacing human jobs, the truth is far more from that. AI isn't about replacing people; it's about eliminating inefficiency. That's my thoughts. I'd love to read what you all think.

The use of AI was introduced to complement human efforts and not to render us effortless in career, AI cannot do it all without the use of human intelligence, because we are the brain behind any technology innovation made with AI, let's see it as a positive development and not a negative one, as they stand to serve and complement our works by making them done at the very best standards with little or no stress.

It surprised me whenever people say in the emergence of AI is to replace people's job and retire people from their jobs and I say that is not true. AI doesn't have such abilities until it is empowered by man to do so, and it will have its side effects which the same people who engage it in place of human will have to face, however detrimental. The emergence of AI in my view is to support the efforts of human and enhance our jobs by making it easier and faster to use. When you use AI intelligently, it helps you optimise your jobs and what would have ordinarily taken you days to figure out could be done in hours through the assistive efforts of AI. I know people are also talking about the neuralink chips, but hey those chips were yet designed to function side by side with the human brains. If cannot work so intelligently, psychologically and emotionally like the real humans would.

[Odusko]

Let me know if anyone here is still afraid that AI will take all the jobs away from humans

The reality sucks that AI could replace a lot of jobs because of major upgrades from the companies if they see the better productivity that they'll get from it. Plus, the cost isn't going to be that much to them and it's likely one time payment if not subscription based then, lifetime function until the developers stop supporting it. People need to upgrade their skills and learn something new to cope with the demand in the labor market so that they won't get stuck from the jobs that could be replaced by humans. Even some people says that even food production and farming might replace people doing farm jobs. But IMHO, like the real bubble, AIs are into this mania and once it pops, we'll get back to normal and the hype that it gets now will be gone.

In as much as I believe in AI capabilities, I still doubt it total ability to take over human jobs regardless of how their are being developed and worked on, this is the certainty of the time, and sure AI will make a lot of things easier, but then it will only function as an alternative or additional support for humans which is why it have the combination of human contributions to it function, AI is not totally independent from humans but humans can be independent of AI.

[uneng]

It surprised me whenever people say in the emergence of AI is to replace people's job and retire people from their jobs and I say that is not true. AI doesn't have such abilities until it is empowered by man to do so, and it will have its side effects which the same people who engage it in place of human will have to face, however detrimental. The emergence of AI in my view is to support the efforts of human and enhance our jobs by making it easier and faster to use. When you use AI intelligently, it helps you optimise your jobs and what would have ordinarily taken you days to figure out could be done in hours through the assistive efforts of AI. I know people are also talking about the neuralink chips, but hey those chips were yet designed to function side by side with the human brains. If cannot work so intelligently, psychologically and emotionally like the real humans would.

AIs will replace the jobs of many people. It will be like in industrial revolution. Where you needed 20 men to execute a task before, you will need just one to manage the machinery. This scenario is seen as dangerous and concerning, but I see as an opportunity for people to spend more time with hobbies and meaningful moments with people they love to be together, while AI does the hard work for them.

In counterpart, our personal expenses should decrease as well, as society walks to a more sustainable and autonomous concept of life. You produce your own energy, while robots produce your food. Therefore, to work for a wage must not be mandatory, but a recreational activity to give purpose to life.

[Altcoiner007]

AI will probably end up much like NFTs.  It is mostly hype, there is good, there is bad but at the end of the hype the truly useful aspects of it remain.  In the case of NFTs, I do not even know if there is any useful aspect.  For AI, it will likely remain solid in areas where it can actually help.  Have you ever interacted with an AI?  Have you seen what it can do?  Sometimes it can surprise you by how much it can do, other times it may be surprisingly stupid.  I doubt it will work as good as a group of human minds could.  It may help with precision, but even there you may see errors.  Humans will stop rather quickly when an error occurs, but if an AI thinks there is no error, it continues to do what it should not do potentially causing way more damage and expenses than a group of employees could.

Further more, what even is AI?  People barely even know what it is.  Nowadays every thing that is programmed is called that way for marketing purposes.

Not quite. All AI systems are programmed but it's not every programmed stuff that's AI. AI based on it programming does things that would have required human intelligence to do them even in a more effective way with less them. Talking about NFT, I've read about people who were lucky to buy NFTs that made them fortune. I think the idea of NFT originated from the idea of digital arts work. Artistic people or artists will appreciate it more just like real life arts work. But it's much easier to profit from AI tokens even without the hype. I think some exchanges like Bitget listed $Sapien token recently. It has good utility since it's a project that produces high-quality AI training data.

[JeffBrad12]

In as much as I believe in AI capabilities, I still doubt it total ability to take over human jobs regardless of how their are being developed and worked on, this is the certainty of the time, and sure AI will make a lot of things easier, but then it will only function as an alternative or additional support for humans which is why it have the combination of human contributions to it function, AI is not totally independent from humans but humans can be independent of AI.

We need to remember that AI is still at its infancy, there are so many things it can improved on. Only recently that these AI were taught how to use tools and it's already replacing software engineering job at entry level. I know because I've got some of my friend who works in SWE and it's hard for them to find job at entry level.
I've build an app myself for trading purpose without knowing how to code using an AI and it was a breeze, the AI for the coding sector has quite matured, I'm sure it will catch up to other sectors too. People shouldn't underestimate it knowing that companies like to cut corner and this corner is company efficiency and you know what is that actually. It's layoff, and replacing job at entry level.

AI replacing human on certain job sector is almost certainty in my honest opinion. It's just waiting to happen.

[bitgolden]

We are now in an era of high technology, where when AI first emerged, many communities were immediately concerned that it would end their careers. However, as time went on,
that's not what happened.

Instead, AI has helped in other ways, such as assisting online resellers to generate other sources of income. AI systems are particularly useful in the field of social media
for creating video content or promoting their products.

Because it is not "that" good yet. Like for example openAI already shared chatgpt version 5, and said that it is the best so far. You know what is their "best so far" version does? If you give it 500 lines of code, it can't read it all and understand it all.

I have tried it, I have shared first 5000+ lines of code, and it looked at the first part and gave me overall nothing, and then I cut it in half, 2500 lines of code each, to make it understand, that didn't work. I went down as much as 500 lines, and it barely can understand. Not only that, but if you do that, lets assume you do 100 lines each. Let's say it understood that, then you send the rest, 100 lines by 100 lines, and it forgets the first ones by the time you come to end. So it still doesn't have it in memory.

[Altcoiner007]

We are now in an era of high technology, where when AI first emerged, many communities were immediately concerned that it would end their careers. However, as time went on,
that's not what happened.

Instead, AI has helped in other ways, such as assisting online resellers to generate other sources of income. AI systems are particularly useful in the field of social media
for creating video content or promoting their products.

Because it is not "that" good yet. Like for example openAI already shared chatgpt version 5, and said that it is the best so far. You know what is their "best so far" version does? If you give it 500 lines of code, it can't read it all and understand it all.

I have tried it, I have shared first 5000+ lines of code, and it looked at the first part and gave me overall nothing, and then I cut it in half, 2500 lines of code each, to make it understand, that didn't work. I went down as much as 500 lines, and it barely can understand. Not only that, but if you do that, lets assume you do 100 lines each. Let's say it understood that, then you send the rest, 100 lines by 100 lines, and it forgets the first ones by the time you come to end. So it still doesn't have it in memory.

Exactly what I mean. Humans will still be needed but humans from different sectors need to familiarized themselves with the use of AI or they'll phase out. But AI can't completely take all the jobs meant for humans.

[Dr.Bitcoin_Strange]

The potential for AI-driven innovation in our world is vast, I'm always interested to see their integration in any sector. Let me know if anyone here is still afraid that AI will take all the jobs away from humans

Since it'm emerged, how many industries or companies has recorded a high reduction in the number of human staffs and increased the use of AI to their productivity? The thing is, AI will exist but human jobs will still remain but just that the AI can be use to supplement and fasten up some things but there are many jobs that can only be properly done by humans.

[Justbillywitt]

The emergence of AI has sparked both excitement and fear. While many believe AI is about replacing human jobs, the truth is far more from that. AI isn't about replacing people; it's about eliminating inefficiency. That's my thoughts. I'd love to read what you all think.

There's no denying that the emergence of AI will take up  human jobs, even though their introduction has increased efficiency in the various industries that they are being used. AI is really helping manufacturers as they are spending little, and getting more in terms of productivity. But won't their be dangers of these things AI will pose in the society in the future when most jobs are gone? Won't the few that will have jobs be scared of living in the midst of the jobless population? Won't the jobless turn on the few that has jobs? While some of us celebrate the emergence of AI we should also be weary of these things. A balance should be maintained, AI should not be used in all fields. It should be more in areas with less man power like medicine and others.

[LeyMonte]

Companies like Google, Microsoft, Apple, Amazon and meta/facebook of course are established and have the trust of their user base. Maybe you've noticed too that those investing in memecoins understand that the tide could turn in their favor or against them. On AI taking over jobs, will these AI operate or prompt itself?

As technology advances one thing is becoming clear: how much trust and control we will have is a big question. Dependence on large companies has been created, but at the same time, the question has arisen, will this dependence turn into slavery in the future? AI does not yet make its own decisions, but if one day it starts to make them. What will our role be then? Just as humans gamble with memcoins, future technologies can also be a kind of bet that can be won or lost.

[el kaka22]

AI is becoming such a hot topic here on bitcointalk, everyone is talking about it. I understand there is a demand, there is at least a desire, to see AI get into our market too. Either as trading AI bot, or some AI token, or some other form, just make it as AI as possible so that people would combine crypto world with AI world and make a new trend.

But believe me, it is not happening right now, maybe in the future it will happen, but at the moment it is not happening, so we need to be more calm about it. On the other hand, AI will not replace jobs, it's the business owners who will replace people. That is what happened overtime whenever something happened. Hell they replaced humans with cheaper humans already, so if they can save a dime, they will use AI too.

[Altcoiner007]

Companies like Google, Microsoft, Apple, Amazon and meta/facebook of course are established and have the trust of their user base. Maybe you've noticed too that those investing in memecoins understand that the tide could turn in their favor or against them. On AI taking over jobs, will these AI operate or prompt itself?

As technology advances one thing is becoming clear: how much trust and control we will have is a big question. Dependence on large companies has been created, but at the same time, the question has arisen, will this dependence turn into slavery in the future? AI does not yet make its own decisions, but if one day it starts to make them. What will our role be then? Just as humans gamble with memcoins, future technologies can also be a kind of bet that can be won or lost.

I quite agree with with your thoughts. Each time I have to verify on platforms or a website to authenticate that I'm human and maybe cache fails to work saying I'm not human, it bothers me. So AI taking control of the future could mess everyone up if it malfunction. That's why I strongly believe humans will still be in charge to give prompts.

[Mpamaegbu]

AI isn't about replacing people; it's about eliminating inefficiency. That's my thoughts. I'd love to read what you all think.

That's the truth, the whole truth and nothing short of it. I share the same perceptive as you on that. I believe those who get scared of Ai are mostly those who work in areas where much expertise isn't needed in their job field. Otherwise, everyone should know that Ai (though controversially) is one of the best discoveries of this era in human advancement. Such discovery shouldn't scare man like a lot of us assume that Bitcoin should replace banks. No, both should work side by side. By the way, Ai is man's input. Computers don't make themselves without man's input.

[gunhell16]

AI isn't about replacing people; it's about eliminating inefficiency. That's my thoughts. I'd love to read what you all think.

That's the truth, the whole truth and nothing short of it. I share the same perceptive as you on that. I believe those who get scared of Ai are mostly those who work in areas where much expertise isn't needed in their job field. Otherwise, everyone should know that Ai (though controversially) is one of the best discoveries of this era in human advancement. Such discovery shouldn't scare man like a lot of us assume that Bitcoin should replace banks. No, both should work side by side. By the way, Ai is man's input. Computers don't make themselves without man's input.

Maybe if there are people who feel worried about AI robots possibly replacing them, they would really feel anxious if they don’t have any other source of income in their lives.
But if they are resourceful, I don’t think they would worry about it as much.

Why? Because they could also use AI as a tool to find new ways to generate profit to replace the jobs they might lose if ever they get laid off.
Besides, in this day and age, many people are no longer employed traditionally—they’re freelancers instead, yet they still have a source of income through Ai.

[Hispo]

AI isn't about replacing people; it's about eliminating inefficiency. That's my thoughts. I'd love to read what you all think.

That's the truth, the whole truth and nothing short of it. I share the same perceptive as you on that. I believe those who get scared of Ai are mostly those who work in areas where much expertise isn't needed in their job field. Otherwise, everyone should know that Ai (though controversially) is one of the best discoveries of this era in human advancement. Such discovery shouldn't scare man like a lot of us assume that Bitcoin should replace banks. No, both should work side by side. By the way, Ai is man's input. Computers don't make themselves without man's input.

Though, the input is already there, on the massive data which is gathered from the internet in order to train chat bots and generative Artificial intelligence. I would like to be as optimistic as you, but I still believe artificial intelligence and robotics are advancing towards a point in which all that knowledge will be used to replace jobs being done by people, so corporations will save money on positions which used to be held by unqualified workers, I am talking about manual work and administrative work, which does not require much insight.

In the end, all technology is developed so companies can save money and this discovering and application of artificial intelligence won't be the exception to that rule, people will train themselves to use AI, but inevitably it will take down human jobs.

[passwordnow]

The reality sucks that AI could replace a lot of jobs because of major upgrades from the companies if they see the better productivity that they'll get from it. Plus, the cost isn't going to be that much to them and it's likely one time payment if not subscription based then, lifetime function until the developers stop supporting it. People need to upgrade their skills and learn something new to cope with the demand in the labor market so that they won't get stuck from the jobs that could be replaced by humans. Even some people says that even food production and farming might replace people doing farm jobs. But IMHO, like the real bubble, AIs are into this mania and once it pops, we'll get back to normal and the hype that it gets now will be gone.

In as much as I believe in AI capabilities, I still doubt it total ability to take over human jobs regardless of how their are being developed and worked on, this is the certainty of the time, and sure AI will make a lot of things easier, but then it will only function as an alternative or additional support for humans which is why it have the combination of human contributions to it function, AI is not totally independent from humans but humans can be independent of AI.

I am afraid that the development of these AIs are quick but I guess that they are targeting specific industries too. And so, they might replace all jobs but I'd agree that there's still a need for human dependency for all sorts of jobs that we'll see. While these AIs no doubt will help things faster and easier. But we can't remove the fact that there's still a job that will be taken by them. Moreso, they'll also generate new jobs and new titles that we'll have to train ourselves for.

[gluedog]

I believe so. AI is definitely replacing human jobs.

[Y3shot]

AI isn't about replacing people; it's about eliminating inefficiency. That's my thoughts. I'd love to read what you all think.

That's the truth, the whole truth and nothing short of it. I share the same perceptive as you on that. I believe those who get scared of Ai are mostly those who work in areas where much expertise isn't needed in their job field. Otherwise, everyone should know that Ai (though controversially) is one of the best discoveries of this era in human advancement. Such discovery shouldn't scare man like a lot of us assume that Bitcoin should replace banks. No, both should work side by side. By the way, Ai is man's input. Computers don't make themselves without man's input.

Their is nothing wrong using AI because of how far we are in technology,  but the most important is that we need to understand when we need AI and when we don't need it expecially when it comes to cryptocurrency. When it comes to cryptocurrency trading ,  get to know that their are some people who depends on AI for trading. The cryptocurrency market is a future market that you can't predict,  Ai is made up of the human knowledge,  and if humans can't predict the crypto market their is no reason to rely on AI.  When it comes to cryptocurrency research the AI plays a vital role.

[Webetcoins]

What you need to understand is that AI is also a tool and while smaller freelancers will of course be replaced, that doesn't mean normal workers will be, because CEO's will not do it. So that human jobs will not be in risk, we are going to just do a lot better so we are going to focus on how to make a lot better results.

We should be considering how AI is something we learn and we need to learn, if we do that then we are going to have a job.

I have been learning design with AI, sora, midjourney, comfy, anything I can learn, and I have done some decent job with them too, even helped my friends business have a logo and my wife made me do her logo as well for her shop. So I think that's easy to show that it can be hired job, just need to learn how to use it.

[BTCOIN_COMADO]

The emergence of AI has sparked both excitement and fear. While many believe AI is about replacing human jobs, the truth is far more from that. AI isn't about replacing people; it's about eliminating inefficiency. That's my thoughts. I'd love to read what you all think.

The use of AI was introduced to complement human efforts and not to render us effortless in career, AI cannot do it all without the use of human intelligence, because we are the brain behind any technology innovation made with AI, let's see it as a positive development and not a negative one, as they stand to serve and complement our works by making them done at the very best standards with little or no stress.

You are spot on right there, I belong in the category of people who will continue singing the importance of human touch in any job and in any career. Robots are meant to serve us but never to take up our jobs. Artificial intelligence was made through human intelligence and can never be better than humans. It is completely senseless to think AI will be able to take up our jobs when in reality they are very limited by automated systems which can only be updated in line with the new requirements by humans.